TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Dems Coalescing Around Second 
Amendment Elimination 
by Jordan Candler
.
Goldman Globalist Gary COHN QUITS 
TRUMP Admin Over “America First” 
{ rickwells.us } ~ Globalist Democrat and former head of Goldman Sachs, Gary Cohn... has announced his resignation as head of the National Economic Council and from the Trump administration. The move has been rumored for months with it intensifying with the announcement last week by President Trump of new tariffs on steel and aluminum. Unable to arm-twist Trump into a reversal, Cohn opted to leave. For those who doubted where Cohn’s loyalties lie, this should be clear evidence that he was in the position more to manipulate things in order to better the bottom line for his investments and those of his cronies than to put the interests of the American middle class at the forefront. President Trump sided with the American workers, putting our jobs and economy first, which frustrated Cohn and led to his decision to exit. President Trump also recognized the importance of our ability to manufacture both steel and aluminum domestically to our national defense. The US has been allowing the unfair trade practices to be used against our own industry, lowering prices to levels which we simply cannot compete against. Now our native steel and aluminum industries can once again compete and thrive... https://rickwells.us/goldman-globalist-cohn-quits/
.
Gowdy, Goodlatte demand appointment
of special counsel, citing FISA abuses
by Brooke Singman
{ oxnews.com } ~ House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and Rep. Trey Gowdy on Tuesday demanded the appointment of a special counsel to investigate... “conflicts of interest” and decisions “made and not made” by current and former Justice Department officials in 2016 and 2017, noting that “the public interest requires” the action. Gowdy, R-S.C., and Goodlatte, R-Va., penned a letter Tuesday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. “Matters have arisen—both recently and otherwise—which necessitate the appointment of a Special Counsel. We do not make this observation and attendant request lightly,” Gowdy and Goodlatte wrote. In an exclusive interview with Fox News, Gowdy and Goodlatte spoke about the discovery of new information as their reasoning behind calling for a second independent counsel...  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/06/gowdy-goodlatte-demand-a...
.
NAPOLITANO – MUELLER RAMPING UP
Targeting of Trump – Nunberg List 
of Names Is PROOF 
rickwells.us } ~ Judge Andrew Napolitano gives his take on the ten person hit list of Robert Mueller... which includes President Trump, which was made public by Sam Nunberg yesterday, and the implications that it holds for those persons listed. It’s not good news. Napolitano incorrectly says that Nunberg was stating that he didn’t want to sit in front of a grand jury and testify about emails that the Grand Inquisitor Mueller is already in possession of. He may have inside information that the emails are already in Mueller’s files, but that is not what Nunberg was saying. Nunberg said repeatedly that he didn’t want to spend 50, 80, 30 hours sorting through emails and complaining about releasing personal exchanges between himself and Steve Bannon as well as Roger Stone. Napolitano says the consequences for non-compliance are incarceration for the life of the grand jury, which could continue through the end of a second Trump term and is already funded through 2019... https://rickwells.us/napolitano-mueller-ramping-trump/
.
The Senate Should Stop Stalling and End 
U.S. Funding for Palestinian Terror

mosaicmagazine.com } ~ In December, the House of Representatives passed the Taylor Force Act, which would withhold aid from the Palestinian Authority (PA)... 
until it ends payments to terrorists and their families and takes steps to discourage terror. The Senate, however, is holding up the bill. Michael Barbero, Sander Gerber, and Michael Makovskyurge senators to prioritize its passage: As soon as a terrorist is arrested, the PA provides him with a salary and, sometimes, a guaranteed government job upon release. The bloodier the crime and longer the sentence, the greater the reward. . . . The families of, as official Palestinian documents put it, “those martyred and wounded as a result of being participants or bystanders in the revolution” . . . also receive a monthly payment, health insurance, and tuition assistance. . . . In 2017, the Palestinian Authority budgeted $350 million to reward terrorism—around $160 million for jailed and released terrorists plus $190 million for terrorists’ families. This is roughly what American taxpayers contribute to Palestinians through payment of PA debts and direct support of projects in PA territories excluding several hundred-million dollars to the United Nations Reliefs and Works Agency... What the heck is wrong with the senate.   https://mosaicmagazine.com/picks/2018/03/the-senate-should-stop-sta... 
.
 
NYT’s Nat Sec. Reporter: Trump Deserves “Enormous Credit” For North Korea Breakthrough
.
North Korea Says It’s Open To Denuclearization Talks With US 
.
FBI’s Peter Strzok Knew Of Possible Breaches Of liar-Clinton’s Server: Did Nothing
.
Dana Loesch: Disgraced Sheriff Israel Won’t Release Tapes
.
Still No Evidence Of Collusion
.
Illegal Immigrant Stole $361,000 From Welfare In California
.
Netanyahu’s Speech @ 2018 AIPAC Conference ‘We MUST Stop Iran’
.
.

Dems Coalescing Around Second Amendment Elimination 

by Jordan Candler:  Democrats are so perturbed by the Second Amendment that they are resorting to the distribution of fraudulent data. For example, during a recent congressional meeting with President Donald Trump, Sen. Dianne Fein-stein (D-CA) presented findings from professor Louis Klarevas, whose analysis points to a homicide-through-mass-shooting reduction rate of 37% between 1994 and 2004 — when the 10-year Federal Assault Weapons Ban Fein-stein championed was in effect. Even if we ignore the reality that this claim is an extreme outlier — it has virtually no peer backing — there are still some major issues with Klarevas’ assessment. According to Ars Technica co-founder Jon Stokes:
          There are few actual “assault weapons” of any type in his dataset, either pre- or post-ban. Klarevas and his allies are taking an apparent drop in fatalities from what are mostly handgun shootings  (again, pre-ban as well as post) and attributing this lowered body count to the 1994 legislation. … Had Klarevas chosen a “mass shooting” threshold of five fatalities instead of six, then the dramatic pause he notes in mass shootings between 1994 to 1999 would disappear too.“

          Columnist Burt Prelutsky makes a cogent point when he observed, "Those on the Left seem to view all murders through a prism of their propaganda value.” There is no better example than the Left’s demonization of so-called “assault weapons.” Back to Stokes’ point about handguns, they are the primary tool by which homicides are inflicted. According to the FBI’s Crime in the United States data, “Handguns comprised 64.6 percent of the firearms used in murder and nonnegligent manslaughter incidents in 2016.
          More precisely, of the 11,004 homicides by firearm that year, 7,105 involved a handgun, whereas just 374 — or 0.03% — involved a rifle of any type. You read that right. In fact, the number of homicides committed with rifles is outpaced by “blunt objects,” which accounted for 472 murders in 2016. The bottom line? Rifles unfairly get most of the flak despite criminals’ relatively rare use of them.
          Nevertheless, Democrats are increasingly belligerently opposed to citizens possessing rifles. According to The Hill, “Democratic senators seen as possible contenders for the White House in 2020 are all taking positions in strong support of an assault weapons ban, pressuring their colleagues up for reelection this year.” Those names include Elizabeth dinky-Warren (MA), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), Kamala Harris (CA), Cory Booker (NJ), Amy Klobuchar (MN) and Chris Murphy (CT).
          The piece adds: “Support for the ban on assault weapons has grown among Democrats over the last 11 years. In 2007, 67 Democrats supported a ban. That number continued to grow in 2013 with 83 Democrats co-sponsoring legislation. The number grew to 149 in 2015 before settling on 167 co-sponsors this year.” Alarmingly, the Democrats’ true vexation actually runs even deeper than that. At the national level, a new poll finds that the complete elimination of the Second Amendment has the support of one-third of the Democrat Party and almost one-quarter of all Americans.
          Clearly, the party is moving further left — to the point that they think this is a winning campaign issue.
          Regarding Democrats, Prelutsky writes, “If they thought they could get more mileage out of church shootings, the endless homicides in Baltimore or the attack on the Republican congressmen at the baseball field in Virginia, they would focus on those crimes. But they realize they can better utilize school shootings emotionally because of the age of the victims.” To accomplish gun control, leftists are citing bogus evidence and carefully choosing which tragedies to exploit. Another ban on semiautomatic rifles with certain cosmetic features wouldn’t just fail like the first one did; it would also be a gateway to broader restrictions on and the eventual elimination of the Second Amendment.
          J
ames Madison said, “Power is of an encroaching nature.” The Left’s encroachment on the Second Amendment is Exhibit A. Leftists won’t stop until guns are completely outlawed. To prevent it, constitutionalists need to be effective in opposing lies, damned lies and statistics.    ~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/54539-dems-coalescing-around-second...

Views: 26

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

 Kavanaugh Accuser Donated   To Hillary Clinton  10 Times,  60+ Liberal Groups 

Reportedly attempted to conceal political activity by scrubbing social media accounts

Over the weekend, a name and face were added to the previously anonymous sexual assault allegation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, which is now threatening to derail his nomination. Those looking to obstruct Kavanaugh’s confirmation certainly saved their best for last, as the prior attempts included pathetic stunts such as:

– Claiming to file perjury charges against Kavanaugh, which only Jeff Sessions would have the ability to file.

– Packing the hearings with hysterical protesters, resulting in hundreds of arrests.

– Threatening female Republicans with extortion.

– Cory Booker comparing himself to Spartacus, the escaped slave who led a revolt against the Romans.

The identity of the accuser was revealed as Christine Blasey Ford, who has agreed testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Ford reportedly made the allegations back in July in a letter to Senator Dianne Feinstein, and Feinstein waited until it was close to the vote to confirm Kavanaugh before making the accusations public.

There’s a record of Ford making the accusation in a 2012 therapy session, though Kavanaugh isn’t named in the session notes that Ford gave to the press. Ford alleges that in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh entered a room drunk, pinned her to a bed, and groped her over her clothing. Kavanaugh “categorically denied” the allegations.View image on Twitter

Fin Gomez @finnygo   NEW: Statement from Judge Brett Kavanaugh:

There is a slight discrepancy in the account Ford provided in her letter to Feinstein and in her therapist’s notes, but that could simply be due to an error on her therapists part.

There are however some other questions that need to be answered which call into question Ford’s motives.

As Grabien reported, they include:

1. Why Ford deleted her public social media accounts before revealing herself.

Ford deleted all of her public social media before she came forward, making it difficult to see the advocacy and partisanship she was engaged in the time leading up to her making her allegation public. Of course, Ford may simply value her privacy, but the act of deleting her public postings will inevitably make some wonder what she didn’t want seen.

2. That Ford may have an unrelated grudge against Kavanaugh, as his mother, once a circuit court judge, ruled against Ford’s parents.

In August 1996, Christine Blasey Ford’s parents, Paula and Ralph Blasey, were foreclosed upon. Kavanaugh’s mom, Martha, was then serving as a judge on the Montgomery Country Circuit Court, and she ruled against Christine Ford’s parents.

3. That Ford is a Democrat who donates to left-wing causes, attended the anti-Trump March for Science, and previously signed an open letter challenging Trump’s border policy.

Ford is a political activist who has made dozens of donations to left-wing causes. According to OpenSecrets, she has made more than 60 donations to liberal causes, with almost four dozen to the pro-abortion group, Emily’s List, alone. Ford also donated to the DNC, Hillary Clinton (more than 10 times), Bernie Sanders, and the progressive organizing group ActBlue.

Ford likewise attended the anti-Trump March for Science, where she wore a hat knitted like a human brain, but inspired by the feminist “pussy hats” worn at the Women’s Marches. Ford also added her name to an open letter from health professionals who argued the U.S. border policy resulting in temporary separation of some families was harmful to children’s development.

There’s no statute of limitations on sexual assault in Maryland, where she claims that the assault happened. Rather than go to the police, Ford went to Dianne Feinstein. If her accusations are true, she should immediately file a police report against Kavanaugh and take him to trial. If she doesn’t, perhaps that’s because she knows the consequences of filing a false police report.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service