What?: Mueller And Comey Went After Blago And Trump – Trump Stopped Them – Now Blago Has The Goods On Obama And The Deep State

Never mind the Russians. Former FBI directors Robert Mueller and James Comey and their Deep State masters are the real threat to our republic.

Aided by a complicit media and feckless representatives in Washington DC, Mueller and Comey have so far gotten away with interfering in at least two presidential elections and they may be at it again in 2020.

Their playbook was simple.

In 2008 FBI Director Mueller was so successful at getting a corrupt progressive nobody, U.S. Senator Barack Hussein Obama, into the White House that his successor, Comey, thought he could use the exact same playbook to do the same for Hillary Clinton in 2016.

The playbook was actually used first in the Valerie Plame scandal known as Plamegate.

The first step involves protecting the Deep State candidate by projecting their crimes onto a chosen patsy.

2008 election: Obama had a history of receiving bribes and favors from convicted felon Tony Rezko: Rezko’s partner, Saddam Hussein bagman Nadhmi Auchi: and former Chicago cop Daniel T Frawley, who claimed in an email to have passed $400k in cash bribes through Rezko to Obama.

In order to divert attention from Obama’s criminal dealings with Rezko and Auchi, FBI Director Mueller opened an investigation into Rezko’s dealings with Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich and simultaneously swept Obama’s crimes under the rug. The five year “investigation” of Blago came to an abrupt end when the Justice Department leaked information to the Chicago Tribune in order to avoid having to arrest Obama’s presidential election campaign co-chairman, Jesse Jackson Jr., for trying to buy Obama’s senate seat.

Blago was arrested, Jackson was not.

Blago faced criminal prosecution while Obama moved on to become President.

2016 election: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a lucrative deal for the Clinton Foundation by illegally selling the Russians control of twenty percent of U.S. Uranium production through Uranium One. This was concealed by Secretary Clinton’s conducting business on a private server and destroying the records when the deal was discovered.

In order to divert attention from Clinton’s criminal dealings with Russia, FBI Director Comey cleared Clinton of her crimes involving the illegal server she set up and the destruction of the records kept on that server. Then Comey helped promote the phony Steele dossier, that Clinton paid for and used to paint Trump as a Russian operative.

Presumably Clinton would have moved on to become President in 2016 and Trump would have been facing criminal prosecution.

However, as Comey learned the hard way:

  • Trump is infinitely smarter than Mueller and Comey ever expected
  • Trump was a far superior presidential candidate than GOP sell-out Senator John McCain
  • Unlike Obama in 2008, it was already widely known that Clinton was a hardcore criminal.

    Which brings us to Trump’s commutation of Blago’s sentence, and why this is so important.

Now that Blago is out of prison, he is free to talk about the crimes Obama committed in Illinois, how Muller covered them up, and how it all relates to Comey’s seditious acts that followed.

So when you hear Blago say, “The same characters that did it to me are involved in doing it to Trump,” what he is really saying is the people who interfered in the 2016 election are the same people who interfered in the 2008 election.

And they’re not Russian!

It’s like Blago said when he was trying to sell Obama’s senate seat, “I’ve got this thing and it’s f—–g “Golden”.

Only this time Blago will be selling the truth about Mueller and Comey.

No wonder the DC swamp and their media are freaking out over Blago’s release from prison.



Germany to Require Social Media Sites to Report Hate Speech

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan in Europe. Last reply by Hank Jordan 1 hour ago. 1 Reply


Blog Posts

Thurs/Med-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 27, 2020 at 9:54am 0 Comments

Thursday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 27, 2020 at 8:02am 0 Comments

Wednesday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 26, 2020 at 7:29pm 0 Comments

Wednesday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 26, 2020 at 12:47pm 0 Comments

Wed/Mid-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 26, 2020 at 9:55am 0 Comments

Wednesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 26, 2020 at 7:54am 0 Comments

Tuesday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 25, 2020 at 5:26pm 0 Comments

Tuesday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 25, 2020 at 12:30pm 0 Comments

Tues/Med-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 25, 2020 at 9:42am 2 Comments

Tuesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 25, 2020 at 8:01am 0 Comments

Monday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 24, 2020 at 4:34pm 0 Comments

Monday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 24, 2020 at 12:50pm 0 Comments

Mon/Med-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 24, 2020 at 10:39am 0 Comments

Monday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 24, 2020 at 8:09am 0 Comments

Saturday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on February 22, 2020 at 4:23pm 1 Comment



  • Add Photos
  • View All


SPAM - If you see spam on our site, report it! Our staff will remove it only when we can find it. Your help is needed.


Wikipedia defines "trolls" as "someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion." Don't be baited by trolls. It's not worth your time. Simply put, "Please Don't Feed the Trolls." When you believe you are encountering a troll, simply let us know, and we'll investigate and take appropriate action

EVIDENCE - If you are in possession of ANY documents or evidence considered confidential then DO NOT POST THEM HERE. Consult your Attorney for guidance. 




Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson


Joe Biden Talks To The Dead: – He Worked On Paris Climate Deal With Long-Dead Chinese Leader

Former Vice President Joe Biden mistakenly claimed on Monday that he worked on the Paris Climate Accord with former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping — who died more than 20 years before its signing.

Zach Parkinson  

Joe Biden claimed tonight that he worked with Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping on the Paris Climate Accord.

Except the current Chinese President is Xi Jinping.

Deng Xiapoing left office in 1992 and has been dead for 23 years.

Biden made the gaffe while citing his accomplishments in President Barack Obama’s administration.

“One of the things I’m proudest of is getting passed, getting moved, getting in control of the Paris Climate Accord,” Biden said in a speech at the College of Charleston. “I’m the guy who came back after meeting with Deng Xiaoping and making the case that I believe China will join if we put pressure on them. We got almost 200 nations to join.”

Xiaoping served as the leader of China from 1978 until his retirement in 1992, and passed away in 1997. Xi Jinping, China’s current president, came to power 2013 and signed the country onto the 2016 agreement.

In June 2017, President Trump announced that the U.S. would withdraw from the agreement, stating that accord will “undermine the economy” and “puts [the United States] at a permanent disadvantage.”

In addition to the Xiaoping gaffe, Biden bizarrely declared in a campaign speech that he is a “candidate for the United States Senate” and that people could “vote for the other Biden” if they prefer one of his rivals.

“My name is Joe Biden. I’m a Democratic candidate for the United States Senate. Look me over, if you like what you see, help out. If not, vote for the other Biden,” the 77-year-old said at the First in the South Dinner.

Biden’s confusing comments come as Democrat primary candidates are scheduled to debate in Charleston Tuesday evening. The former vice president faces increasing pressure to give a standout performance as his “firewall” in the Palmetto State crumbles in the face of a surging Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). The Vermont senator is fresh off a decisive victory in Nevada caucuses on Saturday. Earlier this month, he placed first the New Hampshire primary and won the popular vote in Iowa. In a survey released Monday, the Public Policy Polling outfit said Biden leads South Carolina with 36 percent of support and Sanders is in second at 21 percent.

Hannity: Bernie's beyond gross article


Marxist Bernie Sanders Promotes Cuban Health Care – Filthy Institutions Not Even Pigs Would Enter – With Photos

(Gateway Pundit) – On Tuesday Cuba’s official communist paper thanked Bernie Sanders for recognizing Fidel Castro’s great progress in education and healthcare. The article appeared on the front page of the official communist website Granma. Of course, what Bernie is saying is complete horse sh*t. Cuba has two healthcare systems. One for the rich Marxist […]

Nancy Pelosi: ‘Too Late’ For Trump Admin To Stem Coronavirus Outbreak

(Breitbart) – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Wednesday accused the Trump administration of responding “too late” to halt the possible spread of China’s deadly coronavirus in the United States. “This is shameful,” Pelosi told reporters on Capitol Hill when asked about the administration sending a $2.5 billion supplemental budget request to combat the illness. […]


Trump Flips 9th Circuit Court, Leftists In Panic Mode, Legacy Judges Violate Ethics To Complain To Media

On February 12th, President Trump had his 189th, 190th, 191st, and 192nd judicial nominees confirmed by the senate. 51 of his judicial nominations have been for the federal appeals courts, and ten of those have been on the now-formerly heavy leftist 9th Circuit, where Trump has made 10 appointments in three years. He has effectively flipped the 9th circuit from wackjob leftist to sane, and this has wackjob leftists worried. Bigly.

Townhall notes that 1/4 of all federal circuit court judges are Trump appointees.

The LA Times whines:

When President Trump ticks off his accomplishments since taking office, he frequently mentions his aggressive makeover of a key sector of the federal judiciary — the circuit courts of appeal, where he has appointed 51 judges to lifetime jobs in three years.

In few places has the effect been felt more powerfully than in the sprawling 9th Circuit, which covers California and eight other states. Because of Trump’s success in filling vacancies, the San Francisco-based circuit, long dominated by Democratic appointees, has suddenly shifted to the right, with an even more pronounced tilt expected in the years ahead.

Trump has now named 10 judges to the 9th Circuit — more than one-third of its active judges — compared with seven appointed by President Obama over eight years.

“Trump has effectively flipped the circuit,” said 9th Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Jr., an appointee of President George W. Bush.

“Ten new people at once sends a shock wave through the system,” a 9th Circuit judge said.

Among those who have caused the most consternation is Judge Daniel P. Collins, a former federal prosecutor and partner of a prestigious law firm.

Some judges said that in the early months of his tenure, Collins has appeared oblivious to court tradition. He has sent memos at all times of the night in violation of a court rule and objected to other judges’ rulings in language that some colleagues found combative, they said.

Collins also moved quickly to challenge rulings by his new colleagues, calling for review of five decisions by three-judge panels, and some of the calls came before Collins even had been assigned to his first panel, judges said.

Democratic appointees still make up the majority of active judges — 16 to 13. But the court also has judges on “senior status” who continue to sit on panels that decide cases. Senior status rank gives judges more flexibility but allows them to continue to work, even full time.

Of the senior judges who will be deciding cases on “merits” panels — reading briefs and issuing rulings — 10 are Republicans and only three are Democratic appointees, Smith said.

“You will see a sea change in the 9th Circuit on day-to-day decisions,” Smith predicted.

The biggest change will come in controversial cases that test the constitutionality of laws and the legal ability of presidents to establish contentious new rules. The 9th Circuit is weighing challenges to Trump on a wide array of issues, from immigration to reproductive rights, and the rightward tilt is likely to make it easier for the president to prevail.

Though conservative, the Trump appointees to the 9th Circuit are not monolithic. Two Trump appointees — Bade, a former federal court magistrate, and Mark J. Bennett, a former attorney general of Hawaii — are regarded by their colleagues as experienced and collegial.

Trump appointee Eric D. Miller also has drawn positive reviews from both Democratic and Republican appointees. Before his appointment, Miller headed up the appellate division of a major law firm.

“I think he will be a good judge,” a 9th Circuit veteran said.

The 9th Circuit court has been dominated by Democratic appointees for decades. In 1978, a federal law created 10 new judgeships on the court, allowing President Carter to fill them all. The liberal Carter appointees were followed by judges named by three Republican presidents and two Democrats.

Clinton’s and Obama’s appointees were not uniformly liberal, however, and the 9th Circuit has been growing more moderate. One study, examining the years 2010 to 2015, found that the 9th Circuit was the third most reversed by the Supreme Court, following the Ohio-based 6th and Georgia-based 11th circuits.

Still, with Democratic nominees heavily outnumbering Republicans, there were usually enough votes to overturn conservative decisions by three-judge panels.

Smith predicted the full effect of the Trump appointees won’t be seen until 2021, when they will be carrying full caseloads.

But even now Democratic appointees are likely to be more reluctant to ask for 11-judge panels to review conservative decisions because the larger en banc panels, chosen randomly, might be dominated by Republicans, judges said.

Hold on, sitting judges are speaking to media, gossiping about other judges to the media? Turns out they are violating their own ethical standards by doing that!

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service