Christians are blessed to be able to view/measure their life against God's standards. This does not mean they are judging others who live by different standards. This just means that if an example of something that goes against these standards is given, the observer has the knowledge to separate it out from these standards with a red flag in order to choose avoidance of the example given. Thus, this example is unsuitable for their own life as an authentic disciple. To disagree with something means: to fail to agree; to differ in opinion, and to be unsuitable. There exist a driving hateful force in the homosexual movement and the liberal left to make the world think that this simple disagreement/choice is a judgement.
This hateful driving force is laid out in Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen's book called "After the Ball: How America Will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90's." You see that right in the very title of this book they negligently label what in most cases is a simple disagreement or choice on how to live peacefully by calling it fear and hatred. Thus, in their attempt to fight this supposedly "fear and hatred," it justifies their utilization of intimidation and hate to stop it.
This driving hateful force is called 'jamming.' Jamming is psychological terrorism meant to silence expression of or even support for dissenting opinion. Everyone has a right to be able to express their views and have opinions about virtuous and peaceful ways of living. As you can see, there is nothing virtuous, loving, or peaceful about jamming. In jamming - the target is shown a "bigot" being rejected by his crowd for his "prejudice" (of which it is not but only a simple choice/disagreement on how to live) against gays. Therefore, just by knowing that the homosexual lifestyle is unsuitable for their own lives as disciples...Christians are called "bigots."
If the homosexual does not want to live by God's standards, they have a free will to choose this approach. This does not mean they have to spit obsenities at Christians for having a free will to live under God's standards. Many of them display an uncontrollable anger toward others who chooses differently. In this book, they are actually taught to view the other as their opponent. The Christian is not their opponent that needs to be contested, conflicted, and debated with in order for them to feel good to express their homosexuality in the open and attain the same priviledges as those in a heterosexual marriage exactly because they are not judging them but simply choosing a different way to live.
To judge means: to form an opinion about through careful weighing of evidence and testing of premises; to sit in judgement on; to determine or pronounce after inquiry and deliberation; govern rule; to form an estimate or evaluation of. There is data that exists on the results that are derived in the homosexual lifestyle and the heterosexual lifestyle. This is what should be analyzed by our political leaders in order to make favorable gay rights legislation because they do have to become a type judge in this situation. These are the individuals homosexuals need to work with (not condemn) in order to receive help. Homosexual civil unions is relatively new and gays need to start focusing on improving the data that reflects their own lifestyle rather than hatefully attacking innocent bystanders. In other words, start worrying about themselves instead of sticking their nose in the lives of others to make them out to be "haters" and "homophobes." Jamming in and of itself is hateful and violent language.
I believe the way to help this insane concept of jamming is to expose it for what it is. Before a heterosexual speaks about the controversial issue of homosexuality, they should say: "I do not want to be the victim of jamming just because I believe in a different way to live peacefully."Or "It does not matter what is written into the civil law. It doesn't mean I have to believe it even though I can respect it. 'Seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.'" Matt. 6: 32-34
Comments
It is part of the way they work as to get their way. If you do not agree with me you are a hater, That is not just plain stupid but an attack on the rights of others. We see in truth it is an attack on Constitutional rights to support what many suggest is their own choice. The radical choice supporters do that same thing as do the radical gays.