Little Bright Feather
  • Female
  • Lakeland, FL
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (2224)
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Little Bright Feather's Friends

  • John Barr
  • Tom Gallagher
  • Henry Massingale
  • Mrs.Tif Morgan
  • kathyet
  • Marilyn Calkins
  • DeniseInAZ
  • Rhonda K Clark
  • Scott Rickert
  • Johnny Christensen(GI Joe angel)
  • Kristi Ann Mod
  • June Gagnon
  • H. Gregory Badger
  • Jea9
  • Steven G. Elliott  1SG USA (RET)

Little Bright Feather's Discussions

THE DC COUP HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE !

Started this discussion. Last reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan Dec 7, 2015. 53 Replies

THE  DC  COUP   HAS  ALREADY  BEEN  DONE !   Don't know where y'all been the past 14 years but Bush and Obama both did a coup on DC long ago - Obama made it complete = the COUP WAS DONE LONG AGO -…Continue

Gifts Received

Gift

Little Bright Feather has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Little Bright Feather's Page

Profile Information

Please answer this question: What year was the Declaration of Independence signed?
1776
Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
Yes
How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
Internet
Are you on FaceBook or Twitter?
Other social media
Is President Trump keeping his campaign promises?
Absolutely !!!!!! And REMOVED is the key word !
If you are willing to help what would you be willing to do?
I can't help
Will you help the Tea Party by sharing our Polls on Social Sites?
Yes

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 8:44am on November 18, 2015, Rhonda K Clark said…

God bless u angle

At 7:16pm on October 16, 2015, Tom Gallagher said…

Posted a couple Blogs I'm sick at what I discovered

If not for silly petty political games this would have prevented Hillary from being Sec of State and bar her attempt at office now because of the crap she has pulled at the Clinton Foundation

I am very conflicted by the discovery and the ramifications should they be verifiable, because the implications are profound. It also presents the members of the 1st Congress in the traditional role of a politician instead of as a more virtuous noble character. It is not unusual when doing this type of research that you will stumble across other things unlooked for. This case is no exception, I discovered several exceptionally well researched sites claiming disturbing things relating to the 13th amendment. There is overwhelming evidence that in 1819 the 13th amendment as ratified as the Titles of Nobility Amendment. The evidence is  compelling as it is reflected in the historic records of Colorado and Wyoming, Maine, The British Museum (particularly disturbing)and many other sources that in or around 1876 it was thrown away and replaced with what is represented as the 13th amendment. Some evidence shows the currently accepted 13th amendment as the TONA and the current 13th amendment as the 14th amendment. One shows the previously stated order with the 15th amendment in agreement. There are many questions as to the legitimacy of the ratifications of the 16th and 17th amendment. The records of the states are in conflict

What is readily apparent is the respect and deference paid to the documents is not reflective of their actual treatment . The claim of Rule of Law is only that, there is no respect or belief that the people and government stand as equals before the law and they never have.

http://www.barefootsworld.net/consti12.html#167-1

This link will take you to a site that raises issues with the 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, and 17th amendments. What becomes clear is Congress does not believe the amendment process is important. If an inconvenient conflict arises the Constitution stops being the supreme law of the land

The language of TONA which the call the original 13th amendment bars Hillary Clinton from ever holding office and her time as Secretary of State was in violation of the law

As there was no penalty attached to a title of nobility or honor in the Constitution as originally ratified, the Original Thirteenth Amendmentwas proposed in December of 1809 to institute penalty for accepting or using a "Title of Nobility or Honor" to set oneself apart from, or superior to, or possessing of any special privileges or immunities not available to any other citizen of the United States, and to eliminate the widespread use of "emoluments" as bribery and graft of the legislatures and judiciary used to further the causes and positions of"Special Interests". It was an attempt to keep politicians and civil servants "Honest" in their service to the citizens.

As noted in the discussion 69 in Article 1 of the Constitution, the original Thirteenth Amendment, was ratified in 1819, adding a heavy penalty upon any person holding or accepting a Title of Nob

At 2:04pm on July 21, 2014, Robert Brown Jr MOD said…
Welcome,

WE ARE GLAD YOU HAVE JOINED US IN OUR FIGHT TO TAKE BACK AMERICA!

Please check out the following links to help you navigate the site, use the features available for posting and to adjust your e-mail settings:

TEA PARTY Member Tips

TEA PARTY Navigation Tips

Help Desk E-Mail Settings

TEA PARTY Groups

If you need to Contact Congress then check out these links:

Contact Senate!

Social Site Contacts for the Senate!

House of Representatives!

Social Site Contacts for the House!

If you have any problems or questions, feel free to ask any of the staff to help you!

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Michael RamirezPolitical Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

ALERT ALERT

YIKES!!! Chelsea Clinton Emphatically States A Person With A Beard And A Penis Can ‘Absolutely’ Identify As A Woman

  • The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification
  • In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons about transgender self-identification
  • Chelsea Clinton replied ‘yes’ emphatically when asked if someone with a beard and penis can ever be a woman
  • ‘It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently,’ Hillary said
  • Aitkenhead said Hillary became ‘uneasy’ when the question was asked while Chelsea shot a ‘furious stare’ at the journalist as her mother answered
  • Hillary added: ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw’

(Daily Mail) – It may appear Hillary and Chelsea Clinton always see eye-to-eye, but in a recent interview one topic cracked the facade of the like-minded mother-daughter power duo.

The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons if someone with a beard and a penis can ever be a woman, to which Chelsea replied emphatically, ‘Yes.’

However, as Aitkenhead describes it, Hillary looked ‘uneasy’, and blamed generational gaps for being less accepting.

‘Errr. I’m just learning about this,’ Hillary responded. ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw. It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently.’

The Clintons sat sown with Aitkenhead to promote the book they co-authored, The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience.

The book features Danica Roem, the first trans woman elected to a U.S. state legislature.

According Aitkenhead’s account, she tells Hillary during the interview that many British feminists of Hillary’s generation have a problem with the idea that a ‘lesbian who doesn’t want to sleep with someone who has a penis is transphobic.’

Hillary nods in agreement, while Chelsea ‘stiffens and stares at me’, according to Aitkenhead.

The journalist then adds that many women of Hillary’s generation are uncomfortable with biological males sharing women’s bathrooms.

‘I would say that, absolutely,’ Hillary nods firmly. ‘Absolutely. Yes.’

That’s when Chelsea begins shooting a ‘furious stare’ at Aitkenhead, who points it out to her.

‘I’m a terrible actor’, Chelsea laughs.

Chelsea then says she is thrilled with the National Health Service’s decision to assign patients to single-sex wards according to the gender they identify as, instead of their biological make up.

‘How can you treat someone if you don’t recognize who they feel and know in their core they are?’ Chelsea says.

‘And I strongly support children being able to play on the sports teams that match their own gender identity,’ she adds. ‘I think we need to be doing everything we can to support kids in being whoever they know themselves to be and discovering who they are.’

At this point Hillary looks conflicted.

‘I think you’ve got to be sensitive to how difficult this is,’ Hillary says. ‘There are women who’d say [to a trans woman], ”You know what, you’ve never had the kind of life experiences that I’ve had. So I respect who you are, but don’t tell me you’re the same as me.” I hear that conversation all the time.’

Despite the clear tension in the room, the pair say they don’t argue about this topic.

But according to Aitkenhead, ‘I get the impression they don’t like to present anything less than a united front to the world.’

BONUS VIDEO

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service