TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
The Left Strings Up Tucker Carlson
by Paul Jacob
.
Did McCabe’s Team Plant the Rosenstein Story?
{ greatamericanrepublic.com } ~ There has been a lot of speculation about the origins of the Rod Rosenstein story, but this is the first to implicate former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and his team... It is reported that White House staff are becoming convinced that this is the case. As for Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, he is having no part of it and rejects it in no uncertain terms. White House insiders reportedly believe former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe’s team planted a story in the press suggesting Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein is conspiring against the president, according to Politico on Saturday. McCabe’s colleagues allegedly concocted the ruse to bait President Donald Trump into firing Rosenstein ahead of November’s midterm elections, the report noted. Individuals within the West Wing believe the former FBI director’s team pushed the story to create political consequences for Trump, according to Politico. McCabe’s spokesman pushed back on any such assertions, Politico reported. The report refers to a Sept. 21 New York Times article suggesting Rosenstein discussed wearing a wire to record Trump and volunteered to recruit cabinet officials to potentially remove the Republican from office. Rosenstein allegedly made the remarks in meetings with Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI officials shortly after the May 9, 2017, firing of scumbag-James Comey as FBI director. The deputy AG took part in scumbag-Comey’s ouster, writing a letter recommending that he be fired because of his handling of the liar-Hillary Clinton email investigation... .Kavanaugh Smear Proves dummycrats-Dems are Too
Radical and Ruthless for Voters to Trust with Power
{ fedup.org } ~ The Kavanaugh confirmation fight has proven that the dummycrats-Democrats are not only too radical to be trusted with the power of government... they are also far too ruthless and lacking in any moral limits. Having failed to make a case against Kavanaugh’s sterling record and abilities as a judge, the dummycrats-Democrats have resorted to an unscrupulous smear campaign. Without no evidence whatsoever, they have promoted the claim of a left-wing, anti-Kavanaugh professor, attacking Kavanaugh’s personal reputation. Carefully refraining from bringing up this accusation during private meetings with Kavanaugh, or asking a question during the public hearings, they waited to spring it at the last minute in order to prevent a vote. Now they demand an FBI investigation, even though Kavanaugh’s accuser cannot remember when it allegedly happened, where it happened, did not tell anyone about it, and says she was careful to act as if nothing had happened. Apparently, the FBI is supposed to interview her friends, ask them whether they were ever at a party where she acted as if nothing had happened, and then proclaim Kavanaugh guilty as charged. Consider the hypocrisy. These same dummycrats-Democrats were making every effort to put an accused rapist, liar-Bill Clinton, back into the White House as “First Gentleman.” At that time they insisted on ignoring accusations that could not be conclusively proven, though Juanita Broderick’s case against liar-Clinton had some real, contemporary evidence to back it up. The dummycrats-Democrats have done this even though Judge Kavanaugh has a spotless reputation, and has been vouched for by dozens of women who knew him then and later. Nor has any other woman come forward with a similar accusation against him... .dummycrats-Dems poised to grill
Brett Kavanaugh on drinking, partying in high school
by Naomi Limscumbag-Ellison’s #MeToo Landmine Finally Blows,
dummycrats-Dem Says Allegations ‘Need To Be Investigated’
by MALACHI BAILEY.
For dummycrats-Dems in Ford-Kavanaugh
fight, believing is enough
by Byron YorkThe Left Strings Up Tucker Carlson
by Paul Jacob
{ townhall.com } ~ “Ask Tucker Carlson whatever happened to Tucker Carlson,” writes Lyz Lenz for the Columbia Journalism Review, “and he gets upset.”
Hmm. I guess some rich, white, male, conservative television hosts just don’t like being pigeonholed and belittled.
Ms. Lenz’s profile, entitled, “The mystery of Tucker Carlson,” details Carlson’s descent from apparent good guy to racist bad guy with 2.7 million viewers on Fox News and a conservative position on immigration.
How was he a good guy? Well, he once worked for CNN and MSNBC, and sometimes wrote articles that skewered Republicans. Side of the angels.
Now, however, he appears nightly as a new Grand Wizard.
“If you look at a lot of his early writings,” Lenz explains on CNN’s Reliable Sources, “there has always been kind of a latent racism.”
Always!
So, what is the evidence for this? Lenz dredges up this confession from Carlson’s past: “The idea that I’d be responsible for the sins or, for that matter, share in the glory of the accomplishments of dead people who happened to share my skin tone has always confused me.”
His confusion does not confuse Lenz, apparently. Not at all! Being resistant to racial identitarianism, which is all that Carlson fessed up to, amounts toracism, dontcha know.
The peculiarities of Lenz’s gumshoe work on the Carlson Mystery are not limited to uncovering the depths of his racism, though. She begins her piece focusing on “shouting.”
Tucker’s a shouter. She says. “‘You were definitely shouting before. That’s why this is funny,’ I say laughing nervously. ‘Because you are like, “I AM NOT SHOUTING!”’”
I guess those all-caps help. Case closed!
But there is a problem with writing this analysis out, orthographics aside. A strong, confrontational argumentation style is not understood in the exact same manner by everyone. What’s shouting to one person isn’t shouting to another. This is an area where people can honestly differ.
It’s all very subjective.
So could that be the excuse for Lyz Lenz’s odd forays into old-fashioned “New Journalism”?
In the course of regaling us with the factoid that Carlson is “worth over $8 million” and stands to inherit even more because his step mom is “Patricia Swanson of the Swanson frozen dinner fortune,” Lenz contrasts that with her own struggle as “a single mom, a freelance writer with two kids, swiftly facing a future with no health care.”
Uh, OK. Thanks for sharing? Lenz acknowledges that journalists are “not supposed to make it about ourselves,” but does anyway. CNN Money describes this as “daring,”
We learn more, alas. Lenz is divorcing her husband of 12 years, who is . . . gut-punch . . . a Republican. Their split “didn’t come because of the election,” she says, though “the election certainly revealed a lot of huge problems that we couldn’t overcome.”
Just as Tucker Carlson cannot fathom his responsibility for all Caucasoid sins, he probably won’t grok how her divorce could be in any way relevant to his peculiar essence, either.
Racist! Sexist! Meany!
Or just a Man of Mystery.
by sundance
Comments
I watch Tucker every night as well as Hannity, I also see Levin on Sundays.
as far as tucker carlson goes i like him
his views are his views and obviously this woman has a problem w/the fact he did what maybe changed them oh like many do . he is white what a shock so damn what. many people are maybe to this womans surprise as God made people maybe it is HE she has a beef w/huh?
why she hates him i do not care his views are just that his views i agree sometime and sometime not yet i like him.