Information

Help Desk

Are you stuck?  Confounded?  Confused?  Not sure what to do or how to do it?  Then this is the place for you.  Ask away.  One of our fabulous, knowledgeable volunteers will do their best to help.

Members: 140
Latest Activity: Nov 6, 2016

Discussion Forum

Removing photos from "MY PHOTO's"

Started by Bob Buske Jun 2, 2016. 0 Replies

It has been two days in a row so far that the systems are now allowing me to remove my own photo's. I remove those that are dated, no longer relevant and for the purpose of updating them so they are current.I click on option...........click on…Continue

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Help Desk to add comments!

Comment by James G Prusa on March 18, 2016 at 6:04pm

I have not been receiving my daily updates for well over a month.  Previously reported this.  Even changed my email address thinking they were being blocked by the provider.  Please help and get this fixed.

Comment by Larry K. Parent on March 7, 2016 at 8:01am

I Aam wondering... could it be something to do with NSA activity> Last time I checked, we still had  the 1ST AMENDMENT! Larry, Naples,FL.

Comment by Thomas B. McCauley on March 7, 2016 at 7:25am

I am not receiving any emails from the command center either. Maybe they don't need my support or money any longer.

Comment by Larry K. Parent on March 6, 2016 at 7:41pm

I AM NOT RECEIVING ANY OF MY TEA PARTY COMMAND CENTER NEWS LETTER! NONE FOR THE LAST MONTH!! Even tried to sign up again! BUT....nothing in my e-mail box! Can I please find out why this is?? I even updated my settings! This makes at least 2 times now!! Any response would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Larry K.Parent,Naples,FL.

Comment by Jack Smith on August 28, 2015 at 9:01pm

I have sent several messages regarding why my new friend James Lakes is not listed on my page. i HAVE THE VERIFIABLE PROOFRAND i WANT TO KNOW HOW MANY TIMES i HAVE TO ASK YOU BEFORE YOU ANSWER???

Comment by Christine Puliselic on July 11, 2015 at 12:50pm

This is about the third time in the past month that I've tried to "reply" and your system keeps telling me I need comments to reply.   WTH ????  You won't take my comments.

Comment by Christine Sorensen on April 9, 2015 at 9:44pm

R. Timothy Ritchey, so glad you're getting everything now as well. I'm just relieved it wasn't anything sinister, fingers crossed it doesn't happen again!!! Good luck to you also :)

Comment by R.Timothy Ritchey on April 9, 2015 at 3:30pm

Christine me too. I went into Tea Party it's saved in My Favorites & was able to post a Blog to Dee, I quess some other people were having problems also. Today it started working.  BEST of LUCK

Comment by Christine Sorensen on April 9, 2015 at 12:11pm

R. Timothy Ritchey, I just started receiving emails again, very happy about that!!! Hope you are too??? Don't know what was going on but it looks like all is back to normal :)

Comment by R.Timothy Ritchey on April 8, 2015 at 9:13am

Christine your correct this is weird. I have a Tea Party folder where I save blogs I went into it today and it's empty.  I think your right we're being sabotaged. Tried sending Dee a message couldn't. Is this obozo's admin at work?

 

Members (140)

 
 
 

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service