The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
In Immigration Debate, Race Matters
by PATRICK J. BUCHANAN
.
Libtard Oakland Mayor Claims She’d Go
To Jail To Defend Her Precious Illegals
by rickwells.us
{rickwells.us} ~ The angry libtard mayor of sanctuary city Oakland, CA, supports violating federal law through... the protection of criminals wanted by the federal government. Asked what she thought of ICE raids that are expected in a California crackdown, the appropriately named mayor, Libby Schaaf, demonstrated her severe, inoperable case of liberalism by immediately attacking President Trump for enforcing the law. Libtard Libby replied, “It’s no surprise that the bully-in-chief is continuing to try to intimidate our most vulnerable residents.” Those are her city’s residents who are vulnerable because they are breaking the law by their presence and need to be removed. President Trump is merely enforcing the laws passed by Congress during a more sane time, when globalist commie Democrats weren’t holding America hostage... https://rickwells.us/oakland-mayor-jail-defend-illegals/.
Israel, India Building ‘Anti-Islam
Nexus,’ Pakistan Complains
by Vijeta Uniyal
{truthrevolt.org} ~ Pakistan’s Foreign Minister accused Israel and India of building an ‘anti-Islam nexus,’ Pakistani newspapers report... Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif made that statement on a local TV network while commenting on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to India. Netanyahu is on a week-long visit to India, making him the second Israeli head of government to visit the Hindu-majority country. Much like the Jewish State, India too has paid a huge price for being at the forefront of worldwide jihad. In the past decade, India lost an estimated 5500 civilians and 2700 army personnel to terrorism... https://www.truthrevolt.org/news/israel-india-building-anti-islam-nexus-pakistan-complains.
Undocumented Lawyer Tries Defending
Illegal Immigrants, Wasn’t Ready for Tucker’s
by BENJAMIN ARIE
{conservativetribune.com} ~ Tucker Carlson has a major following among conservatives, and with good reason... He has a strong ability to get to the core of an issue without seeming snarky or hostile, and often makes well-reasoned points that leave his opponents sputtering. That’s exactly what he did on Monday, during an interview with illegal immigrant attorney Cesar Vargas. In case you’re wondering, yes, Vargas is both an attorney for immigrants, and an admitted illegal alien himself. To nobody’s surprise, the topic of the day was immigration policy, and Carlson asked an epic question — one that brought a fresh angle to the debate... https://conservativetribune.com/illegal-immigrant-tucker-carlson/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=libertyalliance&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=libertyalliance.
Shocking Irregularities
in Screening Aliens for Terror Ties
.
House GOP Has Access
to Classified 'FISA Abuse' Report
by Cathy Burke
{newsmax.com} ~ House Intelligence Committee Republicans are reportedly letting lawmakers in the lower chamber see a highly classified report... outlining concerns about the conduct of top FBI and Justice Department officials, and their handling of a surveillance program. "We have concerns — Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act concerns — that all members of the body should know," said Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, Politico reported. GOP lawmakers argue FISA was inappropriately used to snoop on a foreign policy aide to the Trump campaign. But some conservative House Republicans want it released to the public too, including Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who said its release is necessary to "preserve our democracy," and Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., who contends the report would reveal "FISA abuse,"... https://www.newsmax.com/politics/fisa-house-intelligence-committee/2018/01/18/id/838077/?ns_mail_uid=29878495&ns_mail_job=1774507_01192018&s=al&dkt_nbr=0101029zo390.
.
In Immigration Debate, Race Matters
by PATRICK J. BUCHANAN
{wnd.com} ~ President Trump “said things which were hate-filled, vile and racist. … I cannot believe … any president has ever spoken the words that I … heard our president speak yesterday.”So wailed Sen. scum-Dick Durbin after departing the White House.
And what caused the Democratic whip to almost faint dead away?
Trump called Haiti a “s–-hole country,” said scum-Durbin, and then asked why we don’t have more immigrants from neat places “like Norway.”
With that, there erupted one of the great media firestorms of the Trump era. On Martin Luther King Day, it was still blazing.
Trump concedes he may have disparaged Haiti, which, at last check, was not listed among “Best Places to Live” in the Western Hemisphere. Yet Trump insists he did not demean the Haitian people.
Still, by contrasting Norway as a desirable source of immigrants, as opposed to Haiti, El Salvador and Africa, Trump tabled a question that is roiling the West, the answer to which will decide its fate.
Trump is saying with words, as he has with policies, that in taking in a million people a year, race, religion and national origin matter, if we are to preserve our national unity and national character.
Moreover, on deciding who comes, and who does not, Americans have the sovereign right to discriminate in favor of some continents, countries and cultures, and against others.
Moreover, in stating his own preferences, Trump is in a tradition as old as the republic.
The original colonies did not want Catholics here. Ben Franklin feared Pennsylvania was being overrun by stupid Germans:
“Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion.”
Just as anti-immigrant parties have arisen in Europe to stem the flood of refugees from the Mideast and Africa, an American Party “Know-Nothings” was formed to halt the surge of Irish immigrants during the Potato Famine of 1845-1849.
Lincoln wanted slaves repatriated to Africa. In the 19th and 20th centuries, we had Chinese and Japanese exclusion acts.
“Californians have properly objected” to Japanese migrants, said V.P. nominee FDR “on the sound basic ground that … the mingling of Asiatic blood with European or American blood produces, in nine cases out of ten, the most unfortunate results.
After the Great Migration of Italians, Poles, Jews and East Europeans, from 1890 to 1920, the Immigration Act of 1925 established quotas based on the national origins of the American people in 1890, thus favoring Brits, Scots-Irish, Irish and Germans.
Civil rights leader A. Philip Randolph, a major figure in Dr. King’s March on Washington, said of the Harding-Coolidge restrictive quotas:
“We favor reducing immigration to nothing … shutting out the Germans … Italians … Hindus … Chinese and even the Negroes from the West Indies. The country is suffering from immigration indigestion.”
The Senate floor leader of the 1965 Immigration Act addressed what were then regarded as valid concerns about the future racial and ethnic composition of the country. Sen. Edward Kennedy pledged:
“Our cities win not be flooded with a million immigrants annually … the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. … S. 500 will not inundate America with immigrants from … the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia.”
What Kennedy assured America would not happen, did happen.
Today, issues of immigration and race are tearing countries and continents apart. There are anti-immigrant parties in every nation in Europe. Turkey is being bribed to keep Syrian refugees out of Europe.
Boatloads of Africans from Libya are being turned back in the Med. After building a wall to keep them out, Bibi Netanyahu has told “illegal aliens” from Africa: Get out of Israel by March, or go to jail.
Angela Merkel’s party may have suffered irreparable damage when she let a million Mideast refugees in. The larger concentrations of Arabs, Africans and Turks in Britain, France and Germany are not assimilating. Central European nations are sealing borders.
Europe fears a future in which the continent, with its shrinking numbers of native-born, is swamped by peoples from the Third World.
Yet the future alarmed Europeans are resisting is a future U.S. elites have embraced. Among the reasons, endless mass migration here means the demographic death of the GOP.
In U.S. presidential elections, persons of color whose roots are in Asia, Africa and Latin America vote 4-1 Democratic and against the candidates favored by American’s vanishing white majority. Not for the first time, liberal ideology comports precisely with liberal interests.
Mass immigration means an America in 2050 with no core majority, made up of minorities of every race, color, religion and culture on earth, a continent-wide replica of the wonderful diversity we see today in the U.N. General Assembly.
Such a country has never existed before. Are we on the Yellow Brick Road to the new Utopia – or on the path to national suicide?
Comments