double (31)
Sylvia Thompson
Sylvia Thompson
August 21, 2014
Where are the white residents of Ferguson, Missouri – people brandishing signs reading "Justice for Officer Darren Wilson "? There may be a need to bring whites in from other locations, as the blacks have done.
Whatever it takes, but white people had better begin to show force and fight back against the ongoing destruction of all that has been achieved in the racial arena in America. Gains made over many decades by many Americans, both black and white.
Conservative blacks cannot fight this fight for you. You must fight it.
Yes, I am black, descendant of slaves, reared under Jim Crow segregation, and all that minutiae, but I am also extremely tired of the "somebody else is the cause of my problems" mentality engrossing too many black people. A mentality that elitists Barack Obama and Eric Holder have preyed upon throughout their miserable careers.
Understand this, folks, if you glean nothing else from the madness going on in Missouri. Eric Holder is in Ferguson, at the behest of Obama, for the express purpose of subverting justice.
That is what these two despicable men do – subvert justice, so as to perpetuate divisiveness and hatred among blacks and whites. I am not a psychologist, but a good reader of human nature, and I detect that Holder's twisted ego is stroked mightily by all those non-elite blacks fawning over his presence.
The "activist" Attorney General is their savior; he will see that the white man suffers, guilty or not.
I recently caught a glimpse of Holder on TV working a group of blacks as if he were one of them. He is not. He is elite and privileged,(net worth 13 million) and these black masses mean nothing to him (or to Obama), other than in the furtherance of a leftist agenda.
If these agitators can be coaxed to the poll booths, they will vote Democrat.
Never mind that Obama and the Democrats are the reason for much of their economic and social woes.
I am becoming fed-up with the response (or lack thereof) that so many whites display in face of the criminal behavior of so many blacks. I have had it up to my brow with "political correctness" and "white guilt."
I am even becoming increasingly irritated by conservative spokespeople, such as Rush Limbaugh, who, although in satire, displays a defeatist attitude toward black racism.
Limbaugh will often say "You cannot say that..." or "We will never be absolved of guilt...," in what he characterizes as satire. I understand what he is doing, but I sense that as a white person, he may use this tactic out of fear. Genuine fear of taking on the racists.
Or perhaps fear that without satire he might provoke real action on the part of his millions of listeners, and he does not want that responsibility.
I am unclear about his motives, but I do know that it is time for oppositional clarity, not satire.
Circumstances are much more dire since Obama was foolishly placed into the Presidency and Congress foolishly accepted his nomination of Eric Holder for Attorney General. These two men are leading the destruction of this nation, and that reality is dead serious.
All conservative spokespeople and people in positions of leadership should be rallying Americans to fight these men.
When blacks begin tearing down a city (any city), whites should be supportive of the police (in their full, military hand-me-down gear), encouraging them to overrun, apprehend, and detain everybody on the street.
And for those committing crimes, treat them as criminals and stop the crime. If that means killing people, so be it. That is the way the police would treat a mob of marauding whites.
Safety of the police force should be paramount.
Ignoring the bad-asses and criminals (because of perceived grievances) has done nothing but terrorize decent citizens of all races in large inner cities. That lunacy must stop.
Policing is a dangerous occupation and given the police officer's task of confronting crime and protecting the rest of us from criminals, sometimes violence and killing is necessary.
I will give any cop the benefit of the doubt over any suspected crook, whatever his color, until I am given evidence to think otherwise.
It behooves the rest of America to do the same. Or, I say police should refuse to work in areas where they are put upon by small-minded politicos, such as the Democrat governor of Missouri, Jay Nixon, and race-mongering law officials like Eric Holder.
Police officers have unions; they should demand that bosses support the boycotting of hell-holes such as Ferguson, if they are to be demeaned.
One final note, ignore the libertarian scare mongering about "militarized police." Libertarians tend to be elites who live nowhere near inner-city communities. They are more likely to be in gated facilities or areas so financially set that crime is something they experience only in the news.
They have the luxury of whining about how the police are equipped; the rest of us just want them equipped at their best, and armed to the teeth.
Sylvia Thompson is a black conservative writer whose aim is to counter the liberal spin on issues pertaining to race and culture.
Ms. Thompson is a copy editor by trade currently residing in Tennessee. She formerly wrote for the Conservative Forum of Silicon Valley California Newsletter and the online conservative blog ChronWatch, also out of California.
She grew up in Southeast Texas during the waning years of Jim Crow-era legalized segregation, and she concludes that race relations in America will never improve, nor will we ever elevate our culture, as long as there are victims to be pandered to and villains to be vilified. America is better served without victims or villains.
© Copyright 2014 by Sylvia Thompson
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/sthompson/140821
aa
Hello. Don't recognize me? That's OK, I understand. My name was Antonio West. I was the 13-month old child who was shot in the face at point blank range by two black teens who were attempting to rob my mother, who was also shot. I think my murder and my mommy's wounding made the news for maybe a day, and then disappeared.
A Grand Jury of my mommy's peers from Brunswick, Georgia ruled the black teens who murdered me will not face the death penalty. Too bad it was me who got the death sentence from my killers instead, because Mommy didn't have the money they demanded.
See, my family made the mistake of being white in a 73% non-white neighborhood, but my murder wasn't ruled a "hate crime." Oh, and President Obama didn't take a single moment to acknowledge my murder. He couldn't have any children who could possibly look like me, so why should he care? I'm one of the youngest murder victims in our great Nation's history, but the media didn't care to cover the story of my being killed in cold blood
There isn't a white equivalent of Al Sharpton, because, if there was, he would be branded a "racist." So no one's rushing to Brunswick, Georgia to demonstrate and demand "justice" for me. There's no White Panther party, either, to put a bounty on the lives of the two black teens who murdered me. I have no voice, I have no representation and, unlike those who shot me in the face while I sat innocently in my stroller, I no longer have my life.
Isn't this a great country? So while you're out seeking justice for Trayvon or Michael Brown, please remember to seek justice for me. Tell your friends about me, tell your families, get tee-shirts with my face on them, and make the world pay attention, just like you did for Trayvon and Michael Brown. I won't hold my breath. I don't have to anymore.
How have we the USA become such a regulation nation? Why is it that “We the People” cannot make our own decisions? Let me explain, if you will.
When Obama ran for the Presidency, he promised a lot for the citizens of this nation. However, he soon learned this was not how he wanted to RULE. He was and still is ruling his way. Whether he makes a good or bad decision, it is to be followed one hundred percent. Moreover, Congress goes along with it instead of trying to put an end to his dictatorship.
Congress' jobs from Wikipedia, the Constitution grants each chamber some unique powers. The Senate ratifies treaties and approves presidential appointments while the House initiates revenue-raising bills. The House initiates impeachment cases, while the Senate decides impeachment cases.[1] A two-thirds vote of the Senate is required before an impeached person can be forcibly removed from office. Congress needs to be accountable for not following the Constitution or doing the will of the people!
Of course, whenever the citizens squawk about how the President or Congress is doing and the unnecessary regulations, Obama and Congress go into excuse mode, using racism. Some of the media agree with their accusations of racism, too.
However, when an African American speaks the same way towards White Americans it isn't racismand goes unchallenged. At least Congress or the national media never stand up against it nor voice their anger over such atrocities. The same goes with the young blacks who beat up and/or kill, (a male veteran in his eighties), white people of any nationality. the President, Congress, and many well-known African Americans never condemn this. Does this sound like double standards to you?
What I am trying to explain is that “WE The People” need to stop bellyaching; all citizens need to stand up against the wrongs done by our governments and to each other. How? We need to vote, rally, tell our representatives enough is enough and see that our land. As for Congress and the President, (future President, too), they must follow the Constitution and treat every citizen equally or YOU ARE FIRED!
Ida Temple Mansfield Tea Party Mansfield PA
This is the 2nd in a series of blogs about Immigration
Here is a link to the first one
http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/to-the-gang-of-8-immigration-and-all-americans
This blog addresses ONLY the element of Border Protection from "the Bill" ( check links below to access the Bill 113 S.744))
= = = = = = = =
About the 2013 Immigration Act
The Gang of 8 has released their proposed “Comprehensive” Immigration Act
Firstly, who are the Gang of 8?
- Michael Bennet (D-CO)
- Chuck Schumer (D- NY)
- Dick Durbin ( D – IL)
- Bob Menendez ( D – NJ
- John McCain ( R- AZ)
- Jeff Flake ( R- AZ)
- Marco Rubio ( R- FL)
- Lindsay Graham ( R- SC)
Here are some reference links
http://blog.heritage.org/2013/04/18/morning-bell-jim-demint-on-the-senates-immigration-plan/
And some correspondence from an unnamed Senator to a Constitutent.
This excerpt is limited to Border Protection.
It demonstrates the ambiguous language Senators use to “try to slide by”
My comments illustrate the ambiguities.
Hopefully my suggestions make more sense…………let me know
= = = =
Dear Mr. xxxyyy
Thank you for sharing your concerns about immigration reform. No matter how anyone feels about this issue, we all can agree the system we have is broken--and it needs to be fixed.
But if we try to deport the 11 million people who are working in this country with undocumented status, it would devastate our economy.
[[ME...]]] Says WHO?...... What about the TRILLIONS we will save in ILLEGAL Federal Benefits?......... That statement is typical Wash BS ---- pure UNSUPPORTED bull feces!
……………
Their plan for immigration reform has a number of key elements, the first of which is that there is going to have to be real border security. It's hard to patrol a border of thousands of miles, particularly where people can merely walk across. But it has to be done in the context of overall immigration reform.
[[ME...]]] Context of overall immigration reform is more forked-tongue Wash double speak.
The Senator does NOT reveal that the Bill treats Border Security as a “Ho-Hum” 5 year experiment with provision for an “After-Study” IF it is declared a failure.
The Bill creates a “ GOAL”…. A GOAL that has to run for 5 years before being evaluated. THEN, if the GOAL has not been met, a Commission to Study the problem is created.
How about this Mr. Politician……
- Put all benefits on hold immediately ( benefits and the Bill is another whole story)….
- a diversion ….about Benefits
- An individual who has been granted RPI status is not eligible for any Federal means-tested public benefit (as such term is defined in section 403 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1613)).
- …. Should also include “ALL OTHER PUBLIC BENEFIT” too
- Better …………Do the study first…. 9 months should be plenty
- Define the resources needed …. At least for the GOAL, but more for ADEQUATE Border Protection
- I defined ADEQUATE for Ms. Napolitano as :
- When INFLUX of illegals is LESS than EFFLUX….. or simply
When MORE are LEAVING than are Coming IN
[[ME...]]] Then…. Get it implemented within the next 12 months, with weekly “effectiveness” reports
...................
We also need to have an effective way for employers to verify whether the people they hire are eligible to work here. This also has to be part of any immigration reform.
…………..separate issue……….more later…………
