President Trump Defunds UN Abortion Outfit Devoted to Population Control

The State Department has said it will end U.S. funding of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), a group that promotes abortion overseas.

In a letter to U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, the State Department said it would not fund the UNFPA because it “supports, or participates in the management of, a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.”

The State Department said its decision “was made based on the fact that China’s family planning policies still involve the use of coercive abortion and involuntary sterilization, and UNFPA partners on family planning activities with the Chinese government agency responsible for these coercive policies.”

The U.N. agency has been linked with human rights abuses around the world, including forced sterilizations and abortions in China.

Forced abortions and sterilizations were uncovered by pro-life journalists in China as recently as 2009. Since Reagan, only the Obama administration has funded the population control group.

The announcement takes Trump’s move to reinstate the Mexico City Policy one step further. That policy withholds U.S. funding for international organizations that perform or promote abortions. This cut will cost the UNFPA $32.5 million. (For more from the author of “President Trump Defunds UN Abortion Outfit Devoted to Population Control” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/04/president-trump-defunds-un-abortion-outfit-devoted-population-cont

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  •        I AGREE WE SHOULD CUT OFF THE FUNDING OF UN !!   BUT WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT PEOPLE HAVING MORE CHILDERN THEN THEY CAN TAKE CARE FOR OR FEED ??  DO YOU WANT TO PAY FOR THIS ??   HOW MANY CAN YOU AFFORD TO PAY FOR ??  HOW MANY IN THE WORLD NEED HELP NOW ??  DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY ARE REAL POOR IN THE WORLD NOW ????  I THINK IT MIGHT BE CLOSE TO HALF OR MORE !!  HOW MANY POOR CAN WE TAKE CARE OF ????  AT WHAT POINT WILL IT BE IMPOSSIBLE ???? WE TALK ABOUT THE POOR CHILDREN NOW THAT ARE NOT TAKEN CARE OF SO WHAT DO WE DO ????? 

This reply was deleted.