White House Petition: Formally recognize AntiFa as a terrorist organization

Image result for antifa riots

Formally recognize AntiFa as a terrorist organization

Created by M.A. on August 17, 2017


Sign This Petition

Needs 51,396 signatures by September 16, 2017 to get a response from the White House

48,604 SIGNED
100,000 GOAL


Terrorism is defined as “the use of violence and intimidation in pursuit of political aims”. This definition is the same definition used to declare ISIS and other groups, as terrorist organizations. AntiFa has earned this title due to its violent actions in multiple cities and their influence in the killings of multiple police officers throughout the United States. It is time for the pentagon to be consistent in its actions – and just as they rightfully declared ISIS a terror group, they must declare AntiFa a terror group – on the grounds of principle, integrity, morality, and safety.

Sign the petition by using the link below or click on sign this petition (above)


Views: 167

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Fresh Evidence Suggests Charlottesville Was A TOTAL Set Up!

If this story — and the accusations it makes — are legit, the problem is even bigger than we’ve thought.

We all know about the dust-up in Charlottesville. The registered protest by actual white-supremacists (whose right to protest was argued and won in court by the ACLU) were supposed to happen Saturday morning.

Police were supposed to help keep a safe distance between them and the armed, angry, ‘counter-protesters’ (Antifa, and the like). They did not do so.

Violence erupted on a number of occasions. A woman was crushed by a car. About twenty others were injured there. Elsewhere, people were hospitalized by conflicts that rang out.

Early reports by Fox News reporter Doug McKelway suggested that police were ‘standing down’.

his was denied by law enforcement officials, but it was not apparent on the scene that efforts to keep the groups apart looked anything at all like they did in Boston the following Saturday.

We heard explanations like ‘if we take cops of this other beat, crime will rise’. One car crushed twenty people killed one and then sped away. It doesn’t seem like whoever was doing the coordinating managed to actually keep crime down, does it?

Someone claiming to be a whistleblowing cop said this was intentional.

Police: Charlottesville Was ‘Inside Job’ To Ignite Race War
A Charlottesville police officer has come forward to express his anger at being told to “stand down” by the city mayor during violent clashes between protesters. He also claims the protests, which pitched “white supremacists” against members of Antifa, were “set up” to further the agenda of the elites.
“We [Charlotesville police] were ordered to bring the rival groups together. As soon as they were in contact with each other, we were told to stand down. It was outrageous. We weren’t allowed to arrest anyone without asking the mayor first. We weren’t even allowed to stop the driver as he sped away.“
“The event was being set up as far back as at least May and it went like clockwork.”
Michael Signer, the mayor of Charlottesville, ordered police to stand down during the most chaotic and destructive period of the protests – despite police protests against the orders.
“We wanted to do our job and keep the peace. But these mother******s in charge really want to destroy America.”

Is he right? It’s hard to tell… it’s an anonymous story.

When Jeff Sessions directs the inquiry into Charlottesville, we would hope these claims get thoroughly investigated as well. It would be much easier to blame what happened that day on incompetence than conspiracy. This is one claim that we would love to see proven wrong.

To imagine otherwise is a dark and somber option. That anyone wearing a badge or worse — commanding those who do — would be willing to ignore his oath to Serve and Protect advance a violent Anti-American and anti-citizen agenda for political gain?

That’s not just dirty politics: That’s a coup.

See video:

http://clashdaily.com/2017/08/yo-cnn-fresh-evidence-suggests-charlo...!

First tweets from a Hill reporter:

Image result for the hill reporter charlottesville first tweet after car hits crowd

Then, the alt left media changed the narrative.

If Jeff Sessions would immediately conduct a thorough investigation, this would absolutely blow the lid off the narrative that the propaganda media, the Socialist DEMs, and their communist AntiFa thugs have perpetrated on the entire nation. Trump should then take to his public microphone and announce who all these scoundrels really are and say, "See, ........I told ya so!"

Wake up! Jeff Sessions is not going to jump on anything other than a 'rocking chair'.  AG Sessions is not likely to investigate any deeper than required to make it appear he thoroughly investigated ... Any DOJ investigation by AG Sessions will likely agree with the MSM's Narrative...  in spite of claims that the driver of the car was either afraid of being pulled out of it and beaten or that the car and driver detained are not the vehicle and driver that was involved in the incident/murder and mayhem.

AG Session has been a consistent no show when needed.. starting by recusing himself in the No AFFAIR RUSSIAN AFFAIR... He then follows up by failing to properly supervise the ETHICAL conduct of the Independent Counsel and his staff.  He may recuse himself from direct involvement in the investigation but he is still the AG and responsible for the Ethical Conduct of his Department and its agents. 

It should be glaringly evident that AG Sessions is not working to drain the swamp.. In fact, he is acting as if he is part of the swamp. He has failed to indict a single member of the swamp since taking office, or too investigate some of the most egregious criminal conduct occurring in the former Administration: beginning with the 'pay to play' schemes of the Clinton's, their Foundation, and State Department, and ending with the arms running escapades of 'Fast and Furious' under AG Holder's watch. Someone should go to jail and it isn't Pres. Trump.

Hi Mrs. Dee, very very happy to dropped in with ya. as my dad would, kick your shoes off, sit a spell, sit right back and have a Cup Of Tea...:)

LOL Tif

How about Black Lives Matter... they meet the criteria?

Sorry, Colonel.  I Clicked "Add Reply," then saw your yours on the same group, BLM.  

I hear ya, Dee.  But AntiFa (a dopey acronym) is but one of two thuggish groups deserving declaration as a terrorist group. The other is BLM-- Black Lives Matter.

I agree with both of you. Right now, it seems that BLM and ANTIFA are joined together.  I just found something else that is interesting:

The law: “a) (1) Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility of interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including, but not limited to, the mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, with intent – (A) to incite a riot; or (B) to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot; or (C) to commit any act of violence in furtherance of a riot; or (D) to aid or abet any person in inciting or participating in or carrying on a riot or committing any act of violence in furtherance of a riot. . . . ”

Dee...

When it comes to violations of the law by the Leftist groups... there is a plethora of offenses being overlooked... without the will to enforce the law, nothing is being done.  The DOJ and our law enforcement apparatus is seriously broken... it is filled with leftist operatives, who are systematically turning a blind eye to criminal activity.

The concept of 'prosecutorial discretion' needs to be debunked and reframed as "Obstruction of Justice" and "Malfeasance of Office".  Our current prosecutors, beginning with the US Attorney's, are failing to uphold the law. Everything from our Immigration Law, to serious criminal acts, are being ignored when committed by certain privileged groups or individuals. The Clinton's come to mind, along with both former AG's in the Obama Administration... and of course there are the leftist activist groups ... who seem to be immune to the law.

Pres. Trump would be advised to clean house in the DOJ ... too, hire men like Trey Gowdy as US Attorneys and as the AG... the President needs direct the DOJ to focus on political corruption, with the goal to drain the swamp in a year or two at most.  Instead, the swamp has invaded the White House and is gradually swallowing the people's champion... our President.

Frank -Good to see you again, for some reason I'm not getting TP posts, so I miss all of  you.  Thanks, for sending this to Duke -he sent it to me, I've signed it, sent it on and am forwarding to my "A" list.  June G

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service