The Front Page Cover
"I pray that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened"
.
Featuring:
nObama Laying Groundwork
For Capitulation To Iran On Anytime/Anywhere Inspections
Jeff Dunetz
.
"Know who you are standing with"
"Show me your friends and I'll show you your future"
~~~lll~~~
.
DEMS WILL PAY 2016 PRICE FOR IRAN
Vox: “Obama already has vowed to veto planned legislation blocking the deal. That means he will rely on just one-third of either the House or Senate voting with him to save it. He needs a majority of Democrats but only a minority of either chamber. That paradigm — Republicans uniformly opposed and Democrats divided — will make the agreement a tougher sell to the broader public than if it had bipartisan majority support or even full backing from Obama’s Democrats. ‘The easier vote for most us will be no,’ said one House Democrat who is inclined to back the president. Members don’t tend to lose their seats for voting against the president when his position ends up winning, the lawmaker explained.” -Fox News
Vox: “Obama already has vowed to veto planned legislation blocking the deal. That means he will rely on just one-third of either the House or Senate voting with him to save it. He needs a majority of Democrats but only a minority of either chamber. That paradigm — Republicans uniformly opposed and Democrats divided — will make the agreement a tougher sell to the broader public than if it had bipartisan majority support or even full backing from Obama’s Democrats. ‘The easier vote for most us will be no,’ said one House Democrat who is inclined to back the president. Members don’t tend to lose their seats for voting against the president when his position ends up winning, the lawmaker explained.” -Fox News
.
.
ANOTHER TAKES THE PLUNGE FOR FLORIDA SENATE
Miami Herald: “Carlos Lopez-Cantera, the former state lawmaker who rose from relative obscurity as Miami-Dade County property appraiser to become next-in-line to the Florida governor, will run for the U.S. Senate, casting himself as the heir to Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio. ‘I’m running because I want to work for you, to be a part of the solution, not part of the problem,’ Lopez-Cantera said Wednesday in a YouTube video released in advance of a scheduled announcement speech at 1:30 p.m. in the Miami-Dade suburb of Doral. -Fox News
Miami Herald: “Carlos Lopez-Cantera, the former state lawmaker who rose from relative obscurity as Miami-Dade County property appraiser to become next-in-line to the Florida governor, will run for the U.S. Senate, casting himself as the heir to Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio. ‘I’m running because I want to work for you, to be a part of the solution, not part of the problem,’ Lopez-Cantera said Wednesday in a YouTube video released in advance of a scheduled announcement speech at 1:30 p.m. in the Miami-Dade suburb of Doral. -Fox News
.
.
Forget Congress, nObama's Taking the Iran Deal to the UN
It took years to get other nations on board with sanctions against Iran, and Barack nObama has done his best to undo all that work — for nothing in return. Meanwhile, Congress tried to insert itself into the process, but all it got was an empty political victory. Congress now needs a two-thirds majority todisapprove of nObama's bad deal. But it might not even matter, as nObama could essentially skip Congress altogether. CNS News reports, "Despite a legal obligation to allow Congress to review the Iran nuclear agreement for 60 days, the nObama administration will press ahead with a U.N. Security Council resolution enshrining the deal, likely within days." According to Secretary of State hanoi John Kerry, implementation of the agreement will begin "within 90 days of the UN Security Council endorsing the deal." nObama has worked his deal, declared it's awesome, threatened to veto any congressional measure of disapproval, and wants to get on with securing the UN's seal of approval for his legacy-building enterprise. And yet he had the temerity to say, "I welcome a robust debate in Congress on this issue and I welcome scrutiny of the details of this agreement." As long as he can ignore the debate, that is. -The Patriot Post
.
.
Sanctuary Cities Shield Thousands of Felonious Illegal Immigrants
The recent murder of Kathryn Steinle by felon and serial-deportee Fransisco Sanchez in San Francisco elucidated a little-known policy that allows illegal aliens to skirt immigration enforcement measures. Cities like San Francisco that adopt such policies typically don't necessarily seek out undocumented immigrants, but they also don't enforce deportation, which yields the same result. And it's a much bigger problem than we're led to believe. Citing a 2014 government report provided under a Freedom of Information Act request, Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, drops this bombshell revelation: "State and local sanctuary policies caused the release of more than 8,000 criminal alien offenders sought by ICE for deportation in 276 jurisdictions around the country over an eight-month period [January 1, 2014, to August 31, 2014], according to ICE records obtained by the Center for Immigration Studies in a FOIA request. Sixty-three percent of the individuals freed by local authorities had prior criminal histories or were labeled a public safety concern at the time of their release. Nearly 1,900 of the released offenders subsequently were arrested for another crime within that eight-month period. ICE arrested approximately 750 of the recidivists, but just over 1,000 (60 percent) remained at large." These 8,000 criminal aliens — and thousands more since then — were allowed back onto our streets because one party cares more about votes than security. Americans like Kathryn Steinle shouldn't pay the ultimate price for Democrats' vote-buying schemes. -The Patriot Post
.
.
.
Gun Free Zones Are Shameful, Provide Terrorists With Targets
{rickwells.us} ~ Donald Trump joined Bill O’Reilly to discuss the Chattanooga Islamic Terrorist shooting and what can be done to better defend America against threats of this nature... Trump’s first question to O’Reilly is as to whether or not the offices in which the attacks took place were “gun free” zones, which O’Reilly learned during the break that they were. Trump faults a total lack of respect for America, our military and our law enforcement as being at the root of the problem, describing as “absolutely ridiculous” the policy of our Marines not being allowed to be armed and being reduced to unarmed targets as absolutely disgraceful. There is a need, according to Trump, for better intelligence, noting that the father of this shooter is himself a radical and that things like this don’t occur in a vacuum.
.
Marxist Mayors Join Pope Francis In Assault On American Freedom
{rickwells.us} ~ If anyone doubted the intentions of Pope Climate Fraud l aka Francis the Marxist Argentine, they need only look to the guest list of his upcoming workshop titled, “Modern Slavery and Climate Change... The Commitment of the Cities to recognize the blatant political motivations and objectives. The Vatican is joining with like-minded Marxist Democrats to force unconstitutional controls on the American people. Francis is clearly working to implement a global climate religion of Earth worship, though in the initial stages it will be sold as humanitarian and in keeping with the Bible. Marxism and Christianity are incompatible and this guy is clearly a Marxist. That’s a serious concern for Catholics when he minds his own business. It’s an emergency for all of us when he doesn’t. http://rickwells.us/ten-marxist-mayors-join-pope-francis-in-assault-on-american-freedom-lead-up-to-world-climate-government/
.
UN Aims to Trace the Transfer of All Guns and Ammo
{Joe Wolverton,II,J.D.} ~ The United Nations is waging a multi-pronged attack on the right to keep and bear arms and the forces of disarmament are marching to America... Recently, a board of “government experts” approved a report on the United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) to implement the group’s “Programme of Action on Small Arms and Light Weapons in All its Aspects (PoA).” They certainly weren’t exaggerating when they gave that title to the scheme. It certainly does cover “all aspects” of gun ownership. To get an idea of the trajectory the program will take, one needs only look at the list of the speakers called upon to discuss the disarmament deal’s progress.
.
Benghazi Connections – Privacy Lawsuit Containing Jeh Johnson...
{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~ Jill Kelly is a woman who became entangled in the General Petraeus / Paul Broadwell affair story which exploded immediately following the Benghazi attacks in 2012... The affair was used by the White House to remove the CIA Petraeus risk. Jill Kelly was threatened by Paula Broadwell during Broadwell’s affair with Petraeus. Once the affair was exposed, the media outed Jill Kelly as the original source to the FBI who uncovered the sordid affair. Kelly then filed a lawsuit against the FBI for releasing her identity to the public via the media. The source of that media leak was, in essence, traced to then pentagon attorney Jeh Johnson, who later became DHS Secretary.
.
IGNORANT VOTERS POISED TO CROWN HILLY
{Erik Rush} ~ There have been some pretty potent reactions in the alternative press to Judge Andrew Napolitano’s WND column of July 1, “Hilly’s secret war.”... In it, the judge analyzes a shocking interview with an international arms dealer that centers around the man’s dealings with the State Department under Hilly Clinton, as well as evidence in the same vein that has surfaced through other sources, Clinton’s destruction of emails covering that period and testimony she gave at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee in January of 2013. Napolitano is one of the first of his stature and background in the law to pull no punches pertaining to the former secretary of state’s criminality. Yet despite his usual unambiguous legal opinions – or judgments, if you will – written and broadcast, here he doesn’t provide any, instead leaving the reader to digest the weighty revelations. I could almost hear the Judge intone to his readers: You’re smart; you figure it out. What do we typically do with people who commit serial criminal offenses?
.
Document Exposes True Danger Of Terrifying Secret nObama Admin
{James Beattie} ~ More than 200 illegal immigrants were released from detention facilities in the state of Arizona between February and March of 2013. A significant portion of them were in custody for committing violent crimes... The conservative watchdog organization Judicial Watch announced in a press release concerning its successful Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Edward “Bud” Tuffly v U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), that almost 260 illegal immigrants were released from federal custody from February 22 through March 15, 2013. Judicial Watch filed the FOIA lawsuit in January after DHS did not respond to Tuffly’s request in November. Tuffly, a Tucson, Ariz., resident, sought the following information: http://www.westernjournalism.com/newly-released-document-exposes-true-danger-of-terrifying-secret-obama-admin-tried-to-hide/?utm_source=MailChimp&utm_medium=email&utm_content=featured-stories&utm_campaign=DailyEmail07.16.15
.
The Iran Nuclear Deal: Good and Bad News for Turkey
{Burak Bekdil} ~ Officially, Turkey has welcomed the nuclear deal that the P5+1 bloc (the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany) reached with Iran, and the lifting of sanctions on its eastern neighbor... Ankara said that the deal 1) will contribute to the stability and economy of the region; 2) will have a direct positive impact on Turkey; and 3) must be put into practice with full transparency. Ironically, such a warm welcome from Ankara put Turkey into the same line as its worst regional nemesis, the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad, who also welcomed the deal. "We are confident that the Islamic Republic of Iran will support, with greater drive, the just causes of nations, and work for peace and stability in the region and the world," Assad said in a message to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. http://www.meforum.org/5383/turkey-iran-nuclear-deal
.
Dem Strategist Calls Planned Parenthood Video 'Right Wing...
{Caleb Howe} ~ On The Kelly File on Wednesday evening, guests Robert Zimmerman and Dana Loesch were on to discuss the now infamous Planned Parenthood video featuring a top organization official discussing the sale of body parts... The segment quickly exploded when Democrat strategist and committee member Zimmerman characterized the sting video as "right wing pornography." Among his many claims were that the video had been edited to perpetrate "fraud", that the group who created the video hid the raw footage, and that that no media would take the video seriously. While he may be correct that most mainstream press will dutifully ignore this story per their democrat talking points guidelines, he was dead wrong on the rest of his assertions, a point radio and television host Dana Loesch of The Blaze made abundantly and vehemently clear.
.
Cruz Vows To Hold Authorization & Block State Depart Nominees If...
{Jeff Dunetz} ~ As reported here over the past few days, It was president nObama's intention to have the UN Security Council approve the removal of the sanctions per the schedule in the deal, as early as next week, prior Congress voting the deal up or down... On Thursday, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) sent a letter to the president warning him of his intention to hold reauthorizing legislation and block all nominees for the U.S. State Department unless the President provides written assurances that he will block any U.N. Security Council resolution approving the Iranian nuclear deal until the legislative timeline for Congressional review has run its course. At the same time Cruz was sending his letter U.N. Ambassador Rice was circulating a draft UN Security Council resolution was circulated by the United States yesterday. The resolution would nuclear agreement effectively lifting the sanctions imposed by the U.N. per the deal.. The resolution would facilitate any one of the P5+1 partners to to use their security council veto to reinstate sanctions against Iran if it is seen to be violating the deal.
.
The NGO Campaign to Destroy Israel
{Denis MacEoin} ~ The Western world is full of charities that do nothing but good, such as fight disease; help the less fortunate, or offer legal protection. But there are other sorts of charities, the so-called non-governmental organizations (NGOs); these often work on the international stage, supposedly for human rights, humanitarian aid, and peace... These NGOs are funded by foundations, businesses, private persons -- oh, and governments. They exist in astonishingly large numbers: 1.5 million in the US, 2 million in India, and thousands in Europe, over 500 of which are lobbyists in the European Parliament. The total income of OECD-linked NGOs amounts to around $16 billion. Unfortunately, some of these betray their love of humanity by adopting discriminatory policies. Many of these NGOs -- especially those heavily dependent on government money -- seem to be driven by an ideological or political commitment, and are inevitably drawn into political engagement. In a desire to help the underdog, wherever he may be, many NGOs make ideological choices as to whom they place in that category, and who falls into the category of "oppressor." This view often means that their good work may be used as "air cover" for people and actions that are less admirable. http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6123/israel-ngos
.
.
nObama Laying Groundwork
For Capitulation To Iran On Anytime/Anywhere Inspections
Jeff Dunetz
.
.
Most likely is there will be a “sort of” agreement, where the parties announce they’ve resolved all outstanding issues but they still have to fill in some details..This will enable the talks to meet the congressional deadline of July 9th. If a deal is announced by the 9th congress will get 30 days to analyze and vote on the pact. After the 9th they get 60 days..With the “sort of” scenario the P5+1 and Iranians would move in parallel to implement various commitments, the Iranians would have to work with the IAEA on its unresolved concerns regarding Iran’s weapons program (PMDs). By the winter time the IAEA would provide a face-saving way for the parties to declare Iran is cooperating (just like they did with the yellowcake conversion). This scenario would be very attractive to the nObama administration because it puts off granting Iran sanctions relief until the IAEA makes some noises about the Iranians cooperating, and after congress votes. nObama will tell Congress that “of course PMDs will be resolved before any sanctions relief is granted” and after Congress votes the lawmakers will have no leverage to stop the administration from caving..
Meanwhile the nObama administration and the supporters of its sellout are laying the groundwork for another U.S. collapse, this time on inspections. The signs are all there:
.
They have changed their verbiage, indicating they are going to break their promise of the most robust inspection/verification regime in history. During his April 2 announcement of the "framework agreement" President nObama said:
They have changed their verbiage, indicating they are going to break their promise of the most robust inspection/verification regime in history. During his April 2 announcement of the "framework agreement" President nObama said:
.
"Iran has also agreed to the most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history."
.
On May 2, White House spox Josh Earnest doubled down on nObama's statement made a month earlier:
On May 2, White House spox Josh Earnest doubled down on nObama's statement made a month earlier:
.
"What President nObama has indicated must be part of any nuclear agreement... is the most intrusive set of inspections that have ever been imposed on a country’s nuclear program"
.
But on July 1st White House supporter and Director of the Arms Control Association Daryl Kimball spoke to Politico and began to make an excuse for those inspections not happening-- Iran hasn't been defeated in a war:
But on July 1st White House supporter and Director of the Arms Control Association Daryl Kimball spoke to Politico and began to make an excuse for those inspections not happening-- Iran hasn't been defeated in a war:
.
"this particular agreement will establish the most extensive, multilayered system of nuclear monitoring and verification for any country not defeated in a war"
.
Monday Jofi Joseph, a former nonproliferation official in the nObama White House (until it was discovered he was trashing Hilly Clinton on twitter) told the LA Times that the Iranians can’t be expected to submit to anytime/anywhere inspections giving the same reason as Kimball:
Monday Jofi Joseph, a former nonproliferation official in the nObama White House (until it was discovered he was trashing Hilly Clinton on twitter) told the LA Times that the Iranians can’t be expected to submit to anytime/anywhere inspections giving the same reason as Kimball:
.
"What is forgotten is that Iraq was militarily defeated in a humiliating rout and had little choice but to accept anytime/anywhere inspections"
.
Since the beginning of the P5+1 negotiations began the nObama Administration promised Congress that Iran that Tehran would (and after April 2nd had already) accept anytime/anywhere inspections.
Since the beginning of the P5+1 negotiations began the nObama Administration promised Congress that Iran that Tehran would (and after April 2nd had already) accept anytime/anywhere inspections.
.
Many in Congress disagreed and urged the administration to boost American leverage by working with the Hill to pass time-triggered sanctions. The administration responded with two different media wars that included accusations including some by the president - describing lawmakers as warmongers beholden to donor, a nice way to make the charge of Jewish money. Now it looks like Congress was right and the administration was lying misstating the facts; Why would lawmakers now accept a weaker inspection regime than what the administration said it could secure. Actually its not all of congress its the Democrats needed to override a presidential veto and nObama and friends have already begun to warn them to accept any deal he comes up with.
Many in Congress disagreed and urged the administration to boost American leverage by working with the Hill to pass time-triggered sanctions. The administration responded with two different media wars that included accusations including some by the president - describing lawmakers as warmongers beholden to donor, a nice way to make the charge of Jewish money. Now it looks like Congress was right and the administration was lying misstating the facts; Why would lawmakers now accept a weaker inspection regime than what the administration said it could secure. Actually its not all of congress its the Democrats needed to override a presidential veto and nObama and friends have already begun to warn them to accept any deal he comes up with.
.
The new nObama talking point is that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has advanced technology which will compensate for the Administration collapsing on inspections. On Monday, two different progressive vehicles, The NY Times and The Daily Beast published geeky articles about the IAEA’s latest toys but the toys weren't the key part of each story. The NY Times piece had Energy Secretary Moniz explaining that the technology, "lowers the requirement for human inspectors going in"and Daryl Kimball telling the Daily Beast that the technology meant that the IAEA would be able to "detect nuclear activities without going directly into certain areas."
The new nObama talking point is that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has advanced technology which will compensate for the Administration collapsing on inspections. On Monday, two different progressive vehicles, The NY Times and The Daily Beast published geeky articles about the IAEA’s latest toys but the toys weren't the key part of each story. The NY Times piece had Energy Secretary Moniz explaining that the technology, "lowers the requirement for human inspectors going in"and Daryl Kimball telling the Daily Beast that the technology meant that the IAEA would be able to "detect nuclear activities without going directly into certain areas."
.
The argument is a lie misstatement and those scientists should be embarrassed they told falsehoods misstatements to protect nObama's bad deal. In the same story the New York Times quoted Olli Heinonen, a 27-year veteran of the IAEA who used to run their inspections operation.
The argument is a lie misstatement and those scientists should be embarrassed they told falsehoods misstatements to protect nObama's bad deal. In the same story the New York Times quoted Olli Heinonen, a 27-year veteran of the IAEA who used to run their inspections operation.
.
Mr. Heinonen, the onetime inspection chief, sounded a note of caution, saying it would be naïve to expect that the wave of technology could ensure Iran’s compliance with the nuclear deal. In the past, he said, Tehran has often promised much but delivered little..“Iran is not going to accept it easily,” he said, referring to the advanced surveillance. “We tried it for 10 years.”.Even if Tehran agrees to high-tech sleuthing, Mr. Heinonen added, that step will be “important but minor” compared with the intense monitoring that Western intelligence agencies must mount to see if Iran is racing ahead in covert facilities to build an atomic bomb.
.
The most fundamental problem by relying on technology is that the IAEA require physical environmental samples to confirm violations. They may be able to use futuristic lasers and satellites to detect that Iran is cheating. But to confirm the cheating they need environmental samples, and usually multiple rounds of samples. Without that level of proof which requires anytime access the agency simply wouldn't be able to tell the international community that it was certain Iran is violation.
The most fundamental problem by relying on technology is that the IAEA require physical environmental samples to confirm violations. They may be able to use futuristic lasers and satellites to detect that Iran is cheating. But to confirm the cheating they need environmental samples, and usually multiple rounds of samples. Without that level of proof which requires anytime access the agency simply wouldn't be able to tell the international community that it was certain Iran is violation.
.
Since breakout time is supposedly going to be the metric the president is using to evaluate any deal, then the words of the Washington Institute must be considered:
Since breakout time is supposedly going to be the metric the president is using to evaluate any deal, then the words of the Washington Institute must be considered:
.
Warning time could also be shortened if the IAEA is not allowed to fully exercise rigorous monitoring and verification procedures. These range from routine inspections to so-called "anytime, anyplace inspections" and full access to component manufacturing facilities, as well as efforts to follow the procurement of certain dual-use materials and equipment to confirm their end use.
.
And with out those anytime inspections the IAEA won't know where to point those lasers and satellites so the can detect the activity. Unless of course they are to trust Iran to tell them where to look.
And with out those anytime inspections the IAEA won't know where to point those lasers and satellites so the can detect the activity. Unless of course they are to trust Iran to tell them where to look.
.
But this is what President nObama is trying to tell us, "we folded on our promise of unprecedented anytime/anywhere inspections" but that's perfectly okay because the IAEA has cool toys. However unaffiliated scientists are telling us that technology cannot do the job without anytime/ anywhere inspections. Therefore the only thing that can be said about the administration's propaganda is that it's a prescription for a possible nuclear holocaust.
But this is what President nObama is trying to tell us, "we folded on our promise of unprecedented anytime/anywhere inspections" but that's perfectly okay because the IAEA has cool toys. However unaffiliated scientists are telling us that technology cannot do the job without anytime/ anywhere inspections. Therefore the only thing that can be said about the administration's propaganda is that it's a prescription for a possible nuclear holocaust.
.
Comments