Pro-ISIS Hackers Strike US CENTCOM Social Media — While Obama Delivers Cyber Security Address

Supporters of ISIS appear to have taken control of the official @CENTCOM account:

centcom hacked isis-head

They posted this in a pastebin link:

Pentagon networks hacked
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful, the CyberCaliphate under the auspices of ISIS continues its CyberJihad. While the US and its satellites kill our brothers in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan we broke into your networks and personal devices and know everything about you.
read more:

Views: 296

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

If they broke in they must know by now that we will not have mercy...

they broke in precisely because of our super weak and pro terrorist/muslim leaders.

"we will have no mercy" is a joke in the wh now.

That's the truth. They are SO not afraid of the U.S. anymore! What's oVomit gonna do? -  Invite them to watch the super bowl while he cleans his clubs?  

you're right, Clayton. We will not have mercy. Let them do their worst. We can do more than they know!!!

I wish those hackers would locate BHO's hidden files and broadcast them to the world and we'll know then just who Obama really is.

That would be a real HOOT wouldn't it?   They'd never rat on a fellow of their own kind.  I can see it now," Communist Janitor cons all, makes it to the WH".

Where are the French and other European cyber hackers who vowed to go against ISIS? 

Right now they are in the middle of having their own civil war. Paris is in flames. Don't think they much care what happens to us any longer.

"IF THE POLITICAL WINDS SHIFT, I will stand on the side of the Muslims"-
Barack Obama (from his book)

I think Obama is allowing these hacks in order to demoralize the country.

Obamaleina is a Sunni muslim and muslim brotherhood member and sympathizer!!

I posted a message a few weeks ago about the fact that it behooves many of you to tone down the hate rhetoric and threats against Muslims because some of these jihadists can easily hack a site like this in a NY second and put you on their list. Someone responded beligerently that no one has any reason to be afraid. 
   Well, I beg to differ. I think this story indicates otherwise. This Country is obviously at the forefront of World cyber technology and hacking skills. Nonetheless, all of our personal info as well as comments are vulnerable at all times. You can't shoot a gun at an anonymous online hacker but they can really *eff* you up by using your information for spurious purposes.
   Honestly, you must realize that these Tea Party sites are VERY MUCH on the radar for these people and a target for extremist elements. And, they're highly motivated, young, educated and tech savvy with time on their side. We can ignore the danger at our peril; or, we can turn down the harsh tone a bit but still retain our Free Speech!

This is exactly what they 'silence' the world. If we give in to this, where does it stop?




Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert


OMG!! -> Government Now Wants To Seize Your Car For Going 5MPH Over The Limit

We’ve discussed this on and off for several years now. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows the government to seize assets and cash from citizens without any due process or judicial oversight.

You don’t even have to be charged with a crime. You are assumed guilty unless you can somehow prove your innocence.

Of course, not everyone has this ability… if you aren’t local, state, or federal law enforcement, this is called stealing, and you go to prison.

But the government is actually a bigger problem than common thieves.

A 2015 report showed that law enforcement used civil asset forfeiture to steal more from US residents than every thief, robber, and burglar in America combined.

About $4.5 BILLION worth of cash, cars, homes, and other property is taken by civil asset forfeiture each year – hundreds of millions more than common criminals steal.

And it happens at every level. Your local cop can use civil asset forfeiture just like your state trooper. And then any one of the armed agents of the US government—from the FBI to the Fish and Wildlife Service—can rob you for whatever reason they want.

This travesty continues to grow because the cops who take your stuff get to keep it. Police departments and government agencies around the country depend on civil asset forfeiture to boost their budgets.

Cops will literally keep some of the cars they take as squad cars. And they make a fortune auctioning off the houses, boats, and anything else they confiscate.

Obviously this gives cops an incentive to steal, whether or not they actually think the property was used in a crime, or acquired illegally. Remember, civil asset forfeiture adds billions every year to their bottom line.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case of civil asset forfeiture.

Tyson Timbs was convicted of selling a small amount of drugs to an undercover police officer. He was sentenced to house arrest, and paid about $1,200 in fines.

But then police used civil asset forfeiture to take his $42,000 Land Rover which Timbs purchased with money from a life insurance policy after his father died. The money did not come from selling drugs, or any other illegal activity.

Timbs sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, because every lower court in Indiana said the forfeiture was perfectly legit.

The case revolves around whether or not the seizure of the Land Rover was an excessive fine under the 8th amendment, and whether or not this protection against excessive fines applies to state governments.

And the public got some crazy insight into the government’s position.

The Indiana Solicitor General was arguing in favor of civil asset forfeiture when Justice Stephen Breyer asked him a hypothetical.

Breyer asked, if a state needs revenue, could it force someone to forfeit their Bugatti, Mercedes, or Ferrari for speeding? Even if they were going just 5 miles per hour over the speed limit?

And the utterly appalling answer from the Indiana Solicitor General was, yes.

That’s right… the official government position is that they can steal any amount of your property in “connection” with any crime whatsoever, no matter how trivial the crime may be… even exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour.

This is how overbearing and authoritarian the government has become in the land of the free.

This is how much power your local cop has… and the power only grows as you go to state, and federal officials.

If there is any solace in any of this, it is that the other Supreme Court Justices were reportedly laughing at this exchange.

The justices seemed incredulous that Indiana’s top lawyer was using such absurd assertions and flimsy reasoning in his arguments.

So, for now, we can keep our cars if we get pulled over for speeding. But that may not always be the case…

Depending on how this is ruled, it could pave the way for even more egregious abuses of power… or it could curb the practice, and reign in these thieves in uniforms.

Just understand where the government is coming from. These politicians, bureaucrats and officers think they can do whatever they want. Absolutely anything goes, with no limitation whatsoever.

And that makes it a little tough to feel like you really live in the land of the free.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service