Monday ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Michael Cohen Was Supposed to Provide 'Bombshell' Testimony. It Didn't Explode
by Marc A. Thiessen
 
 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Jim Jordan -vs- Chuck Todd
ufY01lmPgaiyu7VbC-_vk8bx_XlkINR9NjWNW-5RdMg-aUm47PIN1EnUoZa6acDFfg8_hhdkkNVJ-eop-vCRsVK5-mNOWf0qtzYlConrPcYgB7J1oSwcnmyyDAjj3VP02xRHof8NAcgemOGKZZQXYNyZ1giV=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby sundance
{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~ Congressman Jim Jordan appears on NBC Meet The Press with Chuck Todd to debate the congressional testimony of Michael Cohen... When it comes to issues surrounding the Clinton/Steele dossier it is quite remarkable to see how far Chuck Todd is willing to take his Mamet act: ie. pretending not to know things, because those things are counter to his necessary Trump-Russia narrative. Jim Jordan keeps throwing facts at Todd, and Todd keeps ducking and jiving to avoid the sunlight.  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/03/03/sunday-talks-jim-jordan-vs-chuck-todd/
.
CBS’s Paula Reid Pushes Back on 
scumbag-Schiff’s Claims of Collusion
rHM_Hb6oAOpZxhBDSq0oo8aKL-3YDURvOwFbRxh3LMXqeYt5dTvCHllfmuW71TgnSx2lKqupPxsxNPIgk650mz9z-08fWP7OKDrxixXFKDCgICVOtlXet-6iZXSFvyFTQD5a0moDrZKsWhvghWJpMbB-bWoBuaHg8r-pdmMBd9fhqnthb39SC9MY-z6_gwZbTTVATkd1DrgPJmRU2PNSDpgUXFFZ3BzmEpIGOS8LP73Ov64=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Nicholas Fondacaro  
{newsbusters.org} ~ In an appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday, CBS Justice correspondent Paula Reid surprised viewers by taking a firm stance against House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) allegations of collusion... In the latter part of the show, moderator Margaret Brennan pointed out the dubious nature of scumbag-Schiff’s latest allegations. “This allegation of money laundering on behalf of Russia through the Trump organization but he admitted he had no proof of that thus far.” “That's a pretty big bomb to lob without any corroboration, I also take issue with his claim that he has evidence of collusion,” Reid declared, suggesting “he seemed to be conflated contact with collusion.” Reid didn’t stop at that. She proceeded to dismantle scumbag-Schiff’s line of argument altogether: He says what happened at Trump Tower was collusion. He’s pointing to e-mails. Nothing was exchanged there. The same with the meeting Paul Manafort had with Konstantin Kilimnik exchanging polling data. We know there was contact, we know that but we don't know what they did with that polling data...
House Democrats send message: 
Impeachment is on
Kh6LmKGusFC6XCpjxVAfbGjADJEO90k5xvvJ1qkD1ALAwOBwVEsO5MiR4AOHExQ_J3TNq_KqX01bnsAVmbwtSJiEBUoY4w8VFODlFIwOVNi1ak-oiz30ESRJ3904tp__gSGmgqA0c-7mv7q_oQDh6CsuaC_YXIGBspK0SF-I9k9YUV3QS0umHdaBeaC9qDwZpvRplAvqdMrt1jtPeOucXslb9BkJHsTGolw4DBUEeXVzlFjj0Nx-bAJBOGklvTQyXHlABkqFkWA6lLYFZx7Qc7KMEtkmX2oIIsQGrXA2naisSfHhlpxofmC9vYrUZT3KGDiGVQGBL2teJFZUQg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Byron York
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee says there is no doubt President Trump has obstructed justice... "It's very clear that the president obstructed justice," Democratic Rep. scumbag-liar Jerrold Nadler told ABC Sunday. "It's very clear — 1,100 times he referred to the dirty cop-Mueller investigation as a witch hunt, he tried to — he fired — he tried to protect Flynn from being investigated by the FBI. He fired scumbag-Comey in order to stop the Russian thing, as he told NBC News. He — he's dangled part — he's threat — he's intimidated witnesses. In public." Think what you will about the reasons — calling an investigation a "witch hunt" is obstruction of justice? — but scumbag-liar Nadler sounded less like a man weighing the evidence than a man who has has made up his mind. Given that, scumbag-liar Nadler's ABC interview led to a question: President Nixon was threatened with impeachment for obstruction of justice. President scumbag/liar-Clinton was impeached for obstruction of justice. Why is scumbag-liar Nadler, who heads the committee in the House that originates articles of impeachment, not moving forward with impeaching President Trump right now? "We don't have the facts yet," scumbag-liar Nadler said — a perplexing admission for a man who had just confidently enumerated the president's crimes. "Impeachment is a long way down the road." As National Review's Rich Lowry pointed out a short time later, no one should believe scumbag-liar Nadler's caution. "Don't be fooled," Lowry tweeted. "Being a 'long way' from impeachment is their first step to impeaching Trump." Indeed, in that revealing ABC interview, scumbag-liar Nadler went on to explain why Democrats have not yet moved to impeach the president. Essentially, scumbag-liar Nadler explained, the party doesn't yet have its ducks in a row. There is preparatory work, such as evidence gathering and a creating a communications strategy, to be done before going forward...
.
Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows Inform AG
William Barr of Compromise Within
dirty cop-Mueller Probe
HV0iIhzqMIfu306fIo0r4YqpKnOBkznhuJXcANQfWmIOeZppE5bfecgg_e_qV0S-Sl3mDyzDC6dHZjWEogi2p7j4klBWRTzQOVeAHCkBd5gtXORsaDuxFclilTN3KyWesxCL_p6qTgYmpB15aRk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby sundance
While a letter from congress to the DOJ amounts to further process frustration for those who bear witness to the corruption that took place; there is a valuable dynamic at play which may help answer whether AG William Barr... is factually going to address corruption, or whether he is apt to just cover it up. Representatives Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows send a letter to AG William Barr questioning the independence of two members of the dirty cop-Mueller team, Zainab Ahmad and Andrew Weissmann. Both Weissmann and Ahmad were involved in contacts and discussions with DOJ official Bruce Ohr as he transferred the scumbag/liar-Clinton/Steele dossier from his wife, Nellie Ohr, and from Fusion GPS into the FBI to advance a political investigation targeting Donald Trump.Over time evidence has surfaced showing how a small group of approximately eighteen officials within the DOJ and FBI worked in concert with media and political operatives to target Trump for the benefit of candidate scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton...  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/03/03/jim-jordan-and-mark-meadows-inform-ag-william-barr-of-compromise-within-mueller-probe/
.
German government refuses to ban 
Hezbollah, rebuffs Israel and U.S
TA7vYvnQVh2jwLvyZjhBs9cngrcZFXfn_slC0NKBC323fcRA0VyEPPJPQHB9bXi4hv7K_0pu3taGeNSL8bYGYyt9RU6jL3zX5zVhWeux7KwKb2yWp_B4Fzy8xS856Irt3R9yu3hegn5NGrCz1skj=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Benjamin Weinthal  
{jpost.com} ~ After the United Kingdom outlawed all of the terrorist entity Hezbollah last week, Germany’s government refused to ban the political wing of the Lebanese Shi’ite organization... A spokesman for Germany’s interior ministry (BMI) wrote The Jerusalem Post: “The BMI does not comment on concrete prohibition considerations in general; this applies regardless of whether there is reason to do so in individual cases.”  The BMI has provided the same answer to Post queries since 2008 about whether German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s administration plans to outlaw all of Hezbollah, while the EU has banned its military arm since 2013. According to 2018 German intelligence reports analyzed by the Post, there are 950 Hezbollah operatives in the federal republic who raise funds, recruit new members and spread Hezbollah’s lethal antisemitic ideology. “According to the case law of the Federal Administrative Court the entire Hezbollah is against the idea of international understanding in the sense of the Basic Law, because it fights the right of existence of the State of Israel with terrorist means,” the BMI’s spokesman said. “Such an objective is antisemitic in nature.” The UK government announced on Friday: “An order laid in Parliament on Monday February 25 to proscribe the terrorist organizations Hezbollah, Ansaroul Islam and Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam Wal-Muslimin (JNIM) has now come into effect, following debates in the Houses of Parliament.” “Under the Terrorism Act 2000, being a member – or inviting support for – these groups will be a criminal offense, carrying a sentence of up to 10 years’ imprisonment,” the statement continued. “All three groups have been assessed as being concerned in terrorism.”...  https://www.jpost.com/International/German-government-refuses-to-ban-Hezbollah-rebuffs-Israel-and-US-582242
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Michael Cohen Was Supposed to Provide 'Bombshell' Testimony. It Didn't Explode

by Marc A. Thiessen

Michael Cohen was supposed to provide “bombshell” testimony against President Trump. Well, the bombshell didn’t explode.

Not long ago, many were speculating that Cohen might have recorded conversations with Trump admitting that he had made payments to Stormy Daniels for political purposes, instructed Cohen to lie to Congress, colluded with Russia or knew in advance about the infamous Trump Tower meeting. It turns out Cohen didn’t have anything like that. His testimony was certainly embarrassing for the president, but Cohen offered no evidence to advance the cause of impeachment.

To the contrary, some of his testimony was exculpatory. While Cohen testified that Trump ordered him to pay off Stormy Daniels “as part of a criminal scheme to violate campaign finance laws,” elsewhere in his testimony he declared that Trump did not care about winning the election. He said Trump saw the campaign as an “infomercial” for the Trump brand, adding that “He never expected to win the primary. He never expected to win the general election. The campaign — for him — was always a marketing opportunity.”

Well, if Trump didn’t care about winning, that undermines the case that the payments were a campaign finance violation. Indeed, Cohen offered evidence that Trump’s motivation was in fact keeping his affair from his wife. “He asked me to pay off an adult film star with whom he had an affair, and to lie to his wife about it,” Cohen said. “Lying to the first lady is one of my biggest regrets. … She did not deserve that.” Paying hush money because he did not want his wife to find out he was having an affair with a porn star is sleazy, but it is not a crime.

Cohen also cleared Trump of the charge that he had directed Cohen to lie to Congress about the Moscow Trump Tower project. Cohen declared that “I lied to Congress” and Trump “did not directly tell me to lie.” Cohen said he assumed Trump wanted him to lie, so he did what he thought Trump wanted. Sorry, that’s not evidence of a crime.

Nor did Cohen provide proof of collusion with Russia. Indeed, he told the committee “I wouldn’t use the word ‘colluding’” though he thought there was “something odd about the back-and-forth praise with President [Vladimir] Putin.” So did many of us. But while saying nice things about the Russian dictator may be evidence of bad judgment, it is not evidence of a criminal conspiracy to collude with Putin to steal the election.

Cohen provided no evidence that Trump knew about the infamous Trump Tower meeting. Last July, CNN breathlessly reported that Cohen had told dirty cop-Mueller that “Trump knew in advance about the June 2016 meeting in Trump Tower in which Russians were expected to offer his campaign dirt on scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton” and that “he was present, along with several others, when Trump was informed of the Russians’ offer by [Donald] Trump Jr.” That’s not what Cohen told Congress on Wednesday. He testified he didn’t know about the Trump Tower meeting in advance — he “read all over the media” about it — but that in retrospect he thought that Trump Jr. might have been telling Trump about the Russia meeting when he walked into Trump’s office and whispered into Trump’s ear in front of Cohen “the meeting is all set.” Big difference.

Cohen testified he was in the room when Roger Stone called Trump and told him that WikiLeaks was going to release  emails damaging to scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton, and that Trump “responded by stating to the effect of ‘wouldn’t that be great.’” Trump knowing in advance that WikiLeaks, acting on its own, was going to put out dirt on scumbag/liar-Clinton is not illegal.

In other words, Cohen’s testimony was a dud. That does not exonerate Trump, not by a long shot. The dirty cop-Mueller report is still yet to come, and Cohen testified there were elements of his cooperation with federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York that he could not discuss.

But we did learn something disturbing at Wednesday’s hearing — how shameless the new Democratic House majority will be in their efforts to undermine the Trump presidency. Democrats scheduled the Cohen hearing on the very same day the president was in Vietnam trying to broker a deal on the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. We all had a stake in the president’s success. They could have waited one day to avoid creating a distraction during a critical diplomatic moment. But they didn’t, because for Democrats it seems that embarrassing Trump is more important than disarming a tyrant.

Talk about sleazy.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/61496?mailing_id=4108&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4108&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center