TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
t’s Time for Trump 
to Give Mueller a Hard Deadline
.
Levin – Dems Are Fighting So Hard Because 
ALL CORRUPTION LEADS to liar-nOBAMA 
{ rickwells.us } ~Mark Levin says the reason that scum-Schiff and the rest of the Democrats and their Praetorian Guard media are fighting so hard... they’re not only protecting the liar-Clintons, but more importantly, Hussein liar-nObama. He notes that liar-nObama’s name never comes up so he draws the connections for the audience. Levin says, “Loretta Lynch knew about these FISA warrants, Yates, the Deputy Attorney General, the extensions, Rod Rosenstein, now the Deputy Attorney General, he knew, FBI Director Comey, Deputy Director McCabe, Strzok, the head of counterintelligence, Page, his girlfriend.” He asks, “Who else would have known about these FISA applications and warrants? Well, let me tell you a little secret, these are counterintelligence efforts. You have to assume the National Security Council and the White House knew. Why would the FBI, the Justice Department keep that from the National Security Director in the White House? Why would they keep it from the Deputy Director in the White House?”...  https://rickwells.us/levin-dems-corruption-obama/
'POLITICAL FIRESTORM': Meet The Man Set To
Ignite D.C. With liar-Clinton Email Investigation 
by RYAN SAAVEDRA
{ dailywire.com } ~ An important player in multiple high-level investigations which have dominated national headlines... is about to go from being relatively unknown to becoming a household name – his name is Michael Horowitz. Horowitz is the inspector general at the Department of Justice and is heavily involved in the Russia investigation and the investigation into how the FBI handled the criminal investigation into former Secretary of State liar-Hillary Clinton – a report expected to come out in the next couple months. Bill Hamel, former inspector general for investigations at the Department of Education, heaped praise on Horowitz for his character. "He is really one of the smartest and fairest people I have ever had the pleasure to work with," Hamel said. "He’s a straight shooter and a fair guy. He’s an honest broker."...  https://www.dailywire.com/news/26825/political-firestorm-meet-man-s...
.
scum-Adam Schiff Fell For Prank, Had Staffers
Work to Obtain Dirt on Trump from 
Foreign Government
by Kemberlee Kaye
{ legalinsurrection.com } ~ Just when you thought it wasn’t possible, the Trump/Russia collusion story reached an entirely new level of ridiculous... The Democrats leading Trump/Russia/Collusion attack dog, Rep. scum-Adam Schiff, was exposed as having taken well-known Russian pranksters, Vocan and Lexus, seriously. Vocan and Lexus, “offered to give him ‘compromising’ dirt on Donald Trump – including nude photos of the president and a Russian reality show star,” reports the Daily Mail. According to the same report, scum-Schiff’s staff corresponded with someone they believed to be a Ukranian politician in order to obtain the non-existent classified information...  https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/02/report-adam-schiff-fell-for-p...
.
Judge Nap Wants Trump To Release Dem 
Memo To Send Intelligence Community 
‘Through The Roof’
by NICK GIVAS
{ dailycaller.com } ~ Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano said he hopes President Donald Trump allows the Schiff FISA memo to be released... and thinks it will drive the intelligence community crazy. “I hope he releases it because it will show who’s spinning, who’s exaggerating,” Napolitano said on Fox & Friends Tuesday. “It will also show … raw intelligence. There’s everything in there. If you like Donald Trump, you are going to find some stuff in there. If you don’t like Donald trump, you’re going to find some stuff in there. So the pressure, once this Democratic memo comes out, the pressure will build for the raw intelligence on which the Republican memo is based and on which the Democratic memo is based to come out.” “That will send the intelligence community through the roof,” he added. “Because this stuff is never ever made public.”...  http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/06/judge-napolitano-democratic-memo/...
.
Gowdy Blames Rosenstein 
For Broad Mueller Investigation
by AMBER ATHEY 
{ dailycaller.com } ~ House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy blames Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein... for the broad purview of the Russia investigation, he revealed in a Fox News interview on Tuesday. Fox News host Martha MacCallum noted that special counsels often go beyond their initial focus and asked Gowdy if he had fears of that happening with Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation. “You have seen special councils in the past leave their purview and the investigation goes on for a long time, the next thing you know, you are investigating a Monica Lewinsky case when the president didn’t even know her when the special counsel began his work. You don’t have any fear of that here?” MacCallum asked...  http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/06/gowdy-blames-rosenstein-mueller-i...
.
.
t’s Time for Trump 
to Give Mueller a Hard Deadline

themadpatriots.com } ~ Even those who understand the significance of the House Intelligence Committee’s memo have been telling President Trump through the media that he must not fire Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein or Special Counsel Robert Mueller. This, they say, would only make things worse. Democrats would cry foul with more ferocity than they’ve ever cried about anything. You wouldn’t be able to pick up a newspaper or turn on your television without seeing reference to Nixon’s “Saturday Night Massacre.” Republicans would potentially have no choice but to bring impeachment proceedings against the president, throwing this country into even more disarray than we already find ourselves in.

Hmm, we’re not so sure.

But okay, let’s take it as fact that it would be “bad” for Trump to fire Rosenstein or Mueller at this time. That’s fine. Let the Russia investigation proceed…but not indefinitely. It’s time for the president to reassert his authority over the Justice Department and put an end to what is now – with the release of the memo – undoubtedly a purely political witch hunt. Give Mueller a hard deadline – early summer at the very latest – and tell him that whatever he’s going to conclude, he needs to conclude it by then. That gives him plenty of time to wrap things up, interview who he needs to interview, indict who he wants to indict, and put a pretty bow on top.

Here’s what it prevents: Letting Democrats and Mueller unveil an October Surprise on the Republicans in the runup to November’s midterms.

Because left unimpeded, that’s exactly where this is headed. The idea that Mueller COULD even bring an indictment against a sitting president is quite silly, even if he had the goods to do so. The idea that a Republican-controlled Congress would pursue impeachment is equally unlikely, and the Democrats know this all too well. So what is the point of this investigation? Why are we spending so much money on this nonsense, when if there was ANY proof of collusion it would have come out a year ago? And the answer to those questions is obvious. The Democrats are waiting and biding their time, and when they feel the public is ready for a cough, cough bombshell, they’re going to drop it. Not in federal court, but on the front page of the New York Times.

This “bombshell” won’t be anything that actually proves the narrative – that Trump colluded with Moscow to win the election. As we said, if there was any evidence of that, we would have already known about it. No, it will be something along the lines of a “crime” Trump or his business committed twenty years ago. Or it will be something having to do with the ludicrous charge of obstruction. Or maybe Mueller will try to pinch Trump on perjury. Once a seasoned prosecutor has the full weight of the intel community on his side, there’s really no end to the chicanery that can transpire.

There’s no good reason for Trump to wait around for that to happen. Mueller has had long enough to conduct a thorough investigation. Give him another four or five months and that’s it. After that, it’s over. If you’ve got a political bombshell to drop, you can do it in June just as easily as you can in October. It’s time to bring this fiasco to an end.

Views: 26

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service