~ Featuring ~
Rabbi Debunks Leftmedia 
Anti-Trump Narrative
by Thomas Gallatin  
Sinema Verite: Arizona Dem Gets Taliban Wish
by Daniel John Sobieski
{} ~ One wonders what Arizona dummycrats-Democrat Kyrsten Sinema, candidate for the Senate seat being vacated by Republican Jeff Flake, thinks of the news that the five members of the Taliban... dubbed their “Dream Team”, that President Barack Hussein scumbag/liar-nObama traded for the traitor and deserter Bowe Bergdahl, have officially returned to the Taliban, their mission once again to kill Americans and, presumably, Arizonans. Let me take a wild guess and suggest that it is doubtful Sinema will express condemnation of and regret for scumbag/liar-nObama’s move to excuse a traitor and reward an enemy of the United States, an enemy that tried to kill and are still trying to kill the likes of her Senate opponent, GOP representative and former A-10 Warthog pilot Martha McSally. In their only debate,  it was revealed that in a 2003 radio interview longtime antiwar activist Sinema said that it was okay with her if you wanted to join those trying to kill the sons and daughters of America in the country that Osama bin Laden used as a base camp to train for and launch the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks: Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, the dummycrats-Democratic Senate candidate in Arizona, said in a resurfaced radio interview from 2003 that she does not care if people fight for the Taliban against the United States…During a February 2003 interview on a radio show hosted by libertarian activist Ernest Hancock, Sinema said she did not object to individuals going abroad to fight for groups hostile to the U.S., Fox News reports. "As an individual, if I want to go fight in the Taliban army, I go over there, and I'm fighting for the Taliban, I'm saying that's a personal decision," Hancock said. "Fine. I don't care if you go and do that, go ahead," Sinema replied...
Beware Turkey's Dangerous New Refugee Role
by Uzay Bulut
{} ~ Turkey, thanks to the United Nations, will now officially be in charge of deciding not only who is a refugee... but also where he or she will be placed or transferred. Turkish state authorities have repeatedly threatened to flood Europe with refugees, such as President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's message to Europe in 2016: "You cried out when 50,000 refugees were at the Kapikule border. You started asking what you would do if Turkey would open the gates. Look at me -- if you go further, those border gates will be open. You should know that." Given the Turkish threats, this new official position for Turkey should be of concern. The pro-government Turkish newspaper Daily Sabah recently reported: "The U.N. refugee agency has handed over the management of registration procedures for the refugees in Turkey to the country's migration authority. Turkey's Directorate General of Migration Management itself will now oversee the registration of refugees and determine their status. Any foreigner seeking international protection in Turkey will now have to apply to the local offices of the Turkish migration authority." The concern exists for three key reasons...
'If you see a white person...say something'
by Robert Weissberg
{} ~ In New York City, where I live, the "If you see something, say something" signs are ubiquitous... Certainly sound advice, at least in the abstract, as regards the war on terror and criminality. Unfortunately, in settings obsessing over the feelings of certain minority groups, alerting the authorities about apparent suspicious behavior can be personally risky. Indeed, save in extreme situations, it's best to keep quiet or quickly flee the scene. To understand this troubling situation, consider that to the trained eye particularly police officers' eyes, suspicious behavior is nearly everywhere. An especially common example is people who appear out of place or at least cannot offer credible explanations for their presence. How should the police react when encountering at 5:00 A.M. a well dressed German tourist in a black neighborhood notorious for drug-dealers and hookers? One can only reasonably surmise that absent any compelling explanation, these out-of-place folks are up to no good, an assessment that would justify asking them – perhaps forcefully – to move on lest bad things happen.  Likewise, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) workers are trained to see suspicious behavior – for example, young men traveling from the Middle East without luggage. Retail stores on the lookout for shoplifters will closely monitor patrons dressed in heavy, bulky clothing during summer or handling expensive designer garments not in their size. Israeli airport security scrutinizes people before they enter the terminal for anxious, nervous behavior – repeated looking around, being fidgety, and other tell-tale signs that make them stand out from other travelers. Particularly valuable for picking out troublemakers early is "odd" behavior, behavior that somehow intuitively does not fit. It is difficult to define "odd" behavior legally, but it is not all that hard to sense it. Remember the  Philadelphia blacks in Starbucks?  Retail clerks cannot help but notice a customer who meanders about the store just prior to closing – he's probably waiting until all the customers leave and the clerks will be busy counting the day's cash...
The George Papadopoulos Interview You’ve Been Waiting For
by Team Bongino
{} ~ In this special episode, I interview George Papadopoulos and his answers are explosive. You don’t want to miss this.
THUG vs. the Truth
by K.M Breakey
{} ~ Like the novel it's based on, the film version of The Hate U Give (THUG) received rave reviews... I knew exactly what to expect, but out of curiosity, I recently read THUG. It didn't disappoint. At every turn, there's an extra helping of dangerous false narrative. It's a quick and easy read. The pacing is taut, the characters well formed except the white ones...I'll get to that.  All the right lingo is present: basic, fresh, a'ight, ratchet, nae nae, and so on. Verb conjugation dutifully follows AAVE syntax. THUG is chock-full of black culture – Malcolm X, Black Jesus, Nation of Islam. Basketball, hip-hop, an obsession with sneakers.  The Black Power fist makes many appearances, hero-worship of Tupac even more. There are plenty of baby-daddies and lots of gangland lore. All very authentic. We're obviously getting the real deal. Sixteen-year-old Starr Carter lives in Garden Heights, a drug-infested ghetto brimming with crime and squalor. But Starr's lucky – she attends a white people school forty-five minutes away, where she's cool by default. She can't quite be herself, though. No slang or she's hood. No aggression or she's angry black girl. Anti-white hostility is rampant in THUG – the kind that's so mainstream nowadays that it goes unnoticed. Anger, hostility, and resentment drip from the black characters. Starr's resentment, muted in early chapters, gains traction as events unfold. To keep the reader on board, THUG provides convenient proxies for white wickedness: racist white chick and racist white cop...
Rabbi Debunks Leftmedia Anti-Trump Narrative
by Thomas Gallatin:  Following the anti-Semitic attack on the Tree of Life synagogue last Saturday, which left 11 people dead, the Leftmedia worked to create a narrative that blamed President Donald Trump’s rhetoric for fostering the hatred that motivated the atrocity. In an interview with CNN’s Alisyn Camerota prior to Trump’s visiting the synagogue, Tree of Life Rabbi Jeffrey Myers refused to badmouth the president, insisting, “The president of the United States is always welcome. I’m a citizen; he is my president. He is certainly welcome.”

             On Tuesday, amid a crowd of protesters, Trump and his family visited the Tree of Life synagogue, where he spoke privately with Rabbi Myers and offered his condolences. Following Trump’s visit, Myers was again interviewed by CNN’s Camerota, who renewed her negative narrative against the president. But once again the good rabbi refused, saying that he was “pleasantly surprised” by Trump’s warmth.
               Myer further related, “I was privileged to have a private 15 or 20 minutes with the [Trump] family. The president was very warm, very consoling. He put his hand on my shoulder and the first question he asked me was, ‘Rabbi, tell me — how are you doing?’ And I must say throughout the time we spent together, I was pleasantly surprised by a warm and personal side to the president that I don’t think America has ever seen.”
               Actually, the rabbi’s personal experience with Trump has been affirmed by many others. As Mark Alexander noted in 2016, “[Trump] is an interesting case study. On a personal level, those we know who are closest to him say that he is very personable and fair, that he demonstrates integrity and humility, and that he treats people with dignity and respect.” In a conversation Alexander had with a longtime friend who managed Trump’s personal security team prior to his nomination, he was told that, despite all of Trump’s brazen, brash bravado in public — his “New Yorker” side — he was universally admired by those on his staff as generous, kind, and fair to those around him, and that his personal interactions with guests were warm and accommodating. Yes, that is the polar opposite of his brawling public persona, but it’s still vintage Trump.
               Even exiting Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), who often butted heads with Trump, confirmed this week that when visiting with Trump at the White House or other venues, he was very personal and hospitable. It’s too bad more of that Trump doesn’t come through in his public comments and interactions.


~The Patriot Post  

Views: 7


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

( – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service