Please Read Part 34:
The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 34)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 27, 2017:
The following recent thought-provoking article revealed that the nation of ‘Saudi Arabia is facing a $6 billion lawsuit’ initiated by scores of American insurance companies which are attempting to hold thousands responsible for personal, business and property damage caused by the ‘terror’ attack on September 11.
It also revealed that the joint lawsuit was filed in the US District Court in Manhattan this past week, along with revealing that the ‘law suit is seeking to hold the artificially created kingdom accountable for the attacks which murdered 3,000 people and caused about $10 billion in property damage’ and that the participating ‘insurance companies (e.g. Liberty Mutual, Safeco, Wausau and many Lloyd’s of London syndicates) are attempting to hold Saudi Arabia responsible for providing funding and other material support to al-Qaeda terrorists,’ who they said, carried out the attacks.
Additionally, it revealed that further ‘personal lawsuits were also filed by surviving family members of about 800 attack victims,’ as well as the ‘1,500 injured first responder personnel’ who responded to the terrorist attack. Surprised?-You Decide:
Trump Supports 9/11 Victims in Seeking Truth and Justice!-Posted on The Common Sense Show-By Dave Hodges-On March 27, 2017:
The nation of Saudi Arabia is facing a $6 billion lawsuit initiated by scores of American insurance companies which are attempting to hold thousands responsible for personal, business and property damage caused by the “terror” attack on September 11.
The joint lawsuit was filed in the US District Court in Manhattan this past week. The law suit is seeking to hold the artificially created kingdom accountable for the attacks which murdered 3,000 people and caused about $10 billion in property damage. The participating insurance companies (e.g. Liberty Mutual, Safeco, Wausau and many Lloyd’s of London syndicates) are attempting to hold Saudi Arabia for providing funding and other material support to al-Qaeda terrorists, who they said, carried out the attacks.
Further, personal lawsuits were also fired filed by surviving family members of about 800 attack victims, as well as the 1,500 injured first responder personnel who responded to the terrorist attack.
Smart As a Fox
During the campaign, and more than once, President Trump made offhanded references to 9/11 which indicated that he did not buy the official narrative. Rather than come out and state his opinions as the President, he is allowing the victim’s families of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia in American courts.
These law suits have the potential to expose some very powerful and influential people with regard to their potenial complicity and/or negligence for the events that transpired on 9/11.
If the hearings are open and honest, then I would respectfully request that all plantiffs seek answers to at least 20 questions. These 20 questions have nagged at me since I became aware that there were some very serious concerns about the events that transpired on the latest day of infamy in American history.
A Day That Will Live In Infamy
Pearl Harbor is often heralded as the most defining event in the 20th Century. The events surrounding the events of that fateful December 7th day have been meticulously investigated (e.g., battle tactics, leadership ineptitudes and conspiracy theories). Don’t the three thousand families of the victims of 9/11 deserve any less of an analysis? Apparently, the administrations of Bush and Obama did not think so.
Therefore, for the last 15 plus years, in the absence of full disclosure, the rank and file of the American people are left to conduct their own investigations. However, for many who have dared to question the official 911 Commission Report, they have been met with unyielding oppression which has often resulted in the researchers and skeptics being fired and publicly humiliated (e.g., Steve Jones).
I have serious doubts about the validity of the findings of the 9/11 Commission. The findings are neither complete nor completely believable in their present form. Here is a brief and partial summary of my continued unanswered questions related to 9/11 that I want answered.
It Is Time for Answers
1. Why was the video of the Mineta testimony removed from the 9/11 Commission website?
2. Why has not the government addressed the “coincidence” of Able Danger? It is a case of a terror drill providing plausible deniability for the terror act embedded within the drill.
3. What explains the failure of the Government to release the many videotapes of the plane, on approach, that struck the Pentagon? It is 15 years later, where are the tapes?
4. Why was there a change in the scramble/intercept procedure three months prior to 9/11 for jets that are off course accompanied by a change in the shoot down orders?
5. What can explain the failure of the government to scramble jets over a period of an hour and twenty eight minutes between the Twin Towers being struck and the crash in Pennsylvania? With this kind of air security, Somalia could successfully invade the United States.
6. How could the unrelated events of 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq be successfully linked which culminated in the demise of Saddam Hussein despite strong evidence to the contrary?
7. What explains the well documented (e.g., Kevin Phillips) Bush/Cheney plans to invade both Afghanistan and Iraq within the first 10 days of the Bush Administration. This was well in advance of 9/11. However, 9/11 was used as the excuse in the early days of our military action to justify these unwarranted invasion. Why wasn’t this contradiction investigated?
8. The well documented engineering and architectural arguments which, in my mind clearly demonstrate that the fire and heat generated by the planes striking the Twin Towers were insufficient to melt the core of the buildings. Why doesn’t this evidence support the 911 Commission findings? Why hasn’t a Congressional investigation looked into this striking discrepancy?
9. What could explain the almost near free-fall collapse of all three towers which defies the official explanation? Never before in the history of engineering and planes crashing into buildings has a building come down in such a free-fall and symmetrical manner?
10. Where are the pieces of plane wings that supposedly struck light poles on its approach to the Pentagon? Shouldn’t independent investigators be able to examine these wings to determine the authenticity of the 9/11 report on this topic. The trust me approach did not fly in 2001 and it damn sure doesn’t in 2013.
11. The attack upon the Pentagon appears to any layman who looks at this evidence to look more like a missile strike than an airplane crash. Why does the circumference of the hole in the Pentagon greatly differ from the width of the plane? Why is there an exit hole on the backside of the building since the plane melted upon impact? Where is the debris field that one would expect on the backside of the building?
12. What about the pop outs we see on each floor of the WTC buildings before the collapse? Howe could this not be considered to be a controlled demolition?
13. Where are the skid marks on the lawn prior to impact at the Pentagon that would have been left by the plane which supposedly struck the Pentagon?
14. What about the evidence which strongly suggests that 11 nations warned the United States about the possibility of such an attack?
15. Maintenance worker, William Rodriguez, was the last man out of the Twin Towers. At 8:46AM, Rodriguez reports that he heard two distinct explosions, seven seconds apart, which emanated from the floors below him. Rodriguez also reports the two explosions occurred before the planes hit the towers. Rodriguez was interviewed by the 911 Commission for 30 minutes, in secret, behind closed doors. His testimony is conspicuously absent from the 9/11 Report. So why did the last man out of the Towers manage to have testimony left out of the 9/11 Commission Report?
16. Former Brigham Young University professor, Steve Jones, concluded that super thermite was used to bring down the Towers, including Tower 7, through a controlled demolition. Jones contends that he was warned by governmental officials that if he published his results his personal “pain would be great.” And the warning proved prophetic as Jones was fired his job as a professor after publishing his results. How does a tenured university professor get fired for publishing legitimate research results when the peer review process could have been utilized to analyze and discredit the Jones’ claims?
17. Ground Zero rescue worker, Mike Bellone, claims he was approached by unknown FBI agents a short time after he and his partner, Nicholas DeMasi, a retired New York firefighter, found three of the four “black boxes” among the WTC rubble before January 2002. In the 9/11 Commission Report, Chapter 1, footnote 76, there is the sole but definitive reference to the airline “black boxes”: “The CVR’s and the FDR’s [voice and flight data recorders] from American 11 and United 175 were not found.” With this obvious contradiction, why weren’t these two rescue workers interviewed by the 911 Commission?
18. How could all four black boxes not be retrieved by the FBI when nearly ALL crashes through course of modern aviation history, do retrieve the black box?
19. When LBJ ordered JFK’s presidential limousine stripped and cleaned, he effectively destroyed the primary crime scene in the murder of JFK and implicated himself as a co-conspirator in the murder. In similar fashion, forty one truck loads of debris were hauled away from Twin Towers within hours of the crime and not one piece of the evidence was analyzed as part of the crime scene. This is obstruction of justice? Who ordered this illegal action to take place and why?
Both events are felonies as they clearly represent the tampering of a crime scene. Why didn’t the 911 Commission Report address the question as to why normal crime scene investigative techniques were not employed?
20. Much of the remaining crime scene evidence is still being held under lock and key at Hangar 17 at JFK Airport. Over 15 years later and with the ink dry on the 911 Commission’s findings, why isn’t the evidence made available to journalists and investigators? What is the government afraid of?
This list could go on to infinity. What unanswered questions do you have? Leave them in the comments section.
An earlier generation knew that the government was lying about JFK’s murder, but did little to force the truth out into the open. I refuse to capitulate to the same kind of arrogance and the possible underlying motives of key government agencies with regard to the events of 9/11. Until these twenty questions, and any other pertinent questions are answered, to the satisfaction of the victims grieving loved ones, I will never let go of this issue and neither should the citizens of this country. We have a solemn duty to the dead. And now we finally have a President who cares enough about the truth to allow these law suits to go through on US soil.
By the way, have you heard about this in the MSM? The Deep State is literally soiling their collective drawers in light of the Trump decision to all these law suits. However, I look for activist, Obama-appointed judges to strike down these suits because the truth cannot be allowed to come out because of how high this dastardly act actually reaches.
The following recent article revealed that a recent assignment in an international studies course at Iowa State University asked students to write a historical account of the ‘9/11 terrorist attacks from the perspective of Al-Qaeda’ and that a copy of the assignment statement was obtained by The College Fix, which stated, ‘Write a paper that gives a historical account of 911 from the perspective of the terrorist network. In other words, how might Al-Qaeda or a non-Western historian describe what happened,’ along with, ‘Don’t worry about the fact you don’t agree with the terrorists, the point of the exercise is to consider completely different perspectives.’ If True-What's wrong with this picture?-You Decide:
Students instructed to write essay on 9/11 from terrorists’ perspective!-Posted on The College Fix-By Nathan Rubbelke - Staff Reporter-On March 27, 2017:
A recent assignment in an international studies course at Iowa State University asked students to write a historical account of the 9/11 terrorist attacks from the perspective of Al-Qaeda.
“Write a paper that gives a historical account of 911 from the perspective of the terrorist network. In other words, how might Al-Qaeda or a non-Western historian describe what happened,” stated the assignment, a copy of which was obtained by The College Fix.
“Don’t worry about the fact you don’t agree with the terrorists, the point of the exercise is to consider completely different perspectives,” the assignment adds.
A university spokesman told The Fix the assignment doesn’t diminish the “tragic events” of 9/11 and equates the essay prompt to work undertaken by America’s diplomatic and intelligence agencies.
The assignment is part of an International Studies course taught by lecturer James Strohman, who’s taught multiple political science and public administration courses at Iowa State over the years.
The assignment aimed to view history from “different contexts.”
“Let’s focus on the 911 terrorist attack and how it might be interpreted differently by different people around the world,” the instructions read. “For this exercise, you have to ‘get out of the box’ of our thinking about what happened on 911 and view it from a completely different perspective.”
The assignment tells students this may be difficult to do, but that it’s an exercise examining the differences of people, cultures and historical perspectives.
Students were encouraged to use their imagination and make their papers as interesting as they’d like in the 500-word minimum assignment, and that there’s no correct answer, “just your ability to look at what we consider a heinous action from other perspectives.”
Strohman, a Democrat, former member of the Story County Board of Supervisors, and current member of the Iowa Employment Appeal Board, did not respond to The College Fix’s requests to discuss the pedagogical reasoning behind the assignment.
A university spokesman provided a statement on his behalf.
“As you can see, the assignment was in no way an attempt to diminish the tragic events of September 11, 2001. Nor was it designed to support the goals of Al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations,” said Rob Schweers, ISU’s director of communications, in an email to The College Fix.
Schweers added the assignment is simply an exercise in expanding critical thinking skills and analyzing international events through a “different lens.”
“This is similar to the vital work being performed in our nation’s diplomatic and intelligence operations, such as the Central Intelligence Agency, or the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research,” he said.
According to the course’s syllabus, the goals of the class include teaching students about globalization and “to develop a basic understanding of broad contemporary themes of the world. Among these are issues involving the environment, economies, technology, communication, socio-cultural change and conflict.”
Note: I believe that the following articles and videos from the recent past, along with my blogs, relate to and/or further support the above thought-provoking articles-You Decide:
Video: Saudi Arabia and 9/11: Give the American people the truth, Mr. Obama!-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Sean P. Carter, Jack Quinn and James P. Kreindler-On April 20, 2016:
Senate passes bill allowing 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia!-Posted on The Hill-By Jordain Carney-On May 17, 2016:
Why Terror Victims Should Sue Foreign Governments: ‘We must acknowledge the inability of our institutions to deal with the ideology behind terrorism’!-Posted on The American Conservative-By Kristofer L. Harrison-On February 23, 2017:
9/11 Families Say McCain, Graham change would “effectively gut” bill that allows lawsuits against Saudi Arabia!-Posted on GOPUSA-By Associated Press-On December 1, 2016:
Video: Expert: 9/11 False Flag Was The Greatest Crime Of The Century!-Posted on TheAlexJonesChannel-On August 21, 2014:
9/11 TRUTH SEEKERS: THE ‘LUNATIC FRINGE’ IS WHOM?-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On May 25, 2014:
Saudi Arabia Implicated In Bankrolling of Extremist Terrorist Movements Around The World!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 16, 2017:
New Evidence in The JFK Assassination!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 20, 2014:
America’s “Long War” against Humanity!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 30, 2014:
The following recent article revealed that, according to U.S. officials close to a heated debate inside the administration over the status of the global Islamist movement, ‘President Trump has, for the time being, put on the back burner an executive order designating the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization.’
It also revealed that, while the White House has declined to comment publicly, officials speaking on condition of anonymity say the administration backed down from a plan to designate the Brotherhood last month after an internal ‘State Department memo advised against it because of the movement’s loose-knit structure and far-flung political ties across the Middle East.’
Additionally, it revealed that the memo ‘explained that there’s not one monolithic Muslim Brotherhood,’ according to one of the officials, who told The Washington Times that while the movement may well be ‘tied to such bona fide terrorist groups as Hamas, its more legitimate political activities would complicate the terrorist designation process.’-You Decide:
Trump backs off Muslim Brotherhood’s designation as terrorist organization: ‘Legitimate political activity complicates designation’!-Posted on The Washington Times-By Guy Taylor, The Washington Times-On March 27, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that 'Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi' has met with President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama and that he has heard both men talk about the importance of defeating the Islamic State, however, al-Abadi said, on ‘Fox News Sunday’ that he noticed a big difference in how President Trump and Obama approached the important issue, while explaining that there was immense public pressure on the U.S. to help Iraq, by stating, ‘President Obama didn’t want to get involved in the first place. He just wanted to just forget Iraq,’ along with revealing that the Iraqi leader added that President Trump, on the other hand, seems to display a ‘very powerful determination to defeat ISIS.’ Surprised?-You Decide:
Iraqi Prime Minister Reveals Striking 'Difference' He Noticed Between Trump & Obama on Fighting ISIS!-Posted on Independent Journal Review-By Jason Howerton-On March 27, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that a ‘Christian college student has been suspended’ after allegedly challenging his ‘Muslim professor’s claims that Jesus wasn’t crucified and that his disciples did not think he was God.’ If True-What's wrong with picture?-You Decide:
Muslim professor insists Jesus wasn’t crucified, Christian student suspended after disagreeing!-Posted on BizPac Review-By BPR Wire-On March 28, 2017:
The following recent article revealed that the full email a now-suspended student sent a 'Muslim professor at Rollins College who had openly used her class time to undermine Christianity' by declaring 'the biblical and historical accounts of Jesus’ crucifixion were a hoax' has been released, along with revealing that it reveals that the student was critical of the professor, but that his only ‘threat’ was to ‘contact some national media personalities’ or ‘pursue legal options if you don’t stop your harassment toward me.’
It also revealed that the student, ‘Marshall Polston, 20, was ordered suspended March 24 by the Winter Park, Florida, school when his Middle Eastern humanities professor, Areej Zufari,’ claimed harassment, ‘although video surveillance obtained by a local paper suggests otherwise,’ the Washington Times said and that Polston apparently repeatedly had ‘challenged the Muslim’s claims that the Bible was false,’ but allegedly school officials claimed they never would suspend a student over such challenges, nevertheless they took action against Polston.
Additionally, it revealed that, according to the Orlando Sentinel, the ‘school president, Grant Cornwell, defended the professor’ and claimed that there were ‘other factors’ involved in the suspension, but refused to provide them. If True-What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:
Here's epic email suspended Christian sent Muslim prof: 'There's something seriously wrong and depraved about you'!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On March 29, 2017:
I believe that the above articles and videos relate to and/or further support my following blogs-You Decide:
Nazi Collaborator Soros Continues Multi-pronged War on Trump, Calls Him “Would-be Dictator”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 5, 2017:
Obama: Submit to Globalism or Face War, Death, Destruction!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 17, 2016:
The Left's Coming Counter-Attack!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 8, 2016:
CIA Assessment Concludes Putin Was Trying to Help Trump Win White House!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 10, 2016:
Russian Election Intervention Is Nothing New: ‘The Kremlin’s history of backing the losers’!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On December 14, 2016:
Not Since JFK, Has a President Spit Into the Face of the Globalists, Until Now!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 21, 2016:
Trump Will Declare the Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 16, 2016:
Saudi Arabia Implicated In Bankrolling of Extremist Terrorist Movements Around The World!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 16, 2017:
New Report Exposes Rockefeller Dynasty's Role in 'Climate Scam'!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 5, 2017:
Why Democrats Don’t Want To Make America Great Again!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 30, 2016:
Retired Head of the FBI Tells All about Illuminati, Satanism, Pedophile Rings in U.S. Government!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 23, 2016:
Attention Obama: Ft. Leavenworth is Calling You For Treason!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 10, 2017:
Vote Fraud – What They Aren’t Telling You!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 7, 2012:
Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 1)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 21, 2014:
Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 3)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On April 7, 2014:
Faith of Our Forefathers!-Posted on WordPress.com-On May 9, 2010:
Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY'! (Part 4)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On May 22, 2014:
Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 30, 2015:
Response from and to NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall (Re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 7, 2015:
Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 8, 2015:
Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 13, 2015:
Letter to our NM Governor Martinez (re: The Shadow Party’s alleged agenda to take down America)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On February 8, 2015:
The MSM conglomerates are the most prolific and insidious "fake news" propagators in the marketplace of ideas!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On November 30, 2016:
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog and/or videos, please copy website link and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide:
“Food For Thought”