OMG! Hillary Clinton Struggles
Up Stairs At 8th Grade Graduation

Hillary Clinton arrived at Hamlin School in San Francisco Friday morning to give an 8th grade graduation speech.

The twice-failed presidential hopeful was seen walking out of her vehicle looking feeble as she slowly walked towards the school entrance.

In the first video, Hillary Clinton is slowly and carefully walking to the staircase leading up to the entrance of Hamlin School.

Hillary pauses after she takes her first step and looks up to size the climb.

Hamlin School is a very prestigious, all-girls private school which costs $34,000 a year in tuition.

Hillary is really down with the struggle!F

ABC News reporter, Amy Hollyfield caught Hillary on camera; it is unclear if Hillary was paid for this appearance, according to Hollyfield.

Amy Hollyfield   @amyhollyfield

Look who is here! Hillary Clinton just arrived at San Francisco’s Hamlin School to speak at 8th grade graduation.

In the second video, Hillary Clinton is tightly gripping the hand railing as she struggled to make her way up the staircase.

Amy Hollyfield   @amyhollyfield

Here is another view of Hillary Clinton walking in to Hamlin school in San Francisco this morning. She’s speaking at 8th grade graduation.

Hillary Clinton has been spotted lately in heavy coats in sweltering heat, covering up what many people believe to be a back brace.

According to various weather reports, it reached nearly 90 degrees in Boston on Friday.

Hillary Clinton received the Radcliffe Award at Harvard. She told the audience she would be the CEO of Facebook given the chance “because it’s the biggest news platform in the world.”


The Attorney General of Massachusetts, Maura Healey posted the photo of Hillary in the sweltering heat.

Maura Healey   @maura_healey

WATCH LIVE NOW - Maura's special conversation with @HillaryClinton at @RadInstitute

Now that we are heading into the summer months, it is obvious Hillary is hiding something with her bulky clothing.

Hillary Clinton has been spotted many times recently wearing a heavy coat and scarf strategically placed to hide what appears to be a back brace.

What is wrong with Hillary?

Blog Posts

Mon/Med-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 18, 2018 at 9:29am 0 Comments

Monday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 18, 2018 at 7:23am 2 Comments

Saturday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 16, 2018 at 4:42pm 0 Comments

Saturday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 16, 2018 at 7:08am 0 Comments

Friday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 15, 2018 at 5:04pm 0 Comments

Friday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 15, 2018 at 12:44pm 2 Comments

Fri/Med-AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 15, 2018 at 9:57am 0 Comments

Friday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 15, 2018 at 7:25am 2 Comments

Thursday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 14, 2018 at 4:26pm 2 Comments

Thursday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

Posted by Rudy Tirre on June 14, 2018 at 7:13am 2 Comments


Report: Haley and Trump  Stick It to UN,
Plan To Withdraw from United Nations
Human Rights Council

The United Nations Human Rights Council is either proof that humorless diplomatic apparatchiks do indeed have a sense of humor or that something is seriously broken with the U.N. mechanism.

The UNHRC essentially serves one major function: wholesale grousing about the state of Israel. That probably shouldn’t surprise you when you see some of the defenders of human rights that are currently or have previously sat on the Council. The group currently features wholesale human rights violators like China, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Cuba, and Viktor Orban’s Hungary isn’t far off that gold standard.

Libya sat on the body during the reign of Gadhafi, as has Evo Morales’ Bolivia. There are innumerable  other nations on the rostrum that have a questionable dedication to democracy in human rights. In short, if you were trying to assemble a body of nations that would be an affront to human rights, you could do far worse than the motley crew the U.N. has assembled to protect them.

For the next few years, the United States was expected to be one of the two states selected to the committee from “Western European and Other Nations.” If U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley has her way, however, that arrangement isn’t going to last very long.

According to a report from Reuters, the United States is expected to withdraw from the UNHRC, citing the body’s refusal to undertake serious reforms to how it works. While it’s unclear when the withdrawal would take place, given that the Council is session is set to convene in Geneva this Monday, one source said it would be “imminent.”

The United States had requested that the body address its “chronic anti-Israel bias” — the only standing committee in the Human Rights Council is one dedicated to exploring the alleged knaveries committed by the Jewish state in Palestine — and some apparatus for keeping chronic human rights violators off of the Council.

This wouldn’t be the first time that the the United States would be boycotting the Human Rights Council. The George W. Bush administration boycotted it for several years before — surprise, surprise — the Obama administration rejoined in 2009.

The primary concern with the United States leaving the Council would be that Israel would have less support on the HRC. Just last month, Australia and the United States were the only two countries on the 47-member panel to vote no on a motion to conduct an investigation of how Israel handled Palestinian protests/riots in Gaza, a motion which accused the Jewish state of excessive force.

On the other hand, when you have 47 members on a panel and 45 of them are going to vote that way, exactly what good is the United States doing lending the panel legitimacy by its presence, especially when it has always been stacked with anti-Israel voices?

In November, Haley made it clear that the United States would be walking away if changes weren’t made.

“We’ve made clear that the Human Rights Council will either adopt these reforms or the United States will leave and fight for human rights in other forms,” Haley said. “We don’t want to walk away, but we’re ready to if these changes aren’t made.”

In March of 2017, the U.S. delegation also walked out of a UNHRC meeting as Israel came up on the agenda, yet another sign that the Trump administration viewed the Council as the joke it so clearly is.

Changes, however, weren’t to come. Part of the problem rested with the European Union, where Belgium felt that urgent situations in all countries — including Israel — should always have a place on the agenda. One wonders why this was a stumbling block, considering that Israel is the only country on the agenda, unless their reasoning was a thinly designed pleasantry meant to wallpaper over anti-Israel sentiment.

One source in Geneva disputed the characterization, noting, “We are still moving ahead with our engagement for the coming session.”

However, another source said that a withdrawal was “imminent.”

If the United States were to withdraw, Swiss Ambassador Valentin Zellweger said that it “will have a profound impact on the Council. If they withdraw, we can expect significant consequences.”

Citing the “leadership role” the Americans played in the Council, he added that, “Unfortunately I agree with them that not all members fulfil the (membership) criteria.”

That was something that could have been fixed. Unfortunately, nobody wanted to. That’s why it’s high time for the United States to leave a desperately broken body.


Obama Administration Accused of Wholesale Destruction of Gov't Records... by National Archivist

Started by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) in Tea Party. Last reply by Hank Jordan 2 minutes ago. 1 Reply

Nat. Archives Stumble onto New Obama Scandal — ‘Wholesale Destruction’ of Gov’t RecordsNat. Archives Stumble Onto New Obama Scandal — ‘Wholesale Destruction’ Of Gov’t RecordsThe archivist in charge of transferring former President Barack Obama’s records into the National Archives has run across a serious problem, according to a report published Sunday: A lot of the records are missing. Next UpCNN Throws Tantrum, Boycotting WH Christmas Party01:09…Continue

(CAN) Christian Action Network, Files Appeal to Overturn Islamic Indoctrination Court Ruling

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan in Indoctrination. Last reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) 54 minutes ago. 2 Replies

June 15,2018- Christian Action Network, and just when you thought President Trump's Administration of GOP would never lie to the American People, yea right, this is in their face. By Martin Fisher, PRB NewsChristian Action Network CorrespondentOn June 15, Christian Action Network (CAN) filed a “…Continue

Trumps Says Russia Should Be In G7, Whether World Powers You ‘Like It Or Not’

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan in Trump Administration. Last reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) 58 minutes ago. 2 Replies

 Russia should be at the negotiating table in the G7 meeting whether world powers “like it or not” Donald Trump said as he was preparing to fly to Canada for the summit. The US President told reporters: “It used to be [the] G8 because Russia was in it, now Russia isn’t in it… But Russia should be in this meeting. Why are we having a meeting while Russia isn’t at the…Continue

Harvard Hospital To Take Down Portraits of Prestigious White Male Doctors

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan in Tea Party. Last reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) 1 hour ago. 1 Reply

 June 18,2018, A teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School will take down portraits of prestigious white male doctors that adorn a venerable amphitheater and scatter them throughout the grounds in a new diversity and inclusion…Continue

Anthony Boudain’s Body Cremated Against Family’s Wishes – No Autopsy

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan in Corruption. Last reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) 1 hour ago. 6 Replies

 Just days after Anthony Bourdain’s death, authorities have cremated his body against his family’s wishes and have refused to perform an autopsy.  Despite claims by his mother Gladys that Anthony was likely murdered – and with evidence suggesting that Bourdain was about to…Continue

Updated Trump administration ends DACA, with 6-month delay 06/18/2018

Started by Kat in Illegal Alien Invasion. Last reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) 1 hour ago. 543 Replies

The Trump administration on Tuesday announced the “orderly wind down” of the Obama-era program that gave a deportation reprieve to illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children – putting pressure on Congress to come up with a legislative alternative.The Department of Homeland Security formally rescinded the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, with a six-month delay for current recipients. According to Acting Homeland Security Secretary Elaine Duke, the interval…Continue

Tags: Obama_executive_action, illegal_defacto_amnesty, DACA

Inappropriately Accused Of Having Connections To Kim Kardashian at LGBTQA

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan in The Lighter Side. Last reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan 4 hours ago. 11 Replies

 Inappropriately Accused Of Having Connections To, like I said, I never heard of the lady, maybe I do live under a Flipping Rock. So I checked into the accusation, of who she is, So What Ever!!!, Some People Need Get a Life...LMBO…Continue

ICE Detention Center Goal... is to reunite children with parents... Not to deport... What?

Started by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) in Illegal Alien Invasion 4 hours ago. 0 Replies

The goal of these facilities should be to DEPORT not to reunite families... in the US. This is crap. Murals at these centers depict detention as War...A quotation attached to a picture of Donald Trump reads:  “Sometimes by losing a battle you find a new way to win the war.” Officials at Casa Padre, a detention facility said: “The goal is to reunite families.”  see: Apparently, our…Continue

Tourists Vote San Fransisco World’s Filthiest Hellhole

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan in State Issues 6 hours ago. 0 Replies

 Tourists visiting San Fransisco have voted the city as being one of the filthiest slums on planet Earth, according to a recent survey. Tourists have been left shocked and dismayed at the poor sanitary conditions, rampant crime, and open injection drug use on the streets.…Continue

Trump Just Told EU President “You’re A Brutal Killer” To His Face

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan in Trump Administration 6 hours ago. 0 Replies

 During the G7 summit this year, President Trump couldn’t help letting slip his real feelings towards European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker. During a meeting in which all world leaders were present, Trump called Juncker a “brutal killer” due to his ridiculous tariff policy, causing an audible gasp from attendees in the room.…Continue


  • Add Photos
  • View All


WikiLeaks Moves In With Kill Shot
After Crooked Hillary Trolls Comey

Crooked Hillary Clinton trolled Comey from her Twitter account Thursday afternoon after the IG report revealed Comey used a Gmail account to conduct FBI business.

Hillary tweeted: “But my emails.”

WikiLeaks utterly destroyed Crooked Hillary Clinton Friday.

In a grotesque display of unabated hubris, Hillary Clinton tweeted, “But my emails.”

WikiLeaks moved in with a kill shot early Friday morning.

“They’re here–at least the half you didn’t manage to destroy,” tweeted WikiLeaks with a link to an archive of Hillary’s emails from her private server when she was Secretary of State.

Hillary Clinton   @HillaryClinton
WikiLeaks  @wikileaks

They're here--at least the half you didn't manage to destroy:

WikiLeaks did a lot of damage to Hillary Clinton’s campagin after they disseminated the DNC emails and Podesta emails during the 2016 election.

The other half of Hillary’s emails from her private server where she innocently discussed Chelsea’s wedding and Yoga were destroyed with BleachBit.

Congressman DeSantis reminded Hillary of that on Thursday in an epic smackdown.

Ron DeSantis  @RepDeSantis

But BleachBit.

Hillary Clinton @HillaryClinton

FBI: Hillary’s Responses to Us Were ‘Hard To Impossible To Believe’

The race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton may be blissfully behind us, but ghosts of Clinton’s infamous email scandal are still haunting the former first lady.

Ever since Clinton was accused of using an unsecured email server for sensitive and even classified information, observers in the case have suspected that she was dishonest about her role in the scandal.

When the FBI, led by now-disgraced former Director James Comey, cleared Clinton of any crimes, it was widely suspected that the bureau went easy on her for political purposes, despite ample evidence that she had broken the law.

Now, it appears that Hillary Clinton was “playing dumb” in order to fool investigators … and more shockingly, it seems the FBI knew they were being played for fools, but let Clinton get away with it anyway.

According to a report from the Department of Justice’s Office of Inspector General, FBI officials who interviewed Clinton about the server found her claims “hard to impossible to believe.”

In other words, they believed the former secretary of state was lying to their faces, yet somehow went along with it.

“Clinton repeatedly claimed ignorance when pressed by FBI agents in a July 2016 interview about receiving multiple emails with a ‘(C)’ classification marker, according to the IG’s report on the FBI’s investigation of Clinton’s private server,” The Daily Caller summarized.

“She said she did not know that the marker denoted classified information and ‘speculated it was a reference to paragraphs ranked in alphabetical order,’” that outlet continued.

Remember, this is a woman who has spent decades in government.

It would be mind-blowing if a first lady with a law degree who went on to become a U.S. senator and then secretary of state didn’t understand the difference between unclassified and classified documents — and indeed, even the FBI found that difficult to swallow.

“The unidentified agent who took the lead in questioning Clinton about her private server stated, ‘I filed that in the bucket of hard to impossible to believe,’” Daily Caller reported based on the DOJ document.

There are strong indications that Clinton feigned childlike ignorance of basic technology terms in order to evade prosecution. For example, when she was asked about her email server being mysteriously “wiped,” Clinton replied, “What, like with a cloth or something?”

Only two possibilities can explain this level of willful ignorance: Either Clinton was incompetent and shouldn’t have been entrusted with classified information and the secretary of state position in the first place, or she was putting on a childish deception act. Neither option is comforting.

Amazingly, even now-ousted Director James Comey suspected Clinton of lying.

“I can’t sit here and tell you I believed her,” Comey said, according to the DOJ report.

The DOJ document also used phrases like “strained credulity” to describe the reaction of FBI agents who interviewed Clinton. In simple terms, almost nobody seemed to actually believe her answers, yet the bureau cleared her anyway.

One reason may be political bias deep within the FBI.

There are already countless text messages from FBI officials involved in the Clinton email probe that show they were biased in favor of her and against Donald Trump, even before they had collected all of the facts.

Now, more messages show even more strong bias within the FBI.

“Four days after interviewing Clinton, (an) agent sent an instant message saying he was ‘done interviewing the President,’ in reference to Clinton,” reported Daily Caller.

The election had not happened yet. Agents responsible for investigating Clinton in a level-headed manner were already referring to her as “the president,” making their bias clear.

“Months later, on election day, the agent messaged his wife, ‘You should know; … that I’m … with her,’” continued the Caller. That’s a reference to Hillary Clinton’s campaign slogan and yet another example of a skewed investigation.

Whether within the local police department or the national FBI, investigators are expected — and indeed, required — to be professional, non-biased, and to follow evidence instead of emotions.

Shockingly, it looks increasingly certain that the once-venerated FBI took a very different approach in the Clinton email case. They revered her, put her on a pedestal, and didn’t see any problem with this obvious conflict of interest.


Rep DeSantis Drops A MOAB On
Crooked Hillary 

WATCH=> Obama Lies on TV About Hillary Clinton’s Private Email Server (VIDEO)

Crooked Hillary Clinton trolled Comey from her Twitter account Thursday afternoon after the IG report revealed Comey used a Gmail account to conduct FBI business.

Hillary tweeted: “But my emails”

Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) dropped a MOAB on Hillary and absolutely lit Twitter ablaze.

In a grotesque display of unabated hubris, Hillary Clinton tweeted, “But my emails.”

Hillary Clinton  @HillaryClinton 

But my emails.

Kyle Cheney  @kyledcheney

IG found that on numerous occasions, COMEY used a personal GMail account to conduct official FBI business, according to source briefed on the report.

Congressman DeSantis dunked on Hillary and it was glorious.

DeSantis tweeted over Hillary: ‘But Bleachbit”

Ron DeSantis   @RepDeSantis  But BleachBit.   Hillary Clinton   @HillaryClinton

But my emails. 

According to the IG report, then-FBI Director James Comey used a secret Gmail account when conducting FBI business, despite warning other agents they would be in “huge trouble” if they did the same thing.

The findings were published on page 425 of the report.The FBI admitted in the summer of 2016 Hillary Clinton used BleachBit software to hide all traces of her deleted emails.

BleachBit goes beyond simply deleting files, BleachBit includes advanced features such as shredding files to prevent recovery, wiping free disk space to hide traces of files deleted by other applications, and vacuuming Firefox to make it faster. Better than free, BleachBit is open source.

Thank you, Congressman DeSantis!

Lock her up!   President Barack Obama held an interview with Steve Kroft from “60 Minutes” in October 2015.

Kroft asked President Obama if he knew about Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

Steve Kroft: Did you know about Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server?

Barack Obama: No… No.

We now know this was another Obama lie.

Thanks to the release of the IG report on Thursday we know that Barack Obama had direct contact with Clinton on private email server.

FOX News reported:

President Obama was one of a select handful of individuals who had “direct contact” with Hillary Clinton on her private email account, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz indicated in his bombshell report Thursday on the Clinton email probe.

In a footnote, the DOJ watchdog notes that “FBI analysts and Prosecutor 2 told us that former President Barack Obama was one of the 13 individuals with whom Clinton had direct contact using her account.


SPAM - If you see spam on our site, report it! Our staff will remove it only when we can find it. Your help is needed.


Wikipedia defines "trolls" as "someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion." Don't be baited by trolls. It's not worth your time. Simply put, "Please Don't Feed the Trolls." When you believe you are encountering a troll, simply let us know, and we'll investigate and take appropriate action

EVIDENCE - If you are in possession of ANY documents or evidence considered confidential then DO NOT POST THEM HERE. Consult your Attorney for guidance. 




Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”


MSNBC: Law Enforcement Officers Are Nazis
And Trump Is Running Concentration Camps

This is the modern day left — Completely unhinged.

Friday morning on MSNBC’s Morning Joe Show host Joe Scarborough on Friday compared US law enforcement officers to Nazis.

The Morning Joe host compared US law enforcement officials to Nazis marching children to the showers.

Joe Scarborough: I know children are being marched away to showers. I know they’re being marched away to showers, being told they are just like the Nazis.

Via Morning Joe:

Later in the day on Friday MSNBC hosts accused the Trump Campaign of running concentration camps.

This is the modern day left. Absolutely unhinged.

Ryan Saavedra 🇺🇸 @RealSaavedra

MSNBC analysts claim that the Trump administration is currently operating concentration camps.


Latest Activity

via Twitter
Sessions: More Heads Could Roll at DOJ
Twitter7 hours ago · Reply · Retweet
via Twitter
‘Anti-Immigrant’ Americans Take In More Refugees Than Rest of the World Combined
Twitter7 hours ago · Reply · Retweet
via Twitter
Christian Coffee House BANNED From Worship Services
Twitter7 hours ago · Reply · Retweet
Tea Party

Video=> NBC Reporter Yells At President Trump As She Stands In Front Of Him To Argue Over Illegal Immigration

(Gateway Pundit) – As she stood right in front of him, NBC White House reporter Kristen…

See More
7 hours ago


HERE IT IS: The Top 10 Different Reasons
The IG’s Report On the Clinton Email
‘Matter’ Is Flawed'

We reported in January that “DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz Has the Potential to Be the Greatest Inspector in US History – He Also Could Be Deep State Hack”.

We received the answer this Thursday and our verdict – Although the IG’s report includes some obvious and already released information about the criminal actions of Hillary Clinton and Obama’s DOJ and FBI, it overall fails in many respects to share an accurate story.  Therefore, based on the report, our assessment is that the DOJ’s IG is just another Deep State Hack!

We reported in January –

Many in the media are getting excited about the upcoming release of the IG’s report into his investigation of abuses at the DOJ. But if it turns out that Horowitz is part of the deep state, the report may be disappointing.

Is IG Horowitz a Good Guy?

There’s reason to believe that Horowitz is a good guy. Last week Horowitz announced that he located the text messages after the FBI said they were lost –

In a letter to congressional leaders, Inspector General Michael Horowitz said his office “succeeded in using forensic tools” to recover messages between senior FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page during a key five-month period ending the day special counsel Robert Mueller III was appointed to investigate possible coordination between the Kremlin and Trump’s campaign. The missing messages have sparked a political firestorm in recent days, as GOP leaders and the president have questioned how the FBI failed to retain them.

Mueller hired both Strzok and Page on his team of Trump-Russia investigators.  They were part of the biased group of far left Obama and Clinton supporters hired by Mueller.  Strzok was removed from the team after his text messages were selected in an investigation carried out by the IG.  When identified, the IG notified Mueller who then removed Strzok from his team.  The claim was that Strzok was biased against President Trump and removed didn’t hold water because Mueller’s whole team was that way.  We now know that the text messages between lovers Strzok and Page are filled with evidence of more sinister actions involving protecting Hillary Clinton from the crimes she committed and framing President Trump for the crimes he didn’t commit.

IG Horowitz has taken actions to date related to Strzok text messages that appear to show that he is a good guy. But what is missing?

Is IG Horowitz a Bad Guy?

Horowitz was nominated by President Obama in July 2011 to be Inspector General of the DOJ.  Before this he was at Harvard where he was groomed by the likes of individuals like former corrupt US Representative Barney Frank.  Prior to working in private practice, Mr. Horowitz worked in DOJ from 1991 to 2002. In the early 1990s, he worked for former fired FBI Director Comey while the two of them were in the Southern District of New York.

The fact that Horowitz was IG at the DOJ since 2012 under the Obama Administration is concerning. There is no evidence that he ordered an inspection into AG Lynch when it was reported that she met with President Clinton on a tarmac in 2016 and then a week later when Hillary Clinton was given a pass by crooked FBI Director Comey.  We don’t know that the IG looked into any number of Obama era crimes and corrupt actions.  We don’t know that he looked into the reasons for why the DOJ is delaying emails and documents to Congress or Judicial Watch concerning scandals during the Obama years.  The biggest and highest risk areas of the Obama era were never touched or never had any issues identified and reported to the public.

When crooked Rod Rosenstein was in front of Congress he kept referring to the IG’s pending report into the DOJ and Rosenstein acted as if he knew that IG Horowitz was going to give him and the DOJ a pass.

IG Horowitz stated that he has located all the text messages that the FBI reported as missing but we really don’t know yet whether that is true. We also don’t know what is in his report into DOJ abuse. Yesterday Horowitz cancelled his meeting in front of Congress today after Congress sent the four page FISA report to the President for release.  Did the IG cancel because he has to determine what is in the FISA memo so that his investigation’s report is not too far out of line?

Joe Hoft@joehoft 

@TheLastRefuge2 the verdict still out on the IG - good or bad cop?


Remember the batting order. Memo release puts Nunes on Second base (with steal)... Chuck Grassley at the plate, and Bob Goodlatte warming up on deck.

Time will tell but odds would suggest that Horowitz is just another deep state hack. Obama was so corrupt!  Drain the swamp!

Others were more optimistic than we were about the IG and his report and now we know that we were right!  Horowitz and his team are Deep State!

Here is a list of 10 Reasons from Thursday’s report that support our conclusion –

1. In the IG’s Report whenever the IG found it necessary to address the judgements, decisions and interpretations of the law, the IG sides with the FBI, DOJ and Clinton team every time. Horowitz and team show an effort to side with these entities and their actions and even provide excuses rather than disagree with their obvious flawed decisions and actions.

In the Executive Summary on page ii alone the IG says –

We found that the prosecutors provided justifications…We found that one of the reasons for not using the grand jury for testimony involved concerns about exposing grand jurors to classified information…We found that the reasons for not doing so were based on limitations…We found that these decisions were occurring at a time when Comey and the Midyear team had already concluded that there was likely no prosecutable case and believed it was unlikely the culling laptops would change the outcome of the investigation…We found that, by the date of her interview, the Midyear team and Comey had concluded that the evidence did not support criminal charges…We found no persuasive evidence that Mills’s or Samuelson’s presence influenced Clinton’s interview.”

2. The IG’s response to the rationale of the FBI making a decision to not to bring Hillary to court for maintaining classified emails on her private server is severely flawed. The IG writes on page iv of the Executive Summary –

They concluded that Section 793(f)(1) likely required a state of mind that was “so gross as to almost suggest deliberate intention,” criminally reckless, or “something that falls just short of being willful,” as well as evidence that the individuals who sent emails containing classified information “knowingly” included or transferred such information onto unclassified systems.”

Even the far-left New York Times reported that the law doesn’t require intent –

The relevant statute places a special burden on public officials to safeguard national secrets, making it a crime to remove national defense information from its “proper place of custody” even through mere “gross negligence.” There is no requirement of finding specific intent.

3. The IG notes on page ii reports that the FBI in the Hillary investigation –

Sought to obtain evidence whenever possible through consent but also used compulsory process, including grand jury subpoenas, search warrants, and 2703(d) orders (court orders for non-content email information) to obtain various evidence. We found that the prosecutors provided justifications for the preference for consent that were supported by Department and FBI policy and practice;

However, a former FBI Agent stated in 2017 that –

Never, I repeat never, in my 25-year career have I or any FBI agent known to me investigated a criminal case without the use of a federal grand jury, federal grand jury subpoenas, search warrants, etc.

Search warrants and/or subpoenas should have been executed at Clinton’s residences in Chappaqua and Washington and at Platte River.

The fact that this is coming out now is shocking.  Why did the FBI and IG until now withhold information that subpoenas were used in the Hillary investigation and what was subpoenaed?  When was it subpoenaed?  Why was the IG ok with the fact that Hillary was never subpoenaed in front of a jury?  Why is the IG not more transparent on this new issue?

4. The IG ends up agreeing with the FBI’s story regarding Hillary’s emails and ignores the significance of some of the emails found on her server. The IG glosses over the fact that some of the emails on Hillary’s server were of the highest of classification categories. Documents like these are maintained in super controlled environments where an individual must have top clearance to review.  Why does the IG seem to ignore this fact?

5. The IG noted that he and his team did not recover all of the corrupt Strzok and Page text messages. A few months ago when Congress requested the text messages, the corrupt DOJ and FBI delayed and delayed and then finally shared some of the messages. Then when pressed corrupt AG Sessions’ DOJ and FBI announced that the text messages had be deleted and they no longer had them.  When that happened the question was raised, why did IG Horowitz not announce that he didn’t receive them?  A short time later the IG announced that he had the Strzok and Page texts.

Now we find out in the (highly unlikely and questionable) report from the IG that he does not have any more of the Strzok – Page texts.  It is simply unbelievable that the IG and his team did not have all the texts at some point in the investigation and if they did not have them, why was Congress not fully disclosed to this fact?

6. When the IG discusses the meeting in Arizona between impeached President Bill Clinton and Obama’s AG Lynch he neglects to highlight that the only emails released related to the meeting from FBI agents didn’t question the reasonableness of the meeting. Emails released since that date requested by Judicial Watch show the FBI was only interested in finding out who reported the meeting, not why the meeting occurred or the legality of the meeting with the Hillary ‘matter’ in the works at that time.

Judicial Watch today released 29 pages of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) documents related to the June 27, 2016, tarmac meeting between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton. The documents show that FBI officials were more concerned about leaks than the actual meeting itself.  The new documents also show that then-FBI Director Comey seemed to learn of the meeting from news reports.

7. Conflicts of interest are all over the report but the IG states that they did not influence the investigation which clearly is not the case. Due to the significance of the Clinton scandal all prejudices in actuality or appearance should have been eliminated but they were not. The result was the Hillary ‘matter’ was a sham.  The IG states on p iii of the Executive Summary –

There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed.

8. The IG mentions emails obtained from Weiner’s laptop but stays away from the contents of these emails. The laptop held by Anthony Weiner, the spouse of Hillary’s top aid, Huma Abedin was obtained by the FBI with a reported 340,000 Clinton emails going back to 2007. What the hell was in those emails?

9. The IG in his report overlooks the actions of the FBI and DOJ that clearly were more about perception than adhering to the law. For example from page xi of the Executive Summary –

Lynch, Yates, Axelrod, and their staffs had several discussions that same day as to whether Lynch or Yates should call Comey directly, but said they ultimately decided to have Axelrod communicate “the strong view that neither the DAG nor [AG] felt this letter should go out.” Yates told us they were concerned that direct contact with Comey would be perceived as “strongarming” him, and that based on her experience with Comey, he was likely to “push back hard” against input from Lynch or her, especially if accepting their input meant that he had to go back to his staff and explain that he was reversing his decision. She said that she viewed Rybicki as the person they needed to convince if they wanted to change Comey’s mind. Accordingly, Axelrod informed Rybicki on October 27 of the Department’s strong opposition to Comey’s plan to send a letter.

With Obama everything was always a production.

10. Finally, one overall question on the IG report is why was it slow walked for so long before being provided to the public? This alone adds more questions to the overall soundness of the report as the Deep State was allowed more time to review the report and make edits. Did it take so long to cover up the truth?

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service