Stan Stanfield
  • Male
  • Long Beach, CA
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (178)
  • Events
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Stan Stanfield's Friends

  • TJ McCann
  • Richard R. Allen

Gifts Received

Gift

Stan Stanfield has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Stan Stanfield's Page

Latest Activity

Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Congress finally takes up 'high crimes and misdemeanors'
"Well called for and put, Bernard.   It would be a far, far better thing than we have ever done if we held the Usurper accountable for, at the very least, his major crime - and ourselves for our collusion in it, for so long. The shade of many a…"
Saturday
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Congress finally takes up 'high crimes and misdemeanors'
"Racism?  Racism?  I don't - Oh, NOW I get it.  We're going after Obama because of his RACE.  NOT his multiple tyrannical acts, in an office that he and the Democrat Party (AND the Republican Party, for its inaction in…"
Apr 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Congress finally takes up 'high crimes and misdemeanors'
"Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum to the man: Go Ted Go! And I certainly don't mean that other Ted these days, who is trying to make two wrongs make a right, in running for an office that he isn't eligible for.  But that's another…"
Apr 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Rubio launches White House bid: Time for 'our generation to lead'
"Time for "our generation to" wake up and realize that either we get back to the Constitution and its rule of law, or we are going to sleepwalk into tyranny and its rule of men. I refer to the blunt fact that Rubio is not eligible for the…"
Apr 13
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Obama: Ban Parents from Having Children Counseled Not to be ‘LGBTQ+’
"Marilyn: With all due respect: Do you always dismiss something without bothering to check it out?  Is that a basic tendency of yours??  Or is it just on this subject???"
Apr 11
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Obama: Ban Parents from Having Children Counseled Not to be ‘LGBTQ+’
"Well done for bothering to look her up, Col.  And yes, indeed, "many scientists and professionals" HAVE "let their personal bias and often bigotry influence their work".  And grant money, to pursue certain lines of…"
Apr 11
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Former DOJ Official: Non-Citizens Registered To Vote Through Motor Voter Registration Forms
"Enough of all this nonsense.  'Clean Elections Or No Elections!' should be the battle cry - and meant. It can be made to happen by the federal government telling the states that unless they 'clean up their act' in regards…"
Apr 9
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Obama: Ban Parents from Having Children Counseled Not to be ‘LGBTQ+’
"1) Look her up.  (She and Jessel also co-wrote an excellent book on 'The Criminal Mind,' and the environmental influences on such.) 2) "Our roll [sic] as parents and society should reinforce the NATURAL ORDER, not a perverted or…"
Apr 9
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Obama: Ban Parents from Having Children Counseled Not to be ‘LGBTQ+’
"I am getting so tired of our failure as a society to address this issue in a meaningful, scientific way.  The fact is that the brain is sexed by maternal hormones at an early stage of pregnancy (around 8-10 weeks, as I recall from the…"
Apr 9
Stan Stanfield replied to Asst Natl Dir Melony B. DeFord's discussion Obama’s ‘Signature Achievement’ Will Be Bypassing The Constitution
"Thanks for your response, oldtexasgal.  What we need to understand, and acknowledge, in this matter is that both the Dems AND the Repubs are behind the sleight of hand going on.  They are the two wings of the New World Order bird that TPTB…"
Mar 24
Stan Stanfield replied to Asst Natl Dir Melony B. DeFord's discussion Obama’s ‘Signature Achievement’ Will Be Bypassing The Constitution
"Speaking of: What does it take to understand that the whole point of the exercise on the part of the constitutional Framers in putting the "natural born citizen" eligibility requirement in the contract for the office of the presidency -…"
Mar 23
Stan Stanfield liked TJ McCann's discussion The New World Order is HERE!
Mar 22
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"Sigh... Little Bright Feather, you left out the most crucial part of the wording of the contract, which explains what you just quoted: "...or a Citizen of the United States AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION..."  Point…"
Mar 16
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"You've nailed it, Ed. Thanks for your clarifications."
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"Indeed."
Mar 14
Stan Stanfield replied to National Director, Dee's discussion Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency
"No it does not, and is not.  A 'natural born' citizen is a category of citizen, but a 'citizen' is NOT necessarily a 'natural born' citizen; and a 'naturalized' citizen is DEFINITELY not a 'natural…"
Mar 14

Profile Information

Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
Yes
How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
Email forward from Friend
Do you agree Obama must be removed from Office?
Yes

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 2:00pm on February 19, 2013, Richard R. Allen said…

Stan This is a direct copy, in part,  of the DHS statement regarding their 100 mile border search and seizure policy.  

The border search exception is a doctrine of United States criminal law that allows searches and seizures at international borders and their functional equivalent without a  or probable cause.[1]

This doctrine is not actually an exception to the Fourth Amendment, but rather to the Amendment's requirement for a warrant (or probable cause[2]). Balanced against the sovereign's interests at the border are the Fourth Amendment rights of entrants. Not only is the expectation of privacy less at the border than in the interior [2] [3] the Fourth Amendment balance between the interests of the Government and the privacy right of the individual is also struck much more favorably to the Government at the border.[4] This balance at international borders means that routine searches are "reasonable" there, and therefore do not violate the Fourth Amendment's proscription against "unreasonable searches and seizures".

Border searches more invasive than "routine" require some suspicion. See the section below.

Despite federal law allowing certain federal agents to conduct suspicionless search and seizures within 100 miles of the border,[5] the Supreme Court has clearly and repeatedly confirmed that the border search exception applies only at international borders and their functional equivalent (such as international airports).[4]

At 1:44pm on February 19, 2013, Richard R. Allen said…

Stan, You asked for more details on the 100 mile border areas set up by the DHS.  I don't really have much more than I put in my blog; however I do have the capability to research it a little further and will get back to you.

Thanks for the comment.

At 11:16am on October 2, 2012, Brad Levy said…

Welcome to the Command Center. The tea is strong, drink up:)

 
 
 

TEA PARTY SUPPORT

     TEA PARTY REPORT - 10/30/14

TEA PARTY FACEBOOK

© 2015   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service