The three top-tier candidates for the Republican nomination came out of the big Conservative Political Action Conference event better than they went in. Frontrunner Jeb Bush took a moderate message to a conservative gathering and came out unscathed. (His team also demonstrated organizational chops in busing in some prepster-looking folks in Jeb! ’16 stickers from the Hill and downtown to fill up empty space in the hall.) Walker scored a surprisingly close second in the event’s closely watched straw poll. While Sen. Rand Paul delivered an expected win with the youngish, libertarian-leaning activists, Walker being just 5 points off the lead with so many conservative alternatives on the ballots is a testament to his surge. And there was no doubt that Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., won new admirers for his nimble, direct answers. And now we start to see some clearer contours of the race. -Fox News
Fox News: “Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a presumptive 2016 Republican presidential candidate, says he has changed his immigration stance and no longer backs comprehensive reform that would allow illegal immigrants to be penalized but remain in the country…Walker in 2013 said a plan in which illegal immigrants can become United States citizens by first paying penalties and enduring a waiting period ‘makes sense.’ However, he is now saying such a plan is tantamount to amnesty, amid criticism that he has flip-flopped on that issue and others, including right-to-work legislation in his home state. ‘I don’t believe in amnesty,’ said Walker, who finished second Saturday in the Conservative Political Action Conference’s straw poll for potential 2016 Republican presidential candidates…Walker also is among the 25 Republican governors who have joined in a lawsuit challenging the president’s 2014 executive action that defers deportation for millions of illegal immigrants.” -Fox News
“And I want to make it clear right now. I’m not comparing [ISIS and government worker unions]. What I meant was it was about leadership. The leadership we provided under extremely difficult circumstances, arguably, the most difficult of any governor in the country, and maybe in -- in recent times. To me, I apply that to saying if I were to run and if I were to win and be commander-in-chief, I believe that kind of leadership is what's necessary to take on radical Islamic terrorism.” –Gov. Scott Walker, R-Wis., on “Fox News Sunday” Watch here.
Churchill's biographers say they can't find the quote, but someone said it. The left/right dichotomy has strongly influenced my life for decades. When I was teaching in the public schools, my history textbooks were slanted liberal. I provided balance by offering a conservative point of view to contrast the book’s perspective. Lately I’ve been teaching a group of ten home-schooled, high school-age students in Auburn with whom I’m doing something I’ve always wanted to try: using both a liberal text and a conservative text, and assigning them readings on a particular period in history from two perspectives. Each student has “A People’s History of the United States” by the late Howard Zinn - a closet communist. They also have “A Patriot’s History of the United States” by Schweikart and Allen. I’ve got students only once a week for two hours, and we cannot cover too much in one year, but it’s very instructive to compare and contrast the two points of view. Authors of both books claim to be unbiased, but neither Zinn nor Schweikart, nor Allen are of course. Neither am I, but I try to be. No one is really, but we should keep our minds open. When I started teaching in 1975, I was pretty far to the left. After dropping out of college in 1972, I worked with liberals in Hanoi John Kerry’s failed congressional campaign in the Massachusetts 5th district that year. I also worked with “community organizer” disciples of Saul Alinsky and Noam Chomsky in Lowell, Massachusetts. After all that I went back to school to become a teacher and began my long metamorphosis from left to right. When I first started publishing columns in 1989, I was still straddling the fence. By about 1993, however, I had become a full-fledged conservative. Around that time, I began publishing regular weekly columns for local newspapers in which I expressed my opinions without reserve. Many readers on the left assumed I taught my history classes the same way I wrote my columns. At first, they wrote letters to the editor suggesting I was unfit to teach and these were published frequently. Several leftists went further by trying to influence principals, superintendents, school boards, and state teacher licensing agencies to discipline me, silence me, or pull my teaching certification. By the time I retired, I had amassed quite a paper trail documenting their efforts. For the past three years, I’ve been working on and off writing a book about this, being careful to get it all down as it happened. Last month, I thought, “Okay, I’m done. It’s all down there in black and white.” I printed it off, made some copies, and asked friends to read it with the condition that they be ruthless in their feedback. Well, that feedback is trickling in and I’m thinking maybe I’m not all done. Looks like I need to expand it. Some suggest I add more on what caused me to move from left to right. Others said it reads too much like “just the facts, ma’am” written by a detective or a reporter, and I need to put in more about what it felt like as events unfolded. Then there’s the business of book publishing. It’s not like publishing columns, except that both are changing rapidly. The more I look into it, the more I realize how much I still have to learn. It looks like I may have been premature when I announced on the “Left and Right” show that my book about moving from left to right was finished. It was hard enough to get down what happened. Now I’m going to have to write about my feelings? That’s not something I’m used to or very good at either, but it appears to be still another thing I have to learn. http://tommclaughlin.blogspot.com/2015/03/left-and-right.html |
Comments