Who Spiked the EpiPen?
Teddy Roosevelt the Trust Buster must be rolling in his grave over news of the recent spike in the price of the life-saving EpiPen. Mylan, the drug company that produces the popular treatment for severe allergic reactions, has steadily raised the price of the device by over 400% since 2008. A double pack of the device cost $100 in 2008, but will now set you back more than $600. The EpiPen has been around since the 1970s and has a low production cost, but due to the lack of competition Mylan has effectively cornered the market and taken advantage by increasing the price exponentially. The fault lies not with other companies attempting to compete, but with Food and Drug Administration regulations. As The Wall Street Journal notes, "The FDA maintains no clear and consistent principles for generic drug-delivery devices." As a result, competing drug companies have no standard by which to measure drug-delivery system compliance when seeking to produce a similar product. Effectively, the FDA has helped to secure Mylan's monopoly on the EpiPen. liar-Hillary Clinton recently waded into the matter, saying she would require all drug makers to "prove that any additional costs are linked to additional patient benefits and better value." Once again, liar-Hillary's socialist instincts have missed the mark — more regulations or price controls won't work. liar-Clinton conveniently blames "Big Pharma," side stepping the real issue of government over-regulation in order to push for even more government involvement in and control of health care.
There is one other interesting angle to this story. Mylan's CEO is Heather Bresch, who is the daughter of West Virginia Democrat Senator Joe Manchin. Manchin has been somewhat hesitant to give his full support to liar-Hillary's run for the White House, as she is no friend of his state's coal industry. It's a good bet that liar-Hillary's calling out of Mylan is more than just politically pandering — it could be a shot across the bow warning Manchin to stay in line. ~The Patriot Post
.
'Born This Way'? New Study Debunks LGBT Claims
Louis DeBroux: Among leftists, it is at convenient times an accepted fact ("settled science," you might say) that homosexuals and transgendered people are "born that way" — that their sexual attractions or gender identities are not the product of choice, but a matter of genetics. (When that's not convenient, of course, it's a perfectly acceptable "life choice.") A new report, instantly controversial, torpedoes that understanding of homosexuality and gender dysphoria, the medical term for transgenderism.
The report, entitled "Sexuality and Gender: Findings from the Biological, Psychological, and Social Sciences," is co-authored by two of the most well respected experts on mental health and human sexuality. Dr. Paul McHugh, described as "arguably the most important American psychiatrist of the last half century," is a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the prestigious Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and served for 25 years as psychiatrist in chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital. And Dr. Lawrence Mayer, Psychiatry Department scholar-in-residence at Johns Hopkins University, is a professor of statistics and biostatistics at Arizona State University.
While, not surprisingly, many on the Left and in the LGBT "community" immediately raged against the report as anti-LGBT, it should be noted that Johns Hopkins was the first medical facility in the U.S. to perform sex-reassignment surgery, and did so for decades until a growing body of peer-reviewed studies, including an analysis of how Hopkins' own transgendered patients fared over time, led the hospital to end those types of surgeries. Furthermore, McHugh is no far right-wing ideologue or Bible-thumper; he's a self-described "politically liberal" Democrat.
Yet it was his long-term experience with patients who suffer from gender dysphoria that led him to his conclusions, summarized in a report that analyzed more than 200 peer reviewed studies. McHugh and Mayer are also very up front about what the science does and does not show. They freely admit the gaps in the available research, which they argue underscores the need for more research before establishing medical standards, public policy guidelines, and laws, based on "settled science" that is not at all settled.
So what did the study find? A few excerpts:
"The belief that sexual orientation is an innate, biologically fixed human property — that people are 'born that way' — is not supported by scientific evidence.
Likewise, the belief that gender identity is an innate, fixed human property independent of biological sex — so that a person might be a 'man trapped in a woman's body' or 'a woman trapped in a man's body' — is not supported by scientific evidence.
Only a minority of children who express gender-atypical thoughts or behavior will continue to do so into adolescence or adulthood. There is no evidence that all such children should be encouraged to become transgender, much less subjected to hormone treatments or surgery.
Non-heterosexual and transgender people have higher rates of mental health problems (anxiety, depression, suicide), as well as behavioral and social problems (substance abuse, intimate partner violence), than the general population. Discrimination alone does not account for the entire disparity."
One of the most shocking findings in the report is that not only do people who suffer from gender dysphoria experience far higher rates of social pathologies (depression, substance abuse, suicide) than the general population, but sex-reassignment surgery does not offer the relief those on the Left claim. One study finds that "compared to [the general population], sex-reassigned individuals were about five times more likely to attempt suicide and about 19 times more likely to die by suicide." The study finds a staggering 41% of transgendered individuals will attempt suicide in their lifetime. The duo investigated the underlying causes of these tragic statistics, and found that while "stressors like stigma and prejudice account for much of the additional suffering observed in these subpopulations ... [this theory] does not seem to offer a complete explanation for the disparities in the outcomes." Even in social environments where transgendered people are accepted, they still suffer from above-normal rates of these social pathologies. McHugh and Mayer encourage additional research be done to study the correlation between childhood sexual abuse and sexual orientation (studies have shown non-heterosexuals to be two to three times more likely to have experienced childhood sexual abuse as compared to heterosexuals).
Far from offering condemnation or judgment, they stress the need for greater understanding of the science behind gender dysphoria, and a more thoughtful, science-based approached to treating it. "More research is needed to uncover the causes of the increased rates of mental health problems in the LGBT subpopulations," McHugh and Mayer say, calling on society to work to "alleviate suffering and promote human health and flourishing."
All the more reason to base medical treatment and public policy on sound science, which is not currently the case. The authors declare they are "disturbed and alarmed by the severity and irreversibility of some interventions being publicly discussed and employed for children. ... We are concerned by the increasing tendency toward encouraging children with gender identity issues to transition to their preferred gender through medical and then surgical procedures." The pair notes, "There is little scientific evidence for the therapeutic value of interventions that delay puberty or modify the secondary sex characteristics of adolescents."
The nObama administration has used (and abused) its vast power to dismiss the concerns of parents, policymakers and medical professionals in implementing policy in the furtherance of its ideological goal — forced social acceptance of gender dysphoria as normal, all under the guise of medical science.
Part of that effort was nObama's announcement earlier this year that schools receiving federal funding were prohibited from requiring students to use the restroom and shower facilities of their birth sex, while threatening a loss of funding for any school that didn't comply with his imperial decree. Essentially, this meant boys who think they are girls would get to shower with female classmates. Luckily, U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor has injected some sanity into the debate, issuing an injunction against implementation of this policy, stating that nObama exceeded his authority in his attempt to reinterpret Title IX. As O'Connor said, "It cannot be disputed that the meaning of the term 'sex' [in Title IX] meant the biological and anatomical differences between male and female students as determined by their birth." Gender dysphoria is a real and debilitating problem for a tiny minority of the population, and we should treat those who suffer from it compassionately. At the same time, we do not show true compassion by pretending it is not an illness, or by encouraging those who suffer from it to embrace and celebrate it. ~The Patriot Post.
Comments