With the news today, one could easily think what’s the use in fighting and toss in the towel. Chance favors the prepared mind. Think what you want and rely on yourself to make it happen.

The masses, we note, depend on the authorities to think for them. Why are they authorities? They think what they want and rely on themselves to make it happen. Thinking what you want requires, first, that you think there is no such thing as objective reality; that we were not created with hive mentality.

Jesus offered that you should do unto others as you would have others do unto you, the Golden Rule. You have your rights and others have their rights. The present authorities would have you submit to the good of all, or as President Obama puts it, submit to “collective salvation.”

Collective salvation is for the masses; the authorities do what is best for them, the law of nature. Obama’s idea of the law, the law he learned at Harvard, naturally, he has a problem with our Constitution, Obama learned the “old world” view of the law and then went to South Chicago as a community organizer to practice “the law.” He was Acorn’s lawyer. What more proof do you want that Obama practices the law South Chicago style, the law of might makes right?

With Obama’s exploding national debt, the law of nature will bring forth someone with the lesser of two evils answer, someone like Obama. With Obama, it is always the lesser of two evils, the evil he helped create, to practice the law of the jungle. How do you deal with it?

We now have a scientific answer for miracles. The state of mind, or conscious awareness is fundamental to the laws of nature. The microcosmic world, a world of infinite possibility, is connected with the state of mind. The more consciously aware we are, the more we, individually, are in control of our lives. When you think in terms of the Golden Rule, the Higher Law of nature under which humans were created, and with which to live, and the background of our Constitution, it all comes into play. When I read the Constitution, I realized it was voices of the past speaking to me. In my experience, you prepare for the worst and fight for your rights. Miraculously, the worst never happens.

Views: 9


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Diamond & Silk

Tea Party
Facebook & Twitter


Breaking: Jury Sides With Sheriff Joe
Smacks Down Establishment GOP’s Lawsuit

A jury has sided in favor of conservative icon, former Sheriff Joe Arpaio, against the lawsuit filed by Austin Flake, the son of GOP establishment Senator Jeff Flake, and Austin’s ex-wife, Logan Brown.

Flake and Brown had filed a lawsuit against the Arizona sheriff for “malicious prosecution” after over a dozen dogs died on their watch at a Gilbert dog kennel.

The jury decided Flake and Brown had failed to provide sufficient evidence to back up their accusations of malicious prosecution by Arpaio, The Associated Press reported via Tucson.com.

Flake and Brown ran the kennel while Brown’s parents were out of town in 2014, the AP reported.

The two were still in college.

Initially, Flake and Brown were charged in the incident, but the charges were dropped at the prosecution’s request. Later, Flake’s in-laws pleaded guilty to animal cruelty charges after an expert determined that the facility air conditioner failed because it was not properly maintained.

Thus, the owners of the kennel were responsible for the death of the 21 dogs, and they answered for their crimes.

Nonetheless, Flake and Brown reportedly alleged that Arpaio had charged them to gain publicity and deal damage to Senator Flake — an establishment fixture within the GOP.

The two “contended the charges caused them emotional distress, contributed to the demise of their marriage and led the senator’s son to being suspended from college for an honor-code violation,” according to The Associated Press.

Despite the jury’s decision, the U.S. District Judge Neil V. Wake will not issue a final verdict until the defense explains why it didn’t turn over documents that may have benefited the plaintiffs, according to a statement from the plaintiffs’ attorney to The Associated Press.

“The struggle to hold government officials accountable has always required a steep, perilous climb,” the plaintiffs’ attorney said in a Friday statement according to KNPX.

“Although we disagree with the jury’s verdict, we are grateful we had the opportunity to force former Sheriff Arpaio and his subordinates at Maricopa County to account for their indisputably reckless conduct. Near the end of the trial, we discovered that the County failed to turn over documents that might have helped us prove our case,” he continued.

“The Court has ordered the County to explain its failure and indicated that it will not enter a final judgment in the case until a satisfactory explanation is provided. We will access our future options in this fight when the County complies with the Court’s Order.”

Charges that didn’t pan out are an annoyance to those affected — there’s no question of that.

But to claim that those charges — which were dropped — were the reason behind a failed marriage, and that Arpaio needs to pay is completely ridiculous.

What do you think about this story? Please share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know!

Are you glad about the jury’s decision? Scroll down to comment below!


© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service