Jim Delaney
  • Male
  • Rochester, NY
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share

Jim Delaney's Friends

  • Steven G. Elliott  1SG USA (RET)
  • George Miller
  • Earl A Bage

Jim Delaney's Groups

Jim Delaney's Discussions

IF Indicted, Will Hillary Prevail?

Started Jul 4, 2016 0 Replies

I did some digging to get a somewhat cogent answer to that question, and , in brief, here is what I found so far:First, while there is a consensus that there are sufficient grounds for the FBI to…Continue

Tags: Indictment, Impeachment, Emailgate, Hillary

TRUMP Should Hit Lib Racism Without Faulty Reference to Lincoln's "Racial Virtues"

Started Jun 11, 2016 0 Replies

In an excellent article today entitled "Trump Vows to Fight Democrat Racism, Sexism", Breitbart News reports that Trump intends to expose Democrats' notorious history of racism and sexism.…Continue

Tags: Trump, Lincoln, Racism, Lib

Leftist Bullies & America's Future

Started this discussion. Last reply by martin smith lll May 3, 2016. 1 Reply

Amidst the presidential campaign maelstrom and relentless Progressive…Continue

Tags: Warming, Religion, Global, Bullies, Tyranny

Gifts Received

Gift

Jim Delaney has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Jim Delaney's Page

Latest Activity

Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"The President issued an Executive Order halting admittance for claims of assylum...  citing the Immigraiotn and Naturalization Act. The following sections grant him such authority: 1. Section 215(a) of the INA states: “Unless otherwise…"
Nov 11
Henry Massingale replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
" Tfi I said delete all comments here, that is not about Birthright Citizenship, have I made myself clear?"
Nov 10
Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"I said Tyndal never published a complete Bible.. old and new testament. The Old Testament consistis of more than the pentateuch... and as far I know his translation of the Pentatauch was not pubished in the form of a competed work durin his life…"
Nov 10
Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"Tif... Tyndale never published a complete Bible prior to his execution, as he only finished translating the New Testament and roughly half of the Old Testament. However, Tyndale's translations have greatly influenced nearly every modern English…"
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"MRS. Morgan, are you really that aliterate? If you had any cojones or rectitude you'd tell the truth about what I've said about not letting the caravan into the US. Why not have the fortitude to put me on the border yourself? Are you too…"
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"MRS. Morgan, I look to the Giver of Life, Jesus Christ. Maj. Benitez"
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"MRS. Morgan, why would I try to adjust the attitude of a bitch? I'll leave that to Jesus Christ."
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"MRS. Morgan, at least we know that you're not a lady. You can't even handle the truth with grace. Maj. Benitez"
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
""Your parent's first cousin is your first cousin once removed. The child of your first cousin is also your first cousin once removed: your grandparent is that child's great-grandparent. You can do the whole "removed" thing…"
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"The correct spelling is PUERILE caitiff,sorry for the typo, So what did you learn?"
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"MRS. Morgan, it seems you like to laugh a lot. Is it you're really not being serious about the Declaration. By the way, you haven't answered my question of why do you think the Tyndale translation was the first version of the Bible. Is it…"
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"MRS. MORGAN, yes, I'm a conservative constitutionalist in the mold of a 17th to 19th CLASSICAL Liberal. I doubt you comprehend that. You might even think its a Democratic Socialist Communist. As for my comprehension of the English language, I…"
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"I see you have little reading comprehension. It's that or you imagine I'm prevaricating about my resent illness. Yet it's you who's the prevaricating caitiff. I never scrived that Hillbillies were doltish. So yes, you disseminate…"
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"Col. Nelson, I believe the following covers citizenship at birth. I've emphasized the categories. U.S. Code Title 8, Chapt 12, Subchapter III, Part I, § 1401- Nationals and citizens of United States at birth The following shall be…"
Nov 8
Henry Massingale replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"Mr. Nelson, The Birthright Citizenship- pdfs are posted, if you have time, will you please point out which one is may be used to change the Immigration…"
Nov 8
Roberto Benitez replied to Jim Delaney's discussion "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law
"I take it by your reply that you're not a Christian."
Nov 8

Profile Information

Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
Yes
How did you hear about TeaParty.org?
Link on Face Book
Is President Trump keeping his campaign promises?
YES

Jim Delaney's Blog

NRA On Wrong Side of the "Conceal Carry Reciprocity Act"

Posted on July 28, 2017 at 4:39pm 2 Comments

When we ignore the Constitution in our “righteous” quest to safeguard the 2nd Amendment, we are little better than the Bloomberg crowd.

Currently under consideration by Congress, the Conceal Carry Reciprocity Act (HR38) would expand our right to carry across State lines, compelling sovereign States to defer to federal authority  in such matters.

Please understand that the ONLY authority over arms delegated to the federal government by the States is Art I Sec…

Continue

9th Circuit's Judicial Tyranny

Posted on February 13, 2017 at 2:16pm 0 Comments

Let me be as crystal-clear as I can be. Madison and Jefferson–and even super-nationalist Hamilton– warned us against an unregulated judiciary.

Per the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, Trump’s within his constitutional authority to IGNORE lawless judicial “rulings”. This also extends to constitutional Congressional acts somehow divinely deemed by the courts to be unconstitutional. 

We have forgotten that court rulings are NOT enforceable rulings or law. They are…

Continue

"Operation Parse & Dodge": AG Lynch Hearing Another Disgrace

Posted on July 12, 2016 at 9:34am 1 Comment

In today’s hearing, the Democrats' shameless effort to deliberately and wholly distract attention from Hillary’s felonious behavior with respect to emailgate and AG Lynch’s consistently stonewalling relevant emailgate queries were on full display. It was sickening..

The primary purpose of the Republican committee members’ questions to the AG was to determine whether or not there is a difference between “extreme carelessness” and “gross negligence”, and…

Continue

Hillary Lucks Out Again

Posted on July 5, 2016 at 1:00pm 2 Comments

Well, the suspense is over.



Today, FBI Director Comey announced that he will not recommend criminal charges, observing only that Hillary was "extremely careless" with her handling of classified email, and alluding to a potential misdemeanor offense if the Justice Department is willing to go that…
Continue

Comment Wall (2 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 4:07pm on April 2, 2013, George Miller said…

Yup. Founded that site and some others. Currently focused on other projects, such as obamaballotchallenge.com, other tea parties, Day of Resistance/Second Amendment, etc.

At 4:49pm on January 13, 2013, Linda Hahn said…

 

WE ARE GLAD YOU HAVE JOINED US IN OUR FIGHT TO TAKE BACK AMERICA

Please check out the following links to help you navigate the site, use the features available for posting and to adjust your settings:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/page/member-tips

;;

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/page/website-navigation-tips&;...;

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/group/help-desk/page/e-mail-settings<;...;

It is always a good idea to join your State Group. You can locate the link to your state:

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/page/state-patriot-groups<;...;


If you have any problems or questions, feel free to ask any of the staff to help you!

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service