Stan Stanfield
  • Male
  • Long Beach, CA
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (275)
  • Events
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Stan Stanfield's Friends

  • TJ McCann
  • Marc Thomas
  • Richard R. Allen

Gifts Received

Gift

Stan Stanfield has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Stan Stanfield's Page

Latest Activity

Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Soros, Top Clinton Lawyer Lose Lawsuit Against Virginia’s Voter ID Law
"A breath of common sense. But we need to go all the way.  CLEAN ELECTIONS OR NO ELECTIONS.  That means: * certifiably cleansed voter registration rolls (certified by an independent, accountable body); * no same-day registration/voting; *…"
Sunday
Stan Stanfield replied to Marilyn Calkins's discussion U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: People Don’t Have to Prove they are U.S. Citizens to Vote
"The law is not an ass. The judge is an ass."
Sunday
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Why George Washington Would Have Agreed With Donald Trump
"New Era, new situation.  Trump is right, and, he is wrong.  It's a new world.  America - the pre-eminent champion of the Individual vs. the State - needs to take a lead in its outcome. 'East' meets 'West', and…"
May 6
Stan Stanfield liked National Director, Dee's discussion Why George Washington Would Have Agreed With Donald Trump
May 6
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Glenn Beck: If Ted Cruz Loses Indiana, We 'Lose Freedom For All Mankind'
"I'm not sure what Glenn's problem is - or agenda is.  He's a smart guy - he MUST know that Ted Cruz is ineligible for the job, for the same reason that Obama is a Usurper in the office: that neither of them is a 'natural…"
Apr 30
Stan Stanfield replied to Elizabeth Jones's discussion Lying, cheating Cruz steals an original idea published in this Forum and uses it absurdly against Mr. Trump.
"Jan, Jan, Jan; with all due respect: We are not talking about a "citizen".  We are talking about a certain KIND of citizen.  A 'natural born' citizen.  Which requires the person to have been born in the country of…"
Apr 20
Stan Stanfield replied to Elizabeth Jones's discussion Lying, cheating Cruz steals an original idea published in this Forum and uses it absurdly against Mr. Trump.
"Stay the course, Frank.  The Truth will out, sooner or later.  And you will want to be on the right side of it.  Believe me."
Apr 20
Stan Stanfield replied to Elizabeth Jones's discussion Lying, cheating Cruz steals an original idea published in this Forum and uses it absurdly against Mr. Trump.
"Supreme Court Justice?  When he is trying to palm himself off as a 'natural born' citizen??  I don't think so. The constitutional Framers' definition of a NBC (from the definitive tome of the day on such matters, E. de…"
Apr 20
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Victims of illegal immigrants beg Congress: 'When will you act on this?'
"Well stated, Rafael.  And good on you for risking the wrath of your fellow Hispanics.  The illegal alien ones, that is.  Who ruin it for all the rest of the good American citizens of Hispanic descent.  "
Apr 19
Stan Stanfield replied to Steve - Ning Creator's discussion Has Glenn Beck Lost His Mind?
"Before you get to endorsement, you should ask yourselves, What is the difference between a born citizen and a natural born citizen?  If you don't know the answer - which it would appear is the case - you should.  Much hinges on this…"
Mar 25
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Republicans kick National Review magazine out of February debate
"As a former subscriber to the NR I feel I can say with all fairness and personal experience that It was a "dead paper" when it failed to call Obama on his ineligibility for the office.  But then, that showed its true colors.  It…"
Jan 22
Stan Stanfield replied to Elizabeth Jones's discussion TEA PARTY MEMBERS HERE IS WHY TED CRUZ SHOULD NEVER BE THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT
"I totally sympathize, Terry.  But we must stand firm with and to the rule of law.  Or we are no better than our enemies - that is, the enemies of the Republic.  Since two wrongs do NOT make a right. And that all means that the Usurper…"
Jan 19
Stan Stanfield replied to Elizabeth Jones's discussion TEA PARTY MEMBERS HERE IS WHY TED CRUZ SHOULD NEVER BE THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT
"Ah.  I see.  The rule of law - the Constitution - doesn't matter to you.  Just move along folks, nothing to see here. You think that "barbarians are at the gates" now...wait 'til you see the barbarians WITHIN the…"
Jan 18
Stan Stanfield replied to Elizabeth Jones's discussion TEA PARTY MEMBERS HERE IS WHY TED CRUZ SHOULD NEVER BE THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT
"Nonsense.  Original intent trumps ANY subsequent Acts of Congress, Statutes, Resolutions, court decisions - whatever.  The only thing that would make either Cruz or Obama eligible is a constitutional amendment.  Otherwise, the meaning…"
Jan 17
Stan Stanfield replied to Elizabeth Jones's discussion TEA PARTY MEMBERS HERE IS WHY TED CRUZ SHOULD NEVER BE THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT
"Elizabeth, how can you overlook the fact that Cruz is not eligible for the office of POTUS anyway?  Not only was he not born on the soil.  His father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth.  He is therefore NOT a…"
Jan 16
Marc Thomas liked Stan Stanfield's profile
Jan 15

Profile Information

Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
Yes
How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
Email forward from Friend
Do you agree Obama must be removed from Office?
Yes

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 2:00pm on February 19, 2013, Richard R. Allen said…

Stan This is a direct copy, in part,  of the DHS statement regarding their 100 mile border search and seizure policy.  

The border search exception is a doctrine of United States criminal law that allows searches and seizures at international borders and their functional equivalent without a  or probable cause.[1]

This doctrine is not actually an exception to the Fourth Amendment, but rather to the Amendment's requirement for a warrant (or probable cause[2]). Balanced against the sovereign's interests at the border are the Fourth Amendment rights of entrants. Not only is the expectation of privacy less at the border than in the interior [2] [3] the Fourth Amendment balance between the interests of the Government and the privacy right of the individual is also struck much more favorably to the Government at the border.[4] This balance at international borders means that routine searches are "reasonable" there, and therefore do not violate the Fourth Amendment's proscription against "unreasonable searches and seizures".

Border searches more invasive than "routine" require some suspicion. See the section below.

Despite federal law allowing certain federal agents to conduct suspicionless search and seizures within 100 miles of the border,[5] the Supreme Court has clearly and repeatedly confirmed that the border search exception applies only at international borders and their functional equivalent (such as international airports).[4]

At 1:44pm on February 19, 2013, Richard R. Allen said…

Stan, You asked for more details on the 100 mile border areas set up by the DHS.  I don't really have much more than I put in my blog; however I do have the capability to research it a little further and will get back to you.

Thanks for the comment.

At 11:16am on October 2, 2012, Brad Levy said…

Welcome to the Command Center. The tea is strong, drink up:)

 
 
 

TEA PARTY SHOP

TEA PARTY SOCIAL NET

© 2016   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service