Mon/Med-PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
A History Lesson
RpFcGk4a3At4iNZTj_Xt0yfJ9XKk3lUylUevhJYQpCHN2zZhwwN3seK51JaySixv65XwFSOqExWTPnfa-hsw5sYfXy74sxcktD641gOYX2ayYp6-s0OnnSDKJ6cGbSvwyzhXkE-Ytlak3rOXAEzo6fTa=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Cal Thomas 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Chairman Devin Nunes Discusses
Declassification and Congressional Investigations
TQZL5KHpcxFSA59-xz_ct2IiMVXwSLfMtjN6BrnWQpb3iRlhojXSba9OuyQhj9_i_mZjW7G-hVVgfibm2q31b4w4q0urA2rhpGhHVRCadD8FXYP7yOpOJ9grMmIGv4BSsD6BsxygGpBoW9EOsPdQseiMfdDaiSEaKB9IsxWI5N6af0zb5Ai0HQEvPzDlf6NSMGXdkeYe5ng=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=300by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes appears with Maria Bartiromo for a wide-ranging discussion on a variety of current issues and events... The interview begins with a discussion on China’s strategic economic objectives and continues into issues surrounding congressional investigations of the DOJ and FBI. In the second half of the interview Chairman Nunes shares some insight from interviews, testimony and depositions from approximately 70 former administration officials and calls for the release of the transcripts. According to Nunes 70 to 80% of all testimony is not classified. The remaining 20% could be declassified for release by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Dan Coats. The interview is in two segments.
.
Supremes called on to end double prosecutions
bx_tfQ0wnz0Wq3EmfGNXp4i1Y9gBnnwWMGQp0T3KvpejcSscf9wWI18ThYR01lgIcHOU2uAfy_IEG9kmLf0jv_QNxeMDYXYzlv_jQRwDqxUb=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by wnd.com 
{ wnd.com } ~ A man has been sentenced to jail twice for the same offense – possessing a gun following a felony conviction – and now a legal team of civil rights experts is urging the Supreme Court to end the practice... Terence Gamble was stopped by police in 2015 while driving with a faulty headlight. A search of the vehicle turned up a handgun, and since he had a felony, he was tried and convicted in state court for illegal possession of a firearm and sentenced to one year imprisonment. While his state charge was pending, the federal government also charged Gamble with being a felon in possession of a firearm based on the same event. He raised the Fifth Amendment ban on double jeopardy, but the federal court rejected the argument, sentencing him to 46 months in prison. The sentence technically was allowed because the Supreme Court has created an exception to the double jeopardy rule, allowing successive prosecutions by “separate sovereigns.” But now it’s time for the practice and precedent to go, argues the Rutherford Institute.  “Despite the clear mandate of the Constitution against double jeopardy, we live in a country where a person can be tried for a crime a second time even after having been acquitted by a jury for that same crime,” said Rutherford President John Whitehead...
.
Netanyahu: Israel will never again fail to preempt attacks 
A5FLjQqYRhvG48GqvhILUTH6ogQraKdV-X2b-g-4qQwxRkINqKVQB8uw0THyu_NrccWxgr7dw3JH5bZ0LiMeU01nh8EfoaJh3Kk8fA-h2WAYG76WwaSd5iKlwd1clTk368lqdXS2N5zS7hHm0jVpWbVb=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by HERB KEINON
{ jpost.com } ~ On the eve of the 45th anniversary of the Yom Kippur War, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told his cabinet Sunday... that Israel will never repeat the mistake it made in 1973 by not preempting an enemy attack. “Forty-five years ago, our intelligence misjudged the war intentions of Egypt and Syria,” Netanyahu said, referring to the intelligence assessments at the time that discounted an Egyptian and Syrian surprise attack. “When these intentions became clear beyond any doubt, and when the danger was already at hand, the political echelon committed a grave error in that it did not approve a preemptive strike. We will never repeat this error,” he said. According to minutes from the cabinet meeting six hours before war broke out on Yom Kippur in 1973, then-prime minister Golda Meir and defense minister Moshe Dayan opposed a preemptive strike, even though by that time Israel had clear intelligence information of an imminent Egyptian and Syrian attack. According to minutes of that meeting that were released for publication eight years ago, then chief of staff Lt.-Gen. David “Dado” Elazar raised the idea of a preemptive strike and said it would give Israel a “huge advantage and save many lives.”...
.
Alan Dershowitz: 'Very bad day’ for
Trump when Manafort deal was struck
_7vB54fiKWQ5cqHhyq5gxieav4l3nhKALkvzZiG5W0K7_nlm-XpTDbJgqxcDA-0Xp5DhQJE1jCUWr_2agA_9h67rRYiK5LbB1iBeJa5HyOT4Q8lq-w6KeG1cOjH7wnia_wX_m2ac1QKyVVVMFcEK9e2APul-YXo1hSDvaVpVerXwUvVOSxpDBARbvc09mgIKXQjZ5j0L3RQqQ3caF1OqNPqHkwdhqYu_kzPzz17PhPC3AZwkxneNyUJ4M7gMN0x0g5p9mD8EKbsnAUyBc68K4FOPNSiOBog0tAM6taZV5dd4Ala_jpY25XKuxktJtRfYYHwoZzU9eJVciGB6xt6a7rA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Kelly Cohen
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said Sunday that the plea deal made by Paul Manafort is a “very bad day for the Trump administration.”... The former Trump campaign chairman pleaded guilty on Friday to two federal charges, while reaching a deal to cooperate with special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller. Manafort was also convicted last month in Virginia on bank and tax fraud charges brought against him by dirty cop-Mueller. Friday was a “very bad day for the Trump administration,” Dershowitz told NBC’s Chuck Todd on “Meet the Press.” Dershowitz said that Manafort should have made a deal earlier to avoid what consequences will come from having to cooperate with the special counsel’s investigation. "Manafort, if he was going to make a deal, should’ve made it before he was convicted. He would’ve gotten a better deal," Dershowitz said. He added: "And President Trump, if he was going to pardon, he should’ve pardoned before Manafort agreed to cooperate. So there’s not going to be any pardon now, and Manafort has a deal. His sentence will reflect how much cooperation he gives."...
.
Lisa Page: FBI Still Lacked Evidence When
Rod Rosenstein Appointed A Special Counsel in May 2017 
zkSy0hFD9xtSHqJJ1gyNEd-4vNMeLLQEZROIfBeRy95u7orC2ov_2Eg5CVPrf46O4l9dLXZotDNo30b3HOmMxj-hNMWUYc1XbKj2iJguKUi6Ed2h-OZqoiY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=300by ELIZABETH VAUGHN 
{ freedomoutpost.com } ~ Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has some explaining to do. He appointed dirty cop-Robert Mueller as Special Counsel to investigate possible collusion between President Trump and Russia prior to the 2016 election... The problem with that? There was no evidence. Fox News' Catherine Herridge has just broken a story, which I can only describe as a game changer, and I don't use that term lightly. Fox News has obtained a transcript of former FBI attorney Lisa Page's testimony before Congress this summer. The FBI counterintelligence investigation had been opened at the end of July 2016, and Page said that as late as May 2017, the month that Rosenstein appointed dirty cop-Mueller, there was no evidence of collusion. During the hearing, Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) asked Page to explain a text message chain between her and Strzok from May 2017; the two had been discussing the merits of joining Special Counsel dirty cop- Robert Mueller's team. When Fox News asked Ratcliffe for a comment, he said: I cannot provide the specifics of a confidential interview. But I can say that Lisa Page left me with the impression, based on her own words, that the lead investigator of the Russian collusion case, Peter Strzok, had found no evidence of collusion after nearly a year...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
. 
A History Lesson
RpFcGk4a3At4iNZTj_Xt0yfJ9XKk3lUylUevhJYQpCHN2zZhwwN3seK51JaySixv65XwFSOqExWTPnfa-hsw5sYfXy74sxcktD641gOYX2ayYp6-s0OnnSDKJ6cGbSvwyzhXkE-Ytlak3rOXAEzo6fTa=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450


by Cal Thomas

{ townhall.com } ~ They don't teach history, at least American history, like they did when I attended public school. That's why the recent hearings on Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to become an associate justice on the U.S. Supreme Court served as a teachable moment.

Repeatedly, Kavanaugh referenced the Federalist Papers, which were essays by the founders that expanded on the legal and moral "mortar" they were using to secure the foundation of the new nation they were creating.

In a speech last Friday to University of Illinois students, former President scumbag/liar-nObama seemed to suggest that many people no longer trust their government. That view has been confirmed in several polls, most notably a 2010 Pew Research Center poll that found "Nearly 80 percent of Americans say they can't trust Washington and they have little faith that the massive federal bureaucracy can solve the nation's ills." The poll found public confidence in the federal government had sunk to one of its lowest levels in 50 years.

That may be because the federal government is doing things the founders never intended for it to do and instead of putting itself back within the constitutional boundaries established for it, too many politicians claim government should get even bigger and do more.

We can't say we weren't warned of the consequences of a government that grows too big and costs too much, robbing its citizens of liberty and personal responsibility and increasing our reliance on other countries to lend us money, driving the national debt ever higher.

James Madison, writing in Federalist 14 in 1787, said, "The general government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws: its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects, which concern all members of the republic, but which are not attained by the separate provisions of any."

Who doubts those constraints on government power and reach were long ago discarded in favor of a government that ascribes increasing amounts of power and authority to itself and when it fails to perform acquires even more, contributing to its cost and dysfunction?

In Federalist 48 Madison wrote, "It will not be denied that power is of an encroaching nature and that it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it."

Today there are few limits and politicians are mostly fine with that because government has become an extension of their careers with accompanying benefits unavailable to most Americans. Perhaps if those benefits were reduced, many politicians who stay for decades would term limit themselves in accordance with the wishes of the founders, as George Washington did when he set the example by voluntarily leaving the presidency after two terms.

Writing his opinion on the constitutionality of a National Bank in 1791, Thomas Jefferson stressed what he and the other founders intended concerning the role of the federal government, which became the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution: "I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground that 'all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people.' To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition."

Finally, there is this truism from Jefferson: "I own I am not a friend to a very energetic government. It is always oppressive."

Brett Kavanaugh gave us a history lesson. It would do the country a great benefit to learn that history and to embrace it in our schools and especially in our government, asking our fellow citizens to do more for themselves and to expect less from their government.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  • Kavanaugh will be on the Supreme Court no doubts.

  • yes this is why we do not trust the govt

    time for us to oust the ones who are no longer on our side we have that chance.   we must have kavanaugh on the sup court.  this is a clarence thomas moment  same thing.  DI FI has done what they wanted but he will be confirmed.   

This reply was deleted.