Lehigh Acres, FL


February 15

Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?


How did you hear about TeaParty.org?

Email forward from Friend

Is America a republic?

I DO Agree --For MANY Reasons, and BEFORE 11/6/12! More POWER to Sheriff JOE!! -- He's now best Hope (perhaps the ONLY one, since the RNC has NO BACKBONE) -no hope for a felony conviction/Obama, pre-November. BUT if Obama IS ON BALLOT -- Heaven Help Us! -The ACORN & New Black Panther (Via Sosos' money) are certain to Steal Election... Buggered Ballot Counts, etc., PLEASE ENCOURAGE Sheriff Joe ... To HURRY! --Earl Bage (r/w `page'), Lehigh Acres, FL (WWII Army Artillery Vet) -- In God We Trust --

Activity Feed

Earl A Bage commented on Jim Delaney's blog post Does 2nd Amendment Confer an Individual Right to Bear Arms?
"OLD SAYING-`Birds of A Feather --Flock Together'! --What's YOUR Flock??

Posted by Earl A Bage on January 31, 2013 at 4:43pm
View Blog 

For me personally I find this comparison to be very `Telling': i.e., [People who SUPPORT vs. OPPOSE ....Right…"
Jan 31, 2013
Earl A Bage posted a blog post
For me personally I find this comparison to be very `Telling': i.e., [People who SUPPORT vs. OPPOSE ....Right ofa  ountry's Citizens .... to Bear Arms] ,  for Instance:                                                  SUPPORTED -`Right to Bear…
Jan 31, 2013
Earl A Bage commented on Allen Toepfer's blog post Alinsky Tactics
"This article's author  seems to believe Alinsky's approach (the END  JUSTIFIES The MEANS!).--Where  Lies and Shameful distortions of Truth is not only `acceptable' as a tactic but `Urged' onto `Community  Organizers' ( with BHO and HRC being…"
May 12, 2012
Earl A Bage commented on Marcia Wood's blog post Obama Hates Senior Citizens
"Leonard! ....  Greetings! ...  please KNOW --I REALLY  Like your Attitude!  (Mostly, I suppose, because I  TOTALLY  AGREE, in principal.) Since I too am 87 Yrs. Young (b.2-15-25; rural MO dairy farm; WW-II Army Artillery-France&Germany, Mech.…"
Apr 28, 2012
Earl A Bage commented on Marcia Wood's blog post Obama Hates Senior Citizens
"To/For David Powers (His post about an hour ago): "You're  Right  ON  TARGET"  (so to speak)-"VeryWell Put" !  {If he hates Sr. Citizens, so  much, let's try to prevent his Becoming  One --Right!}
--Thanks,  Anvil Amos,  Florida"
Apr 24, 2012
Earl A Bage left a comment for Jane Buzzell
"Jane ... How REALLY G R E A T .... to see a message that you've Joined Tea Party!

And yours is the first indication that ANYONE might be reading & following the issue I had written about. You've Made My DAY! --Thanks, ....s/...Earl BAge"
Sep 19, 2010

Comment Wall

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center


  •  Ex Post Facto laws as they pertain to the 2nd Amendment was deduce or obfuscated during the Clinton administration, reason: The Lautenberg gun ban.

    See: http://www.civilrightstaskforce.info/id39.htm

    All “gun ban” “disqualified” that has been passed in 1968 to 1996 violates the rule of the law in the restriction clause:  One Constitutional mandate is in ''Article One, Section Nine, Paragraph, 3., which states, ”No bill of attainder, or ex post facto law shall be passed.'' Several cases involving bills of attainder have been adjudicated.  Two distinct meanings of the phrase 'bill of attainder' have been established, one being a bill of attainder proper, which is a law permitting the death of a person, without a trial.


    The other aspect of a bill of attainder is related to the aspect of the ''doctrine of pains and penalties.''  This type of mandate virtually strips or “disqualified” a citizen of rights, outlawing him, confiscating his property, and denying 'due process' under the law.  In the words of Frederic Bastia, bills of attainder are, ''laws that plunder, life, liberty and property.'' (See; ''The Law, Bastiat, Foundation for Economic Education, 1996.) Too many laws today violate the premise of liberal democracy, and fall into the destructive category of being acts of ‘legalism.’ The destructive force of legalism was recognized hundreds of years before America became a Republic. Gun ban and the 1968-1996 gun “ban” falls within this destructive force acts of “legalism” on the Bill of Rights.


    In Cummings v. Missouri (1867),  states "A bill of attainder, is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without judicial trial and includes any legislative act which takes away the life, liberty or property of a particular named or easily ascertainable person or group of persons because the legislature thinks them guilty of conduct which deserves punishment." (Cited in the USC, as defining cases.) This includes the despicable Lautenberg gun ban 1996. The growing corruption in the legislature, and judiciary reflect a trend to base all American law upon the tyranny of 'Legalism.'  The right of private property for the people to retain property above the right of the government to take it without permission has been systematically stripped from American rights. 


    Contact your Congressman and Senators
    No Summary
    Red Ribbon

    thanks for your comments Earl!

This reply was deleted.