White COP Kidnapped and Murdered by Black Men… Where’s the Media?

To the media, all life doesn’t have the same value.

While the examination of the death of Michael Brown consumes newscasts, a dead white cop killed by black men has garnered scarcely any attention.

The incident took place in Waynesboro, Va.

Police Officer Kevin Quick, a member of the Waynesboro Police Department, was abducted by four African-American men. 

The men, who allegedly had ties with a Los Angeles-based gang, took Officer Quick to an ATM to withdraw money.

Quick was then driven to the forest and killed execution-style by the gang members.

It’s alleged that the motive for the killing was to allow the four suspects to move up in the gang hierarchy by proving their toughness.

The case received little to no attention until this weekend, when a letter to the editor in the Lowell (Mass.) Sun brought the case back into the internet spotlight.

“Nowhere in the national media was this murder of a police officer put to paper,” the letter read.

“But when a white police officer shot a black man named Michael Brown in Missouri, it made the national news for months.”

read more:


Views: 2036

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It is called liberal bias. Watching Al Sharpton take advantage of this, is understanding the buffoon that he is. The Tawana Brawley case of decades ago was his claim to fame, and his learning how easily  he could manipulate the media. It is his life's work and  even though he owes  $4.5 Million if taxes, he does not go to jail, as you or I would.

Al Sharpton got busted by the FBI for drugs and now works as their informant/operative. Which is why he seems to always be 'johnny on the spot'. FBI instigates a lot of the black/white hostility and do their own form of terrorist acts against our country.

It's called state run media. There is no difference between the USSR media 50 years ago and today's USA media except the Soviet media had no choice but to report what the communists made them report, our media does it by choice. Sickening!!


All thugs and their supporters need to be eliminated.



You are entirely right.  Gun up America.

Everybody needs to put the word n-----, back into the white language, it will bring out more attention to them and if we are such racist then all the whites need to go back to the racial thoughts when the KKK was really big.  Time to show these camel humpers, what racial tension really is.  No more false accusations the nation should rise up and show the blacks what real racism is, instead of a white cop being kidnapped should start picking them off the streets one by one and hanging them.

Agree 100% folks, we have to get rid of this black anarchy NOW. !!!

I don't agree with looting and destroying property but I also don't agree with legalizing murder by cops! You idiots have no idea how much police, prosecutor and court room corruption goes on in this country every fing day!

You are right concerning the internal corruption that exists within our government and within our judicial system. I think that many people would be shocked to realize just how deeply rooted this corruption is within our society. There is no doubt that the love of power can corrupt a man or a woman. They say that absolute power corrupts absolutely!

But let us not hasten to condemn the vast majority of law enforcement officers who do, in point of fact, serve the public with honor and moral integrity. The fact that you open a barrel of apples and find two or three that are rotten, does not mean that the rot has spread to all the rest of the apples in the barrel.

As a veteran law enforcement officer of many years, I can attest to the fact that there are a few of those I worked with that had the wrong attitude about their authority and their sworn duties to the public. Some, a few, were "badge heavy". Some had no understanding of the constitutional rights of the citizenry they serve, due largely to a lack of education. One of the professors at college, who was the District Attorney of the county wherein I would work as a category 1 police officer stated in one of his lectures to the class that if we one day found that our badge ever got bigger than our heart, to take off the badge and find another form of employment. If a police officer ever looses his sense of human compassion, then he should truly re-evaluate why he still wears his badge of public authority! There is no room for racism in law enforcement, but I do understand the proclivity of some to embrace this errant and hateful belief. We see so much lawlessness on a daily basis, especially within the black community. However, we also see those within this same community who seek to do good and respect the rights of others, regardless of racial ethnicity. As I have said before, the true root of the problems we are witness to in our society is a sin problem. An attitude of lawlessness is growing and it is spreading like a cancer.

Well said. Thanks. My brother is a judge and must deal with the same issues every day.




Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service