PETITIONS for THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION (and With a Response, on to the Congress)

I am New Member, but as a Daughter of The American Revolution (DAR) it is my duty to protect my country and to defend it against all enemies.  I believe in The Constitution for the united states of America (Original) and The Bill of Rights.  Therefore, in a Petition for We The People on the White House Petitions site, I have created two Petitions.  One is to have the Obama Administration EXAMINE Property Rights.... and Confirm.  The second is an idea of my own taken from my Research of how and why the European Court of Human Rights was established.  At first it was a COMMISSION before it became a Court.  It grew out of THE NUREMBURG TRIALS held in Nuremburg, Germany in about 1954.  HUMAN RIGHTS in many European Countries became a Prime Issue and so The Commission in France found itself addressing issues from many States and citizens in Europe.  The States became members and anyone from those States could present their claim through Application to the Commission.  Later, the Court was founded. 

It seems to have worked out well.  So, I had the idea that if Europe could have a Court of Human Rights, why not the United States and include Canada and Mexico and call it The North American Court of Human Rights.  We do have a Commission on Human Rights in the United States, but it needs to expand into being a Court and include The Americans on the North American Continent.

We have had a great many Human Rights issues and they need to be addressed in a proper Court, that's why I created the Petition.

I welcome your Comments and ideas.  For those of you who feel these Petitions deserve your signature, and support your views, you are invited to read and sign them.

Go to: wh.gov/lvpFE, and wh.gov/lvhuN

Thank You in advance, Margot

Views: 29

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service