Please Read Part 51:
The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 51)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On June 20, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that the 2008 Presidential Election may have been decided by 5.7 million illegal voters. Surprised?-You Decide:
2008 Election May Have Been Decided by Illegal Voters!-Posted on Freddom Outpost-By MIchael DePinto-On June 21, 2017:
The claim that illegal aliens/non-citizens voting and influencing the direction of US politics has long been tarred by the brush of ‘conspiracy theory’ by the media. The mainstream media is quick to rubbish any such claims as that of the losing party being ‘sore losers’. Yet, a recent study of 2008 post-election data shows that as many as 7.9 million noncitizens were illegally registered that year and 594,000 to 5.7 million voted.
In the following video, Today’s Yellow Snow (formerly Right Wing News) looks at the analysis done by James Agresti of the Just Facts group. Using a more conservative margin of sampling error, Agresti’s conclusion shows an even higher figure of illegally registered noncitizens compared to a previous study done at Old Dominion University.
And while Harvard/YouGov released a contradicting study, it seems to have made some seriously flawed assumptions such as that respondent citizens sometimes misidentified themselves as noncitizens but also concluded that noncitizens never misidentified themselves as citizens. Did illegal votes decide the 2008 election? What about the 2012 election?
Video: Surprise! Look What Decided the 2008 Election!!!-On YouTube.com-By Today's Yellow Snow-On June 21, 2017:
Eagle Rising Reports:
This does not surprise me in the tiniest element. A new study just came out showing that the selection of 2008, Obama’s “shining moment”, may have actually been decided by illegal votes.
We already know that it is possible for illegal immigrants to vote in our elections. Just look back at all the votes for Hillary Clinton in this last election that were deemed either illegal, or the stolen identity of a dead person.
DO NOT MISS: Proof That Donald Trump Won the Popular Vote Too
DO NOT MISS: Sorry Protestors: Hillary Didn't Win By Popular Vote Either
That would also explain Obummer’s uncanny support for illegal immigration into our country.
Federalist Papers reports that a new study is claiming that almost 6 million “non-citizens” may have voted in the election of 2008.
The conservative think-tank Just Facts told The Washington Timesthat they took a second look at the post-election polling for the election that gave us President Barack Obama. With fresh eyes, they have concluded that far more illegal ballots were cast than originally believed.
The group’s president, James D. Agresti, said he and his team looked at data from an extensive poll done every two years that has a sample size of tens of thousands of voters. Some of them admit they are non-citizens and therefore ineligible to vote.
He estimated that as many as 7.9 million noncitizens were illegally registered that year and 594,000 to 5.7 million voted.
These numbers are more in line with the unverified estimates given by President Trump, who said the number of ballots cast by noncitizens was the reason he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton.
Last month, the president signed an executive order setting up a commission to try to find on-the-ground truth in illegal voting. Headed by Vice President Mike Pence, the panel also will look at outdated voter lists across the nation with names of dead people and multiple registrants.
For 2012, Just Facts said, 3.2 million to 5.6 million noncitizens were registered to vote and 1.2 million to 3.6 million of them voted.
Agresti defended his calculations to the paper, saying he compared census bureau data with his own information. In addition, noncitizens overwhelmingly vote Democratic.
“The details are technical, but the figure I calculated is based on a more conservative margin of sampling error and a methodology that I consider to be more accurate,” Mr. Agresti told The Washington Times.
So while CNN is too busy with their nose up the crack of a non-existant Russian collusion, they are letting information like this fall through….or perhaps burying it as quickly as they can!
For anyone who hasn’t seen it, the following video has Tucker Carlson and Brit Hume discussing the Georgia Special Election race between Jon Ossoff and Karen Handel. It’s hard not to laugh at Democrats. They still just don’t get it. Democrats have been thoroughly SHELLACKED in the last THREE elections, losing over 1,000 seats across the country, and they just keep doubling and tripling down on hate and utter nonsense. Keep it up Democrats! Let’s go for FOUR in a row and 1,250 seats!
Video: Tucker: Democrats Don't Know Why They Keep Losing!-Posted on YouTube.com-By The Liberty Hound-On June 20, 2017:
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand
The following recent article revealed that 1.2 million to 3.6 million non-citizens may have voted in the 2012 Presidential election. Surprised?-You Decide:
New Study: Millions of Non-Citizens May Have Voted in '12!-Posted on Front Page Magazine-By Daniel Greenfield-On June 22, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that in an interview with Breitbart, a Liberal lawyer representing Bernie Sanders supporters in a class-action lawsuit against the DNC called the committee’s actions “the ultimate Ponzi scheme” and said that, if the suit goes further, they “expect to find much more evidence of the DNC’s misconduct” in helping Hillary Clinton cheat her way to the nomination. Surprised?-You Decide:
Lib Lawyer Blasts DNC Over Cheating for Hillary in Election!-Posted on Conservative Tribune-By Martin Lioll-On June 21, 2017:
In an interview with Breitbart, a lawyer representing Bernie Sanders supporters in a class-action lawsuit against the DNC called the committee’s actions “the ultimate Ponzi scheme” and said that if the suit goes further they “expect to find much more evidence of the DNC’s misconduct” in helping Hillary Clinton cheat her way to the nomination.
Jared Beck of Beck & Lee Trial Lawyers is representing Sanders donors in the case Wilding v. DNC Services Corp. He said his clients had an expectation of impartiality when they donated to the candidate during the 2016 campaign.
Instead, he said hacked emails released from the DNC reveal that the organization was mostly in the tank for Clinton. The plaintiffs are currently awaiting a ruling on the DNC’s motion to dismiss. He also blew the whistle on what he said was an attempt by the office of former DNC head Debbie Wasserman Schultz to interfere with the case.
During the interview, Beck said the suit rested on common law principles of misrepresentation and fraud.
“If there is anything ‘new,’ it is the application of these principles to the sphere of political campaigns,” Beck said. “One might view this application as a natural consequence of Citizens United — an opinion that crystallizes campaign contributions as the quintessential form of American political participation.
“By equating political participation with financial contribution, Citizens United, by inference, incorporates all of the common-law principles of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, etc. that typically govern in the economic sphere. Americans have a cognizable interest in the transparent and fair conduct of primary campaigns precisely because they, through their campaign contributions, are also financiers of the campaign.”
Beck had some very harsh words for the DNC’s methods during the interview…
“I would think of this as a case against the ultimate political Ponzi scheme,” Beck said of the DNC’s actions.
“We are used to the concept of Ponzi schemes in the investment world. In my view, the DNC is really no different: it was purporting to be ‘selling’ a fair primary process but in reality was serving as a front for the Hillary Clinton campaign. People lost well over $200 million as a result.”
Beck also elaborated on a mysterious phone call his office received from a number tied to former DNC head and Clinton functionary Debbie Wasserman Schultz. According to The Daily Caller, the person on the other end of the line inquired about the case while using voice disguising software.
“The incident was startling at the time it happened and we are still very puzzled and concerned by it,” Beck said “The caller had altered his or her voice to be unrecognizable, and refused to identify themselves.
“But please understand that this is just one in a number of disturbing events that have occurred throughout the case … I have no idea who was behind the call, but according to the defendants, the matter has been referred to the Capitol Police,” he added.
Beck was confident that, if the lawsuit moved forward, more corrupt dealings would be exposed.
“If we do get to the discovery phase, I think it is safe to say that we expect to find much more evidence of the DNC’s misconduct, with the publicly released material being only the tip of the iceberg,” Beck said.
“Also, we will be able to place all of the material witnesses under oath and take their depositions. In addition, we will be able to conduct discovery on the question of how the DNC’s internal documents came to be placed into the public domain by Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks, which may ultimately be the most important question of all.”
If Beck’s allegations are true, things are about to get very dicey for the Democrats. The DNC’s role in the 2016 nomination process is the last thing the party wants to be dealing with as it tries to unify the establishment and base in the run up to the 2018 midterms. Dealing with a lawsuit which implies that the party process is rigged in favor of the former group isn’t going to help — and it could yet again dig up the misdeeds of Hillary Clinton for all of America to see.
Note: I believe that the disturbing information revealed in the above articles regarding voter fraud relates to and/or further supports the information contained in my following blog from the recent past-You Decide:
Vote Fraud – What They Aren’t Telling You!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 7, 2012:
The following recent article revealed that a video has just resurfaced showing WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange dropping a series of bombshells about Hillary Clinton that serve as a reminder of just how big of a criminal she really is. Surprised?-You Decide:
WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Drops CHILLING New Video – Every American Should See This…!-Posted on The MRC Blog-By Mr. Conservative-On June 20, 2017:
The following recent video revealed that Russia recently went public on Obama’s “Secrets,” which allegedly “Happened During Obama’s Terms.” Surprised?-You Decide:
Video: Russia Goes Public on Obama’s “Secrets” that “Happened During Obama’s Terms”!-Posted on YouTube.com-By The Hill Gossip-On June 23, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch announced Monday that allegedly the National Security Council cannot hand over records relating to former National Security Adviser Susan Rice’s surveillance of Americans, because they have been moved to the Obama presidential library and may be sealed for as many as five years. Surprised?-You Decide:
Judicial Watch: Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Documents Moved from NSC to Obama Library!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By Kristina Wong-On June 19, 2017:
The National Security Council cannot hand over records relating to former National Security Adviser Susan Rice’s surveillance of Americans, because they have been moved to the Obama presidential library and may be sealed for as many as five years, conservative watchdog Judicial Watch announced Monday.
The NSC informed Judicial Watch in a letter dated May 23 that materials related to Rice’s requests to know the identities of Americans swept up in surveillance of foreign targets, including any Trump campaign or transition officials, have been moved to the library.
The NSC’s Director of Access Management John Powers said in the letter:
Documents from the Obama administration have been transferred to the Barack Obama Presidential Library. You may send your request to the Obama Library. However, you should be aware that under the Presidential Records Act, Presidential records remain closed to the public for five years after an administration has left office.
Judicial Watch earlier this year filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for those documents, including of communications between Rice and any intelligence community member or agency regarding any Russian involvement in the 2016 elections, the hacking of Democratic National Committee computers, or any suspected communications between Russia and Trump officials.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the group will seek to find out when the records were moved, and warned of legal actions. He said:
Prosecutors, Congress, and the public will want to know when the National Security Council shipped off the records about potential intelligence abuses by the Susan Rice and others in the Obama White House to the memory hole of the Obama Presidential Library. We are considering our legal options but we hope that the Special Counsel and Congress also consider their options and get these records.
In April, blogger Mike Cernovich, Bloomberg, and Fox News revealed that Rice had requested to “unmask” — or unveil the hidden names of — Trump trans... who were caught up in surveillance of foreign targets.
Typically, in surveillance of foreign targets’ communications, U.S. citizens mentioned or participating in them would have their names “masked,” or hidden, due to ethical, legal, and privacy concerns. However, government consumers of the intelligence can request to have their names unmasked if it is important to understanding the communications.
According to Cernovich, The White House Counsel’s office identified Rice as the person who had requested the unmasking, after examining her log requests, Cernovich reported on April 2. Bloomberg and Fox News would later corroborate the report. The revelation lent credence to Trump’s assertion that the Obama administration had been surveilling his transition team.
The Wall Street Journal editorial board has argued Rice had no reason to request the unmaskings. Since then, the House intelligence committee has also subpoenaed the intelligence community for information on unmasking requests by Rice, former CIA Director John Brennan, and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power.
The misuse of unmasking came under media scrutiny after U.S. officials illegally leaked to the Washington Post a private conversation between former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak on December 24. Flynn resigned after those communications, not because anything inappropriate was found, but because he had misrepresented those communications to Vice President Mike Pence.
NSC Unmasking Records Response by Kristina Wong on Scribd
The following recent article revealed that former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson told the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Wednesday that the Russian government did not alter ballots, ballots counts, or the reporting of votes in last November's U.S. presidential election. Surprised?-You Decide:
Jeh Johnson Testifies: Russians Did Not Alter Ballot Counts!-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Melanie Arter-On June 21, 2017:
(CNSNews.com) - Former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson told the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Wednesday that the Russian government did not alter ballots, ballots counts, or the reporting of votes in last November's U.S. presidential election.
In his written testimony Johnson said, “To my current knowledge, the Russian government did not through any cyber intrusion alter ballots, ballot counts or reporting of election results. I am not in a position to know whether the successful Russian government-directed hacks of the DNC and elsewhere did in fact alter public opinion and thereby alter the outcome of the presidential election."
During questioning by Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas), Johnson confirmed that the Russians in no way altered any votes.
“You said in your opening statement, or in your prepared remarks, that to your knowledge, there was no vote-tallying changes--that no one’s vote was, they voted one way and it was recorded some other way. Is that still your opinion with respect to the ‘16 election that the intrusions or attempted whatever it is the Russians or others did not affect the actual voting itself?” Conaway asked.
“Based on everything I know, that is correct. I know of no evidence that through cyber intrusions votes were altered or suppressed in some way,” Johnson said.
Conaway noted that Johnson had designated the U.S. voting system "critical infrastructure" and asked him why he believed that was important.
"It was important in my mind because 'critical infrastructure' receives a priority in terms of the assistance we give on cybersecurity. That's number one," Johnson said.
“There’s a certain level of confidence, confidentiality that goes into the communications between critical infrastructure and the department that are guaranteed,” he said, adding that “when you’re part of critical infrastructure, you get the support of the international cyber norms: thou shalt not attack critical infrastructure in another country.”
“And so, those were the principal reasons to do this. There are 16 sectors already that are considered critical infrastructure, and in my view, this is something that was sort of a no-brainer and in fact, probably should have been done years before, and I’m pleased Secretary Kelly has reaffirmed it,” Johnson said.
“Does that include the parties and the infrastructure around candidates or is that just the mechanics of voting itself?” Conaway asked.
“If you read the way I wrote the statement on January 6, it’s pretty much confined to the election process itself, election infrastructure itself, not the politicians, not the political parties,” Johnson said.
The following recent video revealed that Trey Gowdy destroyed former DHS chief, Jeh Johnson during his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday when the Former DHS chief under Obama stated that the DNC, to his ‘disappointment,’ did not cooperate with DHS to respond to the hacks and that he first became aware of intrusions into DNC systems sometime last year in the fall, months after the FBI had learned of the problem.
It also revealed that Trey Gowdy stated, “If they had turned the server over to either you or Director Comey, maybe we would have known more and maybe there would have been more for you to report,’ along with, “So I guess what I’m asking you is, why would the victim of a crime not turn over a server to the Intelligence community or to law enforcement?” Surprised?-You Decide:
Video: Gowdy Destroys Jeh Johnson on DNC Hacking Claims: ‘Why Would the Victim of a Crime Not Turn Over a Server?’-Posted on Gateway Pundit-By Cristina Laila-On June 21, 2017:
Trey Gowdy destroyed former DHS chief, Jeh Johnson during his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday.
Former DHS chief under Obama, Jeh Johnson said that the DNC, to his ‘disappointment,’ did not cooperate with DHS to respond to the hacks.
The DNC rejected help from the DHS following Russian hacks into its computer systems during the 2016 election cycle, according to former DHS chief Jeh Johnson.
Jeh Johnson also said that he first became aware of intrusions into DNC systems sometime last year in the fall, months after the FBI had learned of the problem.
Trey Gowdy: “If they had turned the server over to either you or Director Comey, maybe we would have known more and maybe there would have been more for you to report. So I guess what I’m asking you is, why would the victim of a crime not turn over a server to the Intelligence community or to law enforcement?”
This is the million dollar question. If the DNC is a victim of hacking, then why hasn’t any intelligence agency taken a look at the servers? Don’t they want to get to the bottom of the Russian hacking? Don’t the Democrats want to prevent this from happening again? Clearly they have something to hide otherwise they would hand over their servers.
Jeh Johnson replied, “Uh, I’m not going to argue with you, sir. Uh, that was a leading question and I’ll agree to be led.”
What we do know is that the DHS was also caught trying to hack into the Georgia elections. Typical projection from the left. They are accusing others of doing exactly what they do. The left were the obstructionists; the leftists were rigging the election.
The following recent article revealed that Democrats in DC are great at deflection and it’s amazing that mainstream media can only find “anonymous” reports of “alleged” illegal actions that can’t be corroborated by anyone or anything except other anonymous sources, along with revealing that mainstream media can’t find anything wrong with any actions of any Democrats no matter how much proof is offered, but are looking for a conviction against any allegation made against a Republican. Surprised?-You Decide:
Finally, Proof of Collusion between Russia… and the Democrats!-Posted on Constitution.com-By Joe Messina-On June 21, 2017:
Democrats in DC are great at deflection. It’s amazing that mainstream media can only find “anonymous” reports of “alleged” illegal actions that can’t be corroborated by anyone or anything except other anonymous sources. Mainstream media can’t find anything wrong with any actions of any Democrats no matter how much proof is offered, but are looking for a conviction against any allegation made against a Republican.
They still don’t get it!
Let’s start with the leaked information about a Russian dossier that would bury President Trump! Many mainstream sources reported that the dossier had information that could be used to blackmail Mr. Trump. The dossier would prove that the Trump team and Mr. Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election.
Originally funded by the Republicans and then picked up by the Democrats after Trump won primary, the dossier seemed to never surface. Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper admitted it existed but that there was no evidence of collusion. CNN claimed to have it, or pieces of it, and that it had been floating around the National Security groups but again, it never surfaced. Clapper would later say there was interference by Russia, but never ties to Trump. Curious.
Trump, according to the Left, is guilty of sexual assault against numerous women who came forward during the campaign but seemed to fade away when most were proven to be without merit. The press still called him guilty, but were never willing to get on Billy Bob Clinton when women showed up in numbers to accuse him of sexual assault, even though Bill paid for them to go away. I guess that’s not proof!
Even though mainstream media and all elected Democrats say there is proof that Donald colluded with the Russians, Josh Marshall working with Special Counsel Bob Mueller was tasked with finding and exposing ANY criminal activity by Trump or his associates. Marshall said that there might be some kind of “conspiracy,” but I doesn’t look like there is any real criminal activity. Darn! Remember, bad actions are not always illegal actions. Think that one through!
Mainstream media would have us believe that Trump fired former FBI Director James Comey to stop the investigation against him. Really? How does that work? Mr. Comey was NOT part of the investigation. The FBI was conducting the investigation (with or without Comey). And at the time of this writing, the investigation continues on! The amount of fake news put out by this group of Democrats is almost embarrassing.
And this is only the tip of the iceberg of allegations that have no basis in any truth or even a half-truth!
Remember on May 3rd Comey told the Senate, under oath, that he had NOT been pressured to halt ANY investigation. Then in his recent answers under oath, all of a sudden he remembered he was pressured to let any investigation of General Michael Flynn go simply because the president said he “hoped” Comey could let it go. Now hoping is a crime!
Acting Director McCabe alluded that the investigation into Hillary’s campaign colluding with Russians was also being looked into. Though Mrs. Clinton kept saying all was good, the optics say something else. But mainstream won’t bring it to you!
Billy Clinton got paid over half a million dollars in 2010 for a speech he gave. Paid for by the Russian Company, Renaissance Capital.
The Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars from Uranium One, a company sold to the Russian government in 2010 after they got access to 20% of American uranium. You say no big deal. The sale needed the approval of the CLINTON State Department. Yet mainstream media is having big heartburn that Trump companies are seeing a bump in revenue from foreign companies. It seems like foreign donations to the Clintons and Democrats are OK for any reason. But earned dollars for real services offered at Trump hotels is an impeachable offense EVEN though Trump has divested himself from many of these entities.
Mrs. Clinton agreed to divulge all foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation under President Obama. But they seem to have forgotten to post the over $2 million they received from Uranium One and when pushed to do so, they refused. No outrage from Dems or mainstream media.
John Podesta, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager, failed to disclose that he got 75 thousand shares in stock from a Kremlin-financed company that he was the director of from 2010 to 2014 when he left to join the Obama Administration. Nothing to hide, except that in 2013 Podesta started a shell company and transferred the shares into it so he would not have to report them as a foreign interest before he went to Obama’s regime. Nothing to see here, right?
John’s brother Tom was paid over $24 million as a lobbyist for Sberbank. It seems this Russian bank was looking to have sanctions lifted that were placed on Russia by the Obama Administration. Both Podestas were lobbying for relief and believing Mrs. Clinton would make things happen. A little curious?
John Breaux helped produce radio ads for Mrs. Clinton’s campaign while working for Gazprombank, Russia’s 3rd largest bank. Nothing to see here.
Campaign officials met several times with the Russian ambassador. They don’t deny it, but refuse to reveal anything about the discussion. Mainstream media is good with it!
The New York Times wrote a piece complaining about similar items against Trump, every one of them! But not a PEEP about the Clintons or Obamas.
So, let’s just call it what it is, a concerted effort by the mainstream media and Democrats to bury Trump and the Republicans. They don’t care about justice, truth, or integrity. They are willing to lie, steal, cheat, and overlook to help the Democrats win. And that includes impeaching Trump, even when he’s broken no laws.
I saw a meme that’s perfect. It went like this:
First Trump should plead guilty. Pence should pardon and then nominate him for VP.
Once affirmed Pence should resign, Trump would become president and then nominate Pence for VP.
If that doesn’t work, then the freaked out Dems need to look at the recently discovered Constitution a little more closely. They would have to impeach nearly a dozen people to even come close to getting the presidency. Unless they are planning a coup. And based on their current actions, that may very well be in the works.
Long Live Nancy Pelosi!
The following recent article revealed that foreign Soros-Backed Media outlet bashes Conservatives with US taxpayer dollars. Surprised?-You Decide:
Foreign Soros-Backed Media Outlet Bashes Conservatives With US Taxpayer Dollars!-Posted on The Daily Signal-By Maiya Clark / Mike Gonzalez-On June 21, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that coming July 2, to a Democrat-controlled city near you, the March for Impeachment! In fact, kowabunga, it’s gonna be a **world-wide** march, in case they want to impeach Donald Trump in Venezuela, Zimbabwe, or some other Democrat role model state. Surprised?-You Decide:
Leaked! Trump Impeachment Articles!-Posted on NewsWithViews.com-By Lee Duigon-On June 22, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that the Deep State trio, which include Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller allegedly aim to destroy President Trump and his administration. Surprised?-You Decide:
Deep State Trio: Comey, Rosenstein And Mueller, Aim To Destroy Trump!-Posted on NewsWithViews.com-By Kelleigh Nelson-on June 23, 2017:
The following recent video revealed Fox News’ Sean Hannity revealed that a soft coup is currently taking place in USA in an effort to remove President Trump from office. Surprised?-You Decide:
Video: BREAKING NEWS TRUMP: Do you think America is at a turning point?-Posted on YouTube.com-By Shayetet-On June 21, 2017:
The following recent video revealed that President Trump has recently gone on the offensive against the “Deep State.”-You Decide:
Video: TRUMP goes OFFENSIVE! Alex Jones Infowars!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Info Wars Live-On June 26, 2017:
The following recent video revealed that former President Obama allegedly never did anything about Russia’s election interfering because he believed that Hillary Clinton was going to win the 2016 Presidential election, along with revealing former Attorney General Lynch’s obstruction of justice and former FBI Director Comey allegedly paying $50K for President Trump’s fake Russian Dossier. Surprised?-You Decide:
Video: Sean Hannity - Fox News Today!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Hymes Jeff- June 26, 2017:
The following flyer by a true Patriot reveals HR 2552, which is a Bill in the U.S. House of Representatives to stop federal taxation of your Social Security Benefits, along with a recent column that includes suggestions-Please share with family & friends-You Decide:
HR 2552 Bill In US House Of Representatives To Stop Federal Taxation Of Your Social Security Benefits!-By Devvy Kidd-On June 21, 2017:
Seniors To Get Screwed – A Third Time?-By Devvy Kidd-On June 21, 2017:
Please Read Part 53:
The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 53)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On June 25, 2017:
I believe that the above articles and videos relate to and/or further support my following blogs-You Decide:
Obama: Submit to Globalism or Face War, Death, Destruction!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 17, 2016:
Nazi Collaborator Soros Continues Multi-pronged War on Trump, Calls Him “Would-be Dictator”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 5, 2017:
Not Since JFK, Has a President Spit Into the Face of the Globalists, Until Now!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 21, 2016:
Russian Election Intervention Is Nothing New: ‘The Kremlin’s history of backing the losers’!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 14, 2016:
Saudi Arabia Implicated In Bankrolling of Extremist Terrorist Movements Around The World!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 16, 2017:
Attention Obama: Ft. Leavenworth is Calling You For Treason!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 10, 2017:
Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 21, 2014:
The MSM conglomerates are the most prolific and insidious "fake news" propagators in the marketplace of ideas!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 30, 2016:
Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 13, 2015:
God Bless Our Country/Republic.