Pro-ISIS Hackers Strike US CENTCOM Social Media — While Obama Delivers Cyber Security Address

Supporters of ISIS appear to have taken control of the official @CENTCOM account:

centcom hacked isis-head

They posted this in a pastebin link:

Pentagon networks hacked
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful, the CyberCaliphate under the auspices of ISIS continues its CyberJihad. While the US and its satellites kill our brothers in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan we broke into your networks and personal devices and know everything about you.
read more:

Views: 268

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

If they broke in they must know by now that we will not have mercy...

they broke in precisely because of our super weak and pro terrorist/muslim leaders.

"we will have no mercy" is a joke in the wh now.

That's the truth. They are SO not afraid of the U.S. anymore! What's oVomit gonna do? -  Invite them to watch the super bowl while he cleans his clubs?  

you're right, Clayton. We will not have mercy. Let them do their worst. We can do more than they know!!!

I wish those hackers would locate BHO's hidden files and broadcast them to the world and we'll know then just who Obama really is.

That would be a real HOOT wouldn't it?   They'd never rat on a fellow of their own kind.  I can see it now," Communist Janitor cons all, makes it to the WH".

Where are the French and other European cyber hackers who vowed to go against ISIS? 

Right now they are in the middle of having their own civil war. Paris is in flames. Don't think they much care what happens to us any longer.

"IF THE POLITICAL WINDS SHIFT, I will stand on the side of the Muslims"-
Barack Obama (from his book)

I think Obama is allowing these hacks in order to demoralize the country.

Obamaleina is a Sunni muslim and muslim brotherhood member and sympathizer!!

I posted a message a few weeks ago about the fact that it behooves many of you to tone down the hate rhetoric and threats against Muslims because some of these jihadists can easily hack a site like this in a NY second and put you on their list. Someone responded beligerently that no one has any reason to be afraid. 
   Well, I beg to differ. I think this story indicates otherwise. This Country is obviously at the forefront of World cyber technology and hacking skills. Nonetheless, all of our personal info as well as comments are vulnerable at all times. You can't shoot a gun at an anonymous online hacker but they can really *eff* you up by using your information for spurious purposes.
   Honestly, you must realize that these Tea Party sites are VERY MUCH on the radar for these people and a target for extremist elements. And, they're highly motivated, young, educated and tech savvy with time on their side. We can ignore the danger at our peril; or, we can turn down the harsh tone a bit but still retain our Free Speech!

This is exactly what they 'silence' the world. If we give in to this, where does it stop?




Reporter Kicked Out Of Michelle Obama
Conference For Violating ‘Black Girl Code’

The Black Entertainment Television channel recently hosted a conference in south Florida for black women known as “Leading Women Defined,” which featured a casual conversation between former first lady Michelle Obama and former senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

But according to the New York Post’s Page Six, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who was in attendance was booted from the remainder of the conference after she wrote an article about some of the comments Obama had made during the discussion.

Robin Givhan, a fashion critic and staff writer for The Washington Post, documented the highlights of the friendly chat between Obama and Jarrett.

Some of the highlights of the conversation included the former first lady’s thoughts on President Donald Trump’s inauguration as the Obamas prepared to leave the White House, the role she played during the 2008 election, her difficulty settling in as “the spouse” to the president, how she described her White House garden as a “subversive act” to garner trust with the public and her upcoming memoir. Of course Givhan also wrote about what Obama was wearing … after all, she is a fashion critic.

But following the publication of the article, according to Page Six, BET demanded Givhan leave the conference early amid claims that she had violated a “sacred space” by publishing the content of the conversation.

They also canceled a panel discussion that Givhan initially had been asked to moderate.

However, Page Six noted that BET’s claim that Obama’s discussion was “private” and not intended to be shared with anyone else outside the small gathering in attendance didn’t hold up to scrutiny given the fact that BET itself posted clips from the discussion on its site.

Furthermore, Jarrett also posted those clips on social media and told everyone to “tune in” to the network so they could hear what Obama had to say.

Shortly thereafter, the dispute descended into a sharp back-and-forth on social media between Givhan and others who were irked at what she had done, as can be seen on Givhan’s Twitter feed.

Several of her critics asserted that the conversation had been “off-the-record” — an assertion Givhan flatly denied — and one user claimed the reporter had “violated a sacred trust” between black women.

Another said what she had done was a “complete violation of journalistic ethics and Black girl code, all at once,” while still another asserted through a hashtag that Givhan was “#notoneofus,” as if she were being banished from the exclusive realm of accepted professional black women.

For their part, a BET representative told Page Six that Givhan had been “invited as a guest (not working press) to moderate a fashion panel,” and noted that her travel and lodging expenses had been paid for by the network.

“She was made aware that it was an intimate conversation in a sacred space of sisterhood and fellowship,” the rep added.

Neither Givhan nor representatives for Obama responded to requests for comment on the report from Page Six.

If the WaPo reporter really was instructed ahead of time that the conversation between Obama and Jarrett was “off the record” and a private affair, but published anyway, then BET was justified in booting her from the remainder of the conference — though the mean-spirited commentary she received on social media still crossed the line.

But if Givhan received no prior warning on the matter — and given the fact that BET itself published the conversation later — then this is just a major display of hypocrisy and unnecessary infighting.

What do you think?


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service