ADMIN

9702758495?profile=RESIZE_584x

After obtaining over 500 pages of internal documents from the DC Metropolitan Police, Judicial Watch has found that they believe the shooting of Ashli Babbitt, who inside the Capitol during the riot on January 6, was unjustified.

In May, Judicial Watch filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act to obtain more than 500 pages of internal documents from the DC Metropolitan Police regarding the killing of Ashli Babbitt.

In the report, eyewitness testimony from a Capitol Police sergeant, whose name was redacted, suggests that while Babbitt did in fact climb through a broken window to enter the Capitol building, she was not carrying a weapon when she was shot by Capitol Police officer Lt. Michael Byrd.

"Sergeant [redacted] observed a white, female protester was climbing through an opened area where the glass pane had been knocked out," a document from the Internal Affairs Division states.  

"He heard a gunshot and this female fell backwards through the opening. The crowd on the other side of the barricaded east doors, began to step back and some put their hands in the air. Sergeant [redacted] observed Lieutenant Byrd step back just after hearing the gunshot. He did not see anything in the female protester's hands prior to the gunshot."

The documents obtained by Judicial Watch also reveal that Lieutenant Byrd was "visibly upset" after the incident.

According to Fox News, president of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton said that, "These previously secret records show there was no good reason to shoot and kill Ashli Babbitt," adding that, "The Biden-Garland Justice Department and the Pelosi Congress have much to answer for the over the mishandling and cover-up of this scandalous killing of an American citizen by the U.S. Capitol Police."

read more here: https://thepostmillennial.com/internal-police-docs-no-good-reason-babbitt/

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Really, it takes 10 months to decide what we all knew then?

This reply was deleted.