"Exactly right, Ana Zuniga-Mau; and as an Hispanic yourself, all the more reason to appreciate you for voicing this point of view.
A honey pot attracts; that's its job. This policy of creating dependency amongst the American populace and…"
Tea Party Command Center
-
Stan Stanfield
- Male
- Long Beach, CA
- United States
- Blog Posts
- Discussions (46)
- Events
- Groups
- Photos
- Photo Albums
- Videos
Gifts Received
Stan Stanfield has not received any gifts yet
Stan Stanfield's Page
Latest Activity
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Immigration Bill Contains 'MarcoPhones'Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Immigration Bill Contains 'MarcoPhones'"Excellent link, Andrew. Thanks for it.
Memories need to be nudged back into life, now and then, apparently..."
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion A.D.H.D. Seen in 11% of U.S. Children as Diagnoses Rise"Of course things like food additives and sugar can have effects like these. But there is a direct connection between all these Minimal Brain Damage/Disorder conditions (MBD) and the rise of vaccinations/mass vaccination programs. In…"
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Question for Today 3/23/2013"Yes, John, these people have been used "for their vote and agenda". Have been seduced into coming into the country illegally. And all those 'agenda' people who have used them to further their agendas need to face…"
Stan Stanfield commented on Daniel John Sobieski's blog post (IBD) Forget Gay Marriage: What About The Decline Of Marriage And Rise In Illegitimacy?"The chickens are coming home to roost. Once the American government decided to pay females to have babies on the taxpayers' dime - rather than just give a helping hand to already-existing families in temporary need, and draw the line…"
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Question for Today 3/23/2013"Fair enough thinking, June. But if the legals in this country ever got back the power to "regain control of DC", they wouldn't need to go to all that trouble. All they/we would have to do would be to eliminate the magnet…"
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Question for Today 3/23/2013"P.S. And if the U.S. gets into trouble with the UN for breaching 'human rights' (for not allowing free medical care to illegals)?? All the better; for having THAT little matter out in the open and dealt with finally, too. The…"
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Question for Today 3/23/2013"Good call, Jerry. The answer: No more benefits to anyone who can't prove their citizenship or legal presence in the country. That includes no access to medical care or schools (and huge fines, and/or incarceration, for any person…"
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Question for Today 3/23/2013"As Benjamin Franklin said (in effect). So we were warned.
I think too many people assumed that the Republican Party would keep an eye on such things in Congress, and keep such arrogance from getting out of hand. But it became the party…"
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion March 15th Presidential Memorandum: Deferred Enforced Departure for Liberians"I agree; this seems rather strange. And what "compelling foreign policy reasons" could there be to keep extending their DED?? a) Things are safe in their home country. b) The longer they are here, the more they get…"
Stan Stanfield commented on Asst Natl Dir Melony B. DeFord's video
Full Speech: Senator Ted Cruz Gives Keynote Speech at CPAC 2013
"I like what Joe Wolverton II, J.D. - The New American's 'resident' legal scholar - says about this NBC issue. In an article on TNA's website on Jan. 10, titled 'Texas Sen. Ted Cruz: Constitutionally Qualified to be…"
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Guns And Ammo Production Maxed Out: “This is a Society Preparing For War”"Although your just-previous comment, about your links with the CIA, gives me pause about YOUR creds..."
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Guns And Ammo Production Maxed Out: “This is a Society Preparing For War”"Carter,
So I've read enough now to figure where you're coming from. You're just trying to be a realist; are not an Obot. Are saying that we need to organize for the 2014 elections, as our only viable option.
I beg to…"
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Guns And Ammo Production Maxed Out: “This is a Society Preparing For War”"I'm sorry if I've missed something on this thread, but I may not be the only one: Just what is your position, Carter? You are saying, over and over, that the public doesn't stand a chance against the firepower of the…"
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Court Says No to Obama Secrecy"Excellent work, JW. Good for you. And us.
Hang in there. Don't give up on outing these rascals."
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Thanks Boehner and Cantor: US House OKs bill to avoid government shutdown and funds Obamacare"Are these two joking? When are the Republicans going to bite the bullet?? Who's going to stand up for the United States against these short-sighted pygmies in Congress these days???
This is disgusting stuff. YOU ARE…"
Profile Information
- Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
- Yes
- How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
- Email forward from Friend
- Do you agree Obama must be removed from Office?
- Yes
Comment Wall (3 comments)
- At 2:00pm on February 19, 2013,
Richard R. Allen said… Stan This is a direct copy, in part, of the DHS statement regarding their 100 mile border search and seizure policy.
The border search exception is a doctrine of United States criminal law that allows searches and seizures at international borders and their functional equivalent without a or probable cause.[1]
This doctrine is not actually an exception to the Fourth Amendment, but rather to the Amendment's requirement for a warrant (or probable cause[2]). Balanced against the sovereign's interests at the border are the Fourth Amendment rights of entrants. Not only is the expectation of privacy less at the border than in the interior [2] [3] the Fourth Amendment balance between the interests of the Government and the privacy right of the individual is also struck much more favorably to the Government at the border.[4] This balance at international borders means that routine searches are "reasonable" there, and therefore do not violate the Fourth Amendment's proscription against "unreasonable searches and seizures".
Border searches more invasive than "routine" require some suspicion. See the section below.
Despite federal law allowing certain federal agents to conduct suspicionless search and seizures within 100 miles of the border,[5] the Supreme Court has clearly and repeatedly confirmed that the border search exception applies only at international borders and their functional equivalent (such as international airports).[4]
- At 1:44pm on February 19, 2013, Richard R. Allen said…
Stan, You asked for more details on the 100 mile border areas set up by the DHS. I don't really have much more than I put in my blog; however I do have the capability to research it a little further and will get back to you.
Thanks for the comment.
- At 11:16am on October 2, 2012, Brad Levy said…
Welcome to the Command Center. The tea is strong, drink up:)
© 2013 Created by Steve - Ning Creator.
