The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
 Democrats' 'Better Deal' —
Same as the Old New Deal
by Paul Albaugh
.
Sessions DOJ Imposes New Cooperation
Mandates Cutting Grants To Sanctuary Cities
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ The Justice Department made it official on Tuesday with their announcement that sanctuary cities will not be receiving grant money... Only those cities which allow immigration officials jail access and notification of potential deportees being released will receive funding awards. The funds are generally used for a variety of needs, such as bulletproof vests and body cameras. In announcing the policy, Attorney General Sessions stated, “So-called ‘sanctuary’ policies make all of us less safe because they intentionally undermine our laws and protect illegal aliens who have committed crimes. These policies also encourage illegal immigration and even human trafficking by perpetuating the lie that in certain cities, illegal aliens can live outside the law.” Sessions cited the example of the recent death of ten illegals in the back of a semi-truck in San Antonio as an example of the potential impact of sanctuary policies, that they “can have tragic consequences.”... http://rickwells.us/sessions-doj-imposes-new-cooperation-mandates-c...
.
USS Thunderbolt Fired
Warning Shots at Iranian Patrol Boat...
by Sam LaGrone
{news.usni.org} ~ A Cyclone-class patrol craft warded off an Iranian patrol boat that was approaching a U.S. Navy guided-missile cruiser on Tuesday in the Persian Gulf, a Navy official told USNI News... USS Thunderbolt (PC-12) fired “multiple warning shots” after an Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy Nassar-class patrol boat came within 150 yards of the patrol craft and one nautical mile of nearby cruiser USS Vella Gulf (CG-72). The incident occurred at about 10:20 A.M. local time, or about 3:20 A.M. EST, according to video of the encounter obtained by USNI News... https://news.usni.org/2017/07/25/uss-thunderbolt-fired-warning-shot...
.
House Conservatives Try Again to Block
Funding for Transgender Treatments in Military
by Fred Lucas
{dailysignal.com} ~ Some House Republicans are taking another shot at blocking funding for gender transition surgeries in the military, projected to cost about $3.7 billion over the next decade... Earlier this month, 23 House Republicans joined Democrats to defeat an amendment by Rep. Vicky Hartzler, R-Mo., to block the funding for transgender treatments in the National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA. The NDAA sets priorities for military spending. The military budget is already strained, said Thomas Spoehr, director of the Center for National Defense at The Heritage Foundation... http://dailysignal.com/2017/07/26/house-conservatives-try-again-to-...
.
Amid Trump’s Threats,
Conservatives Rally Around Sessions
by Fred Lucas
{dailysignal.com} ~ Immigration hawks and law enforcement—two key elements of the coalition that helped elect Donald Trump as president—rushed to the defense of Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Tuesday... as Trump continued his public criticism of an early political ally. Trump could face grave political consequences if he fires Sessions over his frustration with a special counsel’s expanding Russia investigation, said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies. “This would do broad and long-lasting harm to the Trump administration,” Krikorian told The Daily Signal...http://dailysignal.com/2017/07/25/amid-trump-threats-conservatives-...
.
liar-nObama Holdovers Scrub Term
“Genocide” To Protect ISIS, Block Christian Aid
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ In an effort that is not unlike Robert Mueller’s purging of references to Islam from terrorist training materials and other documents at the FBI following 9/11... the State Department is rewriting history as well. They’re disassociating ISIS terrorists from their mass murder. The State Department’s top lawyers are excising the word “genocide” from the descriptions of the ISIS mass slaughter of Christians, Yazidis and other ethnic minorities in Syria and Iraq in speeches prior to them being delivered. They’re also purging it from other official documents, according to human rights activists and other attorneys. Democrats are also delaying the confirmation of Mark Green, as they do with every pick, President Trump’s choice to head the US Agency for International Development. That leaves the liar-nObama globalist in charge of giving our money away, which he doles out to leftists, particularly those “Open Society” organizations belonging to George Soros...http://rickwells.us/obama-holdovers-scrub-term-genocide-protect-isi...
.
.
 Democrats' 'Better Deal' — Same as the Old 
 New Deal 
By Paul Albaugh:  Donald Trump has been president for six months now and if you listen to Democrats and the Leftmedia, you might conclude that he and the Republican-controlled Congress are destroying America. But perhaps there is no better indicator of Trump's performance thus far as president than to hear Democrats rail about how terrible a job he has done and how horrific his policies are.
          Democrats remain dumbfounded at his election and they're even more confused that the last four special elections ended with Republican victories. Their "progressive" proposals and the millions of dollars they've wasted on campaigns haven't worked.
          That said, at least Chuck clown-Schumer has enough sense to tell liar-Hillary Clinton to stop blaming everyone else. "When you lose to somebody who has 40% popularity, you don't blame other things — Comey, Russia — you blame yourself," clown-Schumer said. "And the number one thing that we did wrong is ... we didn't tell people what we stood for."
          So, this week, Democrats introduced their "Better Deal" for America. But you'd be forgiven for thinking it sounds just like everything they've been saying for 80 years. As Jonah Goldberg quipped, "I mean, the word 'Deal' is hardly subtle."
          Their beloved highness Nancy Pulosi wrote an opinion piece in The Washington Post to lay out this supposedly better deal. Predictably, Pulosi starts by ripping Republicans for wanting to dismantle the (Un)Affordable Care Act, claiming that they're "trying to raise Americans' health costs to fund tax breaks for billionaires." Naturally, she leaves out the details of the Democrats' health care takeover. The mandate to buy health insurance policies that cover a long list of (often unwanted) required services caused premiums to skyrocket, squeezing the very voters she's trying to reach with this noxious class warfare.
          Trump wants liar-nObamaCare gone, though Senate Republicans failed to accomplish any meaningful repeal and so, for now, we're stuck with the Democrats' terrible law.
          Aside from this, Pulosi and her fellow Democrats are offering three empty slogans: better jobs, better wages and a better future. All of these sound like fantastic proposals for Americans, but the methods Democrats want to use to accomplish these goals are the same ideas that had the opposite effect and brought on the 2008 financial crisis.
          On jobs, Pulosi writes, "Democrats are pledging ourselves to the goal of creating good-paying, full-time jobs for 10 million more Americans in the next five years." When is the last time that a politician created a job? Government cannot create jobs without taking money from those who are already working in order to pay for it. Her proposal offers a new tax credit for companies that train and hire skilled workers and offer them a good wage (read: higher minimum wage). Aren't successful companies already doing this and without a tax credit?
          On better wages, beyond a higher, job-destroying $15/hour minimum wage, Pulosi wants government to crack down on large corporations and monopolies that she blames for Americans missing out on opportunities. Yet she calls for more of the same central planning that has never worked and never will work. In fact, to whip these large corporations into shape she wants tougher standards and even more regulations. Well, we just had eight years of excessive regulations and government standards, and such heavy-handed policy was the primary reason for the slowest decade of economic growth in our nation's history.
          On health care, Pulosi and her fellow Democrats want to take "unprecedented action to lower the costs of prescription drugs." Prescription drugs are far more expensive than they should be, but the biggest reason is — you guessed it — government regulation. But, as usual, rather than rein in the overbearing regulatory commissars at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Pulosi proposes doubling down. "We will leverage the power of Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices," she writes, "force drug manufacturers to open their books and justify cost increases, and create a strong, independent enforcement agency empowered to end outrageous and unjustified prescription drug price-gouging."
          Instead, the best way to reduce the cost of prescription drugs for consumers is to keep government out. Let the free market work the way it should and allow companies to compete for better prescription drugs and the costs will go down. Democrats won't hear of such things.
          Every proposal that Pulosi and the Democrat Party have is part of the same old socialist agenda that has already been tested and failed. They want more control over the economy, more regulations, more taxes to pay for their ideas and more power over Americans. That is the Democrats' vision for a "better" future. Nowhere in Pulosi's proposal are the ideas of less government, more freedom and more individual rights and responsibilities. Hers is the collectivist, statist vision that is the antithesis to what our Founders intended. And it is an agenda that will make America lose, not win.
          But hey, at least Pulosi didn't blame Vladimir Putin or James Comey~The Patriot Post

Views: 13

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

Facebook & Twitter

ALERT ALERT

BREAKING: Hillary Admits She Was Wrong About ‘Deplorables,’
White Nationalists Only ‘0.15%’ Of U.S. Population

(TeaParty.org) – Hillary Clinton, the failed liberal presidential candidate who sealed her fate by slamming half of U.S. voters as a load of racist, sexist, xenophobic “deplorables,” just came out and admitted she was wrong, Breitbart reports.

Speaking with Hugh Hewitt on his radio show about her book “What Happened,” he asked her if she actually believes that half of the American population are white nationalists and racists.

“Of the 62.9 million people who voted for President Trump, do you have a number in your mind that you think are actually white nationalist racists of that 62.9 million, a real number?” he asked.

“No, I don’t,” she said.

Still have any doubts? Later in the conversation, Hewitt asked the same question again. “Do you think there are more than a half million, you know, honest-to-God white nationalists running around the United States?”

Clinton: “Probably not, no.”

A white nationalist would like to establish a sovereign country for people of white European heritage, an idea everyone across the political spectrum finds unspeakably intolerable and offensive. Now, the woman who declared that this was the desire of more than half of Americans is saying that virtually nobody wants it. On both counts, she’s completely wrong.

There’s no doubt that Clinton is probably going to try running again for president in 2020 – if she’s even alive that long – and might be trying to absolve her guilt and pander to all those “undecideds” who instantly went MAGA the second she blasted them as no-good racist deplorables for not voting Democrat.

However, Clinton did later admit that there were more white nationalists in America than she had thought. Expressing her worries that the internet and the presidency of Trump is giving them a voice and a platform, she hinted that under her iron scepter, she will attempt to silence them.

“Unfortunately, their views, which used to be quite beyond the mainstream, you know, have a much broader audience now, because you know, of being online and having outlets and media presence that can promote those attitudes,” she said.

How many white nationalists are there in the United States? That’s a question with troublingly few answers, since for some mysterious reason the liberal mainstream media – even though it claims all the time that white supremacy is on the rise – hasn’t actually bothered to take polls and just ask people whether they are white nationalists.

Actually, there’s a simple answer to that. If such a poll were to be taken, our bet is that liberals would be very disappointed to discover that almost nobody is actually a white nationalist, and so there would be no way they could continue scaring people with those fears. A tactic Clinton has apparently given up on.

Left-wingers are entirely convinced that some vague but large majority of people who say they aren’t racists or white nationalists, actually share a lot of views with them – which is why Nazi and white supremacist have become interchangeable with Republican and libertarian.

An article by Newsweek, which polled around 5,000 in order address this very question, came up with this response:

About 70 percent of respondents strongly agreed that people of different races should be “free to live wherever they choose” and that “all races are equal,” and 89 percent agreed that all races should be treated equally. At the same time, 31 percent of respondents said they strongly or somewhat agreed that the country needs to “protect and preserve its White European heritage,” while 34 percent strongly or somewhat disagreed and 29 percent said they neither agreed nor disagreed.

Reality is, it’s a little true that some Americans do have overlapping views with white nationalists, but the overwhelming majority of respondents STRONGLY believe that the races should be free, are equal, and should be treated equally. Sounds like none of these respondents would be joining a lynch mob or waging a second Holocaust any time soon – trying to equate the preservation of white heritage with support for slavery and genocide is obviously one of the Left’s biggest lies, and the very reason why 39 percent of people in this same survey believe white people are under attack.

So Clinton changes her mind, and now says she believes less than one percent of the American population are white nationalists – did she believe there were even LESS than that during the campaign trail? Either way, she’s either just lying or plain stupid.

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service