Friday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Civil Service Needs a 
Refresher Course on Constitution
eACSvheACCv1VAwTJAFHUpEuV26yVwv8I2TWXCzh_RmchGekN56cSGGPQY3INNDQm2erimoB6I6HrLNP3Qmzd24o8mgLP4DzrUZsWrrzo2ClCMvCaJ4Zb3A4ZE5YbPuZ4j9sVx6nNKUvyJG5dfV47vwIhoFs07Tka9xIF5g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Harold Hutchiso  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Attempted Theft In Progress
v0X54plGq6renrTZW0MjPt2rGV8PgiAa9879h25nR4-LTd-nTp2kimcvWbXSexMa06O6yfHwGVPdfPg9nqfrw8NtZuNRr0huxpVZP1HzGwiDel_V68LlaVUOsbjoWbHRDV-Cngel2eajeusgsw0c0v09zfo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by William A. Jacobson
{ legalinsurrection.com } ~ I am now going to give you the least surprising announcement in the history of unsurprising announcements: by mid-December. They will not wait for courts to force additional witnesses”... In other news, thieves believe they have a right to steal. Make no mistake, the current impeachment push is attempted theft of the 2016 election. The people behind impeachment have been declaring their intention to impeach Trump since before he was elected, before he was sworn in, and ever since. Their tools have been a concerted effort to paralyze the executive branch until they could find something, anything to impeach; the mainstream media have been crucial, willing, and knowing participants in creating a permanent frenzied news cycle and hunting for the excuse. Poisonous characters in the highest echelons of the FBI played a central role. The excuses to steal the 2016 election have varied over time, and are completely pretextual: The ‘unfairness’ of the Electoral College; the Russia collusion hoax; the Mueller Inquisition; the Emoluments Clause; and the 25th Amendment delusion, among others. The result in House committees controlled by Democrats, and likely the full House vote, was preordained. The hearings have been a charade, the window dressing, with rank speculation, supposition, opinions, hurt feelings, and bureaucratic turf battles posing as evidence. The thieves disabled the alarm system by manipulating and selectively leaking closed-door testimony, and by refusing to allow Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee to call the witnesses they wanted to call during the public portion. It was a show trial manipulated by scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff with liar-Nancy Pelosi’s blessing. Jim Jordan had it right. Democrats have not accepted the outcome of the 2016 election. That’s what the past three years of impeachment fever have been about.This is straight up attempted theft. There’s no good faith.  There’s no honesty. There’s not even honor among thieves.
.
The Washington Post Helps Identify 
FBI Lawyer Who Altered FISA Docs
3eiM2Io7-n56VeXoY_o0cI749p7uOxKSkSjZCvFaRzSZfeq96kjSMrdPrkKI4KPlF4CtsUlX_VpqLi06VC7iRXZqwItk9ABP2ypicx6VrMgWXJsXiHO6FA--4sqQJbbo38lzHEKR-lnrYjq0ptxAJWQzED3ZIMQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ At 8:15pm last evening Washington Post journalist Devlin Barrett posted a supportive article for the CNN (Manu Raju) news exclusive that outlined an “FBI Official” who was under criminal investigation as an outcome of the inspector general review of FISA... The original WaPo article by Devlin Barrett noted the FBI official was actually a “line-level” lawyer who worked “under FBI Agent Peter Strzok.” At 12:15am, the WaPo article was significantly edited, two more journalists Ellen Nakashima and Matt Zapotosky were added to the byline.  Unfortunately, no explanation or notation of the changes were given. However, that said, the edits help to identify the identity of the FBI lawyer. The updated article removed the references to Peter Strzok, and identifies the line-level lawyer thus: […] The person under scrutiny is a low-level FBI lawyer who has since been forced out of the agency, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss material that has not yet been made public. The employee was forced out of the FBI after the incident was discovered, two U.S. officials said. Horowitz found that the employee erroneously indicated he had documentation to back up a claim he had made in discussions with the Justice Department about the factual basis for the application. He then altered an email to back up that erroneous claim, they said. If you have followed the case closely, the intentional removal of Peter Strzok in combination with the explanation of the lawyer’s FISA responsibilities; and in combination with prior reporting of FBI lawyer 2; it seems pretty obvious the line-level lawyer was Kevin Clinesmith...   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/22/the-washington-post-helps-identify-fbi-lawyer-who-altered-fisa-docs/ 
Lindsey Graham officially opens investigation 
into loose lips liar-Joe Biden, his son, 
and their dealings in Ukraine  
dxkTcOrxOSGJvDw27zb07P3UbBVCxeG_rx1gUZGynryjFctaxBWVYdsme_pZ26l0gIt5J9ao9QNIGLeF=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Carlos Garcia
{ theblaze.com } ~ Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) called on the State Department to provide documents related to the claims that loose lips liar-Joe Biden abused the office of vice president in his relations with Ukraine during the scumbag/liar-nObama administration... Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, made the request in a letter published on Thursday and tweeted about the probe. "Today, I sent a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo requesting documents related to contacts between: Vice President loose lips liar-Biden, Hunter Biden, other scumbag/liar-nObama administration officials and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko," he tweeted. The accusations center around suspicions that loose lips liar-Biden used his position as vice president to withhold support from Ukraine until they fired a prosecutor that was looking into corruption at the energy company Burisma. That company had also hired Hunter Biden, prompting many to wonder if loose lips liar-Biden was trying to help his son by abusing his office. "Why would you wanna fire the guy after he prosecuted the person you said was the dirtiest person in all of Ukraine?" said Graham to Sean Hannity about the probe. "I want to know are there any transcripts or readouts of the phone calls between the vice president and the president of the Ukraine in February, after the raid on the gas company president's house," he explained. "After this raid, Hunter Biden kicks in, Hunter Biden's law business partner meets with hanoi-John Kerry, and Vice President loose lips liar-Biden on three occasions makes a phone call to the President of Ukraine, and goes over there in March, and they fire the guy!" Graham added.
.
Fiona Hill Testifies that 
scumbag/liar-nObama Was Putin's Puppet
x2mJhtgWq87Boh4ryJuFHxQDmSRV6GMlWjPByT8AHZZv3r4tqMnxznfCBsJeqkXep_EvooA52Z_qOz4_bW_meM2t6SF2HTuFh_IK-8PA7BuMtgOD0DQG5PT4_7kNg24O9e-on1kG31bkkpWiy98N8nyivWyhu2-xd_jcvcu-QflE_3xq-X3qAIZztB1gGw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Tom Trinko
{ americanthinker.com } ~ While the fake news media are trying to convince you that Trump investigating the obvious and blatant corruption of the loose lips liar-Biden family in Ukraine is a crime, one of their witnesses declared that scumbag/liar-nObama danced to Putin's tune... Fiona Hill testified that scumbag/liar-nObama refused to give military aid to Ukraine despite the fact that the "interagency" — the unelected wonks like Vindman who think they not Trump should run foreign policy — said that the U.S. should provide weapons to Ukraine to defend themselves against the Russian invasion. Hill testified that scumbag/liar-Obama refused to provide lethal aid to Ukraine so as to not upset Putin. That's pretty clear evidence that scumbag/liar-nObama, not Trump, was in Putin's pocket. Hill's testimony also creates problems for the Democrats' impeachment narrative.  After all, the elite policy wonks said the U.S. should arm Ukraine to help defeat Russia's invasion, but scumbag/liar-nObama said he wouldn't because that would make Putin mad. Given that the Democrats are saying in the impeachment hearings that Trump temporarily not following the "guidance" of the interagency is an impeachable offense, clearly, scumbag/liar-nObama's permanent rejection of the interagency guidance must also be a crime. What Republicans are doing is using the impeachment farce to shine a light on the many failings of the Democrats that the fake news media will never cover, including how the Democrats, not Republicans, have always been on Russia's side. To see who was really putting America first, we can compare scumbag/liar-nObama's deference to Putin to Trump's actions that have gone directly against Putin's interest, such as provided weapons to Ukraine. Trump held the military aid up for a short time only because of his concerns about corruption and the fact the Europeans should be providing more aid to Ukraine. Unlike scumbag/liar-nObama Trump did what Putin didn't want done and what the interagency wanted done. But that's not the only evidence we have that scumbag/liar-nObama was dancing to Putin's tune...
.
Royal Navy Intends HMS Queen Elizabeth 
to be Integrated into U.S. Carrier Operations
_YYCJbHUU7dyhEaG7ZPPCQrhn8p_oh0zUZi5q2YzUdaONTx5761ILMqGHc5TidTwcnU2PGyRBu6zpbTP215KThvJYWlIYVtdgeU79OIuJGoB032_lxzK5KjCfhHlLlSVklXj-Rrv=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Ben Werner
{ news.usni.org } ~ The U.K. Royal Navy intends its largest, most advanced warship ever built to be considered interchangeable with U.S. Navy carriers, its top admiral said on Thursday... HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08) is indicative of both Great Britain’s return to carrier-based fixed-wing flight operations after a decade’s absence and the strength of its cross Atlantic partnership with the U.S., said Adm. Tony Radakin, the First Sea Lord and U.K. Chief of Naval Staff. Radakin was in Queen Elizabeth’s hangar bay addressing the second Atlantic Future Forum, while the ship was moored in the Chesapeake Bay just offshore of Annapolis, Md. “As she has demonstrated already, we can successfully field a combined U.S., U.K. carrier strike group,” Radakin said. “I look forward to this developing further, moving to the point where we are not only talking about interoperability, but we are looking for interchangeability. ”Queen Elizabeth can deploy with up to 36 F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters. The ship is wrapping up a series of exercises off the Atlantic Coast, in coordination with the U.S. military, he said. When Queen Elizabeth embarks on its first deployment in 2021, its airwing will include a mix of Royal Navy F-35B fighters and F-35B fighters from U.S. the “Wake Island Avengers” of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 211. The combined deployment, with U.S. Marine Corps fighters integrated into a U.K. carrier airwing, signifies the degree to which the two forces can operate with each other, Radakin said. The British designed Queen Elizabeth with F-35B operations in mind. Radakin said. The technological advances of the F-35B inspired much of the ship’s automation, Commodore Steve Moorhouse, Queen Elizabeth’s commanding officer, told members of the media before the forum started. “We’ve embraced technology, innovative solutions, management systems that allow us to reduce our manpower burden,”Moorhouse said...
https://news.usni.org/2019/11/21/royal-navy-intends-hms-queen-elizabeth-to-be-integrated-into-u-s-carrier-operations?utm_source=USNI+News&utm_campaign=1b194d1488-USNI_NEWS_DAILY&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0dd4a1450b-1b194d1488-231491269&mc_cid=1b194d1488&mc_eid=3999f18767   
.
Sweden: The Price of Migration
OlNS7KbzVEtBAFhOATqY6qbUmSRAjClJ3ZC6cfTnaZhjkABmAAAtmX_2XPZjKdBSiS8cK3TU5Lzz1ZM2ubZeYCpaIQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Judith Bergman
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ New figures from the European Union's statistical bureau, Eurostat, show that unemployment is rising in Sweden... According to Eurostat, unemployment there was 7.4% in August, whereas the EU average for August was 6.2 %. This leaves Sweden, on Eurostat's unemployment ranking of countries, at number 24 out of 28. According to the daily newspaper Expressen, one of the main reasons for Sweden's high unemployment happens to be the large number of immigrants that the country has taken in. As late as February 2019, Sweden's Minister of Justice and Migration, Morgan Johansson, mocked those who worried that migration would lead to mass unemployment: "Do you remember when the doomsayers were squawking that migration would lead to mass unemployment?," he tweeted. "Now: unemployment continues to fall among foreign-born and young people. For domestic-born it is at a record low". He cannot mock anyone now. In 2013, Social Democratic leader Stefan Löfven, who has been prime minister since 2014, said he would ensure that by 2020, Sweden would have the lowest unemployment in the EU. That is evidently not about to happen. The disproportionately large influx of people who do not have the educational or language skills to work in the Swedish economy was never likely to help bring about the lowest unemployment in the EU. As previously reported by Gatestone, the small Swedish city of Filipstad exemplifies a place where the influx of non-Western migrants, some of them illiterate, with little or no education, has meant that the unemployment rate in that group is at 80%: they depend for their livelihoods on the municipality's social welfare program. In 2015, during the European migration crisis, nearly 163,000 migrants arrived in Sweden seeking asylum -- primarily from Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq,  according to a recent report by the daily newspaper  Aftonbladet. Out of those 163,000 migrants, 60,000 received a residence permit. In the group of people over the age of 15, made up of 40,019 people, only 4,574 get their livelihood from employment, according to Aftonbladet's report. 18,405 people from the cohort live on welfare handed out by municipalities and 9,970 people receive funds for studying...   https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15081/sweden-migration-price 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Civil Service Needs a Refresher Course on Constitution
eACSvheACCv1VAwTJAFHUpEuV26yVwv8I2TWXCzh_RmchGekN56cSGGPQY3INNDQm2erimoB6I6HrLNP3Qmzd24o8mgLP4DzrUZsWrrzo2ClCMvCaJ4Zb3A4ZE5YbPuZ4j9sVx6nNKUvyJG5dfV47vwIhoFs07Tka9xIF5g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Harold Hutchison:  As the pubic impeachment proceedings go on, it seems more and more obvious that we have been right to express our concerns about the bureaucrats who have always remained over the years even as presidents, senators, and representatives have come and gone. In fact, this impeachment is coming down to a simple question: Who makes the decisions?

Much has been made in the hearing about the career servants from the State Department or DOD who don’t see eye-to-eye with President Donald Trump’s policies. The government does need experts in what goes on around the world — it’s too much for a president to take in, even with the cabinet. But that being said, these people may provide advice and information. They can recommend a course of action.

That is all fine and dandy — but the person who was elected to make the decisions is the president of the United States. As of January 20, 2017, that office is held by Donald Trump. Within the constraints of the checks and balances established by the Constitution, President Trump has a lot of room to maneuver on foreign policy. Whether it’s Syria, Yemen, North Korea, or even how to deal with NATO.

Now, we at The Patriot Post have debated these issues. We have debated Iran, Iraq, and the War on Terror. We have raised our concerns about whether we have followed the proper constitutional procedures for getting into conflicts. But these are issues for the president and Congress to resolve, NOT career bureaucrats or military personnel.

Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman forgot that. Vindman did receive the Purple Heart for being wounded in action, but based on the testimony he gave behind closed doors, he’s also crossed a huge line.

Put it this way, in 1951, General of the Army Douglas MacArthur was relieved of his command over his dispute with President Harry S Truman regarding how to fight the Korean War. Since then, there have been other cases. General Stanley McCrystal was forced out over comments by his staff that went public in a magazine article. Former Secretary of Defense James Mattis, a four-star general, was removed as CENTCOM commander by Barack scumbag/liar-nObama over the perception that he was too tough on Iran.

Each of these officers had careers that were far more distinguished than Vindman’s. Yet we’re supposed to defer to Vindman in his dispute over policy when MacArthur, Mattis, and McCrystal all had military careers end? We don’t think so — and we think that the very important principles of civilian control over the military and the primacy of elected officials over bureaucrats are at risk.

We had many disagreements with the scumbag/liar-nObama administration over some very poor policy decisions. Withdrawing from Iraq; halting programs like the Zumwalt, F-22, and Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle; the Iran nuclear deal; dismantling the enhanced interrogation program; and the “reset” with Russia were foolhardy, and that’s a mild description.

Foolhardy or not, though, scumbag/liar-nObama had the right to make those decisions by virtue of winning the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections. There were many who rightly criticized his foreign policy, and most of them make Syria and the Ukraine look minor. But if there had been even a tenth of the effort to form a “Resistance” to undermine scumbag/liar-nObama’s policies as there has been under Trump, it’s a very safe bet that the same media outlets and pundits celebrating people like Vindman and their efforts to undermine the foreign policy pursued by President Trump would be singing a different tune.

Which brings us to one other point we have mentioned before. America can survive a president with character flaws or who pursues bad policies. What America cannot survive is a sense that double standards are becoming enshrined. Right now, one party has been able to get away with Operation Fast and Furious, the IRS targeting the Tea Party, Wisconsin’s “John Doe” abuses, Operation Choke Point, efforts to use RICO against those who opposed the Left’s environmental policies, Spygate, and scumbag-Andrew Cuomo’s attacks on the NRA.

Americans who want accountability on the part of those bureaucrats will run out of patience at some point. Better for the bureaucrats to be brought in line now, before things get to a dangerous point.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66891?mailing_id=4672&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4672&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center