The Democrats' Election Interference Projection


David Limbaugh


{ townhall.com } ~ You know what doesn't pass the smell test in the Democrats' sham impeachment crusade? Their main beef is that President Donald Trump abused his power to interfere with a presidential election 2020, yet that's all they have been doing for the last three years.

Interference with a presidential election 2016 was also their allegation with the Russia-collusion hoax. Oh, my, how they revere the integrity of the election process.

Remember Rep. scumbag/liar-Schiff's endless guarantees that he had irrefutable evidence of Trump's collusion with Russia?

Well, even the Democrats' would-be savior, former special counsel Robert Mueller, and his team of Trump-hating attorneys, couldn't produce a scintilla of evidence implicating Trump. If scumbag/liar-Schiff had the goods on Trump, he would have turned them over to Mueller. But nothing came of it, which means that scumbag/liar-Schiff didn't just make an honest mistake or, in his emotional zeal, overstate his case.

No, he outright lied. And this isn't a minor fib about a small matter but a major lie about a gravely serious matter. Savor the irony: scumbag/liar-Schiff brazenly fabricated a tale about having concrete evidence that Trump interfered with an election so that he himself could spearhead the mother of all election-interference capers: undoing Trump's 2016 election and preventing his 2020 reelection.

Has scumbag/liar-Schiff been held to account for his lies? To the contrary, he's been rewarded by his co-conspiratorial party with leadership of the latest election interference scheme. Interestingly, this charade began with a so-called whistleblower, who was probably not a whistleblower at all but a Democratic plant in the bowels of the Trump administration as part of another "insurance policy" to undermine the man who was duly elected under our constitutionally prescribed method for electing presidents.

For all the preening about the integrity of the democratic process from a party that routinely undermines the Constitution and our national sovereignty through judicial activism, lawless executive orders, the administrative state and its open borders policy, couldn't the Democrats even pretend to treat presidential impeachment as mildly serious?

No, because their concern isn't election interference or respect for the Constitution but regaining power and advancing their leftist agenda at all costs. If they were so dedicated to our democracy, they'd quit exploiting the impeachment clause to reverse the results of an election. They'd stop saying, along with other cynics, that "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors" has no meaning apart from how the House chooses to define it.

Wrong. The framers chose all of their constitutional language carefully, and this was no exception. These terms had meaning under English common law and American jurisprudence. It's one thing to say that because the House has the authority to impeach, the constitutionally specified grounds for impeachment are irrelevant or the House has no duty to honor the Constitution. These elected leaders are ultimately accountable to the people, and if they abuse their authority to impeach a president, because they hate him or have policy disagreements with him, then they should be held to account.

One said they must impeach him so he doesn't get reelected. Another boasted that they are going to "impeach the mother-----." When the Russia-collusion hoax didn't work, they instantly pivoted to Ukraine. Why not? To them, impeachment is as easy as a grand jury indicting a ham sandwich.

Presidential impeachment is an extraordinary remedy and should be used sparingly for egregious and certain misconduct, not as a weapon used by a single party to disenfranchise voters -- especially when the people will be able to decide the matter for themselves with another election within months of the completion of this bogus process.

Precisely because of the gravity of the procedure, great care should be taken to ensure fairness. They should at least follow accepted evidentiary rules and accord Trump a level of due process provided to an alleged petty thief.

Against Trump, the process began in the basement and has now come upstairs with a one-sided kangaroo proceeding conducted by the Trump-loathing scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff, who is acting both as prosecutor and judge, even interrupting the Republicans' cross-examination in mid-question to coach a witness on his answer.

Everyone has already noted that the Democrats' case is based on hearsay. But that's not their only assault on justice and fairness. They claim Trump withheld aid to Ukraine in exchange for dirt on one of his likely 2020 rivals, loose lips liar-Joe Biden. But the facts including the statements of the Ukrainian president and the delivery of the aid despite no investigation of loose lips liar-Biden indicate the promise of aid wasn't conditioned on an investigation, and so, the case for a quid pro quo is weak. Equally important, they have no idea what Trump's motive was. If we are to have any respect for our election process, they must produce some evidence of Trump's criminal intent beyond wishful thinking -- especially when they are alleging bribery, a specific intent crime.

Trump was likely more concerned about uncovering Ukraine's possible complicity in the 2016 election and why the loose lips liar-Bidens weren't investigated than in exposing loose lips liar-Biden's corruption to undermine his 2020 presidential bid. The point is we don't know and won't know, and yet, they're going to impeach Trump anyway, imputing a motive to him they can't possibly divine. The Democrats have been salivating over a plausible opportunity to impeach Trump since before he took office, so why quibble over a little hearsay and imputed motives?

People say that the thrust of this impeachment farce is a policy difference between the deep state and President Trump. To be sure, this is a factor, but the main thing is that the Democratic establishment, the leftist media and the entrenched bureaucrats cannot stomach Trump occupying the highest office in the land. They despise him and have contempt for the tens of millions of voters who elected him, and the last thing they want to do is to give Trump and his deplorables a chance to do it again.

Views: 113

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 There is a chance both parties are in deep state over issues: https://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/it-was-a-coup-all-along-t...

Hank

That could be true but the dems are in deeper state then the Republicans. Like for instance liar-Pulosi has the trade deal on her desks for months and have not done anything about it. loose liips liar-Biden continues to show he is not worthy to lead this country. And who whats a socialist, commie to also lead this country. Why is scumbag/liar-Hillary still making noises? 

Where is the DOJ investigation on the Bidens Ukrainian connection... One more oversight by our now fully discredited Attorney General... Bar.  Is Bar capable of going after the open criminal conduct by members of the government?  It appears we have another Jim Sessions or worse running the DOJ.  Do I need to remind everyone that AG Bar gave Comey a clean bill of health... overlooking huge felony breaches of the law.

Did former Ambassador Ms. Ivanovitch raise the issue of Biden registering as an agent of a foreign power... failure to do so is a crime. It was her job to report such failures to register... among other duties... like informing the President of massive corruption in the administration of foreign aid to the Ukraine.  It was also her job to manage and request foreign aid for the Ukraine ... including, recommending the type and quantity needed.  Under the Obama Administration the Ukraine was left with blankets and other humanitarian aid... too, fight off Russian Tanks.  Under Trump, they received arms and armaments.

Ronald

They failed to do just that. They are coveringup like what the dems do best.

To repeat a statement by little oh me...:)

 GOP+Soros+Rothschild....:)

Try asking this, when George Soros went into Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu voiced a opinion against Soros, and they shut up Benjamin Netanyahu's mouth.

Take the hint, Rothschild Banking and Soros hand in hand in bed together.

Excuse me Rudy... the Dem's don't control the DOJ, FBI or the US Attorneys ...

Trump and the GOP are fully in control of the Justice Department and its investigatory agencies....  Any failure to conduct a proper and full investigation of those senior officials openly breaking the law FALLS DIRECTLY ON THE HEADS OF THE ADMINISTRATION WITH TRUMP BEING NUMBER ONE in the chain of responsibility.

The BUCK STOPS ... where... with Adam Schiff?  I think not.  The BUCK FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION FIRMLY RESTS WITH TRUMP... period. We need to let him know we are not impressed with his draining the swamp... not at all.

Might I add that it is the President's number 1 job to DILIGENTLY and FAITHFULLY enforce the laws of the United States... he gets a big fat "F" from me on that mission.

Everyone run for cover, its the Communist Ronald at large...:)

You're so cute... love that bravado... run for cover ... like I am so fearsome and wonderfully made... yeap. 

Ronald

Thats true but I am thinking of the scumbag/liar-nObama who has stepped beyond the control of the DOJ and FBI.

 What was the Republican Party doing when Obama was in Office? Other then bending over and kissing his as*s...:)

They were making money and positioning themselves to retain their power... they certainly were not looking out for the best interests of their constituents.

Huh, you drinking again...:) Beer, Pizza and Sunday NFL games...:)

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

Florida Sheriff — “I Will Not Enforce Assault Weapons Ban, Neither Will Most Sheriffs”

Dennis Lemma, who is the Sheriff in Central Florida’s Seminole County, told a group of 2nd Amendment activists recently that he would not enforce an assault weapons ban that could soon become Florida law if the “Ban Assault Weapons Now” amendment passes in the Sunshine State.

According to News965, the ban has the following specifications.

The amendment proposed in the state legislature would ban possession of assault weapons, which are defined as “semiautomatic rifles and shotguns capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition at once, either in fixed or detachable magazine, or any other ammunition feeding device.”

Lemma, an ardent supporter of the 2nd Amendment and a first term sheriff who is running for re-election, said this about whether or not he would enforce such a law.

“It’s not only that I wouldn’t, the majority of sheriffs across the state would not do it,” Lemma said in the video. It’s up to the sheriffs what they are willing to enforce.”

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service