Queen Michelle Hailing victory over the 'free contraception mandate' even though it is still in court!

These people are the king and queen of disinformation...

First Lady Hails Free-Contraception Mandate: 'We Made History'

Michelle Obama

First lady Michelle Obama. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

(CNSNews.com) – First Lady Michelle Obama boasted at a campaign event in Omaha, Neb. on Tuesday that "we made history" when the president's health care proposal was enacted and the administration issued a regulation mandating that insurance companies provide women with free contraceptives.

"Two years ago, we made history together by finally passing health reform," said Mrs. Obama. "And because we passed this law, insurance companies will now have to cover basic preventive care--things like prenatal care, mammograms, contraception--at no extra cost."

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) finalized the "preventive services" regulation in January and it will take effect for most employers on Aug. 1. The regulation mandates that nearly all health insurance plans in the United States must provide women with sterilizations and all FDA-approved contraceptives (including those that can induce abortions) without any fees or co-pay.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and many Catholic leaders in the United States have voiced strong opposition to the mandate because they say it would force Catholics--whose church teaches that sterilization, contraception and abortion are wrong--to act against their consciences and the teachings of their faith. In comments submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops called the regulation an "unprecedented attack" on religious liberty and asked the administration to rescind it in its entirety.

A number of Catholic institutions, including Ave Maria University, Belmont Abbey College, and EWTN, have sued the administration over the regulation arguing that it violates their First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion.

Views: 359

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Healani on May 1, 2012 at 1:58pm

Shes the Queen of Evil. What we have in the WH is King & Queen of Evil & Destruction. They are having the time of their lives living on our tax dollars like Hollywood Celebrities, jet setting all over the world, staying at the most expensive Hotels and Homes, Wearing High priced clothes, having servants at their beck and call, her w/her Make up artist and hair stylist and clothes stylist who go w/her on her extravagant vacations etc While we worry about the next meal or if we will be out on the streets any day because we cannot afford our homes. 

Comment by Lyn Rogers on April 28, 2012 at 5:40pm

Do not call her queen, her White House stated she prefers to be called, "Her Highness". 

Comment by Tina M. Mosier on April 28, 2012 at 2:34pm

She is Mrs Obama, the President's wife....they are both confused!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by R. Michael Rosensweig on April 28, 2012 at 1:39pm

Victory.. she is just another really bad joke on the American people. Too bad the overly emotional liberals think this is a good thing. Not the slightest regard for the fact that now insurance companies will just jack up the cost to everyone.. share the wealth. Does anyone realize how many times in the past 100 years stupid people have fallen for that same line?

Comment by stanboy on April 28, 2012 at 8:39am

ONly 1 answer to this as well as what's coming down from this White House, quote from a republican congressman yesterday....."HOW CAN ONE LIVE BEING DUMB. DEPENDENT, DEMOCRAT".  This quote should be Enshrined !!

Comment by Patrice Hite on April 28, 2012 at 8:36am

DOES "THE QUEEN" KNOW  SOMETHING THAT WE DO NOT KNOW? 

Comment by james richard shelton on April 28, 2012 at 7:55am

Then some people still wonder why she  surrendered their license to practice law the day before it would've been revoked .

Comment by F W Danby on April 28, 2012 at 7:05am

JW asks "Could this be avoided with education?"

To a certain extent, yes. If education is allowed. But there is the RC church in the way for most Latinos and a significant percentage of Non-Hispanic Whites.

But how do you 'educate' a 110 pound woman with a horny 220 lb 'boyfriend' with six beers on board? She needs primary prevention (run like hell), secondary prevention (be on the pill) or tertiary prevention (the option we want to avoid).

If you want her vote, you will need to provide all three. Maybe that'll get her boyfriend's vote, too.

But you already know who they are likely voting for now. And he doesn't have an (R) after his name.

And he'll be sure they vote, perhaps several times.

Comment by Clark Hamblin,aka ComancheShaman on April 28, 2012 at 6:30am

This is like "silence of the lambs", when Hannibal asks Clarice, did you save the lamb, do you still hear them in your sleep?   The mean uncle is still slaughtering those poor little lambs after he sheers them, see any similarity ?

Comment by Ernie Shaw on April 26, 2012 at 10:09am

Could this be avoided with education? First thing first, you have to show up to get one.

U.S. census shows these staggering statistics: Need I say more?

Children in single-parent families by race (Percent)

Non-Hispanic White 24%
Black or African American 66%
American Indian 52%
Asian and Pacific Islander 16%
Hispanic or Latino 41%
Total 34%

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service