Was Obama stoned during Bob Costas interview?

The emergence of Twitter as a social media goliath has unleashed gossip and speculation as a media force. The long term consequences are unknowable, but in the meantime, with a far left president with a dicey past, it is producing some highly amusing results.

Last night, President Obama explained to Bob Costas of NBC Sports why he wasn't attending the Sochi Olympics, but the substance of what he had to say was lost in the controversy that erupted on Twitter over whether or not he was stoned. Yahoo writer Mike Oz took the high road, as would nearly any journalist, and described the president as looking "sleepy." But in the Twitterverse, ,many popeple outright speculated that he was stoned on marijuana, a drug that he is well known to have indulged in to excess in his younger years (at least so far as we know). Twitchy has collected a bunch of comments and pictures taken from TV screens that are far more suspicious than what appears in more mainstream outlets.  Luke Manning wrote: "Obama is stoned" accompanied by this picture:

The fact the president has a history of flagrant drug usage is what unleashes this sort of speculation.

After all, a president can get tired. But as Rick Moran observed to me, Obama seems to lack the self-discipline necessary to kick a habit.

Read more:http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/02/was_obama_stoned_during... 

Views: 2345

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


It seem to me that obummer is no more than a stoned dummy all the time.

Right ON...

Darlin' that is a pot stoned ! No way around it ! Yes our president is a pot smoking idiot ! When I got clean and sober , I had about 8 months and found a roach(a butt of a joint) on my back porch that my room mate had hidden , I got made and thought well I will show him and I took 2 puffs off of it and I was stupid and paranoid all day long ! Never had a problem with that stuff ever again ! I can obviously get stupid enough without pot ! LOL !

I AGREE...(lol)

He is stoned out of his gourd! Or under the influence of some other illicit drug, obviously. I know what stoned people look like. He fits the picture! Let's get rid of him. Maybe a drug test would be in order for him?

And there is another reason why ovomit isn't attending the Olympics. He has been tried by the world court of crimes against humanity. Since that verdict has been handed down, the ovomits have not once traveled abroad. If they do, the chances of another country's army could, hopefully would, and should arrest him. His lifetime secret service protection that he gave himself would not do much good to defend him against another country's army. How is that for his new world order??????

That oughta cut way back on their vacations ! LOL !


get the pot head out of office, come on congress, this is our country that he is ruining.  is this what our for fathers wanted for this nation,  where is our senate, still hiding nunder the bed.  do smonthing before it is really too late

The House has to accuse hin (impeach).
Then the Senate has to decide if he is guilty.


YEP!! He wasn't just 'TIRED'! HE IS A LAUGHING STOCK ! A SAD JOKE ! I just read where IRAN is sending ships OVER HERE? IT SOUNDS TO IMPOSSIBLE! I wonder what TED CRUZ or RAND PAUL would say of this? THIS SHOULD BE ALL OVER THE NEWS! But, ONLY SOCIAL MEDIA! BECAUSE IT ISN'T 'BLACKED-OUT'!! European news sources say he and MOOCHELL fraud marriage is in trouble! He goes into his 'CHOOM GANG 'days! That is his escape! He is so ideologically stiff,and pushing his ISLAMIC AGENDA, he can't handle too much more! That is why I mentioned the pressure itself may make him resign! The 'TEFLON DON' image you know!! NOW WE CAN DOUBLE THE PRESSURE!!  MAKE HIM TAKE A DRUG TEST!! BLESS GOD AGAIN,AMERICA!! UNITED WE MUST STAND!! TEAPARTY COMETH!! Larry K.Parent,Naples,FL.

he gets all he wants from the border that's why he lets them in. 1 lb. of pot come on in the water fine lol




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service