Wednesday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Fein-stein Wants to Ban All 'Assault 
Weapons,' GOP Aims at Reciprocity
o96wPSK4_V2T9CcQoGsgy_pXBBgT_T9dfUWDQdn-9LMk4W8d3PKHtg6PPFVTEicgz0cF-P-A1-NAw5X4l8s-H4Uy4CMe-0kQ8IPEzH-P39bZlTx9zBCK9TFB4rXUm01BeXwU-w9EYmj0eg1DZeZKWgGpdo3sVPeGJFdEQB0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Thomas Gallatin  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The FBI Prostituted Itself
K-pq9oAknfHbRnE4-EA8J_jGowKmHbcXgj678ocg7JhtceUnk3AFVSYBgAOxZaOK4OtohufpUuUP_4DfeEZ_Uq38SH5AoBVWWDJGLGhpEvP119FG-8_3H6Z0brriZqAd-xF84vIfOeL_u_MQha2dCO5Kpc7emLb1sCc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby GEORGE PARRY
{spectator.org} ~ Citing unnamed “former law enforcement sources and others,” the New York Times reports that “in the days after President Trump fired scumbag-James B. Comey as F.B.I. director... law enforcement officials became so concerned by the president’s behavior that they began investigating whether he had been working on behalf of Russia against American interests.” The mainstream media has touted this story as major breaking news. But, to anyone who has been paying even a modicum of attention, it is crystal clear that scumbag-Comey’s firing did not precipitate the FBI’s investigation of Trump. To the contrary, the readily available record facts demonstrate that scumbag-Comey’s FBI began investigating Trump and his campaign for possible Russian collusion shortly after he won the Republican Party’s nomination. Even though the Times would have us believe that the FBI investigated Trump out of a legitimate concern for national security, those same facts prove that, in launching and directing the investigation, the leadership of scumbag-Comey’s FBI was engaging in partisan presidential politics to further their own selfish interests. Here’s why. Recall that scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton was supposed to win the 2016 presidential election. All of the pols, polls, and pundits agreed on that point. She was a lock for the White House. Nevertheless, scumbag/liar-Clinton faced a number of politically sticky issues. Most prominent of these was her use as Secretary of State of an unsecure private email server to transact official business...  https://spectator.org/the-fbi-prostituted-itself/?utm_source=Daily+Afternoon+Email&utm_campaign=49f81648ad-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_01_15_09_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d65fc4e11e-49f81648ad-104762253
.
Barr vows independence: 'I will 
not be bullied into doing anything I think is wrong'
u5C920osD1j4G9AWBdc7j5joOWmz2KVCC3uQ9WU0UfoILxG3QPo6ajP34Vv8nFq_P15ks4GnzZiZQHBIhGPO5YXD8gk0Oo96JZy3EMSKMVJ47TUHu6hGNM8jlCh93alLY9v8quvOVl1zW_5KFlMloz2dk4m1zcmBPWnr4epoDEbbwa22RoMo0ghz0muOA7zMzjJv28zyjdxExRNsxxi0X9idCj1YmtEwDp0EM5HjLvBd4zBWQy38-tZnliDYX6KhvqINfOUjNkS0j6Et42_LslntTuwmcmCKSeyhK_mmuEDRdT4-1LQe2PTlLhQG6aEPQ-tpU6DlgDRj5DjSyyeD6Iqkw9hi3sHWnTk3=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Kelly Cohen
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ President Trump’s attorney general nominee William Barr told senators on Tuesday that he is “not going to be bullied” into doing anything wrong if he's confirmed... "I am not going to do anything that I think is wrong, and I will not be bullied into doing anything I think is wrong by anybody, whether it be editorial boards or Congress or the president,” Barr said during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday. "I'm going to do what I think is right."Barr's remarks are likely to put at ease Democrats who are worried that Trump will try to pressure his new attorney general into protecting him from special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller's investigation. At the same time, Barr doesn't need any help getting confirmed from Senate Democrats as long as Republicans support him. When asked by Sen. scumbag-Dick Durbin, D-Ill., why he wants the job, Barr said it is because “I love the Justice Department.” "If you take this job, you have to be ready to make decisions and spend all your political capital and have no future," Barr said."I feel I'm in a position in life where I can do the right thing and not really care about the consequences. I can truly be independent."...
Sorry, Democrats: Voters Want Strong Borders 
and Don’t Think a Wall is ‘Immoral’
SUELGoEyvd4p5_a3o0_Pf9Hk6026Tyk8Fq2orm57deEJHlUb0NCzfkG83G3JrL2WfHDHpOvhCEIVhrs5HzBuUT2NOLU1s2EkWJXd75uPYb6ya0OTHz_BxFqOyHvbiBR63xrunb290rPSQje4vMFIvkWqwH52=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Kemberlee Kaye
{legalinsurrection.com} ~ According to recent polling conducted by Rasmussen, Democrats are on the wrong side of Trump’s big, beautiful wall argument... “53% of Likely U.S. Voters think it is better for the United States to tightly control who comes into the country,” says Rasmussen. Most voters continue to favor strongly controlled borders and reject House Speaker Nancy Pulosi’s charge that it is immoral for the United States to build a border wall.  The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 53% of Likely U.S. Voters think it is better for the United States to tightly control who comes into the country. Thirty-nine percent (39%) disagree and say it is better to open our borders to anyone who wants to come here as long as they are not a terrorist or a criminal. The survey was conducted over the weekend, gauging reaction to the current demagoguery...
.
Democratic Senators Are Getting Way
Too Comfortable With Religious Tests
WFinEDCxqd0QtobB5VdxC0xyMjqVv7QJg06HPcrqpePFi2_2vgDQSXCrSYR3r9P_Y7S6lg3vqQNB9F04xqHkGI5FapdFUHWlq-CM-1VPadly1jv3uk0P_PY_d74=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Lathan Watts
{dailysignal.com} ~ This new year will quickly reveal to the American people whether some Democrats in Washington have resolved to abandon their overused—and unconstitutional—religious test for office... Two Democrats in the Senate, Sens. scumbag-Mazie Hirono of Hawaii and lowlife-Kamala Harris of California, recently objected to the nomination of Brian Buescher to a U.S. district court in Nebraska based on his membership in the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic fraternal organization. Their objections, premised on the organization’s affirmation of Catholic teaching, hearkens back to California Sen. Dianne Fein-stein’s now-infamous criticism of the “dogma” of Judge Amy Coney Barrett and other Democratic senators who have vocally opposed religious nominees. These “extreme positions,” according to scumbag-Hirono, should require Buescher to recuse himself from any future case related to the subject matter. lowlife-Harris, employing the two most formidable weapons in the progressive arsenal—ignorance and audacity—asked Buescher if he was aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed abortion when he joined...  https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/01/14/democratic-senators-are-getting-way-too-comfortable-with-religious-tests/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CapitolBell%22&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWVdKaE1tRmlOV014Tm1GbSIsInQiOiI0d2JQdTM2azIxWTNvdWlUYUpKTE00QXY4MUtFWE1SQlN4UWRlbnlOWHE0MnJHY2JEWU5xdzBVR2pMRkp3NERzNkRCcDFXbGROZmlLT3JPODRpYlZMdUZDRUtDTDNZdERqNVQ1MUV1aDgyczAyUFRlM0hEK3FMam5NR2ZwbDByNyJ9
.
DOJ expert: Dems strategize 
to take control of elections nationwide
FHBhPbKtaIQ_pFBy5MQyOOVgAbrc-FemeJyII2Rj4b_Sw6cEXYO4N3NxKohXstwVn7_XAkZKnbAk9trPM_uebNw5FVZVX2msWg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby wnd.com  
{wnd.com} ~ There’s an old, and very cynical, saying that it’s not those who vote that count, it’s those who count the votes... Now, a former Department of Justice elections lawyer who worked in the Voting Rights Section, J. Christian Adams, is warning that Democrats in the U.S. House have established as their highest priority to take control of elections – essentially to count the votes. Adams writes at PJMedia about the proposal, the first this term in the House of Representatives, which is now under Democratic Party control. In the bill — the text is not yet available online — there are provisions to that would enable “House Democrats, leftist groups, deep-pocketed dark money, and those who use election process rules to help win elections – or at least to cause chaos.” “If you thought the midterm elections had problems, wait until you learn about Nancy Pulosi’s plan to terminate state control over American elections.” The Democrats’ proposed H.R. 1 is described as an effort to “expand Americans’ access to the ballot box,” but Adams warns it’s really about centralizing elections...
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Fein-stein Wants to Ban All 'Assault Weapons,'
GOP Aims at Reciprocity
o96wPSK4_V2T9CcQoGsgy_pXBBgT_T9dfUWDQdn-9LMk4W8d3PKHtg6PPFVTEicgz0cF-P-A1-NAw5X4l8s-H4Uy4CMe-0kQ8IPEzH-P39bZlTx9zBCK9TFB4rXUm01BeXwU-w9EYmj0eg1DZeZKWgGpdo3sVPeGJFdEQB0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Thomas Gallatin:  Dianne “gun-grabbing” Fein-stein (D-CA) is at it again, this time introducing a new bill that steps all over the Second Amendment by banning “assault weapons.” And these “assault weapons,” according to Fein-stein, now include mean-looking semiautomatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns. (She and a lot of other ignorant anti-gun zealots could learn something here.) Fein-stein’s latest gun-grabbing bill is a retread of her 2017 Assault Weapons Ban, which is a retread of the 1994-2004 ban, but this time it includes banning even more firearms and scary-looking firearm attachments.

             The Truth About Guns notes some of Fein-stein’s anti-gun bill wish list, which includes, “Universal background checks, mandatory safe storage, no transfers of existing standard-capacity magazines, no bump stocks, no folding or adjustable stocks, no large-format pistols, no pistol stabilizing braces (they hate disabled persons!), none of grips or stocks designed specifically not to violate the ‘assault weapons’ definitions.”
               In fact the legislation is so ill conceived that Jake Wagner of The Resurgent bemoans, “When we get into the specifics of what is banned, we see that everything is cosmetic. Most of it is stupid.”
               Obviously, this is par for the course with Fein-stein, as her real agenda is not to combat crime (say the 200-something annual murders committed using rifles of any type) but to effectively void Americans’ constitutional right to self-defense.
               Meanwhile, Republican Sen. John Cornyn (TX) is preparing to reintroduce the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, which would require all states to honor one another’s gun-carry permits. Cornyn stated, “This bill focuses on two of our country’s most fundamental constitutional protections — the Second Amendment’s right of citizens to keep and bear arms and the Tenth Amendment’s right of states to make laws best-suited for their residents. I look forward to working with my colleagues to advance this important legislation for law-abiding gun owners nationwide.”  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/60502?mailing_id=4012&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4012&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center