Dear Fellow Patriots:
What follows is a copy of my fifteenth follow-up letter that I forwarded to our NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall today respectfully requesting that a full-scale investigation be conducted by both houses of Congress into the allegations made, on March 1, 2012 and July 17, 2012, by Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, which I again am taking the liberty of sharing with you for informational purposes.
For your information, I shared the following recent revelations with him that I believe overwhelmingly support said request:
On October 25, 2012, an article and/or blog post revealed an eye-opening letter that revealed that the question of President Obama’s legitimacy will not go away with a change of office because of the uncertainty our country has experienced over the last several years as to who are its natural born citizens, and thereby constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief, which is apparent to many.
On October 26, 2012, the editor of The Post & Email sent a thought provoking letter to Ms. Greta van Susteren, Author of “On The Record”, which airs weeknights at 10:00 p.m. on the Fox News Channel, asking why no main stream media outlets are covering the Obama eligibility and/or identity story.
For your information, I will also be forwarding similar letters to our other NM U.S. Representatives and our Governor.
Letter To NM U.S. Senator Udall:
October 26, 2012
The Honorable Tom Udall
United States Senate
110 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-3101
Dear Senator Udall:
On October 18, 2012, I wrote my fourteenth letter to you respectfully requesting that a full-scale investigation be conducted by both houses of Congress into the allegations made, on March 1, 2012 and July 17, 2012, by Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse.
For your information and again much to my dismay, to date I have not received a response from your office, but be that as it may, what follows are revelations that I believe further support said requests:
On October 25, 2012, an article and/or blog post revealed an eye-opening letter that revealed that the question of President Obama’s legitimacy will not go away with a change of office because of the uncertainty our country has experienced over the last several years as to who are its natural born citizens, and thereby constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief, which is apparent to many. What follows is said article and/or blog post in its entirety:
“WHO WILL DECIDE THE DEFINITION OF “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?”
Has Obama’s occupation of the White House been constitutional and/or legal?
I’ve just emailed a letter to all the Republican members of the U.S. Senate, which I wanted to share. It points out why the matter of presidential eligibility will not simply disappear with a change of office. A copy is posted below.
I am writing concerning the issue of presidential eligibility. The uncertainty our country has demonstrated over the last several years as to who are its natural born citizens, and so eligible to the presidency, is apparent to many. The reluctance of our country’s officers and representatives to deal directly with the matter leads the onlooker to an inevitable conclusion:
It is presumed that when the presidency next changes hands, the matter will fade away.
If the matter were really about Mr. Obama after all, this would probably be true, but to suppose that it is just about him, or that it will fade away, is to misunderstand the issue our country faces.
The matter of presidential eligibility involves the natural right of citizenship, which necessarily affects:
How will our government be able to act honestly on any of these issues without potentially declaring the Obama presidency a farce? If the rule of law and the oath to support the Constitution is to be maintained in pretense only, the charade will need to be continued for a much longer time and over a much wider range of issues than was perhaps suspected!
Must we really continue to treat our laws with contempt in order to avoid self-reproof? Should our nation remain ensnared to avoid an uncomfortable situation? Absolutely not! We should free ourselves from the snare. There is no real loss when a person or nation stops doing wrong in order to do what is right. Partiality in the administration of the law is not a benefit to any nation, but justice brings stability.
Around the country, numerous eligibility cases have been filed which have been tossed out on “lack of standing”, while “official” opinions have been offered in an attempt to dispel the issue. However, the rule of law is not preserved by evasiveness, judicial oaths are not maintained in pretense, and the Constitution cannot be construed so as to be ineffectual.
Even today our government seems unable to address immigration in a reasonable and legal fashion, and by a doubtful construction of birthright citizenship, it causes all foreigners born within our borders to be dual nationals. Can we expect improvement if we are not forthright about such matters?
There is yet another possible consequence of failing to deal with the issue of presidential eligibility.
Uncertainty as to the legality of a presidency causes all legislation passed under that administration to be uncertain. If there are, in fact, any such laws, which are invalid, they remain unenforceable even after a change in office.
Should our state governors, representatives, and judicial officers be placed continually in the position of enforcing and punishing “offences” against federal legislation, which is itself of questionable validity? We have already seen the result of a case involving Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, (a six month prison sentence, and his questions as to the legitimacy of the Obama presidency unanswered).
It is a treacherous path for all. Such a matter as involves the presidency and affects the entire nation can never really be brushed aside as a mere technicality.
“…No Person except a natural born Citizen… shall be eligible to the Office of President…”
“…This Constitution… shall be the supreme Law of the Land… The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution…”
On October 26, 2012, the editor of The Post & Email sent a thought provoking letter to Ms. Greta van Susteren, Author of “On The Record”, which airs weeknights at 10:00 p.m. on the Fox News Channel, asking why no main stream media outlets are covering the Obama eligibility and/or identity story. What follows is the article and/or blog that contained the letter in its entirety:
“IS FOX NEWS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PURSUE THE TRUTH?
[Editor’s Note: The following letter has been mailed to Greta van Susteren, anchor of “On the Record,” which airs weeknights on the Fox News Channel at 10:00 p.m. Eastern. This article is open access and may be reproduced in full with a link back toThe Post & Email and the author’s name kept intact.]
October 25, 2012
Ms. Greta van Susteren
“On the Record”
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-8701
Dear Ms. van Susteren:
In your interview with Donald Trump on October 24, you appeared uncomfortable discussing Donald Trump’s public offer to Barack Obama to give $5,000,000 to a charity of Obama’s choosing if he released his college applications and records as well as passport applications and records to Trump’s satisfaction.
You attempted to make the case that Trump’s offer of $5,000,000 was inadequate because Trump is “a very wealthy man.” Regardless of how wealthy Trump is, to most people, the amount he offered is more than magnanimous for any cause.
On the webpage featuring your show, Fox News asks “Why are so few news/media organizations covering the Libya/Benghazi/US Consulate Story?”
My question to you and all of the handsomely-paid anchors at Fox News is: “Why is no news/media organization covering the Obama eligibility/identity story?”
A law enforcement investigation conducted by the Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff’s Office and Cold Case Posse has determinedand announced formally, on two occasions, that the “long-form birth certificate” to which you referred in your interview with Trump is a “computer-generated forgery,” yet you indicated that you are “satisfied” with its release.
To its credit, Fox News reported on the first and second Arpaio press conference online, but still failed to report the revelations on television and claimed that questions about Obama’s birthplace had been “debunked.” Exactly who debunked them, Ms. van Susteren, when Obama himself claimed that he was born in Kenya before he was born in Hawaii?
Members of the Kenyan Parliament have stated “on the record” that Obama was born in their country.
The posse also found that Obama’s Selective Service registration card is a forgery. Selective Service Director Lawrence Romo, who reports directly to Obama, will not allow access to the “original” application, if one exists. Instead, he referred Mike Zullo, the lead investigator, to the FBI, which has also failed to take action on the charges of forgery and fraud put forth by the investigative team. Numerous graphics and computer experts have gone “on the record,” some staking their reputations, in declaring the “birth certificate” a poor forgery. Even an “expert” quoted by Fox News at the time said that he was misquotedand could not vouch for the authenticity of the document.
A licensed private investigator has staked her reputation and filed a lawsuit in Ohio on her claim that Obama is using a stolen Social Security number.
So what is Fox News hiding? Why would you not want to be the first and only mainstream media outlet to report on these findings in the same way in which you are covering the Benghazi cover-up?
While it is unfortunate that most attorneys are not familiar with our founding documents, particularly the U.S. Constitution, to make the assumption that a digital image of a birth certificate already deemed to be a forgery by many qualifies Barack Hussein Obama for the presidency is ludicrous. Simply being born in the country is not what our Founders intended when they included Section 1, clause 5 in Article II of the Constitution. They wanted the person holding the office of president and commander-in-chief to have sole allegiance to the United States, which involves the citizenship of the parents, or at least the father. Were you aware that in 1916, Democrat Breckinridge Long, who served under President Woodrow Wilson as Third Assistant Secretary of State, correctly questioned the eligibility of Mr. Charles Evans Hughes because he was born in the United States but to a British-citizen father?
Obama claims to have been born to a foreign-born, non-naturalized father; therefore, it makes no difference where in the world he was born, nor did it make any difference for Mr. Hughes.
Obama’s own statements have conflicted with accepted “facts” about his childhood. While he originally claimed that his parents were married when he was born, he now says that he was “born to a single mother.” Moreover, Investigator Zullo has expressed doubt that the life story Obama has made public is accurate, including his birth date. During an interview in early September, Zullo said that Obama’s memoir, Dreams From My Father, was written “to give him a cover story for a life that never happened.” Is this matter not newsworthy?
Is it not worth investigating when a researcher who has published a myriad of articles about Obama states that “There is no Stanley Ann Dunham?” Why would no one within a large news corporation such as Fox be even the slightest bit curious about such a claim?
A hearing took place on October 22 in Indianapolis, IN initiated by Atty. Orly Taitz, of whom I am sure you have heard, during which a Superior Court judge heard testimony from two witnesses specializing in website development and typesetting, respectively, regarding Obama’s alleged long-form birth certificate. One possesses 57 years of experience, and both declared the image a forgery.
By failing to report on what could be the worst fraud ever perpetrated on the American people, you, too, are complicit in the conspiracy which has kept an unvetted, unqualified person in the White House who now is responsible for the deaths of four State Department employees, including an ambassador, and hundreds, if not thousands, of military members who have been maimed and killed under his watch. Everything about Obama’s past has been obscured and “fraught with problems,” yet the media is silent or derisive toward the messenger.
Glenn Beck, who some believe Fox wished to “control,” has now uttered the word “treason” in regard to Obama because of reports that the U.S. is arming Islamic insurgents in the Middle East. Beck is not the first to accuse Obama of treason; it was done by a retired member of the military on March 17, 2009. Since then, thousands of people have signed petitions, written letters and filed formal complaints of treason against Obama and Eric Holder, but Fox says nothing.
If Obama has presented forged documentation to the American people in order to deceive, is he guilty of treason?
It is not the amount which Trump offered that should gain your attention; it is the obfuscation which Obama has committed and the lack of vetting by “media/news organizations” that is to blame. You must surely know that the large media companies control the information which reaches the people. Since 2007, Fox News has failed to verify the “facts” Obama has issued about his life which he himself has now contradicted. Other networks have also gone out of their way to provide cover for Obama’s questionable birthplace and life story.
As a trained attorney, like Trump, I am surprised that you would not be more circumspect about the image which Obama purported to be his birth certificate. As a journalist, one would expect you to want to investigate the matter, but instead you have demonized the messenger. Could it be that you are uncomfortable that the truth is about to become public and Fox News will lose all of its credibility?
While no major “media/news organizations” have followed this story, those of us in the internet community who have worked hard to pursue it will be the ones to break wide open the biggest fraud in all of American history.
Very truly yours,
Editor The Post & Email
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT 06076
Continue Reading More About This Disturbing Issue:
Accordingly, I again am hereby respectfully requesting that a full-scale investigation be conducted by both houses of Congress into the allegations made, on March 1, 2012 and July 17, 2012, by Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse for the sake of the preservation of our United States of America that I love and for which so many brave and courageous Americans have and continue to make the ultimate sacrifice for.
For your information, I will also be forwarding the same information to our other NM U.S. Representatives.
Please feel free to contact me at my email or home address should you have any questions regarding my request.
I look forward to hearing from you regarding this disturbing matter.
God Bless You and God Bless America.
Jake L. Martinez
Automatic Electronic Response Received From Senator Udall’s Office Regarding My Email Above:
“Thank you for your message!
I look forward to reviewing your comments and questions.
Before you leave, I hope you'll explore my website. On this page, you can learn more about the work that I've been doing on important issues and legislation as your U.S. Senator.
Note: The following is an important book in PDF format that contains a general view of the origin and nature of the U.S. Constitution and Government of The United States, along with other eye-opening articles and/or blog posts that reveal that our Constitution currently faces a 'Progressive' threat and that we now live in a post-constitutional country-You Decide:
A General View Of The Origin And Nature Of The Constitution and Government of the United States!-Posted on Citizens For A Constitutional Republic-By Henry Baldwin, Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (January 18, 1830 – April 21, 1844):
George Soros assault on U.S. Constitution: ‘White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document’!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On March 27, 2011:
Obama Versus the Constitution!-Posted on American Thinker-By James Lewis-On April 25, 2011:
American Constitution faces ‘progressive’ threat!-Posted on WND.com-By Aaron Klein-On July 3, 2011:
The Elite Are Not Even Trying To Hide How Much They Hate The U.S. Constitution Anymore!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By The American Dream-On July 5, 2011:
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE: U.S. CONSTITUTION INFERIOR!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On February 3, 2012:
Obama Administration’s War On the Constitution!-Posted on ThruthOut-By John Cusack-On September 1, 2012:
EXCLUSIVE—Mark Levin on ‘Ameritopia:’ ‘We Now Live in a Post-Constitutional Country!’-Posted on CNSNews.com-ByTerence P. Jeffrey-On January 16, 2012:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?
Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility!
Did Saudis Buy Obama 2008 Election?
A Vote for Every Murderer and a Ballot for Every Rapist!
Massive Voter Fraud-Again!
Active complaint to the FEC over President Obama’s 2008 campaign finances!
Recipient of Foreign Donations Accuses Others of Taking Foreign Donations!
CIA Columbia Obama Cover Up!
Why did a black preacher from Harlem have a “hit” placed on his life?
Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!
Where Is America Today?
The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!
Is History Repeating Itself?
WILL WE THE PEOPLE ALLOW A CRIMINAL SYNDICATE TO STAY IN POWER?
A Republic, If You Can Keep It!
Declaration to Restore the Republic!
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy website and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide.
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!