by Burt Prelutsky
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. 

It would be bad enough if the worst things that could be said of America’s education system is that it’s not teaching young people how to do math or communicate in more than 140 characters at a time. Because the people entrusted to teach those who represent America’s future are themselves the products of left-wing indoctrination, it’s too much to ask that they help the kids to think for themselves or to properly appreciate the fact they were lucky enough to be born in a nation founded on Judeo-Christian principles. To ask that the teachers themselves appreciate the genius of the Founding Fathers and the importance of the U.S. Constitution is no doubt a bridge too far.

But when will conservative parents finally rise up and demand some balance in the curriculum? When will they finally demand that those who rely on our taxes for their salaries quit propagandizing their youngsters with watered down Marxism? When will they balk at blowing a quarter of a million dollars sending them off to colleges and universities where the one thing they will carry away after four years of non-stop indoctrination is the certainty that their parents are all wrong about everything because their brilliant professors told them so?

At San Diego State University, they’re offering a class titled: “Trump: Impeachment, Removal or Conviction” to be taught by a professor named John Joseph Cleary. I assume I understand what is meant by “impeachment” and “conviction,” but I’m at a loss when it comes to “removal.”  That sounds like a euphemism for assassination, a fear that overwhelms me every time I see President in a public venue. The campaign of hatred directed at Trump has been so pervasive, it is easy to picture some psycho making the attempt on his life in the belief that if he got the right judge or jury, he could walk out of the court a free man. Or possibly be carried out on the shoulders of Never-Trumpers like Chris Matthews, Joy Behar, Ashley Judd, Madonna, mad-Maxine Waters, Chuck clown-Schumer, Nancy Pulosi, Joe Scarborough, James Comey, Peter Strzok, Rich Lowry, rino-John McCain, rino-Jeff Flake, Rachel Maddow and Andrew McCabe.

In another example of the insanity that has overtaken the education industry in America, when a Louisiana high school student recently mentioned in class that the square root symbol resembled a gun, it was passed along to the Allen Parish Sheriff’s Department. Like a modern-day version of the Keystone Kops, they leapt into action and conducted a search of his home.

Although they turned up no cache of illegal weapons or, I assume, any cocked and loaded square root symbols or even a single insane posting on his computer, the student has been denied access to school property while he awaits an expulsion hearing.

I’m reminded of the kid who some years back was suspended from nursery school because he had turned his Pop Tart into a facsimile of a gun. For all I know, the student in Louisiana might be this same Pop Tart-toting menace. Some people just never learn.

Before moving on, I have always wondered why it is that high schools and colleges are always having reunions, but, so far as I know, grade schools never do. It’s much easier to lose track of those people than it is those we know in our teens and twenties. By then, we have no problem staying in touch. But when you have a best friend in the fourth or fifth grade whose parents move away, staying in touch is pretty much out of the question. So, if any of you attended Hancock Park Grammar School between 1947 and 1952, let me hear from you.

⦿   Peter Geddis of Danville, CA, wrote to point out that so far as manufacturers and the government are concerned, a certain number of deaths are acceptable. For instance, there are ways that car companies could diminish the number of traffic deaths, but to do so would be economically unfeasible.

Similarly, in Chicago, the politicians are willing to allow several hundred people to be killed by gangbangers every year because going after them in a serious fashion would rile the parents, friends and relatives, of the young blacks, and those votes are simply too essential for Rahm Emanuel and the members of the City Council to risk losing. That is why they would rather rail at the NRA than make a serious attempt to disarm the vicious hooligans.

In writing back to Mr. Geddis, I thanked him for reminding me that there’s even a certain percentage of bad stuff that’s allowed in our food and water. “Unfortunately, there’s no such limit when it comes to our politicians.”

⦿   Bob Marcks of Scottsdale, AZ, passed along a number of one-liners, a few of which I wish I had said. Fran Leibowitz: “My favorite animal is steak.” Orson Welles: “My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four, unless there were three other people at the table.” W.C. Fields: “I’m reminded of my safari in Africa. Somebody forgot the corkscrew and for several days we had to survive on nothing but food and water.” Rita Rudner: “I got kicked out of ballet class because I pulled a groin muscle. It wasn’t mine.”

⦿  Sam Hiserman, who lives in Modesto, CA, because somebody has to, sent along the following. It’s not very funny, but I have to bow to the person who went to the trouble of coming up with it.

It seems a thief planned a heist from the Louvre. He got past security with the stolen paintings. However, he was captured two blocks away when his van ran out of gas. When asked how he had managed to pull off such a masterful caper and yet make such a stupid mistake, he replied: “Monsieur, that is the reason I stole the paintings. I had no Monet to buy Degas to make the Van Gogh.”

It concluded with his wanting to know if I had De Gaulle to send this on to someone else, explaining he had sent it to me because he figured he had nothing Toulouse.

⦿  Joseph Neuner, who is equally shameless, sent the following to me: “Let me tell you, friends, that one simple typing mistake can make your life a living hell. While away on a fishing trip, I texted my wife what I thought was a short, romantic message, but I left out a single ‘e.’

“No problem you might think, but the faux pas has caused me to seek a change of identity through the Federal Witness Program. I wrote: ‘Hi, Honey, I’m having the time of my life. I only wish you were her.” 
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. 

Views: 21

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 Look you, get this right, understand this once and for all, the United States was not founded on Judeo-Christian principles. Jews as well as Christians are rejecting this, the whole left wing conspiracy. 

 Seeing how the seats in office are Jewish,British,German, and Polish. All tied into CFR,the UN,the EU, DACA, and I could continue on.

 The United States Of America was Founded Under God, One Nation Under God, not people or their religion. According to legislation by the founding Fathers, they knew that outsiders would try to control this nation through a body of people within a religion, so this brought in the Separation Of Church and State.

 Now as for the Bible, it was Founder by God, in hopes the people would become Christians.



As you recall the people of Europe wanted freedom from the ruler kings of Europe and they decided to come to a land to have their freedom of rights and religion. That to me is the Christian principle freedom of religion. Not all Jews reject this and you do believe that. This is not a left wing conspiracy. All who believed in God knew in their hearts they would fine a place to worship or become believers in a land to worship as they wish.  

Bytheway, there is no separation of church and state.(that is a left wing conspiracy) Its not even in our constitution which is written by our founding fathers. 

Hey man, Rudy, 

your wasting your time trying to school Tif....

by Burt Prelutsky
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. 
@ Burt Prelutsky
Stop Blowing Smoke Up
Our As* !
Judeo-Christian Principles
Founded by The
DNC Democratic National Committee


Ok, you maybe right




Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service