Wednesday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Why Vote for dummycrats-Democrats?
by Cal Thomas  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
MBS, Khashoggi, and the new fork in the road
xCOa88xyiCFC-SuPkptFK4Uzs31WZTTVNAF9oZYcPQcp9HYSd6ZztNwZ93GUAtwd1HpttgkG6Dad9WQePJvAUaso8OFhT2JyjZtziHkdo3Y=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Danielle Pletka
{aei.org} ~ Let’s face it, the fork in the road from Saudi Arabia came some time ago. Was it in Yemen? The Hariri kidnapping episode?... The corruption crackdown? The execution of Sheikh Nimr? The arrest of prominent women reformers? The question is moot. Word is that today, the Kingdom will announce that “rogue elements” were responsible for accidentally murdering Saudi dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi while interrogating him at their consulate in Istanbul. This was the inevitable outcome following the hemorrhaging of support from the US and elsewhere. Addressing, even falsely, the Khashoggi crime will bring Saudi Arabia and its young de facto leader, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), to another fork in the road.  Before you throw your hands up in disgust at their “getting away with it,” a few points: This hypocrisy is a staple of Western foreign-policy. China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, Turkey, and many of that ilk are responsible for similar crimes. Apart from Turkey, we can say that the others are not members of the club of civilized nations; Turkey, of course, is a member of NATO. Sure, Saudi should be better. It is a nominal ally. But please. This is the country that is among those most responsible for this era’s spread of Sunni Islamist extremism. Riyadh has moved far in the right direction in recent years, but it is no Jeffersonian democracy...
.
If Republicans won’t confront entitlements, who will?  
9ocd_rnp1WP6aZ3_c3-gqqxrNyLwEAi49DTzHhkED4VnInBXXcHKeSdZPODO_xNdKbxfpmUDmIG5oJhlGX51LDhQlkl5mFM6kCrBybqYNEy0-H3t_A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Michael R. Strain
{bloomberg.com} ~ If the GOP doesn't address the rising costs of middle-class entitlement programs, then who will?... The National Republican Campaign Committee is running an ad warning voters that dummycrats-Democrats will cut Medicare. The ad tells workers that from their paychecks “the government withheld your money to pay for your Medicare,” and characterized “DC liberals” as “raiding our Medicare.” “That money,” the ad argues, “belongs to you.” This campaign-season rhetoric stands in sharp contrast to Republicans' general approach to entitlements. The party's elected leaders have traditionally advocated changing the way the programs are structured and reducing their projected spending.  How to explain this contrast in GOP messages? A lot of it is simple politics. After all, even Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan in their 2012 presidential campaign presented themselves as protecting Medicare from President Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s plans to cut spending on the program. “Both Campaigns Seize Role of Medicare Defender,” a headline in the New York Times read in the summer of 2012. This stance was especially notable because Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee at the time, was seen as a champion of changes designed to restrain Medicare's spending...
.
McConnell: “Single biggest disappointment” of time in 
Congress is “failure to address the entitlement issue”
hN5pjMBTH7HIxZR_epPfNwdswpsXCD9FK75_RwbuHdjXdxWVu3jiVQTqRfp9hfj8KK3dKlyfcIuTgNZ8GFqU4gne5BYUbMcQCKK0NDJULz6mITkM7Yf9HUmJZufhrZIJJ66o92_MMI7Fpd7lQNfYUvKOFAv3pCrPSLQPr8tlcJl1lQft9t8pbY19M7nrCIKii_3-d_zS6j4dARtfoS7VJy4f-AhyEWgvcto6IguDWAFsXf8Pn2UkRQs=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Kemberlee Kaye
{legalinsurrection.com} ~ In an interview with Bloomberg News Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader McConnell called the skyrocketing federal deficit “disturbing.”... McConnell went so far as to say, “The single biggest disappointment of my time in Congress has been our failure to address the entitlement issue.” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blamed rising federal deficits and debt on a bipartisan unwillingness to contain spending on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, and said he sees little chance of a major deficit reduction deal while Republicans control Congress and the White House. “It’s disappointing, but it’s not a Republican problem,” McConnell said Tuesday in an interview with Bloomberg News when asked about the rising deficits and debt. “It’s a bipartisan problem: unwillingness to address the real drivers of the debt by doing anything to adjust those programs to the demographics of America in the future.”  McConnell’s remarks came a day after the Treasury Department said the U.S. budget deficit grew to $779 billion in Donald Trump’s first full fiscal year as president, the result of the GOP’s tax cuts, bipartisan spending increases and rising interest payments on the national debt. That’s a 77 percent increase from the $439 billion deficit in fiscal 2015, when McConnell became majority leader...
https://{/2018/10/mcconnell-single-biggest-disappointment-of-time-in-congress-is-failure-to-address-the-entitlement-issue/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LegalInsurrection+%28Le%C2%B7gal+In%C2%B7sur%C2%B7rec%C2%B7tion%29
.
The dummycrats-Democrats' IT Scandal
2GvRwPswGYCbOxYCf7V4dnvhip-nUqM-YBIJ84onkJGGuJTku-P9ftVQBJu5AA1W_nhIC5VhcxbrwUKc_PAk41UM9OrtdZV1p4Vp7hF6_sfQxEuIVXL7OIY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=300by Frank Miniter
{americanthinker.com} ~ After spending a year digging into the dummycrats-Democrats' covered up I.T. scandal in Congress, I happen to know there is a lot here that Americans aren't being allowed to know... If all this group of I.T. administrators from Pakistan did in Congress doesn't get out, then much of our freedom, which is wrapped up in this story, will be impacted. The cover-up has been so effective that this isn't happening. Imran Awan, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.)'s I.T. aide, got off without jail time or restitution on only bank fraud charges. Congress got off without paying the price for possible corruption and for allowing a spy ring to run free in Congress. We can't even be sure that Congress has made the necessary reforms to stop another spy ring from infiltrating and spying on Congress and thereby using stolen data to blackmail a congressman, influence a vote, or just know where members of Congress stand on various pieces of legislation, all of which can impact us. Emails and other data also could be used by a foreign intelligence service, such as Pakistan's ISI, to see where our representatives stand on funding being allocated to a given country or on other issues – and, according to sources, that is exactly what likely occurred in this case. Some sources, most notably current I.T. aides who work for congressmen, have told me that security protocols have been tightened and that they don't think other I.T. aides will be able to get in the door again without first passing background checks.  Nevertheless, Capitol Police won't confirm this or even answer if the laptop they'd found and held as evidence – the one Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of Capitol Police with "consequences" over if it wasn't returned promptly – has now been given back to Wasserman Schultz. The government has conveniently managed this cover-up to protect itself...
Senator Grassley Wants Details on Why DOJ 
Declined to Prosecute Senior FBI Official
_v3UKqut7agiTaPOF4eUjz-XWDbs7b8CAMDUWucGI2y7aJnKrKO5JsrNvTCauuirXi7ZVnT3_q-doQ0uSv33QAPRoE6seJ46PF6DO-E9H8pt6qq18jNW18NwcOEYiA9YG7dgxl9wogci26w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by sundance
{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~ The DOJ Office of Inspector General released an interesting investigative summary report today... following a review of a “senior FBI official” accepting tickets from a “television news corespondent” and lying to investigators about the events.  The IG noted “criminal prosecution was declined”.  Now Senator Chuck Grassley wants the details:  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
. 
Why Vote for dummycrats-Democrats?

by Cal Thomas
 

Given what the Trump administration is saying are record achievements for a president at this stage in office, why would anyone consider voting for dummycrats-Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections?
                 Writing in The Washington Examiner, Paul Bedard lists 289 accomplishments of the Trump administration, beginning with the obvious one, the economy: “They include 173 major wins, such as adding more than 4 million jobs, and another 116 smaller victories, some with outsize importance, such as the 83 percent one-year increase in arrests of MS-13 gang members.
               They also include two justices now on the Supreme Court and 82 other federal judges confirmed to lower courts.
               As the White House has touted, unemployment in all demographics is the lowest it has been since 1969. Despite a recent blip in the stock market, portfolios have grown fatter since Trump became president. An analysis in The Wall Street Journal predicts economic growth is likely to continue “for years.”
               Other positives include updated trade deals with Mexico and Canada that will produce benefits for American manufacturers and workers far more than the old NAFTA deal ever did.
               Consumer confidence reached an 18-year high in September, according to Lynn Franco, director of Economic Indicators at The Conference Board, which conducts the Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index®.
               Top this off with the successfully negotiated release of Pastor Andrew Brunson from a Turkish prison and a more realistic foreign policy in confronting America’s enemies.
               According to Gallup’s weekly tracking poll, for the week of Oct. 7, the president’s approval rating jumped a percentage point, from 42 percent to 43 percent. His disapproval rating holds at 53 percent, though that number is down three percentage points from the week of Sept. 16. Rasmussen, which tends to be more favorable toward Republicans, puts the president’s approval at 51 percent. That is higher than President scumbag/liar-nObama achieved at a similar point in his presidency. Presidential polling does not necessarily forecast voter behavior in state and local races, though one Quinnipiac University Poll shows that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has a nine-point likely voter lead over his opponent Rep. socialist-Beto O'Rourke (D-Texas).
               In view of Republican successes, including tax cuts and the booming economy, what Democratic policies would produce results better than these? Other than spite for the president, why would voters elect candidates who want to return to a past where things were far different?
               Do people who didn’t have jobs during the previous administration want to embrace policies that kept them unemployed? Do businesses once prevented from hiring people because of regulations now wish to have regulations re-imposed and to lay off workers they recently hired?
               By what logic do some people wish to return to the recent past, including a recent past that includes Republican presidents who cannot lay claim to the type of successes President Trump is enjoying?
               Perhaps most amazing is the president’s growing approval among African-American voters, whose votes he is openly campaigning for as evidenced by rapper Kanye West’s endorsement and the president’s reciprocal embrace. USA Today reported on a new Rasmussen poll that shows “approval rating among African Americans is at 36 percent, nearly double his support at this time last year.” Despite the NAACP’s hostility toward the president, African-American voters seem focused more on results than symbolism.
               Polls have been wrong in the past — take the 2016 election as the latest example — but the president has begun touting his record while campaigning for candidates. That record appears to be resonating with voters, at least in some states. Never has the Ronald Reagan question “Are you better off than you were four years ago” seemed more relevant. Never has the answer appeared more obvious.

~The Patriot Post  

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/58864?mailing_id=3798&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.3798&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center