Report: Dem-Invited Immigrants to Heckle Trump During Speech to Congress

null

Rumors are swirling that anti-Trump Democrats will prompt Muslim and immigrant guests to boo and hiss during the President’s speech to Congress tomorrow.

Lawmakers usually get one guest ticket each for presidential addresses and numerous Democrats are reportedly planning to pack the crowd with immigrants (both legal and illegal) as well as Muslims angered by Trump’s travel ban.

However, the question of whether the guests will merely represent a symbolic rebuff to Trump’s policies, or if they will engage in actual heckling is being hotly debated.

According to DC Whispers, “It is rumored some of these guests will boo and hiss the president and that the media is already preparing to highlight those examples in its coverage of the prime-time address.”

Given the mainstream media’s obsession with hyping Republican Congressman being interrupted by protesters at town halls across the country, the anti-Trump press must be licking their lips at the prospect of immigrants becoming vocal during Trump’s prime time speech.

Any attempt to interrupt Trump during his presidential address will be abnormal but not totally unprecedented.

continued here

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/02/27/report-dem-invited-immigran...

Views: 715

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Let the Sargent at Arms do his job... screen the visitors, and if there are illegal aliens invited; have ICE present, too take them into custody. Every invitation should be screened in advance for security reasons... if they are not ... don't let them in.  In addition, let the Sargent at Arms identify which representatives invite illegals and have the Speaker take up ethics violations... to censure them...

Stop with the bipartisan BS ...  it doesn't exist.  It is a one way street, with the GOP caving to radical Marxist and Progressives... It is past time to take the gloves off and too enforce the rules and the Laws of the United States.  Illegal Aliens should not be present in the Capitol Building .. law abiding members of Congress should not be inviting Illegal Aliens, it is an insult to law and order and must be severely dealt with.

Have ICE agents on hand to make sure they are legal. If not, arrest them.

Where is the concern for unity within our Republic by the democrats?

The Demoncrats.. are doing everything to deconstruct our Republic... too, fundamentally transform us into one more failed third world dictatorship. They are not interested in unity.. they want us broken up ... divide and conquer is what they want.

And they are not intelligent enough,to realize they are attempting bring down the greatest Nation on Earth, to change it to what????     What world do they have in mind?     It is obvious, that they do not have the mental facilities to think about the Future.  Crazed and demented.   America rejects them.

For every one of them that's illegal....put cuffs on them right then and there and haul their ass out of the building to wait for deportation.  The others can be removed as they disrupt the proceedings if they don't use appropriate social etiquette...

I like the idea of inviting ICE agents
Arrest them, and deport them!

The House is in Control, this is simple.  Any disruptions, should be immediately addressed by Paul Ryan, as he is the Leader.  He calls the Sargent-At-Arms, and they are escorted out, instantly.   Now, will he do it??? Does he have a pair?    Guests to this Speech, should be respectful to the Office of the President of the United States.    If they aren't, throw them out!     Ryan, the Ball is in your Court?????????????

Get their names & pictures & drop them from the U.S. welfare dolls! If this crap continues there will be some civil unrest & I think that anything that smells like a camel may not fare well! Time to UNCOVER these scumbags!

It is one thing to attend these speechs peacefully even if you dont agree with the speaker.

But its an entirely different thing if you are there solely to create disruption and interference with the speakers monologue.

I would think that an arrest would be in order for disturbing the peace or some such charge.

And yes, get the name or names of those who furnished them tickets and broadcast same.

I fully agree with this post. Peaceful protest is our right but deliberate disruption merely for the sake of it is completely unacceptable! Let the man speak. Maybe if everyone would stop yelling at each other AND him we'd find we can work together. 

Maybe we could get Tucker Carlson to name names.....?

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service