What follows is another letter that I forwarded to our NM Governor Susana Martinez today regarding the removal of President Obama form the NM 2012 Presidential Election Ballot, which I again am taking the liberty of sharing with you for informational purposes.
Please note that I have also included excerpts from a letter that I sent to our NM U.S. Senator Jeff Bingaman today, which I believe relate to and/or further support my request for the removal of President Obama from the NM 2012 Presidential Election Ballot:
Letter to Governor Martinez:
May 1, 2012
Dear Governor Martinez:
On April 26, 2012, I wrote to you and provided you with excerpts from a letter that I had forwarded to Senator Bingaman, which I believed supported my numerous requests for the removal of President Obama from the New Mexico 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot because he is Constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President and Commander-In-Chief.
I would be remiss if I didn’t share the following pertinent excerpts from a letter that I sent to Senator Bingaman today in support of my request for the conduct of an investigation by both houses of Congress into the allegations made on March 1, 2012 by Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, which I again am taking the liberty of sharing with you because I believe that they also relate to and/or further support my numerous requests to have President Obama removed from the NM 2012 Presidential Election Ballot:
“On April 28, 2012, an article and/or blog post revealed a ten video series that warns that there has been an effort to overthrow our American system, which is well under way through the “civilization jihad” of the Muslim Brotherhood, with the support of key U.S. government leaders, to include President Obama.
What follows are pertinent excerpts from the article and/or blog post that revealed the video series:
“….Radical Muslims have penetrated “team Obama,” according to the series, which examines six individuals who have been allowed into high positions. The consequent danger is “acute,” according to the video makers.
Included in the conversation are the White House, director of National Intelligence, State Department, Justice Department, the Pentagon, Department of Homeland Security and NASA.
The 10-part course, “The Muslim Brotherhood in America: The Enemy Within,” was created by the the Center for Security Policy under the direction of Frank Gaffney. It has been posted on the Web.
Unveiled are the long-term processes of subversion and deceit through which the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic extremists have infiltrated the American government and promoted their plan to implement Islamic law, or Shariah, in the United States and around the world.
Signs of capitulation already are evident in cases such as the Fort Hood massacre. The official military description of the attack by a self-described soldier of Allah, Nidal Hasan, who allegedly killed dozens at a Texas military base while shouting Islamic slogans, was “workplace violence.”
The film outlines the Muslim practice of taqiyya – deliberate lying to advance Islam. Rather than direct conquest, the video course explains that Muslims are using “civilization jihad, a form of warfare that employs manipulative financial techniques, lawfare, infiltration of our civil institutions and government, and insidious information dominance.”
The goal is the destruction of American society and a takeover by radical Muslims.
Most shockingly, the course shows that the process of subversion includes the takeover of portions of the American conservative movement itself, including filling key positions with members of the Muslim Brotherhood. According to the Muslim Brotherhood’s own internal documents, Islamic extremists are engaged in “a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within, sabotaging its miserable house with their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
In an interview with WND, Gaffney said the course “helps break the code on why we’re losing the war jihadists are waging on America.”
“I think it responds to the real confusion Americans feel about what is going on in this country,” he said. “They see reports of individual extremists killed, but then they suffer long waits at the airport because of ineffective and nonsensical TSA screenings, hear that the Islamic shooter at Ft. Hood was just a case of ‘workplace violence,’ and find out that the Muslim Brotherhood is telling the FBI what they are and are not allowed to say and do to fight terrorism.”
FBI Director Robert Mueller met with top Muslim Brotherhood operatives earlier this year to announce that hundreds of terrorism training documents and briefings that Muslims might deem offensive would be purged from the files.
Gaffney emphasizes that the enemy is “inside the wire,” and the course “connects the dots so that the American people will know the real story.”
See an introduction to the series:
The course explains that even the language used by the Obama administration,“the endless apologies to people chronically offended,”are perceived by Muslims as acts of submission to Islam.
The series explain how many of the well-known Islamic groups operating now in America share the ideals of radicals abroad, including, “Islam is our creed, Allah is our objective, the prophet is our leader, the Quran is our law, jihad is our way and dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”
The strategy of the radicals includes keeping “infidels” ignorant, prohibiting “blasphemy,” demanding concessions, using educational tools, interfaith dialogue, Shariah-compliant finance, inserting Shariah into U.S. courts and placing Muslim Brotherhood partners in positions of influence.”
If the eye-opening and/or alarming information that is presented in the above video series is true, it further supports the need to vet our Presidential candidates to ensure that they meet the Constitutional eligibility requirement of being a “natural born citizen” set forth in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 because it could ensure that the elected presidential candidate would have sole allegiance to and love only one country from birth.
Such love and attachment to only one country from birth would surely have been something that President Monroe thought was needed for the well-being, happiness, and preservation of the United States. This fact was meticulously revealed in the following article and/or blog post that was published by Mario Apuzzo, Esq. on April 28, 2012, which I am taking the liberty of sharing with you in its entirety for effect:
“I received an email today regarding our fifth President, James Monroe. What struck me as being applicable today was the article that was attached to the email. The article was a little biography on President Monroe. In that article is contained a part that included President Monroe’s concern about possible usurpation in our government. Below is my reflection on this article.
Indeed, President James Monroe, in his First Inaugural Address of March 4, 1817, warned:
“What raised us to the present happy state?...The Government has been in the hands of the people. To the people, therefore...is the credit due...
It is only when the people become ignorant and corrupt, when they degenerate into a populace, that they are incapable of exercising the sovereignty.
Usurpation is then an easy attainment, and an usurper soon found. The people themselves become the willing instruments of their own debasement and ruin...”
President Monroe then stated on December 7, 1824, in his 8th Annual Message:
“For these blessings we owe to Almighty God...with profound reverence, our most grateful and unceasing acknowledgments....
Having commenced my service in early youth, and continued it since with few and short intervals, I have witnessed the great difficulties to which our Union has been exposed, and admired the virtue and intelligence with which they have been surmounted...
That these blessings may be preserved and perpetuated will be the object of my fervent and unceasing prayers to the Supreme Ruler of the Universe.”
Source: Monroe, James. Dec. 2, 1817, First Annual Message. James D. Richardson (U.S. Representative from Tennessee), ed., A Compilation of the Messages & Papers of the Presidents 1789-1897, 10 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, published by Authority of Congress, 1897, 1899; Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Literature & Art, 1789-1902, 11 vols., 1907, 1910), Vol. II, p. 12, as found at http://www.americanminute.com/ .
President Monroe was most dedicated to preserving the great nation that the United States had become. He saw usurpation as a most serious threat to that preservation.
Why was President Monroe so concerned about usurpation? To whom could Monroe have been referring when he spoke about “an usurper?” How could such a person become “an usurper?” Actually, Monroe answered this question by telling us that it was when the people became “ignorant and corrupt” that an usurper will come to power which in the end would produce the “debasement and ruin” of those same people.
What would make some political leader “an usurper” in the eyes of President Monroe? If it was the President and Commander in Chief of the Military that concerned Monroe, was it lack of being at least 35 years of age, of having at least 14 years of residency in the United States, or not being a “natural born Citizen” (the Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 eligibility requirements) that so worried him? Who else other than the President could be so important and powerful in our government to give Monroe such concern about “an usurper?” Given the structure and balance of power in our government, it could only have been the President to whom Monroe was referring. And would Monroe be so concerned about age and residency or was it lack of being a “natural born citizen” that so worried him? After all, is it not from being a “natural born Citizen” that sole allegiance to and love of only one country from birth come from? Such love and attachment to only one country from birth would surely have been something that Monroe thought was needed for the well-being, happiness, and preservation of the United States.
This concern by Monroe makes the point about how important it is for us as a nation to assure that the “natural born Citizen” clause is not only honored and protected today, but preserved for the well-being and happiness of future American generations. But for this to occur, the nation must make sure that ill-informed or corrupt people do not allow such an usurpation to occur or to continue.
Our current putative President, Barack Obama, does not meet the constitutional definition of an Article II “natural born Citizen.” That definition is a child born in the United States to two parents who at the time of the child’s birth were both either “citizens of the United States” or “natural born Citizens.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) (“all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners”); United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) (acknowledging and confirming Minor’s American common law definition of a “natural-born citizens” but adding based on the English common law that “‘[t]he child of an alien, if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle [birth in the country]’” (bracketed information supplied)). This American common law definition of a “natural born Citizen” has never been changed, not even by the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore still prevails today.
When Obama was born, wherever that may be, he was born to a father, Barack Obama Sr., who was a British citizen, and to a mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who was a “natural born Citizen.” Under both U.S. and British statutory and U.S. common law existing from the time the Constitution was adopted and to the present, Obama was born an English “natural born subject.” Being born an English “natural born subject,” the Founders and Framers and our early Congresses, as they expressed in the Naturalization Acts of 1790, 1795, 1802, and 1855, would not even have considered him to be a “citizen,” let alone an Article II “natural born Citizen.” If he was born in the United States, a fact that he has yet to conclusively show, he can be a “citizen” under the Fourteenth Amendment and 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401(a), which as interpreted by U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, granted constitutional birthright citizenship to persons born in the United States to one or two domiciled alien parents, just like a person can be a “citizen” under Congressional Acts which grant statutory birthright citizenship to persons born out of the United States to one or two U.S. citizen parents. But not being born to two U.S. citizen parents, Obama is not and can never be an Article II “natural born Citizen.”
Not being a “natural born Citizen,” either because he was not born in the United States or because he was not born to two U.S. citizen parents or both, is Obama the usurper of whom President Monroe warned us?
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
April 28, 2012
On December 12, 2009, the following article and/or blog post revealed the foreign influences of Mr. George Soros on President Obama’s 2008 Presidential Election Campaign in detail, to include who ran cover for his Islamic background and the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by his supporters:
Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s Campaign!’-Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:
By now most Americans are aware that members of Congress know that President Obama was never vetted and that he is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President and Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces, as revealed in the following articles and/or blog posts:
Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!
DC knows that Obama is ineligible for office!
Additionally, most Americans are also aware that the “Certificate of Live Birth” released on April 27, 2011 by the White House as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth is a forgery, which was recently confirmed by Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, but that the FBI is covering up the fraud and no one in Congress is willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash,” which was revealed in the following article and/or blog post:
Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On June 15, 2011:
On April 29, 2012, the following article and/or blog post confirms the information revealed in the above article and/or blog post:
GOP Lawmaker: Eligibility Too Scary To Take On: ‘Fears investigation would be ‘biggest constitutional crisis since Civil War’!-Posted on WND.com-By Drew Zahn-On April 29, 2012:
This truly concerns me because I now believe that some of our own elected officials (both Republican and Democrat) blatantly allowed this President to be propped up and get elected without being vetted knowing that he was Constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President, as documented on the following video, and now they fear that an investigation would bring on a “black backlash” and a “constitutional crisis,” which is a situation that some of them disgustingly had a hand in creating, all while our Constitution is being shredded before our eyes and our country is being destroyed from within:
Video: Illegal Obama "Propped Up" By Congress!
End of Excerpts.
As I’ve stated above in my letter to Senator Bingaman, I now believe that some of our own elected officials (both Republican and Democrat) blatantly allowed this President to be propped up and get elected without being vetted knowing that he was Constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President and now they fear that an investigation would bring on a “black backlash” and a “constitutional crisis,” which is a situation that some of them disgustingly had a hand in creating, all while our Constitution is being shredded before our eyes and our country is being destroyed from within.
Finally, as I’ve stated to you in my letter of April 26, 2012, I will not be silent while I witness our Constitution being shredded before my eyes by what appears to be treason, while our local and national elected officials sit on the sidelines and allow it to happen. It is quite evident to me, as it is to many other Americans, that the cloak of darkness that has kept this travesty from the American people is rapidly coming unraveled on a daily basis, as evidenced by the above excerpts and others that I’ve shared with you and our Secretary of State in the recent past, along with the number of people that are currently coming forward to expose those individuals that took part in what I consider to be the greatest fraud perpetrated in American history.
Governor Martinez I realize that you have an extremely busy schedule, but again I am graciously asking and would very much appreciate an opportunity to visit with you for a few minutes regarding this extremely disturbing and time sensitive matter that continues to keep me up at night.
Please feel free to contact me at my email or home address should you have any questions and/or need any additional information from me.
Thank you again for the excellent job that you’re doing as our state’s Governor.
God Bless You and God Bless America.
Jake L. Martinez
Automatic Electronic Response Received From Governor Martinez’s Office Regarding My Email Above:
Thank you for taking the time to share your comments and concerns with my office. A constituent service representative will be in contact with you regarding your issue.
Sincerely, Susana Martinez”
Note: Americans are waking up!
Thanks again to WND, Obama Ballot Challenge Staff and Sheriff Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse for their unwavering commitment and fortitude to continue the fight.
Americans across the country are waking up to the fact that President Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President, as substantiated by his newly released long-form Certificate of Live Birth, which shows that his father was in fact born in Kenya in 1936. At the time, Kenya was a British colony. Therefore Obama Senior was a British subject by birth (due to the fact that he was born within British-controlled territory). When President Obama was born in 1961, he acquired British nationality by descent, because his father was a British subject by birth. When Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in 1963, President Obama became a citizen of the newly-formed nation.
Additionally, Several new organizations, to include active websites, were established to educate and mobilize the American public on the significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election, along with an initiative to assist ordinary registered voting citizens wishing to challenge President Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on their state’s 2012 primary presidential ballot. The team that established and maintains this website is currently compiling election laws from all 50 states and in the near future will be providing forms, along with sample letters that registered voters can use to file a complaint. Also included is pertinent information regarding those lawsuits and/or complaints that have been filed by state, to include my own.
Word of Caution: Although its great that many Americans are now beginning to wake up and are actively taking some action to have President Obama taken off the 2012 Presidential Election Ballots we need to keep in mind that those individuals with unlimited sources and/or resources, to include the deep pockets of anti-American George Soros, our own local and national elected officials and others, with the help of the MSM, who have spent years planning and successively perpetrating what I now believe could be the greatest fraud in American history are not going to go down without a fight and thus, as a result, I also believe that now more than ever we need to stick together as Americans (it's no longer Democrat or Republican) at this crucial time when our country and/or Republic needs us more than ever to see this thru. A Republic for which so many Americans have and continue to give their all to uphold and defend.
So the question is: Are you going to be part of the problem by continuing to keep your head in the sand hoping this issue goes away by itself or are you going to be part of the solution by stepping up to the plate and doing what ever it takes to uphold and defend our Republic before its too late?-You Decide:
YOUR TURN: TELL CONGRESS TO PROBE ELIGIBILITY: ‘Not to resolve this monumental, unprecedented constitutional issue intolerable’!-Posted on WND.com-On April 10, 2012:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
Could the President’s newly released COLB be a forgery?
The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!
Muslim Brotherhood Declares War on America-Will America Notice!
Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!
Is Shariah Law A Danger To Our U.S. National Security?
What do American Citizens Know About “Sharia Law” and is It Something That We Should Know More About?
Should Americans Fear Islam?
Islam’s Child Martyrs in America!
What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?
Federal judge confirms CAIR is Hamas!
Europe’s Looming Demise: Changes on the Continent Cloud Our Future!
“Food For Thought”
God Bless the U.S.A.!