Bonnie Somer
  • Female
  • River Edge, NJ
  • United States
Share on Facebook
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (2588)
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Bonnie Somer's Friends

  • Kat
  • Kristi Ann Mod
  • Robert Campbell sr.
  • Don Mashak

Gifts Received


Bonnie Somer has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift


Bonnie Somer's Page

Latest Activity

Bonnie Somer replied to Mrs.Tif Morgan's discussion Inspector General: Obama Paid $300 Million To ‘People Who Don’t Exist’
"more and more we shall discover like old dinosaur bones what obama did and hid from us.  my God"
Bonnie Somer commented on Rudy Tirre's blog post Friday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover
"brennan is a disgrace Sen Paul is one of the best out there now as far as standing up for the pres and making sure all know what kind of a man brennan is"
Bonnie Somer replied to Hank Jordan's discussion DNC Chair Tom Perez Refuses To Hand Server Over To FBI
"So we are just supposed to take Mueller at his word.  BS.   why believe him and the o/liars SESSIONS whereever he is needs to b FIRED along w/ROSENSTEIN"
Bonnie Somer commented on Jake Martinez's blog post The Most Dangerous and Treacherous Times in U.S. History! (Part 76)
"this is why everyday i email the president.   i think it is important to do that. yes i agree this is what is happening but many see it.   our job is to stop it.     our kids need us now more than ever their…"
Bonnie Somer commented on Rudy Tirre's blog post Thursday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover
"we know what is happening and who is really responsible for the insanity. in 2003 schumer met w/putin i want the interpreter transcript of that huh.  it is just beyond belief that these anti trump looney tunes want to be in charge.  Dear…"
Bonnie Somer commented on Rudy Tirre's blog post Thursday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover
"CA is deteriorating quick  if people keep voting for these idiot left wing nuts this is what they get shit all over the streets.    who can live there?    they need to vote these people out"
Bonnie Somer commented on Rudy Tirre's blog post Wednesday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover
Bonnie Somer commented on Rudy Tirre's blog post Tuesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover
"i do not care if the lefts heads explode, let them.   they want to end America and all we are i am glad the pres met w/putin he was right no matter what the end result is.     rand paul stood up for him thank God someone…"
Bonnie Somer replied to Mrs.Tif Morgan's discussion Democrats Nominate Convicted Murderer To Run For Vacant Senate Seat
"WHAT.........................................................................HAS THE ENTIRE WORLD GONE MAD"
Bonnie Somer replied to Mrs.Tif Morgan's discussion San Francisco’s Mayor Has Come Up With An Idea To Stop Homeless Pooing On Streets
"whats the problem this is the lefts vision for the entire  nation.   Good Jesus Christ if this is their vision then boy they have problems. It is time that America say NO MORE NOT ONE MORE MINUTE OF THIS DISGUSTING HORROR THAT IS LIB…"
Bonnie Somer commented on Barry Donadio | Celebrity's blog post Private Security Services In Todays Dangerous World
"nice if we can all have that "
Jul 16
Bonnie Somer commented on Albert R Fromberger's photo


"it is a treaty they all need to abide by it.    or just get out why pay for merkels deal w/russia"
Jul 16
Bonnie Somer replied to Mrs.Tif Morgan's discussion Abolish ICE: 'Bill' Just Fell Apart Part 4, Elderly Californian lady raped and killed by 29-year-old illegal
Jul 16
Bonnie Somer replied to Mrs.Tif Morgan's discussion Abolish ICE: 'Bill' Just Fell Apart Part 2, Illegal Immigrant Charged With Murder In Decapitation Of Mother
"WE have to make sure that any politician BUILDS THE WALL   it has to be funded and if any want more illegals they can house them in their own homes.   and pay for them.   "
Jul 16
Bonnie Somer replied to Mrs.Tif Morgan's discussion Elderly British Ambassador Beaten To Near-Death For Supporting Trump
"Remember carry pepper spray or some form of weapon.  bleach is good so is RAID.    these people need a good lesson in oh say free speech.   this is disgusting when i go anywhere i try never going by myself"
Jul 13
Bonnie Somer commented on Craig Andresen's blog post Better to Leave Old Hatchets Buried
"dear God these lib idiots are offended by hello there is no way i will not say what i want if they want to choose to live in a world that is non existent fine but count me out"
Jul 13

Profile Information

Please answer this question: What year was the Declaration of Independence signed?
july 4, 1776
Do you agree to disagree without being disagreeable?
How did you hear about
i am a member of the tea party
Is President Trump keeping his campaign promises?
YES most definitely
If you are willing to help what would you be willing to do?
Moderate, Share discussions, Anything I can do to help
Will you help the Tea Party by sharing our Polls on Social Sites?

Comment Wall (3 comments)

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

At 2:07pm on February 3, 2015, Kristi Ann Mod said…

Thank You Bonnie!!

Have a Great Day and GOD Bless Ye!!

At 8:16pm on December 23, 2014, Robert Campbell sr. said…

I just hope we can save our children from the hedonistic progressive monster robbing and transforming our Republic. Merry Christmas and God Bless...

At 9:12am on July 21, 2014, Carolan La Vallee Asst. Admin. said…


Please check out the following links to help you navigate the site, use the features available for posting and to adjust your e-mail settings:

TEA PARTY Member Tips

TEA PARTY Navigation Tips

Help Desk E-Mail Settings


If you need to Contact Congress then check out these links:

Contact Senate!

Social Site Contacts for the Senate!

House of Representatives!

Social Site Contacts for the House

If you have any problems or questions, feel free to ask any of the staff to help you!



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne


FBI Text Should Alarm Every American

Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, the reported FBI lovebirds, are the poster children for the next “Don’t Text and Investigate” public service ads airing soon at an FBI office near you.

Their extraordinary texting affair on their government phones has given the FBI a black eye, laying bare a raw political bias brought into the workplace that agents are supposed to check at the door when they strap on their guns and badges.

It is no longer in dispute that they held animus for Donald Trump, who was a subject of their Russia probe, or that they openly discussed using the powers of their office to “stop” Trumpfrom becoming president. The only question is whether any official acts they took in the Russia collusion probe were driven by those sentiments.

The Justice Department’s inspector general is endeavoring to answer that question.

For any American who wants an answer sooner, there are just five words, among the thousands of suggestive texts Page and Strzok exchanged, that you should read.

That passage was transmitted on May 19, 2017. “There’s no big there there,” Strzok texted.

The date of the text long has intrigued investigators: It is two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein named special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee an investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and the Russia campaign.

Since the text was turned over to Congress, investigators wondered whether it referred to the evidence against the Trump campaign.

This month, they finally got the chance to ask. Strzok declined to say — but Page, during a closed-door interview with lawmakers, confirmed in the most pained and contorted way that the message in fact referred to the quality of the Russia case, according to multiple eyewitnesses.

The admission is deeply consequential. It means Rosenstein unleashed the most awesome powers of a special counsel to investigate an allegation that the key FBI officials, driving the investigation for 10 months beforehand, did not think was “there.”

By the time of the text and Mueller’s appointment, the FBI’s best counterintelligence agents had had plenty of time to dig. They knowingly used a dossier funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign — which contained uncorroborated allegations — to persuade the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to issue a warrant to monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page (no relation to Lisa Page).

They sat on Carter Page’s phones and emails for nearly six months without getting evidence that would warrant prosecuting him. The evidence they had gathered was deemed so weak that their boss, then-FBI Director James Comey, was forced to admit to Congress after being fired by Trump that the core allegation remained substantially uncorroborated.

In other words, they had a big nothing burger. And, based on that empty-calorie dish, Rosenstein authorized the buffet menu of a special prosecutor that has cost America millions of dollars and months of political strife.

The work product Strzok created to justify the collusion probe now has been shown to be inferior: A Clinton-hired contractor produced multiple documents accusing Trump of wrongdoing during the election; each was routed to the FBI through a different source or was used to seed news articles with similar allegations that further built an uncorroborated public narrative of Trump-Russia collusion. Most troubling, the FBI relied on at least one of those news stories to justify the FISA warrant against Carter Page.

That sort of multifaceted allegation machine, which can be traced back to a single source, is known in spy craft as “circular intelligence reporting,” and it’s the sort of bad product that professional spooks are trained to spot and reject.

But Team Strzok kept pushing it through the system, causing a major escalation of a probe for which, by his own words, he knew had “no big there there.”

The answer as to why a pro such as Strzok would take such action has become clearer, at least to congressional investigators. That clarity comes from the context of the other emails and text messages that surrounded the May 19, 2017, declaration.

It turns out that what Strzok and Lisa Page were really doing that day was debating whether they should stay with the FBI and try to rise through the ranks to the level of an assistant director (AD) or join Mueller’s special counsel team.

“Who gives a f*ck, one more AD like [redacted] or whoever?” Strzok wrote, weighing the merits of promotion, before apparently suggesting what would be a more attractive role: “An investigation leading to impeachment?”

Lisa Page apparently realized the conversation had gone too far and tried to reel it in. “We should stop having this conversation here,” she texted back, adding later it was important to examine “the different realistic outcomes of this case.”

A few minutes later Strzok texted his own handicap of the Russia evidence: “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there.”

So the FBI agents who helped drive the Russia collusion narrative — as well as Rosenstein’s decision to appoint Mueller — apparently knew all along that the evidence was going to lead to “nothing” and, yet, they proceeded because they thought there was still a possibility of impeachment.

Impeachment is a political outcome. The only logical conclusion, then, that congressional investigators can make is that political bias led these agents to press an investigation forward to achieve the political outcome of impeachment, even though their professional training told them it had “no big there there.”

And that, by definition, is political bias in action.

How concerned you are by this conduct is almost certainly affected by your love or hatred for Trump. But put yourself for a second in the hot seat of an investigation by the same FBI cast of characters: You are under investigation for a crime the agents don’t think occurred, but the investigation still advances because the desired outcome is to get you fired from your job.


 Trump Poised To Take
 Control Of The Federal Reserve 

  • The Fed doesn’t stabilize markets and money — it does the opposite
  • President Trump sharply criticized the Federal Reserve this week, saying interest rate increases are hurting the economy.
  • Trump will have the opportunity to fashion the central bank in the image he would like as he has four vacancies to fill on the board of governors.
  • The result could be a more politicized Fed.

President Donald Trump has multiple reasons as to why he should take control of the Federal Reserve. He will do so both because he can and because his broader policies argue that he should do so. The president is anti-overregulating American industry. The Fed is a leader in pushing stringent regulation on the nation. By raising interest rates and stopping the growth in the money supply it stands in the way of further growth in the American economy.

First, He Can

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve is required to have seven members. It has three. Two of the current governors were put into their position by President Trump. Two more have been nominated by the president and are awaiting confirmation by the Senate. After these two are put on the Fed’s board, the president will then nominate two more to follow them. In essence, it is possible that six of the seven Board members will be put in place by Trump.

The Federal Open Market Committee has 12 members and sets the nation’s monetary policy. Seven of the 12 are the members of the Board of Governors. Five additional are Federal Reserve district bank presidents. Other than the head of the Fed bank in New York, who was nominated by the president, the other four can only take their positions as district bank presidents if the board in Washington agrees to their hiring. One of these, the Fed Bank president in Minneapolis, Neel Kashkari, is already arguing for no further rate increases.

Second, Regulation

Following the passage of the Dodd Frank Act in July 2010, the Fed was given enormous power to regulate the banking industry. It moved quickly to implement a number of new rules. The Fed set up a system that would penalize banks that failed to obey its new rules. These rules included setting limits as to how big an individual bank could be; how much money the banks had to invest in fed funds and Treasurys as a percent of their assets; which loans were desirable and which were not; where the banks had to obtain their funding and many, many, more up to and including how much a bank could pay its investors in dividends.

These rules have meaningfully slowed bank investments in the economy (the Volcker Rule) and they have had a crippling effect on bank lending in the housing markets (other agencies have had an impact here also).

Thus, of all of the government agencies the Fed has been possibly the most restrictive. The president has already moved to correct these excesses by putting in place a new Fed Governor (Randal Quarles) to regulate the banking industry.

Three, Killing Economic Growth

In the second quarter of 2018, the growth in non-seasonally adjusted money supply (M2) has been zero. That’s right, the money supply did not grow at all. This is because the Fed is shrinking its balance sheet ultimately by $50 billion per month. In addition, the Fed has raised interest rates seven times since Q4 2015. Supposedly there are five more rate increases coming.

This is the tightest monetary policy since Paul Volcker headed the institution in the mid-1980s. It will be recalled his policies led to back-to-back recessions. Current Fed monetary policy is directly in conflict with the president’s economic goals.

Moreover, the Treasury is estimating it will pay $415 billion in interest on the federal debt in this fiscal year. A better estimate might be $450 billion if rates keep going up. There are a lot of bridges and tunnels and jobs that could be created with this money.

Then there is inflation. It is likely to rise if the Fed eases its policies. If that happens paying down the federal debt becomes easier. On a less desirable note, higher interest rates lower real estate values. Lower rates that stimulate inflation increase real estate values.

Bottom Line

The president can and will take control of the Fed. It may be recalled when the law was written creating the Federal Reserve the secretary of the Treasury was designated as the head of the Federal Reserve. We are going to return to that era. Like it or not the Fed is about to be politicized.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service