The Front Page Cover
 2016             The truth will set you free 
Rico For Climate Deniers?
Chris Skates

HOLLYWOOD, FLA – When the members of the Republican National Committee contemplated their spring meeting at the seaside not only did they not expect to be swarmed by reporters, candidates, and their campaigns, they probably didn’t expect there to be much of anything expect for networking and sunset cruises.
          Instead they find themselves in the first battle of what promises to be a long war over how their convention will pick the party’s 41st presidential nominee. As one committee member put it to Fox News First, “This is like a hurricane.”
          The overriding purpose and concern of this committee is to stage a nominating convention every four years, especially in the era of super PACs and outside money, the fundamental job of the RNC is to stage a quadrennial convention.
          As disconcerting as it is for these members to face challenging odds in the general election, a more pressing and practical concern for these individuals is having a disastrous convention in Cleveland in July.
          The way it is supposed to go, and has gone for forty years, is more akin to a big event like the Academy Awards than a matter of actual political consequence. But Republican frontrunner Donald slump liar-Trump and his many new Washington-based consultants and lawyers are explicitly warning that this institution could fail spectacularly. In this in ominous warning, if slump liar-Trump is not the nominee, the convention would still be a branding exercise alright, but it would just be branding the Republican Party as an undemocratic, incompetent, disaster.
          As one state party chairman put it, “If slump liar-Trump comes up short, are we basically opening our wrists and bleeding out?”
           There is certainly a path for slump liar-Trump to clinch outright and win the 1,237 delegates he needs.
Ask Larry Sabato at the University of Virginia, or ask Nate Cohn at the NYT, but the greatest likelihood is that even if slump liar-Trump trumps in the northeast on Tuesday and figures out how to play the delegate game in Pennsylvania’s complex system, he will still need the Republican equivalent of super delegates to take the nomination. These are the 7 percent or more of delegates who will arrive in Cleveland not bound to any candidate.
          The most likely scenario is that slump liar-Trump shows up just short and will rely on party stalwarts to give him the nomination to avoid the violence, division and upheaval that slump liar-Trump and his team have warned of. It’s a credible threat.
          That’s not the only thing on offer from Team slump liar-Trump. If his party will simply meet his demands there are rewards. In closed door meetings here, there is the promise of not just a slump liar-Trump who plays the party game and hires the consultant class that so dominates the GOP apparatus, but also that slump liar-Trump himself will change. They point to his mostly good conduct in the past three weeks. Yes, the insults were back on the campaign trail in Indiana on Wednesday, but so to was a respectful visit to the state’s Republican Gov. Mike Pence, and more moderate postures on issues.
          The new-look slump liar-Trump includes not just
an effort to beef up his policy proposals, but also a more moderate side including transgender acceptance. Like, really moderate.
          That’s not to say that there aren’t many who relish the idea of a contested and maybe even chaotic convention. The many supporters of Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, as well as those still clinging to the idea of a political messiah who will be revealed at the convention came here in the belief that most of the party apparatus still favored blocking slump liar-Trump.
          One diehard Cruz supporter put it this way: “I still refuse to believe that the Republican Party will allow itself to be hijacked by a charlatan who attacks our party and our system every day.”
          Despite slump liar-Trump’s public menace and private persuasion there are many hold outs. But how many?
          The first ground on which that question will be tested surrounds an arcane and probably only symbolic procedural issue placed before the committee. Solomon Yue, a committee member from Washington state, wants the RNC’s rules committee to recommend that the convention adopt different rules for how the process works. As it stands, the convention will be operated under the same rules that the House of Representatives does. That means no filibusters, no funny business, and nearly absolute power for whomever wields the gavel. And just as it is in the House that person is Speaker Paul Ryan. What Yue and a sizable number of committee members want is to use the same kind of procedure that state parties, subcommittees of the RNC, and your local rotary club follow: Decentralized power with many opportunities for delegates to block the process.
          Yue hasn’t stated a public preference for any candidate, but he
has said that he is concerned about the party leaders, including Ryan, railroading dissident delegates. At first it was assumed that the issue here would be whether an establishment switch-a-roo would deprive slump liar-Trump of the nomination in favor of a more electable candidate.
          But as the new, consultant-backed slump liar-Trump campaign hoves into view like a party boat pulling up at the dock, the debate has shifted on the question of the rules. Now, it seems that it is the Cruz delegation that has the most to lose under a heavy speaker’s gavel. Not only could Cruz be thrown over for a moderate establishmentarian, but might also face the possibility of an establishment yielding to slump liar-Trump, and slamming the door on the first ballot without Cruz ever getting to stage a floor fight.
          Picture the moment: slump liar-Trump arrives in Cleveland just a couple of dozen delegates short of the prize, but many of the delegates and their preferences are in dispute. Cruz’s team would hope to be able to disqualify some delegates or even unbind some that don’t have autonomy on the first ballot. A powerful parliamentary officer can shut down procedural tactics, calls for further debate, or the re-visitation of credentials or rules. Ryan could hammer closed the selection process on round one, and send furious Cruz backers out to the Cuyahoga night.
          The rules committee vote that will be held later today will not be binding on the convention and will not have anything to do with the allocation of precious delegates. But what it will be is the first, best indication we have about whether the RNC is ready to take up occupancy in slump liar-Trump Tower.  -Fox News
 Clinton Raked in Money From Companies Seeking  Influence  More proof that the Clinton Foundation was never anything more than a pay-to-play slush fund for the world's rich and powerful: After the Associated Press analyzed the places Hilly Clinton delivered paid speeches (for hundreds of thousands of dollars a pop), it found most of the banks and larger corporations were also heavily involved in politics. The AP reports, "Federal records show almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored Clinton's speeches have sought to influence the government — lobbying, bidding for contracts, commenting on federal policy or contacting State Department officials or Clinton herself when she was secretary of state." We're shocked — shocked.
          To date, the Clinton campaign has not released transcripts of those speeches and Hilly has steadfastly refused to do so. That's not surprising, given that attendees of those speeches have said the remarks were glowing and complimentary of big banks like Goldman Sachs, and in a battle against Bernie Sanders' anti-Wall Street populism, she can't have that come out. As Clinton once humble-bragged, she and her husband left the White House "dead broke." That was an obviously phony attempt to pander to the rest of us commoners, but even if it weren't, the Clintons have turned their influence into vast wealth thanks to the dozens of corporations who invested in them, hoping to get returns when the Clintons once again returned to positions of power. 
-The Patriot Post
The Great Green Fleet, chicken fat, and Hilly Rodham
Dr. Steven J. Allen
{} ~ When the Left is put in charge of the military, don’t be surprised when the military starts to reflect leftwing values... Many ideas for saving energy or for getting energy from alternative sources may have merit. It may be a good idea, say, to use roll-up solar blankets to power Marines’ GPS devices in Afghanistan, or to coat the hulls of ships with “anti-fouling” coatings to reduce drag from barnacles. But when the armed forces are required to carry out an agenda based on ideology, rather than science and logistics and the needs of the military, how can we be sure that any given policy is in furtherance of national security rather than politics? Sen. James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) once noted the trade-offs involved in “imposing a green agenda on the Department of defense”: “Which would you rather have? Would you rather spend $4 billion on Air Force Base solar panels, or would you rather have 28 new F-22s or 30 F-25s or modernized C-130s? Would you rather have $64.8 billion spent on pointless global warming efforts or would you rather have more funds put towards modernizing our fleet of ships, aircrafts and ground vehicles to improve the safety of our troops and help defend our nation against the legitimate threats that we face?”...
slump liar-Trump is not a conservative
Todd Starnes           
{} ~ What sort of man is lurking deep inside Donald slump liar-Trump’s innards? We were led to believe that Mr. slump liar-Trump was one of us -- a conservative of the gun-toting, Bible-clinging variety... But friends, Mr. slump liar-Trump is no conservative. His talk is far different from his walk. Fox News confirms that senior campaign aides assured Republicans in private that the slump liar-Trump we’ve seen on the campaign trail is not going to be the same slump liar-Trump we get in the White House. “When he’s out on that stage, when he’s talking about the kinds of things he’s talking about on the stump, he’s projecting an image that’s for that purpose,” slump liar-Trump strategist Paul Manafort said behind closed doors...      
Prosecutors: ISIS Ebook Helped Inspire
Aborted Attack on Pamela Geller
   John Rossomando  
{} ~ An Islamic State (ISIS) ebook, "How to Survive in the West: A Mujahid's Guide," may have contributed to a plot by two accused Islamic State (ISIS) terrorists from Boston to behead free-speech advocate Pamela Geller, federal prosecutors say... Boston police killed a third conspirator on June 2 before they could carry out their attack against Geller. David Dawoud Wright, Usaamah Abdullah Rahim and Nicholas Rovinski answered ISIS's call to commit terrorist acts in Western countries beginning in January 2015, a superseding indictment issued Thursday said. The three were inspired by the terrorist organization's online magazine Dabiq and also looked to "How to Survive in the West" for guidance in forming a sleeper cell after it appeared in March 2015. Wright wrote organizational documents for a "Martyrdom Operations Cell" in April 2015. He also researched firearms, tranquilizer guns and law-enforcement capabilities. His search queries included: "what is the most flammable chemical;" "Which tranquilizer puts humans to sleep instantly;" and "how to start a secret militia in [the] US."...
slump liar-Trump isn't your protector: A warning to conservative Christians
Dr. Michael L. Brown
{} ~ Donald slump liar-Trump has presented himself as a protector of conservative Christians and as the best friend Christians will ever have. He has held up his mother's Bible and pledged to bring Christ back into Christmas... But when the rubber meets the road, he is anything but the defender of conservative Christians and their values. This became crystal clear yesterday morning April 21, when slump liar-Trump, appearing on the Today show, answered questions on abortion, North Carolina's Bathroom Privacy Act, and transgender rights. When he was asked if he would like to change the Republican Party platform on abortion, which allows no exceptions for rape, incest, or the life of the mother, slump liar-Trump replied without hesitation, "Yes, I would, absolutely, for the three exceptions. I would."...
ISIS suspect reveals plans to open up route from
Syria to U.S. through Mexico
Pamela Geller
{} ~ Build that wall. What has to happen? How many people have to die for our elected officials to understand the grave threat that the global jihad movement presents?...Mind you,  this is an American Muslim indicted on terror charges who revealed this plot. They are here. One of the American men accused in Minnesota of trying to join the Islamic State group wanted to open up routes from Syria to the U.S. through Mexico, prosecutors said. Gules Ali Omar told the ISIS members about the route so that it could be used to send members to America to carry out terrorist attacks, prosecutors alleged in a document filed this week...
The Self-Contradictory Liberals
Denis MacEoin
Demonstrators in The Hague, Netherlands chant "Death to the
Jews", while flying the black flag of jihad
{} ~ It is no secret that politicians on both the "right" and "left" lie, dissemble, equivocate, misrepresent, misinform, falsify, whitewash and cover up. Not even the noble and honest Cicero was immune to fudging and shifting sides... It is the nature of politics. For much of the time we put up with it until it grows so far-fetched, we can no longer shut our eyes and let ourselves be lulled into further acquiescence. We all put up with this, do our best to spot the lies, or rely on investigative journalists to dig beneath the surface of what governments claim or their opponents hide. But something strange has been happening to people calling themselves liberals. Note: The term "liberal" differs enormously between the U.S. and the UK. Americans use it to describe anyone from the Democratic Party through to those even farther to the left. But the British use it for people from the political centre towards the right, and it has no connotations of far left extremism. It is used here in the American sense. The far left -- the Marxists, Trotskyites etc. -- the campus extremists, even the new leadership of Britain's Labour Party have started to contradicting their own ideals, not least when it comes to free speech, Israel, the Middle East, Islam, and the rights of Muslim women. All sides of the political spectrum share many ideals in their original form: advocacy of human rights, equal justice under the law; the rights of racial and religious minorities, homosexuals, workers, women. They also share an opposition to racism, anti-Semitism, fascism, and religious fundamentalism. These are ideals in any democratic nation -- views demonstrated by modern legislation across a host of democratic parliaments...
To slump liar-Trump Supporters: Congratulations
Suckers, You’re Almost There
Jay Caruso
{} ~ That cartoon certainly represents the truth as it relates to slump liar-Trump supporters. Sounds harsh? Too bad. For people that have gone around bellowing how sick and tired they are of politicians “lying” to them, they don’t seem to have cared Donald slump liar-Trump has been lying to their faces for close to a year now... As slump liar-Trump inches closer to the GOP nomination, he has over time, begun the process of reversing himself on issue after issue that drove 38% of primary voters to support him in the primaries. Since he started winning primary contests he has reversed himself on issues such as his ban on Muslims, allowing Syrian refugees into the country, visas for high-skilled workers, sending troops to fight ISIS and more. Many conservatives warned that slump liar-Trump’s newly discovered pro-life view was a facade and that he was using it to curry favor with evangelical voters. Sure enough, as Sara pointed out yesterday, slump liar-Trump is already talking about changing the GOP platform on abortion to be less restrictive. This idiot cannot even keep his views on abortion straight. Several weeks ago he was arguing that women who get abortions, should be it be illegal, ought to be charged with a crime. This is what happens when you’ve never ever actually  given serious thought to the subject. Yet his supporters are still there with him...Give me one good reason WHY?
Rev. Franklin Graham Slams slump liar-Trump’s
Bathroom Bill Cowardice...
Caleb Howe
Rev. Franklin Graham
{} ~ Rev. Franklin Graham, son of legendary evangelical pastor the Rev. Billy Graham, posted on Facebook today attacking Donald slump liar-Trump’s position on the North Carolina bathroom bill... one that slump liar-Trump in typical fashion later tried to waffle on. Graham has not endorsed anyone in this election, stating instead “let God tell you to who to vote for.” Today, in his own measured way, he absolutely destroys slump liar-Trump’s position as immoral and unwise and not from God. Ouch. Outstanding. Well-crafted, on point, and most of all, totally correct. Graham is not just a preacher but head of international humanitarian relief organization Samaritan’s Purse. He is also a strong Christian leader and someone I personally admire....
slump liar-Trump can’t break the Republican Party
Michael Barone
{} ~ Republican primary voters and caucus-goers, we have often been told, award their presidential nomination to the candidate next in line. Conservative Christian Republicans are, as one national reporter once wrote and later apologized for, “poorly educated and easily led.” Not this year... The normal pattern, to use a word from the Watergate era, is inoperative. Republicans are not supposed to behave like this. Donald slump liar-Trump’s candidacy has proved as disruptive to the Republican Party as Craigslist was to newspapers’ classified ads and Uber has been to taxi cartels. It’s by no means clear that Mr. slump liar-Trump will earn the 1,237 delegates needed for the party’s presidential nomination. But the Republican Party seems likely to suffer serious damage either if he is nominated polls show him far behind Hilly Clinton) or if he is not he predicts violence then and won’t rule out an independent candidacy. Some historic perspective may be useful here in assessing how much potential damage the Republican Party may suffer, and if it will be lasting...
HYPOCRISY: In London nObama Did Exactly What He Ripped Netanyahu For Doing
Jeff Dunetz
{} ~ Today in London President nObama had a joint press conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron... One of the major lines of questioning from the British press involved the appropriateness of the American president getting involved in the campaign surrounding the upcoming vote to decide whether Great Britain remains in the European Union. The reasons nObama traveled to London was to support the British premier’s position that the country should remain in the European collective. No one however, asked about the nObama hypocrisy of getting involved with the British EU vote while ripping Netanyahu’s address to congress. During his opening remarks the president contended that his involvement was totally appropriate: Let me be clear, ultimately this is something the British voters have to decide for themselves, Part of our special relationship, being friends is to be honest, to let you know what I think...
Rico For Climate Deniers?
Chris Skates
{} ~ How corrupt and fraudulent is the government “science” that denies natural climate change?

Paul Driessen and Ron Arnold

A self-appointed coalition of Democrat state attorneys general is pursuing civil or criminal racketeering actions against ExxonMobil, the Competitive Enterprise Institute and other organizations. The AGs claim the groups are committing fraud, by “denying” climate change. The charge is bogus.

What we contest are false assertions that “humans are creating a dangerous climate change crisis.” We do not accept false claims that “the science is settled” and will not be limited to discussing only “what we must do now to avert looming climate catastrophes.”

That’s not just constitutionally protected free speech. It is the foundation of scientific progress and informed public policy.

Meanwhile, EPA and other federal agencies, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), climate activist organizations, state legal and environmental agencies, and legions of scientists who receive government grants for advancing the “manmade climate cataclysm” mantra are themselves engaging in what many say is truly misleading or fraudulent climate science, policy and regulation.

Millions in poor countries die annually from preventable diseases, because hysterical climate claims justify denying them access to affordable modern electricity and transportation that could be provided by coal, natural gas and petroleum products. In developed nations, climate hysteria has cost millions of jobs, adversely affecting people’s living standards, health and welfare. In European countries, thousands are dying each winter, because they can no longer afford proper heat.

The problem is not human intervention in the climate; it’s improper political intervention in climate science. It has corrupted scientific findings from the very beginning.

A 1995 document from the US State Department to the IPCC confirms this, or at least gives allegations of fraud and corruption sufficient credence to raise serious integrity questions.

When a recent FOIA lawsuit sought that 1995 document, the State Department said there is “no such correspondence in our files.” But if we have a copy of the document, how come State doesn’t? Attesting to its bona fides, Our copy has State’s date-stamp, a Department official’s signature – and 30 pages of detailed instructions on how the Clinton Administration wanted the IPCC to change its scientific findings and summary for policymakers, to reflect US climate and energy policy agendas.

The document is too complex and technical to summarize. So we’ve posted it in PDF form – unchanged in any way and exactly as received from a well known and credible source who must remain anonymous to avoid retribution by people like the RICO prosecutors. You’ll be amazed at what it says.

It consists of a three-page cover letter to Sir John Houghton, head of the IPCC Science Working Group, from Day Mount, Acting State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment and Development, introducing 30 pages of line-by-line “suggestions” from scientist Robert Watson and others. One wanted a correct statement about warming rates changed to a flat lie. “Change ‘continue to rise’ to ‘rise by even greater amounts’ to provide a sense of magnitude of the extended change,” it says.

Talk about agendas dictating science. Moreover, this “ominous” warming ended just a couple years later, there has been virtually no planetary warming since then, and the warming followed 30 years of cooling.

The document raises serious questions about State Department actions on subsequent IPCC Assessment Reports. What did State do? Where are the correspondence and instructions to change the science in other IPCC reports? What are the State Department, EPA and other nObama agencies doing now to further corrupt climate science and advance their radical energy, social, economic and political agendas?

We know they won’t answer truthfully. If they did, they’d have to investigate themselves under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Worse, the corruption, deception, manipulation, exaggeration and fabrication have grown with every passing year, as alarmists sought to obfuscate their shenanigans and preserve their $1.5 trillion Climate Crisis Empire. The AG actions are designed to punish and silence organizations that are revealing the scientific flaws and deceptions.

The IPCC was set up in 1988 to examine possible human influences on Earth’s climate, amid powerful natural forces that have always driven the complex, dynamic, turbulent, frequently changing climate. As we note in our book, Cracking Big Green, from the outset, Swedish meteorology professor and zealous warming advocate Bert Bolin wanted to help scientists “get global warming onto the political agenda.”

By 1995, Bolin could finally say “the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.” Of course, “discernible” merely means “detectable.” But it gave the State Department license to dictate the “science.” Then “discernible” morphed into “dominant,” which morphed into “sole.” Suddenly humans had replaced the complex, interrelated natural forces that had driven innumerable climate changes throughout Earth’s history. Voila. Climate hysteria began to drive the political agenda.

Behind the hysteria are carefully orchestrated efforts to find steadily increasing planetary temperatures, and claim floods, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, snowstorms and snowless winters are more frequent and intense – even though Real World records show they are not. Original data are “homogenized” with other data to create higher temperatures; student papers and activist news releases are presented as “peer-reviewed studies” in IPCC documents; computer models are presented as “proof” of chaos, even though actual observations contradict their predictions; and ClimateGate emails reveal more chicanery. As climatologist and professor David Legates explains, even the 97% consensus claims are fraudulent.

Organizations that pointed out these flaws and fabrications became a threat to politicians, activists, “warmist” scientists and bureaucrats who were determined to advance an anti-fossil-fuel agenda. Their money and efforts were not winning the non-debate. They needed a blitzkrieg counterattack.

In June 2012, the Union of Concerned Scientists and Climate Accountability Institute organized a “workshop” in La Jolla, CA for climate activists, scientists, lawyers and other experts. Their subsequent report detailed how successful attacks on tobacco companies could be used as a template for campaigns, RICO actions and other operations against “climate denier” companies and organizations.

By 2015, Senator Sheldon “Torquemada” Whitehouse (D-RI) was calling for RICO prosecutions. His actions prompted free market champion Alex Epstein to tell a congressional committee the senator should resign because of his “unconstitutional” attacks on free speech and the energy that powers our economy.

In January 2016, a secret meeting was held in the Rockefeller Family Fund’s Manhattan offices. It brought founder Bill McKibben and a dozen other anti-hydrocarbon activists together, to refine their legal strategies against ExxonMobil and others who dared to challenge “the scientific consensus” that fossil fuels have brought humanity and our planet to the brink of “climate chaos.”

Then, on March 29, 2016, New York AG Eric Schneiderman headlined a press conference of 16 state attorneys general, who announced their intention to go after organizations that were “committing fraud” by “knowingly deceiving” the public about the threat of manmade climate change. Within days, he had launched a RICO action against ExxonMobil, and the Virgin Islands had done likewise against CEI.

It is difficult not to perceive a pattern of collusion here, among the activists and their financiers, among the AGs, and probably among all of them. We are eager to see what emails and other documents might reveal – especially since Section 241 of US Code Title 18 makes it a felony “for two or more persons to agree together to injure, threaten or intimidate” another person in exercising their constitutional rights.

We have only begun to fight – for energy, jobs, sound science, free speech and human rights. CEI and Exxon are vigorously battling the outrageous RICO suits, and CFACT will present its new Climate Hustle movie in a one-day May 2 extravaganza in hundreds of theaters across the USA. We will not be silenced.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow ( Ron Arnold is executive vice president of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. They are coauthors of Cracking Big Green: To save the world from the Save-the-Earth money machine.

Views: 33


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on April 26, 2016 at 8:35am



Comment by Steve - Ning Creator on April 25, 2016 at 2:31pm

Great content! Rock on! 




Obama Lies Again: – Ignores That The Year After Signing The Stimulus More Than (4) Million Jobs Were Lost

Former President Obama, the only President in US history who had his FBI and other Intel agencies spy on the opposition party candidate, claims that he created the great economy that Americans are enjoying today. The only thing Obama created was debt and massive job losses with his horrible economic recovery.

Yesterday the former President tweeted an effort to take credit for President Trump’s successful economy:

Joe Hoft@joehoft

Of course another @BarackObama lie. He can’t open his mouth without lying. 11 years ago the US lost (4.3) million jobs over the next 12 months. Horrible liar. 

Barack Obama  @BarackObama

Eleven years ago today, near the bottom of the worst recession in generations, I signed the Recovery Act, paving the way for more than a decade of economic growth and the longest streak of job creation in American history.

President Obama’s policies were a disgrace and a failure. He doubled the national debt in spite of zero interest rates from the Fed. His recovery was the worst in US history.

Also, Obama’s assertion is just plain false. The ‘Stimulus’ was passed in February 2009 right after Obama took over the Presidency. He promised to not pass any bills for at least a week to allow for the bills to be read by the people but lied as soon as he was sworn in. The Stimulus was hundreds and hundreds of pages of government handouts to Democrat districts and it was close to $1 million. This was not what America needed and it led to the Tea Party.

Far-left Wikipedia has this to say about the Stimulus:

Note that in his infinite wisdom, NYT economist Paul Krugman is credited with arguing that “the stimulus was far smaller than the economic crisis warranted”. (He also said the markets would crash and burn if President Trump was elected President.)

The data shows that the 12 months after Obama’s stimulus, the US lost 4.3 million jobs:

In Obama’s first three years he netted a loss of 1.5 million jobs compared to President Trump who has added more than 6.7 million jobs.

When it comes to the economy, the billionaire schools the community organizer every time.

Tucker: Bloomberg is trying to buy the election

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service