~ Featuring ~  
South Carolina's College Constitution Course
Culture Beat  
Harry dinky-Reid, hanio-John Kerry and 
scumbag-Al Gore named in Areva’s 
$28 billion corruption case
by Jean Patrick Grumberg
{} ~ “When, at the beginning of the year 2018, I discovered the scope of this case, I forwarded to the FBI director all the elements I had been able to get my hands on,”... Marc Eichinger told French Economic monthly magazine Capital (1). This private investigator specialized in the fight against serious international crime and corruption is very familiar with the case: he is the one who wrote the report submitted in April 2010 to Areva’s security department to denounce the potential fraud linked to the acquisition of Uramin three years earlier. Shocked by this new case of corruption in the United States, he also referred the whole case to the French courts, causing the investigation services to overheat in the middle of the summer. At the heart of this new scandal, which has not yet broken out in the United States, are the conditions under which Areva acquired, in February 2010, Ausra, an American startup specialized in solar energy.  Officially, according to the French group, the purchase price was reportedly $243 million. Problem: an Ausra manager claims to have sold the company for… 275 million. Among the shareholders who sold Ausra was scumbag-Al Gore. The former Democratic candidate had acquired his shares in Ausra, totaling $123.3 million, through the two investment funds he chairs or advises, Kleiner Perkins (formerly KPCB) and Generation Investment Management. But a few weeks before this acquisition, in January 2010, a meeting of the Nuclear Policy Council, held in the Elysée Presidential Palace in the presence of all the main players, concluded that it was urgently needed to be recapitalized. The operation was carried out a few months later: the company obtained 900 million euros ($1.2 billion), $800 million being paid by the Kuwait sovereign fund, the KIA, and $400 million by the French State. To recoup its losses, the Trump Administration should trigger a corruption trial against the French company, and, in the event of a win, the rule is that the amount of the fine should cover the total financial loss...
Warning to American Jews: 
Wake Up Before It’s Too Late!
by Ed Brodow
{} ~ Since I was a kid, Jews have been married to the Democratic Party. Everyone in my Brooklyn neighborhood — primarily Jews, Irish, and blacks — voted straight Democratic... If you announced a deviation from the party line, they would look at you as though you were from outer space. It made a lot of sense. The Democratic Party of the 1950s was the party of the underdog. In contrast, today’s Democrats represent America’s social and cultural elites. “How is it possible,” asked author David Horowitz, “that Democrats can pose as defenders of minorities, the middle class, and the poor? Democratic policies,” he says, “have devastated all three.” Yet the majority of today’s Jews still cling to the Donkey’s skirt. Exit polls indicate that 71% of American Jews voted for scumbag/liar-Hillary and 76% voted Democratic in the midterm elections. There are two main reasons: (1) Jews always have been afraid of conservative politicians; and (2) they don’t want to betray the values of their beloved parents. Most Jews don’t realize that the entire picture has flipped. The Democratic Party of their parents and grandparents is not the party of today. Ironically, the liberal Democrat of 1950 is today’s conservative Republican. I have the same worldview that I had in the 50s and 60s, yet I am now a conservative. So what the hell happened? What happened is that the Democratic Party was hijacked by neo-Marxists who reject all American values. They militate for increased governmental control over every aspect of our lives; limitations on free speech and freedom of the press; replacement of capitalism with socialism; replacement of meritocracy with race-based criteria; and a dysfunctional version of social justice that promotes anti-Semitism. These are the values of Venezuela and Cuba. All of these items were part of the Democratic platform under President scumbag/liar-nObama. His negative attitude toward Jews was exposed by his attachment to Jew haters Reverend Wright and Louis Farrakhan. The Jews’ fear of conservative politics has been misplaced. Their fear ought to be reserved for leftists. Since the 1960s, “hatred of Jews in America has moved from being primarily a prejudice of the right to being primarily a prejudice of the left,” says Mosaic...
The Swamp Fights Back
by Victor Davis Hanson
{} ~ Trump was warned by friends, enemies, and neutrals that his fight against the deep state was suicidal... Senate minority leader Chuck scumbag-Schumer, just a few days before Trump’s inauguration, cheerfully forecast in a precursor to Samantha Power’s later admonition what might happen to Trump once he attacked the intelligence services: “Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”Former administrative-state careerists were not shy about warning Trump of what was ahead. The counterterrorism analyst Phil Mudd, who had worked in the CIA and the FBI under dirty cop-Robert Mueller, warned CNN host Jake Tapper in August 2017 that “the government is going to kill” President Donald Trump. Kill? And what was the reason the melodramatic Mudd adduced for his astounding prediction? “Because he doesn’t support them.” Mudd then elaborated: “Let me give you one bottom line as a former government official. The government is going to kill this guy. The government is going to kill this guy because he doesn’t support them.” Mudd further clarified his assassination metaphor: “What I’m saying is government — people talk about the deep state — when you disrespect government officials who’ve done 30 years, they’re going to say, ‘Really?’” It was difficult to ascertain to what degree Mudd was serious or exaggerating the depth of deep-state loathing of Trump. A writer for the London Review of Books, Adam Schatz, seemed even more direct. He reported a supposed conversation that he had with an American political scientist knowledgeable of the Washington permanent caste. He purportedly had assured Schatz that if Trump were elected, he would likely not survive his full term: “He will have to be removed from power by the deep state, or be assassinated.”...
Ethics Group Files House Complaint 
on commie-AOC Over Social Media Use
by Chris White   
{} ~ A Washington, D.C-based ethics group is claiming that New York Rep. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s social media usage violates House ethics rules... against using taxpayer resources for political purposes. commie-Ocasio-Cortez’s political Instagram account contains direct links to her House Instagram account and includes a link for political contributions, alongside posts of official video footage on the House floor,  according to a complaint Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust plans to file Thursday with the Office of Congressional Ethics. The group claims these actions violate House ethics rules.“In a way, it’s a straight forward complaint,” Kendra Arnold, executive director of FACT, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “Broadly speaking, the rules clearly define that politics and government works cannot overlap. There are reasons for that: mostly because we don’t want our taxpayer dollars going toward campaigns.” FACT is a nonprofit group whose past president was Matthew Whitaker, an attorney who served as President Donald Trump’s acting attorney general in 2018. “One is influencing the other,”Arnold said, referring to what she believes is the New York Democrat’s penchant for using Twitter as a form of cross-promotion...
JW Videos of the Week
Why is scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton Associate Lanny Davis Attending the Michael CohenHearings?
EVERYONE in Washington DC Knows There is No Trump/Russia Collusion
Rep. Nadler's Investigation into Trump a ‘Remarkable’ Abuse of Power
Tom Fitton’s Video Weekly Update – March 8, 2019
South Carolina's College Constitution Course
Culture Beat:  South Carolina’s Senate recently passed an update to the Reinforcing College Education on America’s Constitutional Heritage Act, the state’s 95-year-old legislation requiring all college students at state schools to take a course on the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Federalist Papers. The update to the law was brought forward after the president of the University of South Carolina, Harris Pastides, refused to comply with the law back in 2014 because he termed it “archaic.”

How “progressive” of him.

Pastides raised particular objection to the law’s language that stated a student could not graduate until the “power of his loyalty” to the Constitution had been examined. Pastides called this “problematic” and believed it to be unconstitutional. But it’s ironic to think that requiring students to pass a course on the history of the founding documents of the country — including the Constitution — can be construed as unconstitutional.

Jameson Broggi at The Daily Signal noted the state’s important role in founding the country, writing, “In 1776, 56 Americans signed the Declaration of Independence, recognizing God-given unalienable rights and pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor in support of that. These were not just words for these men, but a commitment. Three of the four signers from South Carolina paid a price when they were captured by the British during the War for Independence.”

In any event, South Carolina has finally responded to update the language of the law mandating a three-credit-hour course on America’s founding documents as a graduation requirement. Hopefully, South Carolina’s House will follow suit and pass the update to the legislation as well. Heaven knows young people need some help in the civics department.  ~The Patriot Post

Views: 13


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service