Tuesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
How Liberal Short-Term
Thinking Is Destroying America
by John Hawkins
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 A Genuine Investigation or a Witch Hunt? 
_RR7VxIl4h9TeKCx6lrBP7G_zeWSfoTBk7UEFhsT5QZDn_2NMfvCl10tKwDr0VLEV-BOac2WIVuILrRNWtkyr11jpmwl1e3GmB__DLGEHTdjjVcIpm0SRh1Zn0dEww=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By Arnold Ahlert: America will now endure an investigation led by former FBI director Robert Mueller regarding "Russian influence" in the election and Donald Trump's campaign. One driven by an overwhelmingly slanted Leftmedia campaign determined to shape a relentlessly anti-Trump narrative, one anonymous felony-committing source after another.
          Yet what — exactly — is Mueller investigating? As former CIA director John Brennan told the House Intelligence Committee Tuesday, there was "information intelligence about interactions and contacts between U.S. persons and the Russians" — even as he admitted he didn't have "sufficient information to make a determination whether or not there was cooperation or complicity or collusion."
          That's the evidentiary "standard" for precipitating a special counsel-led investigation? Then why did Democrat exchanges with the Russians never precipitate one?
          Bill liar-nClinton was paid $500,000 for a 2010 Moscow speech by Renaissance Capital, a firm with ties to Russian intelligence. Uranium One, a company whose sale to the Russian government was approved by the liar-Clinton-led State Department — giving them control of over 20% of America's uranium supply — donated millions of dollars to the liar-Clinton Foundation.
          liar-Clinton campaign manager, John Podesta, enjoyed a relationship with Joule Unlimited, a Kremlin-financed company that employed him as a director and gave him 75,000 shares of stock. His brother Tony lobbied on behalf of Sberbank, an institution completely beholden to Vladimir Putin, and one accused by Ukraine's Security Service of financing terrorism.
          Couldn't those contacts could be characterized as "cooperation or complicity or collusion" by law enforcement officials and a hysterical media — if it suited their purposes? If this investigation doesn't examine Republicans and Democrats, it's a sham.
          Another element of these machinations that doesn't pass the smell test is the appointment of Mueller himself, championed as a paragon of integrity and impartiality.
          Impartial? "While Mueller technically reported to Comey as deputy attorney general, Comey, two decades his junior, treated Mueller as a close friend and almost mentor," Politico reported last week.
          If Mueller is the consummate straight-shooter we're assured he is, why not recuse himself for this transparent conflict of interest? "The law governing the special counsel (28 CFR 600.7) specifically prohibits [Mueller] from serving if he has a conflict of interest in the case," Fox News contributor and attorney Gregg Jarret explains. "The rule has been interpreted to mean that even the appearance of a conflict is sufficient for disqualification."
          Jarrett presumes Comey himself is being investigated. Yet on Monday, House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz revealed Comey's scheduled testimony was postponed — because he "wants to speak with" Mueller prior to going public. Thus, unless this is Comey-Mueller version of the liar-Clinton-Lynch a "Tarmac Moment," we now know Comey is not being investigated.
          Why not? In a masterful connect-the-dot piece of journalism, columnist Diana West explains a substantial part of the assertion the Russians hacked the DNC computers is based on statements made by security experts from CrowdStrike, the private cyber security firm hired and paid by the DNC.
          The FBI? At a March 20, 2017 House Intelligence Committee hearing, Comey testified the agency "never got direct access to the machines themselves."
          At the same meeting, NSA Director Michael Rogers, another liar-nObama administration holdover, was asked if his agency directly accessed the computers. "The NSA didn't ask for access," he stated. "That's not in our job..."
          Rep. Will Hurd pressed the issue with Comey. "So, director, the FBI notified the DNC early, before any information was put on WikiLeaks and when — you have still never been given access to any of the technical or the physical machines that were hacked by the Russians?" he asked. "That's correct," Comey answered, "although we got the forensics from the pros that they hired. ... Again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this, my folks tell me, was an appropriate substitute."
          Second-hand information provided by a biased source is an appropriate substitute? For what? What stopped Comey from getting a subpoena and seizing the machines?
          By itself, this example of Comey's seeming determination to avoid conducting a thorough investigation should warrant his investigation. Yet the FBI also allowed liar-Hillary Clinton testify about her personal server without recording or transcribing the conversation. And the agency granted wholly unnecessary immunity deals to liar-Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson that included two side agreements — one limiting the FBI's scrutinization of documents to a time period before the most likely evidence about obstruction of justice occurred, and the other a promise to destroy the aides' computers after their examination. Even more egregious, Mills and Samuelson were allowed to function as part of liar-Clinton's legal team even though they were subjects of the same FBI investigation.
          If all of that was done with Comey's knowledge and presumed approval — how can he remain inviolate?
          According to yet another unnamed source, CNN is reporting that Comey is sharing his Trump memos with Mueller. What about memos with regard to liar-nObama, liar-Clinton, or Loretta Lynch? The same Loretta Lynch whose meeting with Bill liar-Clinton prompted Comey to assert the DOJ "could not credibly complete the investigation and decline prosecution without grievous damage to the American people's confidence in the justice system," in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee?
          "If the massive intelligence capabilities of the NSA and the CIA are being used for internal political purposes, the United States of America, as we know it and the Founders envisioned it, no longer exists," warns PJ Media's Roger Simon. "We are a post-modern totalitarianism and the Russian collusion scandal was just an excuse to impose it — or, more scarily, to cement what was already there."
          A bombshell report released yesterday — one so far avoided by every mainstream media outlet — reveals liar-nObama's NSA routinely violated Americans' Fourth Amendment-based privacy protections. Were Trump and/or his associates some of those Americans?
          Either this blatant abuse of power now becomes an integral part of the investigation — or America has ceased being a constitutional republic. And this investigation is a witch hunt.  ~The Patriot Post
.
G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Left's biggest lies exposed on major TV show
EtWPTHK8SwV7r4C_Hh4eDDrdWEtS2MzkUdxBk6EGI2VNihs2Ddz6qxqnlSRIPdT96P7AnNHjiR1XxrC8CXriz5AO=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Paul Bremmer
{wnd.com} ~ The legal principle of “separation of church and state” is enshrined in the Constitution, right? After all, Americans hear it all the time from their politicians and judges and mainstream journalists... Authorities and “experts” would never tell such a huge lie, would they? Wouldn’t they be afraid of being found out? But as psychologists have observed over the decades, repeat a lie often enough, no matter how blatantly false it is, and many people come to believe it. “Separation of church and state,” in fact, is never mentioned in the Constitution or Bill of Rights, yet the left in politics, academia, law and the media have drilled it into Americans’ consciousness as though it were true... http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/lefts-biggest-lies-exposed-on-major-tv-show/
.
Tillerson State Dept Doubles Refugee
Import Levels While Trump Overseas
0V30RiCVoGYsqpI6xKsZduU7OpSGrAzLqSZ6ZRDW9wG8fJD6rTqw1XHy_Oy0CCNYQuo3w0RJT1HUFS7mWA06lf7WgBNbLgJYodO0h1MSb5GCg33LtIQKU8xuzcVJPpR6hMOSAlFRiJNE6w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ The strange goings-on at the State Department continue, with nobody other than the Secretary himself behaving in a manner that would be reflective of the new president’s leadership and consistent with his agenda... If he’s truly representing the president, another round of wholesale firings is clearly in order. Earlier this month the State Department fought the release of two un-redacted emails to Judicial Watch that contain information relevant to the criminal activities of liar-Hillary Clinton and on  Friday they acted as representatives of liar-Hillary Clinton in a lawsuit filed by two family members of the victims of liar-Clinton’s fatal mischief in Benghazi. America is tired of the secrecy of our shadow government and our supposedly legitimate version as well. We hired Donald Trump to clean the mess up, not to allow business to continue as usual. They work for him and for us. In yet another instance where the State Department is acting as if Hussein liar-nObama is still in the White House, in a Democrat-style Thursday before a holiday weekend email notification, they revealed that the restrictions on the flow of “refugees,” terrorists and terrorist sympathizer applicants into the US would now be readjusted to Hussein liar-nObama’s “the sky is the limit” levels, effective immediately...http://rickwells.us/tillerson-state-dept-doubles-refugee-import-levels-trump-overseas/
.
Rumsfeld: There's No Evidence of
Trump-Russia Collusion
JvIE7BSe1wmXk30gVwgu2U0EP_SA0CeQFEqBFMSGA70p4ZAl8Ww_jAtq-dreL-wVxXEB3dWpqSvIrcJKsv2_s9av4Lsw6G4UajuQBprhmP700G_mwnl03y-g2nyuj03pF04x5XZuRfYlt_tS17IfSIbAFk_s-iZHyQglQf8g5dnmK2e3PY5xgUwV6rM_lBaXMjAG=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Leah Barkoukis
{townhall.com} ~ Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld agreed Friday that the Russians tried to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election but said he did not see any evidence of collusion... “I assume you agree that the Russians attacked our election via false news and cyber hacking and all that,” conservative host Hugh Hewitt asked. “Sure. I mean, in that the Russians and other countries have an interest in what goes on in the United States. And to the extent they have the kinds of capabilities the Russians do, they have the ability and capability of engaging in things that are disruptive and harmful to other countries, including the United States,” he replied... https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2017/05/26/rumsfeld-russia-comments-n2332187?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
.
New Kushner-Russia Story Stokes
Concern of West Wing Leakers
CAOWzpmB75_QvTYxeQZv4xebEPFQDBvOWPdlywXtJumMC9LcDMD04m70N3TjL8MUfZbRE7UokKvcvmEHZZKoCldSKFsD-L3LYInKXJn-rKJkOzH3xdjumuGuQxCxm19btME49Z0vIvArID7FkuxpDtyiegXk66qnqNVr5RX4zw4e5zaDRRGhHyUPmpBCTPc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Margaret Menge
{lifezette.com} ~ Another Washington Post anonymously sourced hit job dropped on the Trump White House — this one about Jared Kushner asking the Russian ambassador for a “secret channel.”... It landed just in time to greet the president upon his return from his first international trip and shortly after Attorney General Jeff Sessions pledged to “put an end to” the rampant leaks coming from within the government. An administration plagued with leaks is now trying to determine whether recent damaging claims may have been fanned from within the West Wing... http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/new-kushner-russia-story-stokes-concern-west-wing-leakers/
.
Pulosi Short-Circuits To Avoid Giving
Trump Credit For Anything
7uaJ1M4nvUBePfI3Hc0Z7xTy9xAXGUteTpNs0V1SvR-wtKERr-KwqFFY3X3SZeaErozoEpLvNjNJhcDQpvHE_PtbFiiOPgl_vQ5CGZtyhoUPLJIQjvnVjVVVPNGmuw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Nancy Pulosi is asked in her weekly DC press briefing for her impression of President Trump’s first foreign trip and if she thinks it’s been a successful one... Rather than answer that question, which might involve her actually having to give credit to the President for an accomplishment or two, dunderhead Pulosi starts blabbering on about a trip she made to four or five unnamed countries and how she didn’t criticize the President to local folks. Finally she’s found someone she won’t badmouth the President to. She says she told those raising the issue that “That’s not why we’re here. We don’t criticize our President when we go abroad.” Really, Pulosi? When did that start? That must be a new policy, something that Potty Mouth Perez implemented or something. That’s pretty unlikely; it’s much more probable that she’s just lying, that’s what Dems do...http://rickwells.us/pelosi-short-circuits-avoid-giving-trump-credit-anything/
.

G3awWDhq0cgsx1oLFdnSVnRhXyexuF4d4rUDu3lfkpM9CEhh9A5FQE1OH4TFrExvY2Q4ahoGJYapHkZh9qWTNzup1a-HaWzeK4jRKG9BkzXE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
How Liberal Short-Term
Thinking Is Destroying America
MHdNmBo6CSDN9NHjPT-LOqt3LfXinnm5PDFMX66hh2EhTBEtH5a8XMxW4M0yG102DX1sIbYTadvxbrFxbwnad8YzSuEpFAMEiK4kRBw-3mMVjJSrVwJrekl5hFG3FlESAf1_lj3UiHDw2qqJmt35FhSQn4Fyfj50Nxh5TK-FJu-N39DDabvw9LQp=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

by John Hawkins
{townhall.com} ~
Like a crack addict who can’t seem to think about anything other than his next fix, liberals can’t seem to think about anything but spewing their emotions at the world. They may be reflexively saying something that makes them feel compassionate, outraged, sensitive or angry, but liberals usually seem to be caught in the grip of some strong emotion.

Of course, it goes without saying that emotion unmoored from logic produces a lot of warped views, but it also mires a person in short term thinking….if you could even call it that. Because when you’re emotional, most of the time you’re not thinking; you’re reacting based on your “feels.” This is where a lot of liberals live 24 x 7 and so, it’s not shocking that their behavior is so thoughtless.

Take rock star Katy Perry’s reaction to the Manchester bombing, "No barriers, no borders, we all just need to coexist.” So, what does co-existing with radical Islamic terrorists who want to kill you mean? Is Katy Perry going to invite ISIS terrorists from Syria to bomb her next concert?

Can you imagine how bizarre the typical liberal reaction to terrorism must seem to the terrorists?

Terrorist: We want to kill you in the name of Allah because we’re good Muslims!

Liberal: No, you’re not. That’s not what you believe.

Terrorist: Yes, it is.

Liberal: No, no…you’re oppressed and probably upset about global warming.

Terrorist: Wait, what?

Liberal: Let’s all co-exist!

Terrorist: How did you miss the entire, “We want to kill you in the name of Allah” thing? What is wrong with you?

Then there are the Trump Administration leaks. Undoubtedly, some of the leaks inside the Trump Administration are coming from his staff, but others appear to be coming from the “deep state.” In other words, Democratic holdovers in the government bureaucracy are leaking information to the press in order to attempt to sabotage a rival political party. Obviously, these leakers are so consumed with their hatred for Trump that they feel politically motivated leaks are justifiable. Except what’s going to almost inevitably happen once a Democrat gets back into office? Republicans in the deep state are now going to leak things in an attempt to embarrass him.

Liberals are so overwrought with emotion that they don’t get the idea that they’re setting precedents when they do these sort of things. It’s like the shock and surprise they experienced when they used the nuclear option to keep Republicans from blocking Barack liar-nObama’s cabinet appointments, only to find that it also meant they couldn’t stop Trump’s cabinet appointments. Wait, you mean that applies to liberals, too? Yes, and those leaks? The next Democrat President is likely to be undermined in exactly the same way.

Look at the liberal threats and violence at universities that have become a regular occurrence. At worst, liberals riot when people they disagree with speak on college campuses and at best, they make threats and do everything they can to rob conservative speakers of their First Amendment rights. Liberals are so supportive of this kind of thing that the police in liberal cities or on liberal campuses refuse to stop the rioting or disruptions.

In other words, conservatives no longer get the same protection from the police. Even illegal aliens are treated better by the police on campuses controlled by liberals. So, when that’s the case, is anyone surprised to see that someone like Based Stick Man was warmly received by conservatives for breaking a stick over a violent ANTIFA protestor’s head? It wouldn’t surprise me if we start seeing armed gangs of conservatives policing marches to protect other people on the Right from armed gangs of liberals since the Left has convinced the police not to do it. This is the world liberals are creating with their short term thinking: one where both sides of the political argument will have armed factions at political rallies. How healthy does that sound for the country?

Liberals do the same thing on the deficit. “Supporting that program makes me feel good! Spend somebody else’s money on it and I don’t like thinking about the debt; so just ignore that.”

They did it with liar-nObamacare. They lied about the bill, assumed no one would recognize they were misled to when the bill became law and cared nothing about creating an expensive new entitlement program when the country is drowning in debt.

They get upset that Trump actually told NATO that if we’re going to be in a military alliance, then the nations involved will have to spend enough on their militaries so that they field an effective military force. How dare Trump try to make NATO useful again!

They’re so blinded by their emotions that they’ll even rank liar-Hillary Clinton as the 6th most beautiful woman on the planet. Seriously.

It is impossible to competently govern a nation based on pure emotion and short term thinking. Additionally as a practical matter, it’s impossible to cut a deal with people whose entire rationale for doing things is, “A celebrity told me what I should believe and now I have to do it” or “I heard a sad story yesterday; so everything has changed.” At some point, liberals have to engage in some long term thinking that goes beyond, “As long as we’re in charge, everything we do is okay,” or our country is going to get dragged down the tubes along with them.

https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2017/05/27/how-liberal-shortterm-thinking-is-destroying-america-n2332321?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center