The Front Page Cover
2016 The truth will set you free
Featuring:
Since God Hates the Shedding of Innocent Blood,
Can a Christian Vote for liar-Hillary?
by Michael Brown
~~~
.
'What if liar-Hillary Clinton Were a Man?'
Allyne Caan: Was that the sound of a glass ceiling breaking? Or was it Bill liar-Clinton diving over the Oval Office desk in pursuit of an intern? It's hard to tell.
liar-Hillary Clinton claims it's the former, saying her selection as the first female presidential nominee of a major political party put the "biggest crack" yet in the proverbial glass ceiling — the term feminists love to use for the limits on what women can do. But is being nominated because you're a woman — and, more specifically, because you're a woman who effectively played the role of devoted wife defending her high-powered husband's seduction of women — really something to tout?
Let's be honest. liar-Hillary's policies haven't driven her career. Her gender, combined with her last name, have. If you want to track liar-Hillary Clinton's rise, start with her marriage certificate.
This makes the irony of Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen's missive this week even more potent. "What if liar-Hillary Clinton were a man?" he asked. "What if she were a 68-year-old man rather than a 68-year-old woman? Would we think differently of her? Her raised voice would be lower. She would be better at physically commanding the stage. Her indomitability might be seen as manly. If she were taller and bigger, might she have been able to get away with saying nothing about her email server — as Donald Trump has with his tax returns? As they say, I'm just askin'."
Well, to answer, if liar-Hillary were a man, she never would have gotten to the Senate, let alone to the presidential nomination. Even the Democrat Party wouldn't nominate a man as inept and unlikeable as liar-Hillary. In fact, Cohen himself writes, "I understand the criticisms and don't reject them out of hand. She has been slippery. She has fibbed. She has used a private email server, which was wrong and careless. She has been the marital partner of a man who has taken other partners. She did not leave him, as many women wanted her to do. To them, she became the personification of the female doormat." Yet, he laments that "the dislike of liar-Clinton is so palpable that it has become akin to a prejudice."
Did you catch that? liar-Hillary is a lying, crooked, adulterer-enabler, but those who don't support her — say, those who value honesty, honor and faithfulness, for instance — are prejudiced and sexist. Makes perfect sense.
Tennis legend and liar-Clinton supporter Billie Jean King complained, "What bothers me the most is that there's not very much excitement about liar-Hillary being the first woman." As if women must check their brains at the voting booth and vote with their ovaries instead.
Then again, if everyone who disagrees with Barack nObama is a racist, everyone who disagrees with liar-Clinton must be a misogynist. This includes the many women who aren't jumping on the liar-Hillary bandwagon. As the Wall Street Journal reports, "While 52% of female voters from both parties support Mrs. liar-Clinton, the proportion falls to 36% among white women ages 50-64 and 34% among white women ages 35-49, according to a Wall Street Journal/NBC News Poll this month." In other words, all women are not the ignorant dupes Democrats take them for.
Certainly, the fact that we live in a nation where a woman can win a presidential nomination is something to celebrate. But the fact that we live in a nation where this woman won the nomination is deplorable.
As National Review's Ericka Anderson writes, "There is a small part of me that celebrates but more than that, I'm sad. I'm sad that the woman who represents our gender in this pretty cool moment of history is of such low moral character, and has clawed her way here in the most politically calculated climb in history. ... liar-Hillary Clinton has defended a man time and again who has been accused of sexual assault, rape and of course, infamously taking advantage of a young intern during his time in the White House. ... If nothing else, just remember that women are celebrating today a defender of a serial sexual assaulter, a woman who told any number of other women they don't deserve to be believed or heard."
If there really is a "war on women," picking one of its chief enablers as a presidential nominee is hardly worth celebrating.
-The Patriot Post
.
It's Pay-to-Play at the Clinton Foundation and DNC
Among the extensive DNC emails exposed by WikiLeaks is one that implies yet another pay-to-play scheme. This one involves donors and their chances of landing lucrative positions allotted by White House officials. On April 20, Jordan Kaplan, the DNC National Finance Director, requested in a staff email: "[T]his is the last call for boards and commissions; if you have someone [in mind], send to [Finance Chief of Staff Scott] Comer — full name, city, state, email and phone number. Send as many as you want, just don't know how many people will get to." Six days later, a list of 23 prospects was transferred to Amanda D. Moose, the Special Assistant to the President for Presidential Personnel. Interestingly, not a single one of the possible recruits gave any financial contributions to the Sanders campaign.
The Daily Caller highlights a particularly suspicious finding: "One entry on one iteration of the DNC donor spreadsheet is telling as it suggests that one party donor expressed his desire to someone at the DNC about an appointment to the U.S. Postal Service's board of governors. Next to the name of Democratic donor David Shapira is the acronym 'USPS.' The CEO of Giant Eagle, Inc., a supermarket chain, Shapira was nominated by nObama to the USPS board of governors last year. The pick was blocked by Congress, however." The timing is purely coincidental, we're sure.
Meanwhile, speaking of pay-to-play, the IRS is finally embarking on an investigation it should have begun long, long ago regarding the activities of the liar-Clinton Foundation. IRS Director John Koskinen announced that his agency's Exempt Organizations Examinations program would look into the foundation following a July 15 request from members of the House GOP.
As Jazz Shaw observes, "The timing of this next phase of the ongoing investigation into the affairs of the liar-Clintons could hardly come at a worse time." That's for a number of reasons, not the least of which has to do with WikiLeaks' pledge to reveal emails that, allegedly, incriminate the liar-Clinton Foundation.
No wonder, The Wall Street Journal points out, Bill liar-Clinton avoided the topic during his DNC address earlier this week: "No doubt the foundation does some charitable good, but this is incidental to its main purpose of promoting the liar-Clinton political brand," the editors deduce. "Since its creation in 1997, the nominal nonprofit has served as a shadow Super Pac, designed to keep the liar-Clintons in the national headlines, cover their travel expenses, and keep their retinue employed between elections." How appropriate it would be, then, if the liar-Clintons' so-called "charity," created to foster their own ego and ambitions, is finally what brings them down. -The Patriot Post
.
.
Will Europe Refuse to Kneel
like the Heroic French Priest?
by Giulio Meotti
by Giulio Meotti
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Imagine the scene: the morning Catholic mass in the northern French town of Etienne du Rouvray, an almost empty church, three parishioners, two nuns and a very old priest... Knife-wielding ISIS terrorists interrupt the service and slit the throat of Father Jacques Hamel. This heartbreaking scene illuminates the state of Christianity in Europe. It happened before. In 1996 seven French monks were slaughtered in Algeria. In 2006, a priest was beheaded in Iraq. In 2016, this horrible Islamic ritual took place in the heart of European Christianity: the Normandy town where Father Hamel was murdered is the location of the trial of Joan of Arc, the heroine of French Christianity. France had been repeatedly warned: Europe's Christians will meet the same fate of their Eastern brethren. But France refused to protect either Europe's Christians or Eastern ones. When, a year ago, the rector of the Great Mosque of Paris, Dalil Boubakeur, suggested transforming empty French churches (like that one in Etienne du Rouvray) into mosques, only a few French intellectuals, led by Alain Finkielkraut and Pascal Bruckner, signed the appeal entitled, "Do not touch my church" "Touche pas à mon église" in defense of France's Christian heritage. Laurent Joffrin, director of the daily newspaper Libération, led a left-wing campaign against the appeal, describing the signers as "decrepit and fascist"... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8576/europe-islam-kneel
.
Lou Dobbs – liar-Hillary Clinton’s Dilema –
Hiding From Reality and Truth
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs offers a few thoughts on the election battle between liar-Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. After noting that liar-Clinton is the first female major candidate for president, Dobbs notes that the key issue as he sees it is still the economy... He says, “liar-Clinton’s refusal to confront the failures of the administration to restore prosperity are, well, apparent.” He then cuts to a clip of liar-Clinton’s DNC acceptance speech in which she says that the current occupant and his sidekick aren’t getting enough credit for “saving us from the worst economic crisis of our lifetimes.” Mrs. liar-Clinton went on to say, “Our economy is so much stronger than when they took office.” Her economy is certainly stronger, but not all of us have access to government secrets and most of us wouldn’t sell them if we did. For us the economy is still in the toilet. Dobbs points out a few facts which call her rosy depiction into question. He says, “We all understand the Democrat nominee’s dilemma. Voters are likely to hold her accountable for nObama’s, well, enfeebled and inadequate leadership, reflected in the painful reality that seven years after the recession our economic recovery is the weakest since World War ll.”... http://rickwells.us/dobbs-clinton-hiding-reality-truth/
.
Gen Flynn Mystified By Peer Supporting
More liar-Clinton Terrorism
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Something doesn’t smell right with General John Allen’s suddenly embracing the spotlight at the DNC, as a featured speaker in support of liar-Hillary Clinton... Megyn Kelly calls him reluctant to engage in politics but he’s already been intimately involved with the nObama liar-Clinton regime as Commander of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. He’s capitalizing on that less than stellar experience for a reason; more of the same. General Michael Flynn is at a loss of words to explain what happened to General Allen. Megyn Kelly delivered a robust endorsement of Allen as, “firing up this crowd,” over liar-Hillary Clinton. She described him as not being a political guy, but “Man, he believes in her.” We can concur that he’s putting on the hard sell, believing in what he’s doing in support of liar-Clinton is a bit of a reach. General Flynn agrees with Allen on one point, that we do have the greatest military in the world, he adds the caveat that they are not as ready as they need to be. Beyond that Flynn is puzzled, saying, “I cannot see how John Allen can support somebody who perpetually cannot tell the truth and was actually described by the director of the FBI as not being able to tell the truth. So I honestly don’t know how John Allen can look himself in the mirror and say why he supports liar-Hillary Clinton.”... http://rickwells.us/gen-flynn-mystified-supporting-terrorism/
.
This new federal rule will undermine
local authority to create...
by Convention of States Project
{conventionofstates.com} ~ There is an old saying, “He who owns the gold makes the rules.” Nowhere is this more evident than in the relationship between the federal government and state and local authorities... Washington bullies, cajoles and intimidates inferior jurisdictions to go along with its edicts or lose federal funding – or worse. And just when you think things can’t get any worse, along comes the Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (AFFH) rule. If you haven’t heard of AFFH, don’t feel bad, neither have most other folks. Nevertheless, the AFFH is one of the most radical initiatives yet purposed by the nObama administration and allows Washington to usurp powers traditionally reserved by local governments... http://www.conventionofstates.com/this_new_federal_rule_will_undermine_local_authority?utm_source=Convention+of+States+Project&utm_campaign=c89a7a3cb2-7_30_16_COS_Weekly_Roundup&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_45196125c1-c89a7a3cb2-214976545
.
DNC Deception – Nice Sounding Words,
Same liar-Clinton Lies
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lovely ideas, that’s how Judge Jeanine says the Democrats tried to present their convention. It’s through “Ideas like unity, inclusion and global humanity; concepts that we’re stronger together.”... Cue the birds and the butterflies, she says. And about that fairy tale of the corrupt duo’s love story; how sweet and phony it was. The problem is no matter how great the theme, you’ve got to know you can believe the messenger. With a liar-Clinton or nObama, that’s impossible. Judge Jeanine says, “That kumbaya stuff has absolutely nothing to do with being a leader. A leader is one who drives the economy, creates a strong national defense, and is painstakingly honest. So pull your heads out of the sand and snap out of it. A leader is someone who protects you, who sets the stage so that you can make a living and feed your family. What does this kumbaya-fest have to do with the crisis that is facing Americans today?” “Whether you like him or not,” says Judge Jeanine, “Donald Trump talks about real issues. liar-Hillary says he paints a dark, divisive picture of an America in decline. But ask yourselves, are you better off? Do you feel safer than you were before these two got into power? Is America more united than it was? Are race relations better? Is police esteem anywhere near where it was eight years ago? It was during those nObama/liar-Clinton years that 22 Veterans a day committed suicide, not even able to make an appointment with a doctor.”... http://rickwells.us/judge-jeanine-dnc-nice-sounding-lies/
.
New Agenda 21 Policies Call for
90% Depopulation of the US
by Dave Hodges
{thecommonsenseshow.com} ~ Four years ago, a Medford, Oregon man was jailed for collecting rainwater and snow runoff on his very own property while the developing world is trashing their environment at alarming rates, suffocating waterways, rivers, and lakes with trash and other forms of pollution... Agenda 21 have morphed into Agenda 2030 which has now morphed into Vision 2050. In the video below are the noteworth and provisions of the newest flavor of Agenda 21.
In the video, you heard me mention the emergence of the Megacities concept. Here is the map for this dastardly notion:
The legend of the map indicates that each of the 11 megacity regions will considt of 6 million people, each. Where will the other 250 million Americans have gone? liar-Hilllary Clinton is a supporter of Agenda 21 and its policies. http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/07/30/new-agenda-21-policies-call-for-90-depopulation-of-the-us/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=new-agenda-21-policies-call-for-90-depopulation-of-the-us
.
Watergate Journalist Calls Out liar-Hillary
for ‘Indefensible’ Act
{teapartyjournal.com} ~ Famed former Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein, who along with colleague Bob Woodward broke the Watergate scandal that brought down the Nixon presidency, said what Democratic presidential candidate liar-Hillary Clinton did with emails was “indefensible.”... The topic came up while Bernstein, who is a liberal and prefers liar-Clinton over Trump, was appearing as a guest on CNN Wednesday and discussing Ben Carson’s speech the night before to the Republican convention. CNN’s Chris Cuomo tried to defend liar-Clinton, saying Carson was misrepresenting what the former secretary of state did with her private, unsecured, unauthorized email server. The CNN host argued that the FBI found she had not “knowingly” committed any wrongdoing. Bernstein countered, “What she did is indefensible. What she did, and FBI Director James Comey made it very clear …” “Not illegal,” Cuomo interjected. Bernstein replied forcefully: “Not illegal in terms of bringing a case before a grand jury or into a courtroom. Whether it’s illegal or not, he did not quite say. What she did is indefensible. It was reckless. She has lied about it.”... http://teapartyjournal.com/watergate-journalist-calls-out-hillary-for-indefensible-act/
.
Blue lights for blue lives sweep nation
by wnd.com
{wnd.com} ~ It may have started with a 12-year-old boy, the son of a police officer, in Thornton, Colorado, earlier in July, after the tragic police assassinations in Dallas and Baton Rouge... Alex Herrera got the idea to encourage neighbors in his town to switch out porch lights with blue bulbs letting passing officers know they are appreciated and supported. “Every day they wake up, they’re risking their lives for a stranger that they don’t even know,” Alex said. When Alex and his parents stopped by a local home-improvement store, the manager was so impressed with the idea, he donated 24 bulbs to the cause... http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/blue-lights-for-blue-lives-sweeps-nation/
.
Turkey's Tradition of Murdering Christians
by Robert Jones
by Robert Jones
Father Andrea Santoro Bishop Luigi Padovese
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ On 26 July, the northern French town of Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray witnessed a horrific Islamist attack: Two Islamic State (ISIS) terrorists killed an 85-year-old priest, Jacques Hamel, in his church during Mass. Two nuns and two churchgoers were taken hostage... The terrorists, who had pledged allegiance to ISIS and, shouting "Allahu Akbar", slit the throat of the priest and captured the bloody episode on video, according to a nun who escaped the assault. Such Islamist attacks might be new to EU member countries but not to Turkey. For decades, so many innocent, defenseless Christians in Turkey have been slaughtered by Muslim assailants... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8577/turkey-christians-murders
.
Israeli security forces arrest Abbas guard
by jpost.com
{jpost.com} ~ Border Police last week arrested a guard who had been protecting Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, security sources in Israel confirmed on Saturday... The raid overnight Wednesday in the Palestinian village of Beit Anoun, near Hebron, was launched after the guard became suspected of taking part in terrorist activities. The sources refused to disclose any additional details on the suspicions against the guard. Separately, security forces arrested two wanted suspects overnight Thursday in the West Bank. One suspect allegedly took part in attacks against civilians and security personnel, while the other is a Hamas member, according to the IDF... http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Security-forces-arrest-Abbas-guard-462796?utm_source=newsletter+31-07-2016&utm_campaign=newsletter_31_7
..
Since God Hates the Shedding of Innocent Blood,
Can a Christian Vote for liar-Hillary?
by Michael Brown
{townhall.com} ~ There are few sins God hates as much as shedding innocent blood, especially the blood of children. Seeing that liar-Hillary Clinton is a radically pro-abortion candidate and seeing that the Democratic platform reinforces those radical views, can a Christian vote for liar-Hillary in good conscience?
In Jeremiah 19, God explained why the people of Judah were about to go into exile: It was because they worshiped idols and because they “filled this place speaking of Jerusalem with the blood of the innocent. They have built the high places of Baal to burn their children in the fire as offerings to Baal-- something I did not command or mention, nor did it enter my mind” (Jer. 19:4-5).
Because of these heinous sins, Jerusalem was destroyed and the Temple of Yahweh burned to the ground, with tens of thousands going into exile.
Does God hate the shedding of innocent blood any less today, especially when it is the blood of children? Listen again to Jeremiah: “They have built the high places of Topheth in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to burn their sons and daughters in the fire-- something I did not command, nor did it enter my mind” (Jer. 7:31).
What, exactly, did this entail? Listen to this description from the medieval Jewish commentator Rashi, who explained that the high places of Topheth refer to the god “Molech, which was made of copper, and they would heat it up from underneath it with its hands spread out and heated. And they would place the child on his hands, and he would be burnt and moan, and the priests would beat drums so that the father should not hear his son’s voice and take pity.” What a horror!
Now stop for a moment and look at these images of aborted babies and ask yourself how the Lord must feel about the shedding of this innocent blood – the blood of innocent babies in the womb.
Can you, as a follower of Jesus, cast your vote for a candidate who supports this bloodshed? Can you vote for liar-Hillary Clinton, one of the best friends Planned Parenthood has ever had?
Just look at the stark contrast between the RNC and DNC platforms on abortion.
As reported by LifeNews.com, “The proposed Democratic Party platform this year is more extreme than it has ever been, calling for taxpayer funding of abortion and a repeal of the Hyde Amendment. The Democratic Party platform already supports legalized abortion on demand for any reason up until birth.
“‘We will continue to oppose — and seek to overturn — federal and state laws and policies that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including by repealing the Hyde Amendment,’ it reads.”
In complete contrast, the RNC platform on abortion begins with: “Faithful to the ‘self-evident’ truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed.”
The platform supports “a human life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.” It opposes “using public revenues to promote or perform abortion or fund organizations which perform or advocate it and will not fund or subsidize health care which includes abortion coverage.”
It calls for appointing judges who will uphold these values, reaffirms its opposition to partial birth abortion, and salutes “the many States that have passed laws for informed consent, mandatory waiting periods prior to an abortion, and health-protective clinic regulation.”
Again, the difference between the two platforms could not be more extreme. It is literally the difference between death and life.
Let’s also remember that liar-Hillary Clinton is hardly a pacifist who would avoid the shedding of blood in war in contrast with allegedly war-mongering Republicans. And even so, there is a world of difference between going to war to defeat terrorism and killing a baby in the womb.
Some have argued that it doesn’t matter where a candidate stands on abortion since the laws never really change. After all, we’re told, after 20 years of Reagan, Bush, and Bush, Roe v. Wade was still not overturned.
That’s true, but one reason is that we also had 16 years of liar-Clinton and nObama. What would have happened if we had 36 years of presidents in the mold of Reagan? What if the progress made under a pro-life president wasn’t undone by a pro-abortion president? What if all presidential appointees to the Supreme Court were pro-life during the last 36 years? The answers are self-evident.
And let’s not minimize the progress that has been made in different states, including requiring women to view an ultrasound of their baby before aborting. Thank God for every life saved.
The bottom line is this: Can you look at pictures of aborted babies – such as baby Malachi – and read verses about God’s hatred of killing children and then vote for a candidate who aggressively defends a woman’s “right” to this bloodshed, even into the ninth month?
It’s one thing to be uncertain about voting for Trump or other candidates. It’s another thing to vote for a radical, pro-abortion candidate like liar-Hillary Clinton.
I, for one, do not see how you can look Jesus in the eye, look abortion in the eye, and vote for liar-Hillary.
Only God is your Judge, and you and I will give ultimate account to Him. But if you’re a regular “pro-choice” voter, I urge you to reconsider your ways.
In Jeremiah 19, God explained why the people of Judah were about to go into exile: It was because they worshiped idols and because they “filled this place speaking of Jerusalem with the blood of the innocent. They have built the high places of Baal to burn their children in the fire as offerings to Baal-- something I did not command or mention, nor did it enter my mind” (Jer. 19:4-5).
Because of these heinous sins, Jerusalem was destroyed and the Temple of Yahweh burned to the ground, with tens of thousands going into exile.
Does God hate the shedding of innocent blood any less today, especially when it is the blood of children? Listen again to Jeremiah: “They have built the high places of Topheth in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to burn their sons and daughters in the fire-- something I did not command, nor did it enter my mind” (Jer. 7:31).
What, exactly, did this entail? Listen to this description from the medieval Jewish commentator Rashi, who explained that the high places of Topheth refer to the god “Molech, which was made of copper, and they would heat it up from underneath it with its hands spread out and heated. And they would place the child on his hands, and he would be burnt and moan, and the priests would beat drums so that the father should not hear his son’s voice and take pity.” What a horror!
Now stop for a moment and look at these images of aborted babies and ask yourself how the Lord must feel about the shedding of this innocent blood – the blood of innocent babies in the womb.
Can you, as a follower of Jesus, cast your vote for a candidate who supports this bloodshed? Can you vote for liar-Hillary Clinton, one of the best friends Planned Parenthood has ever had?
Just look at the stark contrast between the RNC and DNC platforms on abortion.
As reported by LifeNews.com, “The proposed Democratic Party platform this year is more extreme than it has ever been, calling for taxpayer funding of abortion and a repeal of the Hyde Amendment. The Democratic Party platform already supports legalized abortion on demand for any reason up until birth.
“‘We will continue to oppose — and seek to overturn — federal and state laws and policies that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including by repealing the Hyde Amendment,’ it reads.”
In complete contrast, the RNC platform on abortion begins with: “Faithful to the ‘self-evident’ truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed.”
The platform supports “a human life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.” It opposes “using public revenues to promote or perform abortion or fund organizations which perform or advocate it and will not fund or subsidize health care which includes abortion coverage.”
It calls for appointing judges who will uphold these values, reaffirms its opposition to partial birth abortion, and salutes “the many States that have passed laws for informed consent, mandatory waiting periods prior to an abortion, and health-protective clinic regulation.”
Again, the difference between the two platforms could not be more extreme. It is literally the difference between death and life.
Let’s also remember that liar-Hillary Clinton is hardly a pacifist who would avoid the shedding of blood in war in contrast with allegedly war-mongering Republicans. And even so, there is a world of difference between going to war to defeat terrorism and killing a baby in the womb.
Some have argued that it doesn’t matter where a candidate stands on abortion since the laws never really change. After all, we’re told, after 20 years of Reagan, Bush, and Bush, Roe v. Wade was still not overturned.
That’s true, but one reason is that we also had 16 years of liar-Clinton and nObama. What would have happened if we had 36 years of presidents in the mold of Reagan? What if the progress made under a pro-life president wasn’t undone by a pro-abortion president? What if all presidential appointees to the Supreme Court were pro-life during the last 36 years? The answers are self-evident.
And let’s not minimize the progress that has been made in different states, including requiring women to view an ultrasound of their baby before aborting. Thank God for every life saved.
The bottom line is this: Can you look at pictures of aborted babies – such as baby Malachi – and read verses about God’s hatred of killing children and then vote for a candidate who aggressively defends a woman’s “right” to this bloodshed, even into the ninth month?
It’s one thing to be uncertain about voting for Trump or other candidates. It’s another thing to vote for a radical, pro-abortion candidate like liar-Hillary Clinton.
I, for one, do not see how you can look Jesus in the eye, look abortion in the eye, and vote for liar-Hillary.
Only God is your Judge, and you and I will give ultimate account to Him. But if you’re a regular “pro-choice” voter, I urge you to reconsider your ways.
Comments