Please Read Part 50:
The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 50)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On June 17, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that when baseball-field shooter James Hodgkinson tried to kill as many Republicans “as possible” last Wednesday, he didn’t act alone, although, in a de jure sense he did, but the de-facto reality is that there were many accessories before the fact: the media, academia, and Hollywood (Kathy Griffin) and President Trump-killing Shakespeare in the park come to mind.
It also revealed that many leftist commentators, exhibiting selective memory, behave as if the Hodgkinson shooting occurred in a vacuum, but it’s just the latest in a pattern of leftist violence, only with a different tool because instead of fists, a club or incendiary device, Hodgkinson used a gun. Surprised?-You Decide:
Bloody Leftist Hands: Conservaphobia Caused Scalise Shooting!-Posted on The New American-By Selwyn Duke-On June 16, 2017:
When baseball-field shooter James Hodgkinson tried to kill as many Republicans “as possible” on Wednesday, he didn’t act alone. Oh, in a de jure sense he did, but the de-facto reality is that there were many accessories before the fact: the media, academia, and Hollywood — Kathy Griffin and President Trump-killing Shakespeare in the park come to mind.
Many leftist commentators, exhibiting selective memory, behave as if the Hodgkinson shooting occurred in a vacuum. Yet it’s just the latest in a pattern of leftist violence, only with a different tool. Instead of fists, a club or incendiary device, Hodgkinson used a gun.
The Daily Caller just outlined this phenomenon, what it calls “an escalating pattern of violence and intimidation against Republicans.” Here are some examples (quotations are from the Daily Caller):
• A town-hall event by Virginia Rep. Tom Garrett that required heavy police protection after he received death threats, which included “This is how we’re going to kill your wife.”
• A female GOP congresswoman received an email after the Wed. shooting that read “One down, 216 to go”; another congresswoman received a threatening voicemail stating her days were “numbered.”
• After recent town halls, one congressman encountered a woman who tried to run him off the road; another was accosted by a man; and yet another had to be escorted back to his car by police, only to find four slashed tires.
• A “71-year-old female staffer for California Rep. Dana Rohrbacher was knocked unconscious during an angry protest activists staged outside Rohrbacher’s office.”
• Violence has been used to prevent conservative speakers from appearing at colleges.
• “A month before the election, someone firebombed a North Carolina GOP office.”
• Republican students have been assaulted at schools. Schoolgirl Jade Armenio was attacked by a girl who said to her, “You support Trump. You hate Mexicans” (video below).
Video: California High School Trump Student BRUTALLY BEATEN by Black Hispanic after Hillary Clinton lost!-Posted on YouTube.com-By LivingTheGoodLife-On November 12, 2016:
My, where could the attacker possibly have gotten the idea that Trump support=hating Mexicans? Not from the media, I’m sure.
Add to this the last year’s leftist riots, vandalism, arson and attacks on Trump supporters, and the picture is clear. It’s exactly what Democrat operatives tried to foment, as they admitted on hidden camera in a 2016 sting operation (video below — warning: vulgar language).
Video: Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Project Veritas Action-On October 17, 2016:
It’s also precisely what national organizer for BAMN (By Any Means Necessary), Yvette Felarca, called for on not-so-hidden camera (video below).
Video: Berkeley riots backer proud of shutting down 'fascist' Milo!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Fox News-On February 13, 2017:
Now it’s time for perspective. Please ponder what the reaction would be to the following statements:
1. “They should be lined up and shot” (referencing members of a certain mosque).
2. “I’ve thought a lot about blowing up Mecca.”
3. I want to “pick up a baseball bat and take out every f****** Muslim I see.”
4. “You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Mohammed’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables.... [T]hey are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America.”
Of course, the last one gives it away; everyone knows that a variation of statement 4 wasn’t uttered about Muslims but about Trump supporters by Hillary Clinton. Likewise, 1 actually was written by a professor referencing GOP politicians and not a mosque, 2 was expressed by Madonna with “White House” in the place of “Mecca,” and 3 was disgorged by actress Lea Delaria with “republican and independent” in the place of “Muslim.”
The point? Had those comments been made about Muslims, the powers-that-be would be railing against “Islamophobia” and shrieking that such rhetoric could lead to violence against Muslims. And the careers of those making them would be over.
Yet people who’d swear these examples were violence-spawning Islamophobia will say, with a straight face, that the actual statements aren’t violence-spawning Conservaphobia.
In fact, despite Conservaphobia’s rampancy — there’s a multitude of examples — we still see outrageous denial, an example being a University of California-Irvine psychology professor who said that individuals such as Hodgkinson would commit violence regardless, finding justification from somewhere. This ignores that when a person becomes a walking powder keg, the wider society was one of the many influences in his life. As for the timing of combustion, even a powder keg requires a spark.
Moreover, if words are irrelevant, why does most of the Western world have hate-speech laws? Why are Michael Savage, Pamela Geller, and Robert Spencer banned from Britain? Why does every statist Western politician warn of Islamophobia? Why is rhetoric taught? Why does the Left trouble over what it terms Trump’s “demagoguery”? Demagogues’ weapon, mind you, is words — and only words.
This isn’t a screed against freedom of speech, only a reminder that with freedom comes responsibility. As G.K. Chesterton once noted, “Having the right to do something is not at all the same as being right in doing it.”
There’s also a generally missed point here. It isn’t just the violent rhetoric — it’s the lies.
When people believe they’ve gotten a raw deal, that the game is rigged and/or that the “other side” is destroying the planet or nation, they get angry. The more this drum is beaten, the angrier they get. And when that reaches a boiling point....
And what’s occurred for the last many months? The media, Democrat Party, academia and others have incessantly claimed that Trump “colluded with Russia to steal the election.” Add to this the emphasis on how “he didn’t really win because he lost the popular vote.” There has been a full-court press to portray Trump as an illegitimate president leading an illegitimate party.
In fact, with the terms used to demean conservatives today (fascist, Nazi, mouth-breather, hater, etc.), the level and type of rhetoric has exceeded political-realm norms. It now reflects something far more extreme and dangerous — wartime propaganda — smacking of what we might have said about the Japanese during WWII or what they said about us (calling the American the “hairy white ape”).
I know of a high-school student in a wealthy Northeastern suburb who wouldn’t express his support for Trump in school because he feared persecution. What if Muslims were afraid to reveal their Islamic heritage in school for fear of same? Could you imagine the holy cause this would become in the media, how we’d be preached to about the “intolerance” and bigotry of America? Yet Conservaphobia is scoffed at.
Having said this, claiming it’s always wrong to deploy harsh rhetoric against a group would be to render superficial analysis. For example, when facing a burgeoning Nazi movement (which is what some leftists claim they face), condemning it in harsh terms is necessary. Yet one first better make sure he’s right about his oppenents’ nature because, first, he needs to know he’s battling the evil, not the good.
Second, one or both of two things will happen if the demonization if effective enough:
• The targeted group will be persecuted.
• Upon being pushed too far, it will strike back.
Then you may have civil war.
As I’ve often warned, those who cannot be reasoned with can only be fought. Those who insist upon being unreasonable should take note.
The following recent article revealed that a leading Democrat Party official in Nebraska has come under major fire after a jaw-dropping statement in which she used the word “funny” to describe the reaction of Republicans who witnessed the Arlington shooting on Wednesday, along with revealing that, according to the Omaha World-Herald, Chelsey Gentry-Tipton, head of the Democrat Party’s Black Caucus in the Cornhusker State, used the shooting to disrespect and mock grief-stricken Republicans over gun control, implying that she found their reactions humorous. Surprised?-You Decide:
Dem Party Official Says Alexandria Shooting Was “Funny”!-Posted on Conservative Tribune-By Martin Lioll-On June 17, 2017:
A leading Democrat Party official in Nebraska has come under major fire after a jaw-dropping statement in which she used the word “funny” to describe the reaction of Republicans who witnessed the Arlington shooting on Wednesday.
According to the Omaha World-Herald, Chelsey Gentry-Tipton — head of the Democrat Party’s Black Caucus in the Cornhusker State — used the shooting to disrespect and mock grief-stricken Republicans over gun control, implying that she found their reactions humorous.
“Watching the congressman crying on live tv abt the trauma they experienced. Y is this so funny tho?” Gentry-Tipton wrote in a Facebook post about the Arlington shooting.
Later in the same thread, she added that, “The very people that push pro NRA legislation in efforts to pad their pockets with complete disregard for human life. Yeah, having a hard time feeling bad for them.”
It didn’t take long for party leadership to ask for Gentry-Tipton’s resignation, which she has thus far refused to provide. In a separate Facebook post, she kind-of-sort-of apologized for her comments on the Arlington shooting but fell back on three reliable liberal talking points to excuse herself: 1) You took me out of context, 2) I’m the real victim here, and 3) If you’re not black, you don’t really understand.
“As a victim of gun violence, I understand that today’s events are deeply troubling. I don’t condone or find the humor in what happened,” Gentry-Tipton said in response to Nebraska Democrat Party chairwoman Jane Kleeb’s request for her resignation, according to the Washington Times.
“I do however, see that misconstrued statements are more easily interpreted as damaging to those that want to believe them to be. There was context to what I said. I would have loved to discuss this context with you but you chose to act in haste, without consideration for my point of view and I am quite sure without receiving all of the information. This is troubling.
“It’s also troubling that gun violence affects the black community in a way that you clearly don’t understand and you are slow to react,” she added. “What you choose to react to is some gossipy snippet of what I said and then call for my resignation.”
Yes, that “gossipy snippet” in which she called the pain of those who just witnessed a politically motivated attack on their colleagues “funny.” That’s a bit like Richard Nixon saying that lawmakers shouldn’t pay attention to the “gossipy snippet” in the Oval Office tapes when he suborned H.R. Haldeman to help cover up the Watergate burglary.
Also, I’m really impressed that she managed to work white privilege into this. She went online to tell the world she found the grief of shooting survivors to be heee-larious because they were Republican, and then very solemnly noted that those showering her with opprobrium simply didn’t get it because of their paucity of melanin. Nadia Comaneci couldn’t handle those sorts of contortions.
For her part, Kleeb has maintained that Gentry-Tipton needs to go. “Anyone who commits violence against anyone is wrong,” the party chairwoman said on Thursday. “Anyone who makes insensitive comments about gun violence is wrong. For me that’s the end of the story.”
The fact that even need be said in 2017 indicates there is a deep crisis of humanity among the Democrats. Gentry-Tipton wasn’t the only liberal public figure who managed to reveal a frightening depravity of character in the wake of the Scalise shooting — and, surprisingly, she wasn’t even the worst.
She is, however, the only one to do so who is also a major functionary in the Democrat Party hierarchy (at least, so far). If the Democrats are really serious about refusing to have those who would countenance acts of violence among their ranks, Gentry-Tipton is one toxic element that needs to be removed.
H/T Sean Hannity
The following recent thought-provoking article revealed that perhaps nothing has contributed to the toxic nature of today’s political climate more than the disturbing reality that a once classically liberal Democrat Party has been hijacked by the radical Left, along with revealing that this is not the party of John F. Kennedy, Tip O'Neill or former DNC chair Henry “Scoop” Jackson, who simultaneously supported liberal causes while remaining staunchly anti-Communist.
It also revealed that allegedly today’s DNC chair is Thomas Perez, whose contribution to “thoughtful” debate is to assert that Republicans “don’t give a s—t about people,” and declare that President Trump “didn’t win the election.” Surprised?-You Decide:
'Resisting' Democracy and Decency: ‘The disturbing reality is that a once classically liberal Democrat Party has been hijacked by the radical Left’!-Posted on The Patriot Post-By Arnold Ahlert-On June 19, 2017:
“Liberals protest; radicals rebel. Liberals become indignant; radicals become fighting mad and go into action. Liberals do not modify their personal lives and what they give to a cause is a small part of their lives; radicals give themselves to the cause. Liberals give and take oral arguments; radicals give and take the hard, dirty, bitter way of life.” —from Saul Alinsky’s “Reveille for Radicals,” published in 1946.
Perhaps nothing has contributed to the toxic nature of today’s political climate more than the disturbing reality that a once classically liberal Democrat Party has been hijacked by the radical Left. This is not the party of John F. Kennedy, Tip O'Neill or former DNC chair Henry “Scoop” Jackson, who simultaneously supported liberal causes while remaining staunchly anti-Communist. Today’s DNC chair is Thomas Perez, whose contribution to “thoughtful” debate is to assert that Republicans “don’t give a s—t about people,” and declare that Donald Trump “didn’t win the election.”
But Donald Trump did win the election, despite the recounts, the death threats and petitions aimed at getting Electoral College voters to subvert the will of the people, and the felonious Inauguration Day riots, courtesy of leftist thugs who smashed property and threw rocks at police.
And ever since, a Democrat Party, aided and abetted by a corrupt phalanx of leftist radicals in media, academia, Hollywood and vast swaths of the unelected federal bureaucracy, has made it clear Donald Trump must not be merely challenged or discredited.
He must first be demonized and then impeached — by any means necessary.
Hence, a severed presidential head is presented as comedy. A Shakespeare play featuring an orange-haired Caesar murdered by political rivals is presented as drama. A CNN host of a religious show tweets that Trump is a “piece of s—t” who is “a stain on the presidency,” and Huffington Post columnist Jason Fuller writes that everyone assisting Trump’s agenda must be convicted of treason — and executed. “Anything less than capital punishment — or at least life imprisonment without parole in a maximum security detention facility — would send yet another message to the world that America has lost its moral compass,” Fuller spews.
America hasn’t lost its moral compass. Democrats have urged their followers to trample on it. Last Wednesday, Bernie Sanders supporter and dedicated Trump-hater James T. Hodgkinson attempted to massacre Republican Congressmen, critically wounding Steve Scalise before being shot dead by two Capitol Police officers.
Sanders was “sickened by this despicable act” and insisted that violence “is unacceptable in our society” — now. Yet the same Bernie Sanders told Rachel Maddow in March that “seeing members of Congress, Republicans, having to sneak out the back door or claim I’m worried about my safety, I can’t even hold a town meeting” is “our goal.”
Blaming Democrats or the greater left for the motives of Hodgkinson, regardless of his politics, or his list of Republican targets, is the stuff of fools or agitators. Yet it is hard to ignore the reality that Democrat politicians have supported groups such as Occupy Wall Street, and Black Lives Matter, whose violent tactics have been propagandized as a fight for “social justice.” They are virtually silent about, or tacitly supportive, of masked “antifa” (anti-fascist — irony alert) thugs who commit violence to oppress “hate” speech. And in May, Hillary Clinton announced her intention to fund groups supporting the “Resistance™” movement.
The Resistance™ movement highlights the divide between classic Democrat liberalism and the Party’s current allegiance to radicalism. The Nation’s Natasha Lennard illuminates why the former no longer satisfies the radicals. “Liberals cling to institutions: They begged to no avail for faithless electors, they see ‘evisceration’ in a friendly late-night talk-show debate, they put faith in investigations and justice with regards to Russian interference and business conflicts of interest,” she writes. “They grasp at hypotheticals about who could have won, were things not as they in fact are. For political subjects so tied to the mythos of Reason, it is liberals who now seem deranged.”
In short, faith in the Constitution and the Rule of Law is deranged. What’s not? According to Lennard, "disruption, confrontation, doxxing [publishing personal information online] and altercation remain tactics anyone taking seriously a refusal to normalize Trump-era fascism should consider.“
No one has led the effort to de-normalize Donald Trump more than Democrats and their media allies. Absent a shred of proof, Americans have been fed a steady diet of media leaks regarding collusion between Trump and the Russians, while former FBI Director James Comey, who testified that investigation began almost a year ago, refused as late as May to confirm whether the FBI had even begun investigating the only known felonies perpetrated by that leaking.
And media leaking about the Russian investigation has now morphed seamlessly into leaks of the investigation being conducted by Robert Mueller, and the revelation that the investigation into "Russian meddling” has now morphed into an investigation of Trump’s “obstruction of justice.”
Loretta Lynch’s efforts to obstruct justice as outlined by Comey himself? Mueller’s conflict of interest with regard to his long friendship with Comey, in clear violation of a special counsel statute? His hiring of at least a dozen attorneys, including four who contributed several thousands of dollars to the Democrat Party, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and one who once represented the Clinton Foundation?
The media portray Muller as a paragon of integrity, and Democrats threaten that any attempts to remove him will precipitate impeachment proceedings. The same impeachment theme Democrats have reiterated ad nauseam since the inauguration.
The Wall Street Journal’s Peggy Noonan takes on the media and their unstinting efforts in making “the whole political scene lower, grubbier,” and “showing the young what otherwise estimable adults do under pressure, which is lose their equilibrium.”
The result? “By indulging their and their audience’s rage, they spread the rage,” Noonan adds.
The Democrat Party? Dedicated leftist Camille Paglia excoriates their reaction to Trump’s election as “one of the most disgraceful episodes in the history of the modern Democratic party,” and describes Party leader Chuck Schumer as someone who “asserted absolutely no moral authority as the party spun out of control in a nationwide orgy of rage and spite.”
Not quite. Rage and spite are integral parts of the Democrat Party platform. Promoting victimization, and the tribalism it inevitably produces, is now its stock in trade, based on an adage as timely as it’s ever been:
The right believes the left is wrong; the left believes the right is evil.
Thus, a party once known for classic liberalism’s “give and take,” now embraces the radicals’ “hard, dirty, bitter way of life.” It is the party that champions the political correctness Paglia refers to as “repressively Stalinist, dependent on a labyrinthine, parasitic bureaucracy to enforce its empty dictates.”
What dictates? “Well-nigh the entire ruling class — government bureaucracies, the judiciary, academia, media, associated client groups, Democratic officials, and Democrat-controlled jurisdictions — have joined in ‘Resistance’ to the 2016 elections,” writes Angelo Codevilla, who further characterizes that Resistance™ as “a cold civil war against a majority of the American people and their way of life.”
Will Democrats and their allies turn a cold war hot?
The following recent article revealed that an entire political party, which gleefully embraces swearing in speeches and protests, on social media and clothing slogans, in news media and entertainment, along with revealing that public figures from entertainers to talk show hosts to politicians intentionally and unapologetically hurl obscenities and that it should come as no surprise that that political party is the Democratic Party, which is in the grip of the far left, and that those public figures are invariably so-called Progressives.
It also revealed that, after the recent attempted assassination of Republican congressmen, the cry has gone up among decent people across the country for greater civility and mutual respect in our political discourse, but unfortunately that’s not going to happen because, as their obsession with obscenity demonstrates, leftists don’t value decency, civility or respectful dialogue; their aim is to derail the conversation altogether and that’s a damned shame. Surprised?-You Decide:
The Left's Obsession With Obscenity: What really lies behind the Left's love of vulgarity?-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Mark Tapson-On June 19, 2017:
“The foolish and wicked practice of profane cursing and swearing,” declared George Washington, “is a vice so mean and low that every person of sense and character detests and despises it.” Theodore Roosevelt concurred: “Profanity is the parlance of the fool. Why curse when there is such a magnificent language with which to discourse?” The answer is that profanity is a useful substitute for discourse when one is losing a debate and needs to trump reason with passionate intensity in order to win. That is what is happening in the current degraded state of our national political conversation.
I’m not talking about the cursing that the average American citizen may do in private, which is common enough on both sides of the political fence. I’m not talking about a careless slip of the tongue during a radio interview, or being caught on an open mic letting loose with a profanity. I’m talking about an entire political party which gleefully embraces swearing in speeches and protests, on social media and clothing slogans, in news media and entertainment. I’m talking about public figures from entertainers to talk show hosts to politicians intentionally and unapologetically hurling obscenities.
It should come as no surprise that that political party is the Democratic Party, which is in the grip of the far left, and that those public figures are invariably so-called Progressives.
Needless to say, the following examples come with a maximum-level language alert.
The one notable exception on the right is President Donald Trump himself, who is more publicly self-restrained now but often cursed for colorful emphasis during his election campaign – saying, for example, that he would “bomb the shit out of ISIS.” But Trump is hardly the typical Republican politician, and many on the right disapproved of this kind of vulgarity.
By contrast, Democrats have made public cursing such a kneejerk habit that it’s as if the entire party is afflicted with Tourette’s. Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez told one audience, for example, that Trump “doesn't give a shit about health care.” Rather than disapprove of Perez’s phrasing, the DNC decided to make it a hip slogan and began selling a t-shirt which read, “Democrats give a shit about people.”
The left is fond of such scatological outbursts. Muslim Brotherhood shill and juvenile egotist Reza Aslan tweeted that President Trump is “a piece of shit” so often that CNN was forced to cut him loose.
But the left is really enamored of the F-word. The radical Salon reported that New York Senator Kristen Gillibrand recently dropped multiple F-bombs while discussing Trump during a speech at NYU’s Personal Democracy Forum. “Has he kept his promises?” she asked rhetorically. “No. Fuck no.” As for her party, Gillibrand declared that “if we’re not helping people, we should go the fuck home.” “Good for her,” was Salon’s supportive response to this indecorous outburst. Gizmodo writer Hamilton Nolan agreed: “It’s encouraging to hear more Democrats say ‘fuck.’”
Really? It’s not like Democrats weren’t already reveling in the F-word. In the wake of the shooting of Republican congressman Steve Scalise last Wednesday, HuffPost writer Jesse Benn tweeted this get-well message: “Fuck #SteveScalise.” Since Trump’s election to the presidency, chants of “Fuck Donald Trump!” have rung out from protesters in major urban centers and on campuses across America. The Woman’s March earlier this year was teeming with obscene placards, “pussy” hats, and cries of “Fuck the patriarchy!” Now try to imagine Tea Party protesters leading each other in chants of ‘Fuck Hillary Clinton!” and “Fuck cultural Marxism!” It’s literally unthinkable.
The unhinged former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann, now reduced to delivering comically histrionic rants from what looks like the basement of the GQ magazine offices, recently tweeted at the President, “TO HELL WITH YOU, YOU MOTHERFUCKING TRAITOR.” Olbermann’s Twitter profile pic shows the bespectacled loon draped in a flag and hunched beneath the words, “TRUMP IS F*CKING CRAZY,” which appears to be the title of his upcoming book. Try to imagine any conservative commentator, even the button-pushing Ann Coulter, prominently featuring a profanity in a book title.
And then there’s showbiz. Late night leftist propagandists masquerading as comedians such as Bill Maher, Stephen Colbert, John Oliver, and Samantha Bee regularly spew obscenities on their shows. Host Seth Myers, the unfunniest Saturday Night Live alumnus in its four-decade history, gave Trump the middle finger on the air twice in one episode last week. Celebrated stage actress Patti Lupone said in an interview at the Tony Awards that if President Trump came to her show War Paint she wouldn’t perform. “Why is that?” the interviewer asked. “Because I hate the motherfucker,” she said through a tight, mirthless smile. Try to imagine the dignified, openly conservative actor Jon Voight saying the same thing about Barack Obama. Nerdy Joss Whedon, the perpetually apoplectic director of big-budget comic book movies, hinted at a bestiality fetish when he tweeted that he wanted a “rhino to fuck Paul Ryan to death.” No one on the right – not even Greg Gutfeld – could have come up with that.
There is no end to the examples I could list. The evidence is abundantly clear: the left loves vulgarity. What’s that all about?
Some would argue that this is a generational thing, that contemporary culture is simply cruder than in the past, and that swearing comes as naturally as breathing to youth now. Sadly, our culture is indeed cruder, but only because the left has spent the last 50 years pushing the envelope of moral standards in pop culture. But that’s not all there is to it.
Swearing sends a thrill up the left’s collective leg because Marxists and their inheritors, Progressives, consider decency to be a contemptable bourgeois value. Even though leftists control the culture, they still think of themselves as counterculture revolutionaries bucking the Establishment, like teenagers rebelling against their parents.
But there is yet another explanation. The left-leaning UK Guardian noted a University of London study which showed that liberals curse more than conservatives on Twitter; “shit” and “fuck” were among the top ten words used by tweeters on the left (the right, by contrast, featured such words as “God” and “psalm” among its top ten). A linguist who led the study declared that “What we think is going on is that the liberal side are expressing themselves with more emotion.”
And that is the crux of the phenomenon: emotion. Leftists cannot win against the right on the playing field of reasoned debate, because they are animated not by logic and evidence but by feelings. They don’t let facts get in the way of their passionate conviction that they are right and the other side is not merely wrong but evil. And nothing displays passionate conviction quite like cursing. The right believes that public profanity is not just uncivil but unprofessional, and that it delegitimizes one’s argument, whereas Progressives feel that it legitimizes their passion.
After the recent attempted assassination of Republican congressmen, the cry has gone up among decent people across the country for greater civility and mutual respect in our political discourse. Unfortunately that’s not going to happen because, as their obsession with obscenity demonstrates, leftists don’t value decency, civility or respectful dialogue; their aim is to derail the conversation altogether. And that’s a damned shame.
The following recent article and video contained therein revealed that for the second time in three days, protesters disrupted a controversial production of “Julius Caesar” in New York’s Central Park in which the titular dictator is depicted as being closely akin to President Trump and is murdered on stage, along with revealing that one protester had a three-word message for the crowd gathered to watch the play: “Liberal hate kills!.” Surprised?-You Decide:
Video: Protesters Interrupt “Trump Murder” NYC Play Again!-Posted on Conservative Tribune-By Martin Lioll-On June 19, 2017:
For the second time in three days, protesters disrupted a controversial production of “Julius Caesar” in New York’s Central Park in which the titular dictator is depicted as being closely akin to President Donald Trump and is murdered on stage.
One protester had a three-word message for the crowd gathered to watch the play: “Liberal hate kills!”
The protester, whose name is not known, was carried away by security after disrupting the performance. It was the second time that the play has been disrupted since the shooting of several conservative lawmakers and officials, including Republican Rep. Steve Scalise, in Alexandria, Virginia last week.
Video of the event is below:
Video: Protesters Disrupt Liberal Trump Assassination Fetish Play!-Posted on YouTube.com-By james hoft-On June 18, 2017:
It was the final night of the performance of the Public Theater’s production of the play, which has seen two major sponsors withdraw their support: Delta Air Lines and Bank of America.
“No matter what your political stance may be, the graphic staging of Julius Caesar at this summer’s Free Shakespeare in the Park does not reflect Delta Air Lines’ values,” the airline said in a statement, according to the New York Daily News.
“Their artistic and creative direction crossed the line on the standards of good taste. We have notified them of our decision to end our sponsorship as the official airline of The Public Theater effective immediately.”
“Bank of America supports art programs worldwide, including an 11-year partnership with The Public Theater and Shakespeare in the Park,” a spokeswoman for the bank told the paper.
“The Public Theater chose to present Julius Caesar in a way that was intended to provoke and offend. Had this intention been made known to us, we would have decided not to sponsor it.”
According to the New York Post, the first protest had been organized by bloggers with Canadian website The Rebel. That time, the Public Theater blamed it on paid protests. It’ll be interesting to see who or what they’ll blame it on this time. Trump? Gun laws? Judge Crater? We’ll have to wait and see.
The following recent article revealed that there are people in this country who can safely express their anger and those who can’t because, if you’re angry that Trump won, your anger is socially acceptable, but, if you were angry that Obama won, it wasn’t. Surprised?-You Decide:
Anger Privilege: ‘Only leftists are allowed to be angry’!-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Daniel Greenfield-On June 20, 2017:
The following article and video contained therein revealed that Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, never one to shy away from exposing mentally unstable leftists, invited James Devine, the Democrat operative who urged Liberals to hunt Republicans, on his show for an interview and that it went pretty much as you’d expect it to, with Devine babbling incoherently, holding up signs to supposedly prove his point (ala Kurt Eichenwald), trying to link long-since debunked conspiracy theories, and Tucker egging him on and letting his victim talk himself into embarrassing revelations. Surprised?-You Decide:
Tucker Carlson Obliterates James Devine, The Democrat Operative Who Urged Liberals to ‘Hunt Republicans’!-Posted on The Political Insider-By Rusty, Featured Contributor-On June 20, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that the Profiling Project, an independent, nonpartisan group, has released a lengthy report of its probe into the murder of former DNC staffer Seth Rich and that the team, made up of forensic experts and George Washington University graduate students, followed the NYPD’s process for investigating murders.
It also revealed that, since Rich’s death last July, the D.C. police department has stated its belief he was the victim of a botched robbery, however, the report lists several reasons the murder likely was not the result of a botched robbery and that law enforcement may be hindering any independent investigation. Surprised?-You Decide:
Profiling Project Issues Bombshell Report on Seth Rich Murder Investigation!-Posted The Stream-By Rachel Alexander-On June 20, 2017:
The following article revealed that several online accounts belonging to murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich have been deleted in recent weeks, according to team of private, nonpartisan investigators working on the case. Surprised?-You Decide:
Private investigators: Seth Rich murder evidence vanishing: 'Little is more critical to investigation of this murder than this online information'!-Posted on WND.com-By Alicia Powe-On June 22, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that, if there remained any question about the character of the radical Left, recent reporting by Ian Miles Cheong at Heat Street paints a disturbing picture of the extent to which Antifa leftists condone violence against capitalists and so-called “fascists.” Surprised?-You Decide:
Antifa leftists are completely honest: They want to destroy you!-Posted on Conservative Review-By Chris Pandolfo-On June 20, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that Leftists have a long history of advocating for violence. Surprised?-You Decide:
Leftists have a LONG History of Advocating for Violence!-Posted on Constitution.com-By Gary DeMar-On June 18, 2017:
“There will be blood,” Democrat State Representative Douglas Geiss threatened from the floor of the Michigan House of Representatives in 2012 as its members debated legislation that eventually made Michigan the nation’s 24th right to work state. Union thuggery is not uncommon or new. It was Jimmy Hoffa, Jr., who said this about the Tea Party: “Let’s take these son-of-a-bitches out and give America back to an America where we belong.”
The history of the labor movement in this country is a history of purposeful disorder. “As it entered the industrial age full blast in the 1870s, America had plunged into ‘the bloodiest and most violent labor history of any industrial nation in the world.’”1 Under the auspices of the first Education and Defense Society, “workers met regularly and drilled with firearms.”2 On May 4, 1886, during a labor rally in Chicago’s Haymarket Square, anarchists had thrown a bomb into police ranks, killing 7 policemen and injuring 70 more. The gathering had been organized to protest the killing of six striking workers at the McCormick Harvester plant.
At the trial for the anarchist leaders, the following treatise, written by Johann Most, a leading American anarchist, was entered into evidence: Science of Revolutionary War — Manual for Instruction in the Use and Preparation of Nitro-Glycerine, Dynamite, Gun-Cotton, Fulminating Mercury, Bombs, Fuses, Poisons, and so forth.3 Most’s guide consisted of information he gathered from his experience at an explosives’ factory in Jersey City. “With a certain zest he contemplated using ‘hand grenades and blasting cartridges … the proletariat’s substitute for artillery.’ Larger bombs were even more promising: ‘That which reduces what had been solid rocks into splinters may not have a bad effect in a court or a monopolist’s ballroom.’”4
Like all romantic revolutionaries, these early social justice warriors believed that humanity could be saved only “with blood and iron, poison and dynamite!”5
Note: I believe that the disturbing information revealed in my following blog from the recent past relates to and/or further supports the information contained in the above article regarding the Leftist’s long history of advocating violence-You Decide:
Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!-Posted on WordPress.com-On April 5, 2010:
The following recent article revealed that Charlie Daniels recently stated that the current atmosphere in this nation is unsustainable. Surprised?-You Decide:
Charlie Daniels: The Current Atmosphere in This Nation Is Unsustainable!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Charlie Daniels-On June 19, 2017:
A lot is said about resistance these days. Resistance denotes something that goes beyond political discourse and disagreements. It denotes belligerence, intractability, unwillingness to compromise, a militant demeanor willing to go outside the lines of decency and lawfulness.
Resistance is what the French and other European countries practiced during Nazi occupation, a justifiable and noble posture to take, considering that their countries were occupied by an evil and overwhelming force that could only be bitten off in small clandestine chunks in whatever covert actions they were able to mount.
Of course, we're only speaking semantics now, and whether it’s called resistance or loyal opposition, is really not as much of a point as is the vitriol and hatred that fuels it.
When you cast your ballot against, speak against, write against or otherwise work against a candidate or a party, that is political dissent, and if so desired, could be called resistance.
But when a prominent show business personality holds up a replica of the bloody severed head of a sitting president, or a major corporate sponsored Shakespeare company perverts a four-hundred-year-old play to plot and carry out the multiple stabbing of a sitting president, that is hate.
When you wheel and deal and pull out all the political stops to achieve goals you consider beneficial to the nation, that's politics as usual.
But when you're willing to suspend the nation's business and indefinitely delay programs that are desperately needed for the welfare of the country just to keep a president from having a win, that's hate.
Hate is a many-headed monster, fickle and deceptive, just as apt to turn on its instigator.
There are many old and unturned stones that reflect badly on both major political parties in this nation, and if these numerous investigations persist, last long enough and dig deep enough, there could well be a lot of garbage slung on both sides of the aisle.
Be that as it may, the current atmosphere in this nation is unsustainable and can have deadly effects, as we saw take place in Virginia, when a nut with a gun went hunting for Republicans to shoot.
Now, what motivated him? What encouraged him? What made him feel justified in taking the lives of those he disagreed with?
How many more kooks are hiding in the bushes, just waiting until some words or events set them off and they go on a rampage? How many springs are close to snapping, how many malcontents standing on the edge of the precipice just waiting for an excuse to jump off?
It has been proven that both sides, right and left, conservative and liberal have their own oddballs and cliff hangers.
Would it have made a difference if that had been Democrats that were attacked in Virginia the other day?
No, it would not have, nor would the rhetoric, coercion or whatever pushed the shooter over the edge have been any less harmful, regardless of what political direction it came from.
The point is the rhetoric itself, the attitude of take down the other side if it kills us all and destroys America in the bargain, not which direction it comes from.
I know we've heard that our nation is divided until it's coming out of our pores, but this scorched earth, last man standing scenario cannot persist.
No political party and no individual is more important than the country.
It’s time to put the knives away, to cool the rhetoric, let the investigations go forth, and if guilt is found, let the guilty be prosecuted and punished.
But in the meantime, there is a nation to run, and Capitol Hill is crawling around in the garbage trying to find another accusation or juicy piece of innuendo, so they can get 15 seconds of face time on CNN.
What do you think?
Pray for our troops, our police and the peace of Jerusalem.
God Bless America
Charlie Daniels is a legendary American singer, song writer, guitarist, and fiddler famous for his contributions to country and southern rock music. Daniels has been active as a singer since the early 1950s. He was inducted into the Grand Ole Opry on January 24, 2008.
The following recent article revealed that bloodshed is coming to America, and it won’t be a response to oppression but the result of aggression against God and our constitutional form of government. Surprised?-You Decide:
Bloodshed is coming to America: ‘Exclusive: Jason & David Benham caution, 'God warned of this long ago'!-Posted on WND.com-By Jason & David Benham-On June 18, 2017:
Bloodshed is coming to America, and it won’t be a response to oppression but the result of aggression – against God and our constitutional form of government.
The increasingly violent acts in our streets, town-hall meetings and university campuses are simply birth pangs for a greater upheaval that’s brewing hot – and it’s not by accident.
Although the narrative is that street protests and student uprisings are simply a response to Trump as president or guest speakers with conservative values, the truth is they are coordinated attacks resulting from a subversive anti-God, anti-American ideology that has indoctrinated our universities for more than 50 years.
Let us explain.
In 1963, a book written by Cleon Skousen titled “The Naked Communist” was presented to Congress by Rep A.S. Herlong Jr. of Florida. In his remarks, he submitted the book’s list of goals, which revealed how revolutionaries intended to turn our nation from constitutionalism to communism without firing a single bullet. And the schoolroom provided the perfect staging ground. The full list of goals can be found in the Congressional Record – Appendix, Pages A34-A35, Jan. 10, 1963.
Here are just a few:
17) Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18) Gain control of all student newspapers.
19) Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations, which are under Communist attack.
20) Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21) Gain control of key positions in radio, TV and motion pictures.
24) Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.
26) Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
28) Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”
29) Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30) Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
31) Belittle all forms of American culture, and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.”
32) Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture – education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
40) Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
42) Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition, that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use “united force” to solve economic, political or social problems.
Sound familiar? These goals aren’t simply being taught to our youth, they are being caught – and now carried out.
The problem is many of the cultural leaders in this movement are now calling for – and sometimes even demanding – bloodshed.
Listen to some of these horrifying statements:
“I wish they (Republicans) were all f—ing dead!” – Dan Savage
“If I had my way, I would see Katherine Harris and Ken Blackwell strapped down to electric chairs and lit up like Christmas trees. The better to light the way for American democracy and American freedom!” – Democratic talk radio’s Stephen Crockett
“Republicans, whose goal in life is to profit from disaster and who don’t give a hoot about human beings, either can’t or won’t. Which is why I personally think they should be exterminated before they cause any more harm.” – The Village Voice’s Michael Feingold
“Michele (Bachmann), slit your wrist. Go ahead. .. or, do us all a better thing [sic]. Move that knife up about two feet. Start right at the collarbone.” – Montel Williams
“I have zero doubt that if Dick Cheney was not in power, people wouldn’t be dying needlessly tomorrow. … I’m just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That’s a fact.” – Bill Maher
“F— God d-mned Joe the God D-mned Motherf—ing Plumber! I want Motherf—ing Joe the Plumber dead.” – Liberal talk-show host Charles Karel Bouley on the air.
“That Scott down there that’s running for governor of Florida. Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him.” – Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa.
“Are you angry? [Yeah!] Are you angry? [Yeah!] Are you angry? [Yeah!] Well, we’ve been watching intifada in Palestine, we’ve been watching an uprising in Iraq, and the question is that what are we doing? … It’s about time that we have an intifada in this country that change[s] fundamentally the political dynamics in here. And we know every – They’re gonna say some Palestinian being too radical – well, you haven’t seen radicalism yet.” – U.C. Berkeley lecturer Hatem Bazian
This is serious stuff, folks. Calls for bloodshed are on the rise.
But we should know God warned of this long ago. When a nation devalues His precepts, distorts His principles, and denies His path bloodshed will follow bloodshed.
The prophet Hosea said, “Listen to the word of the LORD, O sons of Israel, for the LORD has a case against the inhabitants of the land, because there is no faithfulness or kindness or knowledge of God in the land. There is swearing, deception, murder, stealing and adultery. They employ violence, so that bloodshed follows bloodshed. Therefore the land mourns, and everyone who lives in it languishes” (Hosea 4:1-3).
Today, we are beginning to languish as a nation – and it’s high time we turn back to God.
“Therefore, return to your God, observe kindness and justice, and wait for your God continually” (Hosea 12:6).
Just as bloodshed is the result of turning away from God, liberty and freedom are His response when we turn back to Him. Let’s pray for this today.
Note: I believe that the disturbing information contained in my following letter to my NM U.S. Representative from the recent past relates to and/or further supports the information contained in the above thought-provoking article regarding the bloodshed coming to America-You Decide:
Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 13, 2015:
The following recent article revealed that the recent attempted assassination of dozens of congressmen in the heart of America allegedly means that we have descended into being a 3rd rate, third world banana republic and our enemies are laughing at us and those that are Patriots are frightened. It also revealed that Patriots have a short time to act because evil never takes a day off.-You Decide:
Patriots Have a Short Time to Act Because Evil Never Takes a Day Off-Genocide Awaits!-Posted on The Common Sense Show-By Dave Hodges-On June 18, 2017:
Attempted assassination of dozens of congressmen in the heart of America. We had descended into being a 3rd rate, third world banana republic. Our enemies are laughing at us and those that are Patriots are frightened.
I received an email from a reader and a family member expressed a similar view:
Dear Mr. Hodges,
Now that the deep state and their pedophilia is exposed, shouldn’t we be able to take them down and restore this country? Can’t we expose their immoral behaviors so that most people will not follow them?
Thanks for all that you do. “You can’t dodge the hodge”.
I wish it was that simple. There are committed Patriots and there are committed Communists (i.e. masquerading as Democrats). It is the middle group that will determine how this conflict ends.
Before the election cycle, about 8-10% of the public were awake and self-identified Patriots
After the election cycle, the number of Patriots grew to an estimated 20%. Many feel the Communists/snowflakes/anarchists total about the same 20%.
This leave about 60% of the population categorized as largely ignorant and inactive. Most know something is wrong, but as long as tomorrow’s meal is on the table, they do not want to be bothered. It is this 60% that will decide America’s immediate fate.
Breakdown of the Warring Factions
If the Patriots can overcome a corrupt Congress, a CIA/Deep State controlled media and the backing of radical subversives (e.g. George Soros), and establish a plurality of about 20% more converts, the system will self-correct as would any marketplace and America can regain much of our lost liberties. However, if the ignorant 60% remain a DUD (“Dumb Until Death”-Steve Quayle), we will have a purge, with major violence directed at the conservatives. However, if Deep State wins, we will witness a violent purge of conservatives in this country which will exceed Stalin and Hitler combined.
On the Verge of a Stolen Presidency
The mere word of a fired FBI Director, James Comey, is enough to institute a bogus investigation of a sitting President for the purposes of impeachment. The mere word of Comey, the NYT and WAPO, based on unnamed sources and a fired Comey are enough to disenfranchise the vote of tens of millions of Americans.
Amazingly, a blind man could see that Comey is obviously seeking revenge against the man who fired him and Comey has no proof of his obstructions of justice allegations against Trump. Further, the Deep State establishment media has provided enough firepower through the use of “unnamed sources, rumor and innuendo, that the mere opinion of the New York Times and the Washington Post are enough to bring America to the brink of impeachment.
There was a time in America that representatives such as McCain, Boxer and Graham would have been afraid to come out of their offices for fear that they would be chased down the street and tarred and feathered in public for their treason and their subsequent actions against a popularly elected president.
The American Middle Class: Living the Life of a Serf
A recent and prominent economic study was just released which found the economic condition of much of the former American middle class to be extremely dire.
In the report, researchers found that 44% of all Americans do not have access to $400 in cash should they have an emergency. And 25% of the nation cannot pay their monthly bills. Yet, corporate America has never more profitable, thanks in large part to the free trade agreements which have destroyed the wage structure and employment market of the American middle class.
Again, there was a time in America in which the members of Wall Street would have been afraid to come out of their offices for fear of being chased down the street and tarred and feathered.
What Is Wrong with America? Where Have All the Real Men Gone?
These three examples of what is wrong with America constitute the tip of the iceberg in that our children are not safe from the pedophile rings of the elite, the very economic existence of the American middle class is being threatened and the man who we elected to correct these types of abuses is on the verge of being illegally taken out of office. What the hell is wrong with America? Where is our collective backbone? Can we even find 10 good men with courage enough to stand up to these abuses?
Why won’t America stand up for herself? Why is the country, once a country which possessed courage and conviction, now sitting idly while allowing itself to be taken to the slaughter without so much as a whimper?
The answer to the above question lies in the psychological concept known as “Learned Helplessness” as discovered by Martin Seligman in the 1960’s.
“Learned helplessness” occurs when an animal, or a person, is repeatedly subjected to an aversive stimulus that it cannot escape from. Eventually, the animal will stop trying to avoid the stimulus and behave as if it is utterly helpless to change the situation. Even when opportunities to escape are presented, this learned helplessness will prevent any action”.
In the first phase of the learned helplessness experiment, Seligman placed a dog on an electrical grid, shocked the dog and noted that the dog would demonstrate the ability to escape the aversive stimulus.
In the second phase, the dog was barricaded on the grid and was unable to escape the painful shocks. Eventually the dog laid down and passively accepted the shock.
Seligman then removed the barricades and the dog could have easily escaped the shocks. However, the dog, conditioned by the prior set of events, simply laid down and accepted the shocks, without mounting any resistance whatsoever. This, in large part, is where America is at today.
By my estimate, 60% of the country has learned helplessness to various degrees. This is couple with the idea that most of these 60% also have cognitive dissonance in that they want to deny the changes that is in their face.
Keep this number in mind. It is my belief that about 2% of all Patriots are in the business of restoring their country. The rest are mere spectators. Throughout my academic career, I have immersed myself in discovering how change occurs. Why do some movements take hold and win the day, while others die on the vine? The answer, coming from the field of social psychology, is surprisingly simple.
Scientists from the prestigious Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have determined that if just 10% of any given population holds to an unshakable idea, that the idea will become adopted by the majority of the country. However, the scientists who belong to the Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Center (SCNARC) found that if the ideas are shared by less than 10% of the population, the idea will not progress and will eventually die out. The research was first published in a peer reviewed E Journal in an article entitled “Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities.”
Computational and analytical methods were used to discover the tipping point where an obscure idea eventually becomes the majority opinion. The finding has dramatic implications for those of us trying to wake up the sheep in this country.
The SNARC scientists found that the 10% figure was applicable whether they were talking about the spread of innovations or to advance an ideal.
Reaching 10% of the population should be the objective of the alternative media and the primary goal should be the preservation of the soul and not to be quite as focused on achieving physical victory in this realm of existence.
Subsequently, the 2% of committed activists need to convince 8% of those that I call slacktivists to become active. Then, America would have a fighting chance.
The Consequences of Inaction
Once Trump is removed from office, we really need to fear what will follow. The crackdown will begin in earnest. To understand what is coming following impeachment, we need to consider the following.
There is a lot one can learn from the field of psychology. One of the things that psychology can teach is how so many people were deluded enough to follow two people like Obama and Clinton with all that they have done.
Here are the reasons why.
Video: Why So Many Followed Obama- The Learned Helplessness Phenomena!-Posted on YouTube.com-By The Common Sense Show-On January 22, 2017:
Finally, by my estimate, for each active Patriot, we need to each convince 4 people to get active. When that happens, we will have a fighting chance. If we do not, it is FEMA camps for millions.
Remember, evil never takes a day off and the FEMA camps are already built!
Please Read Part 52:
The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 52)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On June 21, 2017:
I believe that the above articles and videos relate to and/or further support my following blogs-You Decide:
Obama: Submit to Globalism or Face War, Death, Destruction!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 17, 2016:
Nazi Collaborator Soros Continues Multi-pronged War on Trump, Calls Him “Would-be Dictator”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 5, 2017:
Not Since JFK, Has a President Spit Into the Face of the Globalists, Until Now!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 21, 2016:
Russian Election Intervention Is Nothing New: ‘The Kremlin’s history of backing the losers’!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 14, 2016:
Saudi Arabia Implicated In Bankrolling of Extremist Terrorist Movements Around The World!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 16, 2017:
Attention Obama: Ft. Leavenworth is Calling You For Treason!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 10, 2017:
Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 21, 2014:
The MSM conglomerates are the most prolific and insidious "fake news" propagators in the marketplace of ideas!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 30, 2016:
“Food for Thought”
Hello: Are Americans Going To Wake Up and Take a Stand Against The Deplorable Obstructionists That Are Doing Their Utmost To Take Down Our Democratically Elected President, His Administration and ultimately destroy our Country/Republic?-God Bless America!