The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
If a Trump Supporter Had
Shot a Democratic Congressman
by Dennis Prager
.
. Impartial Investigators or Hit Squad?
Several weeks ago, we asked whether Robert Mueller's investigation into President Donald Trump and the whole Russia fiasco was legitimate or a witch hunt. It's enough that he's an old friend and virtual mentor for James Comey, but we're discovering much more about the investigation by virtue of the team Mueller is putting in place.
Among that team are three individuals with troubling ties to the liar-Clintons and Democrats. Anthony Weismann is a prosecutor who's given a lot of money to Barack liar-nObama and Democrats. Aaron Zebley represented Justin Cooper, who was a liar-Hillary aide and one of two people with access to liar-Clinton's clandestine email server — Cooper helped set it up. Perhaps most questionable is Jeannie Rhee, who worked for Eric Holder, gave $16,000 to Democrats in the last nine years, and, the kicker, represented liar-Hillary Clinton in the lawsuit over her emails and defended the liar-Clinton Foundation in a racketeering lawsuit.
Nevertheless, former independent counsel Ken Starr said of Mueller, "He has his head down, he's doing his job, he's assembled a fantastic team. That is a great, great team of complete professionals, so let's let him do his job." Mueller is indeed respected on both sides of the aisle. And yet...
The appointments prompt questions about the team's objectives and impartiality. Can having liar-Clinton attack dogs on the case be a good sign for Trump? Newt Gingrich doesn't think so. "Republicans are delusional if they think the special counsel is going to be fair," he said. "The fix is in." Lefty Harvard legal scholar Alan Dershowitz warned the investigation was becoming "too political," saying, "In a partisan atmosphere like this, you have to be so careful not to give the other side the ability to claim prejudice. And I think they have given the other side the ability to claim prejudice." And former liar-Clinton advisor Dick Morris asserted, "This is not a special prosecutor's staff; this is a hit squad."
Strategically, there are two possibilities. One, investigators are going to rabbit trail and find something, somewhere about Russia or something else, and then make a referral to the House to trip up the GOP ahead of the 2018 election. The question of impeachment will be hung around Republican necks, which will be especially troubling for Republicans in marginal districts.
Two, contrary to Dershowitz, Mueller has diversified his team so that when they find nothing, they'll be immune from charges of partisanship. Let's hope it's the latter, but brace for the former. ~The Patriot Post
.
.
liar-nObama’s Homeland Security Chief Says
DNC Rejected Help Following Email Hacks
by Chuck Ross
{dailycaller.com} ~ The Democratic National Committee rejected help from the Department of Homeland Security following Russian hacks into its computer systems during the 2016 election cycle, according to former DHS chief Jeh Johnson... In testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Johnson also said that the DNC, much to his “disappointment,” did not cooperate in any way with DHS to respond to the hacks. Johnson said that he first became aware of intrusions into DNC systems sometime last year, several months after the FBI had learned of the breach...http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/21/obamas-homeland-security-chief-says-dnc-rejected-help-following-email-hacks/?utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=TheDC%20Morning&utm_campaign=TheDC%20EveningUN Warns Trump – US Can
Be Replaced, Cough Up The Cash
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Warnings to the United States are being issued by the globalist leech in charge at the UN, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres... On Tuesday, the open borders communist operative cautioned President Trump that we could be replaced. We should be so fortunate and ought to, in fact, work to help guarantee that happens. There must be plenty of countries around the world ready to take on the “developing nations” as national dependents, though they may have to “sweeten the deal” with a little slave labor or territory, something that isn’t presently required. Guterres told reporters at his first press conference since taking over the UN on January 1st, that the new funding levels proposed by the United States would be disastrous and create, “an unsolvable problem to the management of the U.N.” Can it be possible there is a problem that the globalists can’t solve? How obvious has it become that their “problem solving” is based solely upon the model of throwing American money at a problem? If the cash flow is restricted they can’t function...Trump kick them out of the USA. We don't need them. http://rickwells.us/un-warns-trump-us-replaced-cough-cash/.
Trump supporter stabbed
9 times after political rally
by wnd.com
{wnd.com} ~ Trump supporter Tony Foreman is in intensive care after he was stabbed nine times following a “free speech rally” in Santa Monica, California, on Saturday... Now some are claiming the June 17 stabbing is a hate crime because they claim Foreman was targeted for his pro-Trump views. The stabbing reportedly came after he left a sanctuary-city protest. Foreman works as a bodyguard for Tim Gionet, an Internet personality known as “BakedAlaska,” his Twitter handle. He is also a member of Oathkeepers, a group of veterans who provide security at pro-Trump rallies... http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/trump-supporter-stabbed-9-times-after-political-rally/.
Antifa ‘Resistance’ Sends Out Call
for Violence Against Conservatives
by Trey Sanchez
{truthrevolt.org} ~ An Antifa website dedicated to the anti-Trump “resistance” is peddling violent imagery against conservatives... According to Hannity.com, the site It’s Going Down, “a go-to resource for anti-Trump activists and anarchists in the aftermath of the 2016 US general election,” published a propaganda poster of a man in a MAGA hat, with a Nazi soldier as a shadow, submitting to a bayonet: In addition to calls for violence as a “necessary evil,” the website also calls for “mass insurrection” and urges “mass resistance” against the Trump administration, which it labels “Nazis” and “fascists.” Yes, the “anti” fascist group calling out “fascists” is a nice irony... http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/antifa-resistance-sends-out-call-violence-against-conservatives.
Drone Recovered In S Korea Verified From
North, Had Sensitive Photos, “Grave Provocation”
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ South Korea’s military confirmed on Wednesday that a drone recovered earlier this month on a mountain near the Demilitarized Zone border has been confirmed to be North Korean... They described the intrusion as a “grave provocation” and a violation of the Korean War truce. Reuters reports that the drone went down while on the final portion of a reconnaissance flight into the South and was equipped with a camera and contained aerial photographs of a US anti-missile defense system located in a southern region of South Korea. In their briefing, South Korea’s defense ministry and military officials stated that the origin and flight path of the drone were confirmed in an analysis of the onboard computer and camera...http://rickwells.us/drone-recovered-s-korea-verified-north-sensitive-photos-grave-provocation/.
.
by Dennis Prager
{townhall.com} ~ What would have happened if a Trump supporter had shot a Democratic congressman and other Democratic Washington officials?
The answer is obvious.
The New York Times, the rest of the left-wing media and the Democratic Party would have made the shootings the dominant issue in American life. It is not possible to understand the left -- and, therefore, the media and the current state of American life -- without understanding how the left uses and relies on hysteria. Hysteria is to the left as oxygen is to biological life.
From the moment Donald Trump was elected president, America has been drowning in left-wing hysteria, all fomented by the media and the Democratic Party.
The charge of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign is hysteria. The claim that the president engaged in obstruction of justice is hysteria. As I have pointed out, the charge of Trump's election unleashing hate and anti-Semitism, which dominated American media for months, was hysteria.
If Democrats had been shot by a Trump supporter, all you would be hearing and reading about is how much hate the Trump election has unleashed in America, how his election is threatening our democracy and how he is unleashing fascism.
But it was a not a Trump supporter who attempted to murder a Democratic congressman, Capitol Police officers, a House GOP aide and a lobbyist; it was a Trump-hating leftist who attempted to murder a Republican congressman and other Republican officials. And, for that reason, what would have been the dominant issue in America today is already a nonissue. The shooting took place on Wednesday. On Friday, the only article about it on The New York Times front page was about the "harmony" engulfing Democrats and Republicans in the wake of the shooting. By Saturday, there was nothing about the shooting on the front page.
The "harmony" issue is worth noting. As sure as the sun rises in the east, had a Trump-supporting fanatic shot Democratic officials, the Democrats would not have said a word about the need for "harmony," or the need to lower the temperature in American political discourse. On the contrary, they would have greatly raised the temperature of their already blistering rhetoric. They would have attributed the shooting entirely to Trump's "hateful" rhetoric having permeated conservative and Republican America.
But it was a leftist who attempted to slaughter Republicans, so it was Republicans who had to respond. And they did so by calling for harmony and lowering the temperature of political differences.
In other words, Republicans reacted with complete conciliation, whereas, the Democrats and their media would have gone ballistic against the right.
Now, why is that?
One reason is that Republicans have accepted the post-shooting narrative of there being some sort of moral equivalence between right-wing and left-wing hate. That they have reinforces my belief that the great majority of Republicans and conservatives, whether in politics or in the media, do not appreciate how rotten the left is (the left -- not traditional liberals). Many really believe that calls for "harmony" and "unity" with Democrats and the left are meaningful.
But the only reason Democrats talked about harmony for a few days after the shooting was one of theirs was the shooter.
Even during the three-day "harmony" period, the left was busy furthering the falsehood that there is quantitative and qualitative equivalence between right-wing and left-wing hate. As evidence, a New York Times editorial said: "Was this attack evidence of how vicious American politics has become? Probably. In 2011, Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl. At the time, we and others were sharply critical of the heated political rhetoric on the right. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin's political action committee circulated a map that showed the targeted electoral districts of Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs."
A Republican putting crosshairs on vulnerable Democrat districts is the worst the Times could come up with. And that is apparently equivalent to all the hate directed at President Trump: calling opposition to him "resistance," as if Democrats were the French resistance and Trump were a Nazi; Kathy Griffin holding President Trump's mock severed head with blood gushing out; Stephen Colbert saying on his TV show that Trump's mouth would make a good "c--- holster" for Russian President Vladimir Putin; and so much more unprecedented hate.
The difference between what has happened after these shootings and what would have happened had a right-winger shot Democratic officials is, in a nutshell, the moral difference between the left and the right; and between Democrats and Republicans.
If a Trump Supporter Had
Shot a Democratic Congressman
{townhall.com} ~ What would have happened if a Trump supporter had shot a Democratic congressman and other Democratic Washington officials?
The answer is obvious.
The New York Times, the rest of the left-wing media and the Democratic Party would have made the shootings the dominant issue in American life. It is not possible to understand the left -- and, therefore, the media and the current state of American life -- without understanding how the left uses and relies on hysteria. Hysteria is to the left as oxygen is to biological life.
From the moment Donald Trump was elected president, America has been drowning in left-wing hysteria, all fomented by the media and the Democratic Party.
The charge of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign is hysteria. The claim that the president engaged in obstruction of justice is hysteria. As I have pointed out, the charge of Trump's election unleashing hate and anti-Semitism, which dominated American media for months, was hysteria.
If Democrats had been shot by a Trump supporter, all you would be hearing and reading about is how much hate the Trump election has unleashed in America, how his election is threatening our democracy and how he is unleashing fascism.
But it was a not a Trump supporter who attempted to murder a Democratic congressman, Capitol Police officers, a House GOP aide and a lobbyist; it was a Trump-hating leftist who attempted to murder a Republican congressman and other Republican officials. And, for that reason, what would have been the dominant issue in America today is already a nonissue. The shooting took place on Wednesday. On Friday, the only article about it on The New York Times front page was about the "harmony" engulfing Democrats and Republicans in the wake of the shooting. By Saturday, there was nothing about the shooting on the front page.
The "harmony" issue is worth noting. As sure as the sun rises in the east, had a Trump-supporting fanatic shot Democratic officials, the Democrats would not have said a word about the need for "harmony," or the need to lower the temperature in American political discourse. On the contrary, they would have greatly raised the temperature of their already blistering rhetoric. They would have attributed the shooting entirely to Trump's "hateful" rhetoric having permeated conservative and Republican America.
But it was a leftist who attempted to slaughter Republicans, so it was Republicans who had to respond. And they did so by calling for harmony and lowering the temperature of political differences.
In other words, Republicans reacted with complete conciliation, whereas, the Democrats and their media would have gone ballistic against the right.
Now, why is that?
One reason is that Republicans have accepted the post-shooting narrative of there being some sort of moral equivalence between right-wing and left-wing hate. That they have reinforces my belief that the great majority of Republicans and conservatives, whether in politics or in the media, do not appreciate how rotten the left is (the left -- not traditional liberals). Many really believe that calls for "harmony" and "unity" with Democrats and the left are meaningful.
But the only reason Democrats talked about harmony for a few days after the shooting was one of theirs was the shooter.
Even during the three-day "harmony" period, the left was busy furthering the falsehood that there is quantitative and qualitative equivalence between right-wing and left-wing hate. As evidence, a New York Times editorial said: "Was this attack evidence of how vicious American politics has become? Probably. In 2011, Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl. At the time, we and others were sharply critical of the heated political rhetoric on the right. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin's political action committee circulated a map that showed the targeted electoral districts of Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs."
A Republican putting crosshairs on vulnerable Democrat districts is the worst the Times could come up with. And that is apparently equivalent to all the hate directed at President Trump: calling opposition to him "resistance," as if Democrats were the French resistance and Trump were a Nazi; Kathy Griffin holding President Trump's mock severed head with blood gushing out; Stephen Colbert saying on his TV show that Trump's mouth would make a good "c--- holster" for Russian President Vladimir Putin; and so much more unprecedented hate.
The difference between what has happened after these shootings and what would have happened had a right-winger shot Democratic officials is, in a nutshell, the moral difference between the left and the right; and between Democrats and Republicans.
Comments