TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
RINO-Lindsey Graham, the Uninvited Guest
by Ann Coulter
.
Monday Top Headlines
by Political Editors: Pulosi: Immigration framework is a “campaign to Make America White Again” (Hot Air)
by Political Editors: Pulosi: Immigration framework is a “campaign to Make America White Again” (Hot Air).
.
.
.
.
Shock, Las Vegas mogul has sex scandal history: RNC finance chair resigns over misconduct (Fox News)
.
.
.
15 times major media outlets used a statistic about plastic straws based on research by a nine-year-old (Reason)
.
.
Humor: Facebook now requires blood sacrifice before anyone will see your page’s posts (The Babylon Bee)
.
.
Policy: Is $1.7 trillion too much to rebuild America? Not at all (Investor’s Business Daily) ~The Patriot Post
.
Dems Pushing “Impeachment Lite,”
Untouchable Demi-God Special Counsel
by rickwells.us
{ rickwells.us } ~ We all have seen the partisan overreach of agitators disguised as so-called judges... in the efforts of the Ninth Circuit and other rogue black-robed devils who envision themselves as dictators superior to the President. Some in Congress, globalist Democrats and RINOs, are so enamored with leftist judicial overreach and so desperate to depose President Trump that they now want to transform the position of special prosecutor into that of a Frankenstein monster that can only be turned off by them. Under pressure from Democrats, the Judiciary Committee, chaired by Chuck Grassley, may consider such a move. Judicially expedient Senators would never consider such an action, particularly with the best of real life evidence ever offered against such a move now being exhibited in the out of control witch hunt of Robert Mueller. His inquisition has deviated completely from the supposed initial purpose and is now a naked attempt to “get President Trump” no matter what it takes... https://rickwells.us/dems-pushing-impeachment-lite/ .
Trump: Democrats only
want to 'use' DACA, not solve it
by Daniel Chaitin
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ President Trump said late Saturday that Democrats have no appetite to create a solution for so-called "Dreamers,"... but rather wish only to "use" immigration for political advantage. By comparison, the president said Republicans are on board to fix a "long time terrible problem." "I have offered DACA a wonderful deal, including a doubling in the number of recipients & a twelve year pathway to citizenship, for two reasons: (1) Because the Republicans want to fix a long time terrible problem," he tweeted. "(2) To show that Democrats do not want to solve DACA, only use it!"... http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-democrats-only-want-to-use-daca-not-solve-it/article/2647313?utm_campaign=Washington%20Examiner:%20News%20Alert&utm_source=Washington%20Examiner:%20News%20Alert%20-%2001/27/18&utm_medium=email.
Trump Wanting To Fire Mueller Story Aimed
To Divert Attention Away From FBI Texts
by Matt Vespa
{ townhall.com } ~ Yes, some were a bit frustrated that we posted about The New York Times’ late Thursday night story about... President Donald Trump wanting to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller last June. The fact of the matter is it never happened, but it would certainly rehash the Russian collusion hysteria that has gripped the news media since Trump won the 2016 election. Yet, Washington Free Beacon reporter Liz Harrington noted the odd timing of the leaked story, noting it came two hours after it was reported that FBI agent Peter Strzok and bureau lawyer Lisa Page were worried that they were going to hard on liar-Hillary Clinton during the probe into whether the former first lady mishandled classified information. It seemed to suggest the two were mulling pulling some punches concerning the former first lady, which is wholly inappropriate... https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/01/27/free-beacon-reporter-trump-wanting-to-fire-mueller-story-aimed-to-divert-attenti-n2440288Are We Heading for an Immigration Sellout?
by Derek Hunter
{ townhall.com } ~ If I’d told you 2 years ago journalists would scramble to “report” on the allegation President Donald Trump wanted to fire... Special Counsel Robert Mueller seven months ago like it A) just happened, and B) actually happened as in he was fired, you would’ve thought I was lying to you. But it’s all too real, and someone will likely win a journalism award for it. But in an age of frantic reporting over rumors, lies, and non-stories, the pearl-clutching class chose a faux-scandal over some real news – that the White House is open to selling out on immigration. Oh, they mentioned it, but it wasn’t nearly as important as the alleged prospect of the President wanting to fire someone he has every Constitutional right to fire. It deserves more than a mention... https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2018/01/28/are-we-heading-for-an-immigration-sellout-n2440709?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad= .
New Age NOprah: How Democrats'
hope is leading Americans astray
by wnd.com
{ wnd.com } ~ The leftist media is doing its best to promote NOprah Winfrey as the next presidential nominee for the Democrat Party.... But a video clip which is going viral shows NOWinfrey specifically denying Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. And even leftists are beginning to question the consequences of NOprah Winfrey’s New Age beliefs and relentless marketing for pseudo-scientific charlatans. As revealed in the book “‘O’ God: A Dialogue on Truth and NOprah’s Spirituality,” NOWinfrey has used her media platform to promote anti-Christian spiritual ideals, including the concept there are many ways to achieve eternal life... http://www.wnd.com/2018/01/new-age-oprah-how-democrats-hope-is-leading-americans-astray/
.
.
RINO-Lindsey Graham, the Uninvited Guest
by Ann Coulter
{freedomsback.com} ~ Why does Sen. RINO-Lindsey Graham have a seat at the table on immigration? Are Jorge Ramos and Vicente Fox unavailable?
{freedomsback.com} ~ Why does Sen. RINO-Lindsey Graham have a seat at the table on immigration? Are Jorge Ramos and Vicente Fox unavailable?
RINO-Graham’s claim to fame is: 1) having twice negotiated a voluntary surrender for the GOP on immigration; and 2) winning 0.00 percent of the vote when he ran for president two years ago.
You could run for president on the platform that we should kill babies and eat them, and you’d get more votes than RINO-Lindsey Graham. Who designated this most remote of back-benchers, thoroughly rejected by the American people, as the principal negotiator on Trump’s central campaign promise?
RINO-Graham’s thought process seems to be: We had an election, I ran for president; literally no one voted for me, so my views should prevail over the guy who won an Electoral College landslide.
How about getting Dennis Kucinich in there? Has anyone asked Martin O’Malley for help in the “DACA” negotiations?
To a rapturous media, RINO-Graham has been peddling the lie that President Trump blew up a beautiful bipartisan deal on immigration. It wasn’t “bipartisan,” except in the sense of being “angrily rejected by the voters.”
It’s the same deal that has gone down in flames at least twice before. It’s the same deal that has already destroyed the careers of Sens. RINO-John McCain, Marco Rubio, RINO-Jeff Flake, Bob Corker, Kelly Ayotte, Mark Kirk and Gov. Jeb! Bush.
It’s the same deal President Bush tried to push through Congress in 2006 — with RINO-Graham’s support! — leading directly to the Republican wipeout in the midterm elections later that year. Innumerable polls showed that the public hated Bush’s proposed amnesty even more than it hated the Iraq War.
It’s the same deal that voters repudiated for approximately the 87th time when they made Donald Trump president and — again — gave RINO-Lindsey Graham zero votes.
Notwithstanding the media’s phony polls showing 98.6 percent of voters wildly enthusiastic about amnesty for “Dreamers” — or “Nightmares,” as radio host Howie Carr calls them — every time the public gets its hands on an actual ballot, it votes for: less immigration, punishing employers who hire illegals, no government services for illegals, no driver’s licenses for illegals, no amnesty ever, English-only and Donald Trump.
What the media call a “bipartisan deal” didn’t even meet the basic definition of a “deal.”
For at least a decade now, the argument for amnestying the Nightmares has been: Screw the parents. THEY SUCK! They were the lawbreakers … but don’t blame the innocent children (single typewriter key) brought-here-through-no-fault-of-their-own.
Then we get to see the big bipartisan deal, and it’s: We amnesty the kids — but also the parents! Not only is this not meeting Trump halfway, it’s also doubling the distance.
It’s like negotiating in the Kasbah:
Democrats: We demand $30!
Republicans: We’ll give you $10.
Democrats: OK, $200.
RINO-Lindsey Graham: DEAL!
How did an existential issue for the Republican Party get assigned to the single worst person to negotiate it?
It would be as if during Bush’s presidency, anti-war Republican Chuck Hagel had anointed himself spokesman for the GOP on the Iraq War. Republicans would have gone nuts! They would have been screaming at the media, the Democrats and the president: DO NOT TALK TO CHUCK HAGEL!
The fact that Senate Republicans have not done this in the case of RINO-Graham and immigration makes me think the fix is in. If we had a party that was serious, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Senate GOP would say, “That’s great that you and RINO-Jeff Flake have been having meetings, RINO-Lindsey, but you don’t speak for us.”
It’s hard to avoid the impression that other Republicans are saying, God bless RINO-Lindsey. There, but for the grace of God, go I — because this is what our paymasters want. The Business Round table doesn’t care what Republicans have to do to fool the base, provided: Another year goes by, the Nightmares are still here, and we haven’t sealed the border.
Either Mitch McConnell is very, very stupid or the reason he’s not pulling RINO-Graham is precisely because he keeps missing shots.
Let’s see, what’s the stupidest way we could do this? Every single day of Trump’s campaign he promised everyone a wall and mass deportations. What if we DON’T build a wall, but take the person who got zero votes, was the earliest and most vociferous in attacking Trump — and involve him centrally in the negotiations on immigration?
Recall that McConnell spent $8 million to defeat Rep. Mo Brooks in the Alabama Senate Republican primary last August, leading to Trump’s humiliating defeat in the reddest state in the Union in December. There’s nothing embarrassing about Brooks. But he’s with Trump on immigration, so he had to be stopped.
Voters get lip service on “securing the border” at the same time that Republicans are letting RINO-Graham negotiate amnesty. The complicit senators hide in their offices and practice looking shocked. No, RINO-Lindsey! That’s not what we wanted at all! … Oh well, what are you going to do? Let’s just get those illegals their permanent residence cards and move on to more tax cuts for Wall Street.
It’s said so often that it’s become a cliche: Elections have consequences. Just this once, couldn’t an election have a consequence? A wall and deportations — YES! Amnesty for the Nightmares — NO!
Comments