TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Closing the Asylum Loophole for Illegals
by Political Editors  
.
Trump Administration Returns 
To Supreme Court, Seeking End To DACA  
by Kevin Daley
{dailycaller.com} ~ The Trump administration returned to the U.S. Supreme Court Monday night seeking to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program... an scumbag/liar-nObama-era amnesty initiative that extends protected status to illegal aliens brought to the U.S. as children. The move is aggressive and unusual, as decisions on Trump’s efforts to rescind DACA are still pending in several federal appeals courts, and the justices seldom take up cases before those judgments issue. But the U.S. Department of Justice told the Supreme Court Monday that action is needed in the near term. The Trump administration previously sought the Supreme Court’s review of its efforts to phase out DACA. After two federal judges issued injunctions requiring the government to continue administering the program, the Justice Department bypassed normal appellate procedure and went directly to the Supreme Court on Jan. 18 to vindicate its right to terminate the program. The justices rejected that request on Feb. 26, but asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to quickly process the case so it could return to the high court in a reasonable time frame. Other challenges to DACA repeal efforts are currently before appeals courts in New York and Washington, D.C...  https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/05/supreme-court-daca-trump/?utm_me...
.
dummycrats-Democrats on precipice of governor power grab
by Naomi Lim
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ dummycrats-Democrats are poised to loosen the Republican stranglehold on governors' mansions across the country on Election Day Tuesday... with voter enthusiasm unusually high for a nonpresidential cycle. But it will be a handful of "toss up" races that could determine whether the GOP maintains control of the bulk of governorships heading into the 2020 presidential election and beyond. Prognosticators, who look at the wide scope of polling, foresee a good night for dummycrats-Democrats. They predict dummycrats-Democrats will make gains for a more balanced distribution of power, as Republicans are currently governors in 33 out of 50 states. Of the 36 states with gubernatorial elections on Tuesday, 26 are headed by Republicans, whereas nine have dummycrats-Democrats in charge. Alaska's governor, Bill Walker, is an independent. In their Monday evening forecast, FiveThirtyEight said dummycrats-Democrats were likely to make a net gain of eight governorships on top of the 16 they already have, giving them governors in 24 states after the 2018 midterm cycle. Meanwhile, RealClearPolitics projects dummycrats-Democrats will pick up two governors' mansions, leaving 12 contests in "toss up" status. But, according to their "no toss ups" map, dummycrats-Democrats could make a net gain of eight, leaving them in control of 24 states. dummycrats-Democratic candidates campaigning in Illinois, Michigan, and New Mexico are positioned for wins in three of the 26 Republican strongholds, while those politicking for power in the state capitols of Florida, Iowa, Maine, Nevada, Ohio, and Wisconsin are in neck-and-neck races, according to the nonpartisan Cook Political Report. dummycrats-Democrats are also competitive in the traditionally red enclaves of Georgia, Kansas, Oklahoma, and South Dakota. Republicans are making a play for Alaska, Connecticut, and Oregon... We'll see by the end of today if their predictions are correct.
.
The Dire State of Free Speech in Europe
{americanlibertyreport.com} ~ Free speech is the foundation upon which all other freedoms are built. When a nation’s citizens are unable to express their thoughts, ideas, and opinions without fear of criminal punishment... democracy crumbles and tyranny fills the vacuum. In spite of the utmost importance of free speech, the United States is the only country in the world with an ironclad right to free speech enshrined in its constitution. For a long time, other free countries such as those in Europe allowed and even protected free speech even though it was not regarded as a fundamental right. In 2018, though, free speech in Europe is in real danger. On October 25th, the highest human rights court in Europe – the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) – ruled that slandering the prophet Muhammad is not protected speech and is subject to criminal prosecution. This ruling came after an anonymous Austrian woman made statements at two seminars calling Muhammad a “pedophile” for his marriage to a six year old girl when he was fifty-six – a marriage that was consummated when the girl was nine according to Islamic teachings. After being fined for her statements, the woman took her case all the way to the ECHR, arguing that the punishment was a violation of her freedom of speech. However, the ECHR upheld the ruling, stating that criticizing Muhammad did not fall under the category of protected speech...Anyone with common sense would know CDHR's ruling was wrong.
.
The Five Simple Words that SNL 
and Pete Davidson Should Learn to Say
by Sara Carter
{saraacarter.com} ~Saturday Night Live’s skit about retired Navy SEAL and congressional candidate Dan Crenshaw just wasn’t funny at all... The joke–if you can call it a joke–felt like someone kicked me in the stomach.The laughter from the audience following Pete Davidson’s depraved statement about Crenshaw was the worst part of the entire skit. Davidson joked when Crenshaw’s picture came up on screen Saturday night that he looked like a “hitman from a porno” because he wears an eyepatch over his left eye, which he lost while serving in Afghanistan. “I’m sorry, I know he lost his eye in war…laughter or whatever,” he said as he laughed and the audience laughed with him. “Whatever.” Really?Can you imagine what it’s like to lose your sight? Imagine fighting overseas, far away from your loved ones, only to find yourself blinded in a momentary hail of gunfire and a grenade being lobbed over your head...
.
Senate Investigators Find Evidence Ford 
May Have Mistaken Kavanaugh for Another Man
by Randy DeSoto
{westernjournal.com} ~ A report released by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday included the account of a man who said... he had a consensual encounter with Dr. Christine Blasey Ford in the early 1980s, which mirrored in multiple respects the allegation of sexual misconduct she brought against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. The report overall found no credible evidence of sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh. During his public testimony regarding allegations made by Ford in late September, Kavanaugh emphatically denied he had ever sexually assaulted her and insisted she must be mistaking him for another man. According to the report, committee investigators interviewed a man — whose name was redacted — the day before Ford testified. This man related that when he was a 19-year-old college student he visited Washington, D.C., over spring break and kissed a girl he thought was Ford. The reports reads: “He said that the kiss happened in the bedroom of a house which was about a 15-to-20 minute walk from the Van Ness Metro, that Dr. Ford was wearing a swimsuit under her clothing, and that the kissing ended when a friend jumped on them as a joke. The man said that the woman initiated the kissing and that he did not force himself on her.” Breitbart noted his account is similar to the testimony Ford offered before the Senate Judiciary Committee in at least three ways...hmmmm interesting.
.
. 
Closing the Asylum Loophole for Illegals
by Political Editors:  On Thursday, President Donald Trump announced that he working on an executive order designed to end the abuse of the U.S. asylum system. Trump stated, “My administration is finalizing a plan to end the rampant abuse of our asylum system, to halt the dangerous influx, and to establish this control over America’s sovereign borders. Under this plan, the illegal aliens will no longer get a free pass into our country by lodging meritless claims in seeking asylum. Instead, migrants seeking asylum will have to present themselves lawfully at a port of entry.”

             Trump noted that he would be releasing the “comprehensive” order next week, adding, “Those who choose to break our laws and enter illegally will no longer be able to use meritless claims to gain automatic admission into our country. We will hold them — for a long time, if necessary. The only longterm solution to the crisis, and the only way to ensure the endurance of our nation as a sovereign country, is for Congress to overcome open-borders obstruction.” He also emphasized, “We will end catch and release. We are not releasing any longer.”
               This is indeed a welcome announcement from Trump. For too long the U.S. asylum system has been abused by illegal aliens who are caught sneaking across the border. If one’s asylum request is legitimate, then go to a legal port of entry and apply.
               Trump is also making it clear that he is interested in stopping illegal immigration, not legal immigration or the legal process for making genuine and needed asylum requests. This is not, nor has it ever been, a quest to stop legal immigration or asylum. Nor has it been about the ethnic background of those seeking entry into the U.S. It hasalways been an issue of enforcing our nation’s sovereignty and laws.
                  The truth is that most illegal aliens who sneak into the U.S. do so because they know they don’t meet the asylum requirements. That fact is borne out by the regular practice of illegal aliens making requests for asylum only after they have been apprehended by the Border Patrol. Secondly, as Trump noted, escaping poverty is not legitimate grounds for asylum. Socialism south of our border is certainly bad, and these countries are often economically wrecked, but that’s not sufficient to grant access to our own lavish benefits.

~The Patriot Post  

https://patriotpost.us/articles/59255?mailing_id=3839&utm_mediu...  

Views: 30

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service