Stan Stanfield
  • Male
  • Long Beach, CA
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (169)
  • Events
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Stan Stanfield's Friends

  • TJ McCann
  • Richard R. Allen

Gifts Received

Gift

Stan Stanfield has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Stan Stanfield's Page

Latest Activity

Stan Stanfield replied to Asst Natl Dir Melony B. DeFord's discussion Obama’s ‘Signature Achievement’ Will Be Bypassing The Constitution
"Thanks for your response, oldtexasgal.  What we need to understand, and acknowledge, in this matter is that both the Dems AND the Repubs are behind the sleight of hand going on.  They are the two wings of the New World Order bird that TPTB…"
Mar 24
Stan Stanfield replied to Asst Natl Dir Melony B. DeFord's discussion Obama’s ‘Signature Achievement’ Will Be Bypassing The Constitution
"Speaking of: What does it take to understand that the whole point of the exercise on the part of the constitutional Framers in putting the "natural born citizen" eligibility requirement in the contract for the office of the presidency -…"
Mar 23
Stan Stanfield liked TJ McCann's discussion The New World Order is HERE!
Mar 22
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"Sigh... Little Bright Feather, you left out the most crucial part of the wording of the contract, which explains what you just quoted: "...or a Citizen of the United States AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION..."  Point…"
Mar 16
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"You've nailed it, Ed. Thanks for your clarifications."
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"Indeed."
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"No it does not, and is not.  A 'natural born' citizen is a category of citizen, but a 'citizen' is NOT necessarily a 'natural born' citizen; and a 'naturalized' citizen is DEFINITELY not a 'natural…"
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"Correct."
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"Patricia, You keep confusing 'citizen' with 'natural born citizen'.  They are DIFFERENT CATEGORIES.  You obviously haven't read my initial posting on this thread.  Alexander Hamilton, at the constitutional…"
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"And 'interpreting' the law, as opposed to sticking strictly to INTENTION, is what has landed this country in such deep-doo, Ray. Saying, in other words: tyranny. I'll stick with the constitutional Framers.  If you can show me…"
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"I learned to read, and comprehend, English a long time ago, Ray. Also to recognize expediency when I see it."
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"Victoria, With all due respect: A "natural born" citizen, which rules out a naturalized citizen OR A DUAL CITIZEN, cannot change its birth status, only ASPECTS OF its birth status.  If it chooses to cease being a dual citizen, that it…"
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"Dear Patricia, Nothing trumps intention.  The intention of the constitutional Framers on this issue is very clear: the candidate must not have any DUAL OR CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES.  He  must therefore not be a DUAL CITIZEN…"
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"'An American' is spot on on this matter, and those two shyster lawyers can go to warmer climes.  (It's obvious that both the Democrat AND the Republican Parties are in on this scam, or we wouldn't BE in this terrible…"
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Cruz says support for presidential bid ‘breathtaking’
"Dear W, Listen carefully.  The whole point of the "natural born citizen" eligibility requirement being put in the Constitution by the constitutional Framers for that particular office - and that particular office ONLY; a rather…"
Mar 8
Stan Stanfield replied to kathyet's discussion Obama Publicly Announces His Supreme Authoritative Dictatorship
"Indeed, Alvin. It is NOT a question of impeachment.  That is for legally sitting presidents who have gone astray.  Obama is a Usurper, and simply needs to be removed from the office - or resign, under pressure from The People - and be held…"
Mar 7

Profile Information

Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
Yes
How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
Email forward from Friend
Do you agree Obama must be removed from Office?
Yes

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 2:00pm on February 19, 2013, Richard R. Allen said…

Stan This is a direct copy, in part,  of the DHS statement regarding their 100 mile border search and seizure policy.  

The border search exception is a doctrine of United States criminal law that allows searches and seizures at international borders and their functional equivalent without a  or probable cause.[1]

This doctrine is not actually an exception to the Fourth Amendment, but rather to the Amendment's requirement for a warrant (or probable cause[2]). Balanced against the sovereign's interests at the border are the Fourth Amendment rights of entrants. Not only is the expectation of privacy less at the border than in the interior [2] [3] the Fourth Amendment balance between the interests of the Government and the privacy right of the individual is also struck much more favorably to the Government at the border.[4] This balance at international borders means that routine searches are "reasonable" there, and therefore do not violate the Fourth Amendment's proscription against "unreasonable searches and seizures".

Border searches more invasive than "routine" require some suspicion. See the section below.

Despite federal law allowing certain federal agents to conduct suspicionless search and seizures within 100 miles of the border,[5] the Supreme Court has clearly and repeatedly confirmed that the border search exception applies only at international borders and their functional equivalent (such as international airports).[4]

At 1:44pm on February 19, 2013, Richard R. Allen said…

Stan, You asked for more details on the 100 mile border areas set up by the DHS.  I don't really have much more than I put in my blog; however I do have the capability to research it a little further and will get back to you.

Thanks for the comment.

At 11:16am on October 2, 2012, Brad Levy said…

Welcome to the Command Center. The tea is strong, drink up:)

 
 
 

TEA PARTY SUPPORT

     TEA PARTY REPORT - 10/30/14

TEA PARTY FACEBOOK

© 2015   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service