TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Dems Enraged at Trump's Plan to Send 
Illegals to Sanctuary Cities
Louis DeBroux
.
dirty cop-Robert Mueller Interviewed 
President Trump Six Days After Criminal 
“Obstruction” Investigation Began
by sundance
theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Now that people are starting to absorb the intent and motivations of the Special Counsel investigation it’s worth remembering dirty cop-Robert Mueller interviewed President Donald Trump... six days after the FBI launched a criminal “obstruction of justice” investigation, and ten months after the FBI launched the counterintelligence investigation….The May 16, 2017, dirty cop-Mueller meeting with President Trump in the Oval Office. The dirty cop-Mueller Report shows there never was a Trump Russia-Collusion-Conspiracy case to begin with; and with the report showing how most of dirty cop-Mueller’s investigative time was spent gathering evidence for an ‘obstruction case’; and with new revelations from Andrew McCabe, John Dowd and dirty cop-Mueller officials overlayed on the previous Strzok/Page texts; we can now clearly reconcile the May 16th, 2017, meeting between President Trump, Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and dirty cop-Robert Mueller.  Here’s how…FBI Director scumbag-James Comey was fired on Tuesday May 9th, 2017. According to his own admissions (NBC and CBS), Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe immediately began a criminal ‘obstruction’ investigation the next day, Wednesday May 10th; and he immediately enlisted Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. These McCabe statements line up with with text message conversations between FBI lawyer Lisa Page and FBI agent Peter Strzok – (same dates 5/9 and 5/10)...
.
House Judiciary Committee issues subpoena for 'complete and unredacted' dirty cop-
Mueller report
by Adam Shaw  
{foxnews.com} ~ House Judiciary Committee Chairman scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., issued a subpoena Friday to obtain the "complete and unredacted" version of Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller's Russia report... as well as the underlying materials -- the next step in what is almost certain to be a lengthy political and legal battle between Democrats and Republicans over the report. "This includes, but is not limited to, all summaries, exhibits, indices, tables of contents or other tables or figures, appendices, supplements, addenda or any other attachments whether written or attached in a separate electronic format," the subpoena says. scumbag liar-Nadler's push comes a day after a redacted version of the report was made public. The White House has hailed the report, which found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government in 2016, as a victory. But Democrats have pointed to dirty cop-Mueller's review of 10 instances where Trump may be considered to have obstructed justice -- although the special counsel did not conclude that Trump committed a crime -- as well as other details in the report as justification for Congress to see the report, as for dirty cop-Mueller to testify to Congress. scumbag liar-Nadler and other Democrats have been particularly opposed to Attorney General William Barr's decision to release a redacted version of the report to Congress. Barr said that he, along with special counsel, identified four areas of the report that needed redactions, including grand jury material, information the intelligence community believes would reveal intelligence sources and methods, any material that could interfere with ongoing prosecutions, and information that could implicate the privacy or reputational interests of “peripheral players.”... They will never ever be satisfied with any documents.  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-judiciary-committee-issues-s...  

MSNBC's Brian Williams Challenges Trump's 
Lawyer On 'No Collusion,' Gets Smacked With 
Direct Quotes From dirty cop-Mueller Report
by James Barrett
dailywire.com } ~ On Thursday, MSNBC's Brian Williams attempted to poke holes in Attorney General William Barr's summary of the newly released redacted report by Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller... After inviting on Donald Trump's attorney Jay Sekulow, Williams suggested that Barr misled the public by concluding that dirty cop-Mueller's report found "no collusion" between the Trump campaign and the Russian government in election interference. Sekulow responded by reading directly from the report clearly stating that it "did not establish" collusion.  "Counselor, thank you very much for joining us," Wiliams began in a moment highlighted by the Washington Examiner. "My first question, I'm afraid, is going to verge on plain English: Where did the attorney general get off with that characterization this morning, including four mentions that there was 'no collusion'? What document was he reading compared to the one we're left with?" Sekulow responded by simply reading directly from the second page of dirty cop-Mueller's now publicly available report. "Well, page 2 of the document says, 'the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities,'" Sekulow read. "So it's right from the document itself," he added. "Have you read Part 1?" asked Williams. "I have read Part 1 and Part 2," Sekulow replied. "You find good news in here for the president and the administration?" asked Williams, suggestively. Sekulow answered by reading another direct quote from the report: "Page 181: 'The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume 1 [Section IV, supra],' that's the Russian contacts, 'amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal criminal law, including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws.'" Sekulow then answered Williams' loaded question directly: "Yeah, I think it's a very good win."...
.
‘You’re Very Rude, Sir!’ — Martha MacCallum Fires Back At Filibustering Dem Congressman 
During Heated Exchange  
by Scott Morefield
dailycaller.com } ~ Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum criticized Democratic Rep. Sean Maloney as “very rude”... after the New York congressman kept talking over her during their Thursday night conversation about the dirty cop-Mueller report.  After  MacCallum asked Maloney if things had been “blown out of proportion” during the last two years, the Democratic lawmaker switched the focus to several incidents related in the report that some have interpreted as attempts at obstruction. “Excuse me,” MacCallum interrupted. “I have let you explain yourself in great detail. I just want to say one thing and I will let you go on …” “Excuse me, I have something to say,” the Fox News anchor said after Maloney continued talking. “The point is Carter Page …” said Maloney. But a visibly annoyed MacCallum was finished playing nice: You are very rude. You’re very rude, sir. That was rude. I’m trying to interject for a moment. I don’t want to interrupt but I want to say one thing about the underlying crime here. When there is not an underlying crime with regard to collusion, it’s difficult to say someone is obstructing something. So, you just laid out your thinking about why you think the president was being obstructive. But if there is no underlying crime. That’s one of the reasons dirty cop-Robert Mueller was unable to make a finding there. I’m sorry for getting heated, but please go ahead...
.
Rick Perry Planning His Exit as Trump’s 
Energy Secretary, Sources Say
by Jennifer Jacobs, Jennifer A Dlouhy, and Ari Natter
bloomberg.com } ~ Energy Secretary Rick Perry is planning to leave the Trump administration and is finalizing the terms and timing of his departure... according to two people familiar with his plans. While Perry’s exit isn’t imminent and one person familiar with the matter said the former Texas governor still hasn’t fully made up his mind, three people said he has been seriously considering his departure for weeks. All of the people spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. An Energy Department spokeswoman, Shaylyn Hynes, rejected the idea that Perry would be leaving the administration any time soon. “He is happy where he is serving President Trump and leading the Department of Energy,” she said in a statement. The White House press office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Perry, an Air Force veteran who was previously Texas’s longest-serving governor, has enjoyed a good rapport with President Donald Trump. Trump personally asked Perry if he’d take over as Homeland Security secretary, before the president asked Kirstjen Nielsen to resign earlier this month, two of the people said. Perry declined, they said. Perry has been preparing the agency’s deputy secretary, Dan Brouillette, for the transition, two people said. It’s unclear if Trump would name Brouillette as secretary. Part of Perry’s motivation in seeking to leave before the end of Trump’s first term is a desire to build his income before retiring, two people said...
.
.
.

Dems Enraged at Trump's Plan to Send 

Illegals to Sanctuary Cities
Louis DeBroux:  Conservative icon Ben Shapiro once wrote that President Donald Trump’s superpower “is that he can irritate people into doing the dumbest things imaginable.” At the time he was speaking of Trump’s trolling of Democrat Senator Elizabeth dinky-Warren until she took a DNA test to prove her claims of Native American ancestry, and instead proved that she was, at most, 1/1024th Native American, and therefore a fraud.
 

Last week, President Trump didn’t just throw gas on the fire of the illegal-immigration debate, he backed up a tanker truck to the fire and opened the valves.

When word leaked out of an internal White House discussion as to the wisdom and feasibility of taking captured illegals and transporting them to sanctuary cities, obstructionist Democrats went (more) insane, enraged that Trump would dump illegals on their doorsteps. In response, Trump tweeted, “The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy — so this should make them very happy!”

Democrats, having lost their collective minds, exposed not only their abject hypocrisy, but their cynical politicization of an issue that is deeply impacting and harming millions of Americans.

House Speaker Nancy Pulosi, suddenly terrified of seeing thousands of illegals in her front yard, self-righteously declared Trump’s threat “unworthy of the presidency,” calling the idea “cruel,” “warped,” and “despicable.” Of course, when illegals jumped Pulosi’s fence last year, she didn’t invite them into her living room, she had cops haul them off.

Other Democrats were equally terrified. Democrat Senator and 2020 presidential candidate scumbag-Cory Booker declared that busing illegals to sanctuary cities would “make us less safe.” New York Rep. scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler protested that Trump had “no right” to do so. Seattle’s mayor called Trump a “despot.”

The Wall Street Journal editorial board points out legitimate problems with President Trump’s plan. While the constitutionality of the plan can be debated, there are other unintended consequences that could undermine it. With the 2020 census just around the corner, transporting tens of thousands of illegals to Democrat-heavy districts could actually result in more seats in Congress after reapportionment. The WSJ also argues that busing illegals to “sanctuary” cities would lend legitimacy to the idea that cities and states can defy federal immigration law and enact their own policies on immigration.

On the other hand, one would have to be utterly blind to avoid the glaring double standard. Democrat-controlled cities and states refuse to enforce federal immigration law, even going so far as to actively assist illegals in evading federal authorities. So it seems a bit disingenuous to argue that Trump is breaking the law by offering to give them exactly what they have asked for. And what other segment of the population can break laws with impunity and not only go unpunished but be rewarded?

Some believe this is a political stunt by Trump, but others believe Trump has every intention on following through. Trump also declared, “The USA has the absolute legal right to have apprehended illegal immigrants transferred to Sanctuary Cities. We hereby demand that they be taken care of at the highest level, especially by the State of California, which is well known or its poor management & high taxes!”

Regardless of whether this threat is enacted as policy, Trump has dealt Democrats another blow politically, exposing their rank hypocrisy.

Democrats repeatedly declare there is no border crisis, and attack Trump when he claims illegals are responsible for tens of thousands of cases of assault, rape, murder, and other crimes against American citizens. Democrats claim illegals are all just hard-working people looking to make a better life in America. They claim illegals commit crime at lower rates than native-born Americans, are a net benefit to the economy, and make us a better country by making us more diverse.

If all that is true (and, to be fair, it often is), why are “progressive,” open-borders Democrats terrified of Trump’s plan? One would think they’d be eager to usher tens of thousands of these wonderful, law-abiding (except for the whole illegally crossing the border thing, and the identity theft, and the other crimes) people into their cities.

The truth is that Democrats could not care less about the plight of these poor immigrants. In 2009-2010, with Barack scumbag/liar-nObama in the White House and Democrats holding supermajorities in both houses of Congress, the Democrats made no effort to deal with the decades-old immigration problem.

Why? Because illegal immigration is far more useful to Democrats as a bludgeon against their Republican foes. If President Trump is able to secure the border and get an immigration-reform package through Congress, then the crisis is solved, and they can no longer accuse Republicans of being heartless and racist.

In the meantime the crisis gets worse. In the El Paso sector alone, the Border Patrol apprehended 71,063 illegals from January to March 2019, compared to “just” 10,975 in the same time frame in 2018, a 647% increase. The Border Patrol is overwhelmed, unable to keep up with the waves of migrants flooding the border. The waves of illegals leave rivers of trash in their wake, and unlike legal immigrants who have to undergo medical screenings, illegals are bringing with them diseases long ago eradicated in the....

Congress must fix our nation’s broken immigration system, but until it does, President Trump should do all within his power to enforce the law and protect the American people.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/62437?mailing_id=4210&utm_mediu...  

Views: 15

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service