Little Bright Feather
  • Female
  • Lakeland, FL
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (2224)
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Little Bright Feather's Friends

  • John Barr
  • Tom Gallagher
  • Henry Massingale
  • Mrs.Tif Morgan
  • kathyet
  • Marilyn Calkins
  • DeniseInAZ
  • Rhonda K Clark
  • Scott Rickert
  • Johnny Christensen(GI Joe angel)
  • Kristi Ann Mod
  • June Gagnon
  • H. Gregory Badger
  • Jea9
  • Steven G. Elliott  1SG USA (RET)

Little Bright Feather's Discussions

THE DC COUP HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE !

Started this discussion. Last reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan Dec 7, 2015. 53 Replies

THE  DC  COUP   HAS  ALREADY  BEEN  DONE !   Don't know where y'all been the past 14 years but Bush and Obama both did a coup on DC long ago - Obama made it complete = the COUP WAS DONE LONG AGO -…Continue

Gifts Received

Gift

Little Bright Feather has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Little Bright Feather's Page

Profile Information

Please answer this question: What year was the Declaration of Independence signed?
1776
Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
Yes
How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
Internet
Are you on FaceBook or Twitter?
Other social media
Is President Trump keeping his campaign promises?
Absolutely !!!!!! And REMOVED is the key word !
If you are willing to help what would you be willing to do?
I can't help
Will you help the Tea Party by sharing our Polls on Social Sites?
Yes

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 8:44am on November 18, 2015, Rhonda K Clark said…

God bless u angle

At 7:16pm on October 16, 2015, Tom Gallagher said…

Posted a couple Blogs I'm sick at what I discovered

If not for silly petty political games this would have prevented Hillary from being Sec of State and bar her attempt at office now because of the crap she has pulled at the Clinton Foundation

I am very conflicted by the discovery and the ramifications should they be verifiable, because the implications are profound. It also presents the members of the 1st Congress in the traditional role of a politician instead of as a more virtuous noble character. It is not unusual when doing this type of research that you will stumble across other things unlooked for. This case is no exception, I discovered several exceptionally well researched sites claiming disturbing things relating to the 13th amendment. There is overwhelming evidence that in 1819 the 13th amendment as ratified as the Titles of Nobility Amendment. The evidence is  compelling as it is reflected in the historic records of Colorado and Wyoming, Maine, The British Museum (particularly disturbing)and many other sources that in or around 1876 it was thrown away and replaced with what is represented as the 13th amendment. Some evidence shows the currently accepted 13th amendment as the TONA and the current 13th amendment as the 14th amendment. One shows the previously stated order with the 15th amendment in agreement. There are many questions as to the legitimacy of the ratifications of the 16th and 17th amendment. The records of the states are in conflict

What is readily apparent is the respect and deference paid to the documents is not reflective of their actual treatment . The claim of Rule of Law is only that, there is no respect or belief that the people and government stand as equals before the law and they never have.

http://www.barefootsworld.net/consti12.html#167-1

This link will take you to a site that raises issues with the 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, and 17th amendments. What becomes clear is Congress does not believe the amendment process is important. If an inconvenient conflict arises the Constitution stops being the supreme law of the land

The language of TONA which the call the original 13th amendment bars Hillary Clinton from ever holding office and her time as Secretary of State was in violation of the law

As there was no penalty attached to a title of nobility or honor in the Constitution as originally ratified, the Original Thirteenth Amendmentwas proposed in December of 1809 to institute penalty for accepting or using a "Title of Nobility or Honor" to set oneself apart from, or superior to, or possessing of any special privileges or immunities not available to any other citizen of the United States, and to eliminate the widespread use of "emoluments" as bribery and graft of the legislatures and judiciary used to further the causes and positions of"Special Interests". It was an attempt to keep politicians and civil servants "Honest" in their service to the citizens.

As noted in the discussion 69 in Article 1 of the Constitution, the original Thirteenth Amendment, was ratified in 1819, adding a heavy penalty upon any person holding or accepting a Title of Nob

At 2:04pm on July 21, 2014, Robert Brown Jr MOD said…
Welcome,

WE ARE GLAD YOU HAVE JOINED US IN OUR FIGHT TO TAKE BACK AMERICA!

Please check out the following links to help you navigate the site, use the features available for posting and to adjust your e-mail settings:

TEA PARTY Member Tips

TEA PARTY Navigation Tips

Help Desk E-Mail Settings

TEA PARTY Groups

If you need to Contact Congress then check out these links:

Contact Senate!

Social Site Contacts for the Senate!

House of Representatives!

Social Site Contacts for the House!

If you have any problems or questions, feel free to ask any of the staff to help you!

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service