~ Featuring ~  
Democrats Turn on Women
Robin Smith  
FBI failed to provide details on contact with scumbag/liar-Clinton campaign lawyer: 
Judicial Watch
by Gregg Re  
{} ~ The FBI failed to respond to an October 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking more information about secretive communications in late 2016 between... a top scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer and the bureau's then-general counsel, according to the  transparency group Judicial Watch. Additionally, the group said, the FBI has ignored September 2018 FOIA requests concerning bureau communications with, and payments to, British ex-spy Christopher Steele -- who authored the infamous anti-Trump dossier. In response, Judicial Watch announced Tuesday it has filed lawsuits  seeking the full release of all relevant documents. The flurry of litigation comes just days before Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller's report is set to be publicly released, with some redactions. Separately on Tuesday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham was joined by Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson in sending a letter to the Justice Department demanding the release of information concerning the FBI's investigation of scumbag/liar-Clinton's private email server, known as the "Midyear Exam" probe. "In May of 2016, around the same time then-FBI Director scumbag-James Comey was drafting a statement exonerating scumbag/liar-Clinton, the FBI’s Midyear team wrote a memo seeking DOJ permission to review highly-classified information 'necessary to complete the investigation,' according to the unclassified DOJ Inspector General report," the chairmen wrote...  
DOJ can't hide behind dirty cop-Mueller 
investigation anymore, GOP says
by Caitlin Yilek } ~ Senior Senate Republicans have told the Department of Justice to stop making excuses. They are pushing again for details about the FBI’s investigation into scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s private email server... Three Senate committee chairmen wrote to Attorney General William Barr on Tuesday, saying Justice cannot use special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller's investigation any longer as an excuse to avoid briefing Congress. “Now that the Special Counsel’s investigation has concluded, we are unaware of any legitimate basis upon which the Department can refuse to answer the Judiciary Committee’s inquiries,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., wrote in their letter. The Republicans previously requested information on a classified appendix to the Justice Department inspector general’s report titled, “A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election," that was released in June 2018. “The classified appendix raises significant issues associated with the FBI’s failure to review certain highly classified information in support of its Midyear investigation,” they wrote, referring to the code name for the email investigation. “In particular, the Inspector General noted that it learned that the FBI acquired classified material that ‘may have included information potentially relevant to the Midyear investigation.’ The FBI even drafted a memorandum in May of 2016 stating that access to the information was ‘necessary to complete the investigation.’ However, that memorandum was never completed.”...
‘Stop commie-Sanders’ Democrats Haven’t 
Noticed One Of commie-Bernie’s 
Biggest Weaknesses Yet  
by Warren Henry } ~ According to The New York Times, “mainstream Democrats are increasingly worried that their effort to defeat President Trump in 2020 could be complicated by commie-Bernie Sanders... in a political scenario all too reminiscent of how Mr. Trump himself seized the Republican nomination in 2016.” commie-Sanders pays lip service to the idea of unity, but has warned supporters he is also fighting establishment Democrats. commie-Bernie is embroiled in a bitter feud with scumbag/liar-Clinton loyalists at the Center for American Progress (CAP), which has been criticizing the socialist’s Medicare-for-All proposal behind the scenes. There is little question where the Times stands in this battle; its hit piece uses CAP President Neera Tanden’s 78-year-old mother to attack her. The “Stop commie-Sanders” Democrats will turn out to be as ineffectual as NeverTrump Republicans were in 2016 unless they find a line of attack that is not simply a grievance of the party’s establishment. commie-Sanders supporters are about as likely to ditch commie-Bernie over his millionaire status as Trump supporters were affected by the bankruptcies in his business past. Nor are they likely to care about the details of his single-payer health-care bill. But once commie-Bernie’s opponents understand the roots of his success, they may find a potent issue staring them in the face. There are two major reasons commie-Sanders is near the Democrats’ center of gravity. First, his socialism or “social-ism“ largely expresses a vision Democrats have held for at least 50 years and often longer. Second, because his vision is old, it remains rooted in class, rather than the identity politics of the New New Left. For some, this second reason is a feature; for others, it is a bug. The potential fault line for commie-Sanders among Democrats may be his position on immigration...
Christie Tells It Like It Is
by John Hinderaker } ~ Chris Christie’s public career has had its ups and downs, but at his best he has brought clarity to a number of issues... On Fox Radio with Brian Kilmeade, he said what he thought about Ilhan Omar and commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: “As somebody who had my wife two blocks away from the World Trade Center that day, my brother on the floor of the New York Stock exchange, and a number of people in our local parish here who passed away, a murder occurred,” Christie said on the Brian Kilmeade Show on Fox News Radio.“Multiple murders occurred, 2,900 murders occurred on that day by radical Islamic terrorists and that’s the way it should always be spoken about to honor those victims and this woman is completely – let’s put aside her religion for the moment – as a public servant, she’s off her rocker to be describing it that way and it’s a disgrace, it’s a disgrace to anyone in her congressional district who voted for her.” \*\*\* Christie also referred to Dem. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who defended Omar by quoting a passage about the Holocaust as a “joke” who will soon be “an asterisk” in history. “This is the problem with people like commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. They like to talk a lot, but they don’t want to be held responsible for anything they say…Good point!…and the fact is that to diminish the attacks on 9⁄11, the greatest attack ever perpetrated on this country, on our soil from a terrorist organization, is to demean the lives that were lost that day, both among those who were in those buildings and on those planes, and those who lost their lives trying to save them,” Christie said. “What she should do is apologize, and be done with it, because there’s no justifying it, and listen, part of it too Brian, is I’m so tired of hearing ‘commie-AOC’ as she’s called, being given airtime in this country. She’s a joke.” “She got elected because a member of Congress \$&Joe Crowley\$& went to sleep and never went back to his district and was too busy running for speaker rather than running to keep his congressional seat and I think she will be seen ultimately as an asterisk in history because I can’t imagine she will stay all that long.”
Three Questions to Ask Liberals
by Steven Kessler } ~ As President Trump threatens to transport illegal aliens to sanctuary cities, suddenly, many on the Left are feeling significantly less generous and magnanimous regarding illegal immigration...
 Colloquially, this is known as "skin in the game." When people have no skin in the game, then the issue is "no skin off their back." Cher, for example, was gung ho when it came to immigration, as she had no skin in the game. However, when she had some skin in the game, her position suddenly became more conservative. This conversation is surprisingly typical. It arises so frequently that it has become one of the three questions I have learned to ask when dealing with liberals and liberal ideology. I learned to ask this question while in graduate school for higher education administration, a discipline whose pedagogy is informed by social justice ideology. A professor of mine always advocated for "redistribution of wealth from big business." I remember telling her how unstable business can be from month to month and year to year. Due to this instability, would it not make more sense to redistribute wealth from a more stable profession? The most stable profession I can think of is tenured professor. Tenured professors have guaranteed contracts for life. Not only that, but it was her idea in the first place, so one would think she would be in favor of implementing her own idea. Believe it or not, she did not want to redistribute wealth from tenured professors. When the money was coming out of her pocket, she was much less enthusiastic...
Democrats Turn on Women
Robin Smith:  Well, that didn’t take long. The party whose playbook is identity politics has gone from claiming the moral high ground on women’s rights and having loyalty from the female voting bloc to essentially guaranteeing the end of women’s sports as a field of accomplishment, competition, and reputation, as well as pushing legislation that will harm women by making it more difficult for them to own firearms for self-defense.

The last two Januaries, the National Mall was occupied by tens of thousands of angry women in who, most likely, expected scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton to become the 45th U.S. president. Their noggins were covered in bright pink knitted caps fashioned in the shape of a female organ, and they were unified under the rallying cry that they would prevail in the body politick despite the unimaginable victory of Donald Trump. As the #MeToo Movement commenced, Democrats at the national level would become the only group to stand up for the rights and empowerment of women, right?

Well, that was so yesterday.

As the same Democrats in elected office shift their focus from one identity group to another, the solidarity of victimhood that disgruntled women have found within the ranks of the political Left has been displaced by the emphasis on the social-justice efforts to satisfy other various voting blocs — most recently the LGBTQIA+ Rainbow Mafia.

All but one House Democrat cast votes in favor of the Equality Act, demonstrate that their legislative priorities are directed by politics, not constitutional policy. (They were joined by two Republicans who apparently misplaced their copies of the RNC Platform and the U.S. Constitution.) If this bill were to become law and actually amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964, not only would women’s sports become dominated by the gender-confused and “transgender” who fluctuate genders based on feelings, not biology, but every aspect of hiring and promotion, scholarship consideration, and public life would be forever changed by the regulatory morass that would result from such an insane policy.

What’s fascinating about the Equality Act is that it was a policy first introduced in July 2015 … when Barack scumbag/liar-nObama was president, the Senate was controlled by Democrats, and the GOP held only a 33-seat majority in the House. The bill died in both House and Senate committees, never seeing the light of day on the floor of either chamber for a vote. Why? It could be argued that it would’ve been much easier for America’s first black president working to transform our nation to embrace this far-reaching proposal. Only now, it seems, in 2019 — with a strong economy and other Trump administration achievements — that the urgency to employ identity politics has become so very critical to the hard-Left Democrat Party.

It’s not just through the LGBTQIA+ agenda that women are finding themselves harmed, but the anti-gun agenda is a threat to women who choose to protect themselves observing their Second Amendment right. The reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) by the House — led by Speaker Nancy Pulosi and her famed freshman class of radicals who govern via Twitter — sounds like good policy, but, as always, the devil is in the details.

As with the Equality Act, a good moniker does not always reflect effective policy. First passed into law in 1994 with bipartisan support, the VAWA was expanded with future reauthorizations and faced Republican opposition in 2012 because the rights of homosexuals were included as were provisions permitting illegal immigrants to access temporary visas. Nothing like DC politics to take a reasonable bill and contort it beyond recognition, right? The most recent reauthorization by the House follows its expiration in February this year but comes with new amendments that will deny due process of those whose weapons are confiscated based on an ex parte order of protection — meaning the accused or their representative need not be present or heard. In fact, a citizen could even permanently lose the right to own, purchase, or possess firearms if convicted of the misdemeanor of stalking — a crime that may not include violence.

Hijacking a decent piece of legislation has become the new tool of Democrats to find incremental ways to establish their extreme agenda of gun control. In this case, that means potentially permanently erasing one’s constitutional right without a record of violence.

As militant leftists move to enact their radical agenda, women aren’t faring so well. Finding the gender-confused preferred in legislative protections and the facts flatly ignored that a growing population of women are turning to the Second Amendment to effectively protect themselves from all sorts of crimes are just two examples of the consequences of identity politics. Those politics circumvent the foundational principles of our Constitution and, in turn, harm females, not just erode Liberty.

A key phrase from the Democrats’ 2018 party platform declares, “We are stronger together.” Yeah, that is until Democrats need to appeal to a different identity group for votes. Good luck, ladies. The #MeToo movement is proving #YouToo can be left behind when the Constitution is ignored.  ~The Patriot Post  

Views: 12


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Political Cartoons by Ken CatalinoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich


TRUMP:  Trump To Give ‘Start Your Engines’ Command At Dayton

President Donald Trump will give the command for drivers to start their engines before the Daytona 500.

Daytona International Speedway officials named Trump the grand marshal for NASCAR’s season opener, meaning he will deliver the most famous four words in auto racing. “Gentleman, start your engines,” has been a staple of races around the country and world for decades.

White House spokesman Judd Deere said Thursday the president plans to attend the race. Track president Chip Wile confirmed the news in a release.

“Daytona International Speedway has been privileged to have hosted several sitting presidents of the United States over our history,” Wile said. “We’re honored that the president of the United States has chosen to experience the pageantry and excitement of ‘The Great American Race.’”

Trump is the third sitting president to attend a race at Daytona, but only the second to attend the Daytona 500. George W. Bush attended in 2004. Trump is the first to be given an honorary role in pre-race ceremonies.

Trump is scheduled to spend part of the Presidents Day weekend at his private club in Palm Beach, Florida.

The Federal Aviation Administration issued a flight restriction for Sunday and the U.S. Secret Service, which is responsible for presidential security, also tweeted to fans that drones are prohibited within 30 miles of the race in Daytona Beach — a restriction put in place for presidential visits.

Trump has hosted previous NASCAR champions at the White House and last October awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to motorsports titan Roger Penske. Last year, Trump also praised retired driver Mario Andretti, the Daytona 500 winner in 1967, reminiscing about a ride Andretti gave him in a race car for his reality show “The Apprentice.”

“I said, ‘Mario, get me out of here. I want to get out of this car,’” Trump recalled. “We went so fast. We literally — we covered four blocks in like a second.”

Tucker: Elizabeth Warren's campaign on its last legs

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service