“Red Dawn”: Supporters Rally to Defend Family Facing Showdown With Feds

After his son’s arrest, Cliven Bundy posted a statement on his website which read, “They have my cattle and now they have one of my boys. Range War begins tomorrow.”

cliven bundy feds stole cattle

Supporters of Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy violated a “First Amendment Area” by staging a rally in support of Bundy, who earlier declared a “range war” against federal authorities in response to a land dispute that threatens to escalate into a Waco-style standoff.

Bundy is currently embroiled in a spat with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) over his long standing refusal to acknowledge a 1993 modification to grazing rights on land that Bundy asserts has been in his family since 1870. On Saturday, hundreds of federal officials, aided by helicopters, low flying aircraft and hired cowboys, began rounding up Bundy’s cattle in northeastern Clark County.

The feds say the move is about enforcing the law and protecting the endangered desert tortoise, but the Bundy family says the spat represents a showdown between big government and American farmers.

“We’ve had enough, we’re going to take our land back, we’re done,” said Bundy’s wife, Carol Bundy, adding that the rally was held “to show that we are not standing alone. People are getting tired of the federal government having unlimited power.”

read more:

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/04/08/red-dawn-supporters-rally-d...

Views: 7310

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

randy weaver was murdered by govt they will murder this cat as well

He's not a cat. His name is Cliven Bundy. 

Randy Weaver wasn't killed. It was his wife and son who were killed by the Gestapo.

Nevada just might be a good place to get it started.  It is going to start some place, some day.

Gentlemen: "Fix bayonets".  All AR's M1A's have bayonet lugs, time to use them.  Don't tell me there aren't any semi auto military style weapons out there!  This country is full of them, that's why this regime is scared of an armed populace.  Lets  not forget our veterans out there. Still a lot of fight left in us.  We WILL defend this nation and it Constitution against ALL enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. 

Hey, Robert S. W., 

I know for a fact that a Romanian AK-47 also has a bayonet stud that takes a 'knife'--lol.  Personally,  I prefer a 7.62 by 39 mm projectile over an AR-15, .223, and think there is just a little bit more "oomph"  in the ammo, IMHO.   What say you? 

    BTW,  I graduated from WATERFORD H.S.,  in Wisconsin !  I now live in the U.P.

Warm Regards,

Tommy Schuckman  [email:  tschuckman@aol.com]  --Disabled Vietnam Veteran: 68-70.

I saw an episode of Myth Busters a while back and they compared the AK round to the AR-15 round. They put 1" thick glass panels together with clamps and fired from the same spot. The AR penetrated 2 and cracked the 3rd. pane. The AK penetrated 10 and cracked the 11th.

 

I watched the same episode, they used an AR-15 with .223 ammo. The M-16 uses 5.56 ammo and you can get the AR-15 that uses 5.56. With the 5.56 you can use both rounds. I have yet to see any comparison between the 7.62 NATO round and the 5.56 JHP. But the AK-47 is a lighter weapon and one that is easier to keep clean.

Oh, and Thomas, I graduated from Horlick High in Racine.

Air Force Vet, 1979 - 1984

Brent, if you had been in the Army you would know that the .223 and 5.56 are the same round.

You can not fire a 5.56MM in a rifle made to shoot a 223 should as a Ruger 223. If you have a MIL SPEC 5.56 Rifle you can shoot either round. There is rifles out there that will shoot only 223 but want shoot the 5.56MM, this is unsafe.

Bob R.,   Thanks!!   I needed that.  [smile].   I served with the U.S. Army, in  Vietnam: 68-70, the 2nd tour with the 240th AHC, [door gunner] at Camp BearCat, RVN, and the 1st tour with USARV --CuChi, PhuLoi, and Bien Hoa.  I have heard a lot of  other soldiers claim that, ' if we had the enemies' AK-47's, we would not have lost so many people from jams -- and with our M-60's too!'   I believe it, even if the AK didn't have the total accuracy that the M-16 had... but that is water over the dam, now, and too many good people on the "Wall, in D.C."

Welcome Home: I agree with you 100 %. I forgot about the 47's and the M1 Garand's. There are a lot of foreign gun makers who also made weapons for the military of their respective countries with the lugs.  I prefered the M-14 over the M-16. I carried a 14 in Nam and the .308 was an excellent round for that type of country. 7.62 by 51 mm.  Nam 64-65. Thank you brother for your service. 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Glenn McCoy

Tea Party
Facebook & Twitter

ALERT ALERT

‘WikiLeaks Can’t Protect Their Sources’
Is The CIA About To Reveal Names Of DNC Leakers

Image result for Julian Assange

The saga surrounding who leaked sensitive DNC documents to WikiLeaks may take an interesting turn, hints former CIA officer Fred Rustmann.

WND reports:

The Central Intelligence Agency knows the identities of the people who leaked DNC emails to the whistleblower organization WikiLeaks during the heat of the 2016 presidential campaign, a former CIA officer contends.

Fred Rustmann, who served as an operations officer in the CIA’s National Clandestine Service for 24 years and was a member of the agency’s elite Senior Intelligence Service, said in an interview with WND that WikiLeaks’ ongoing release of classified information is “disgusting.” 

“WikiLeaks says they want to protect their sources – Julian Assange said that he wouldn’t reveal his sources, but he would say that it wasn’t the Russians,” Rustmann said. “But the agency knows a lot of the information. I suspect they may have a pretty good idea of who provided that information to WikiLeaks.”

Rustmann’s comments raise questions about potential plans for the CIA to reveal the names of those who allegedly leaked DNC documents to WikiLeaks.

Recently, the CIA made a veiled threat to WikiLeaks in respect to protecting their sources.

“WikiLeaks may think they are protecting those who provide them with classified information & other secrets, but they should not be certain of that,” the CIA statement said. 

In a statement to WND, Robert L. Deitz, a former advisor to CIA head Michael Hayden, called the threat “unprecedented.”

“It’s pretty unusual for the CIA to make a threat to WikiLeaks so publicly. It’s pretty unprecedented; one ought to be skeptical about this. That is not the way that CIA officials should operate,” Deitz said.

“This is the kind of thing, if somebody were to make this kind of threat it would come out of a different organization, DOD, State or maybe the White House. Traditionally it would certainly not come out of the CIA,” Deitz added.

WikiLeaks is in the news after both CNN and CBS falsely reported the group granted Donald Trump Jr. access to future leaks.

However, WikiLeaks had tweeted a link to the information days before the email reached Trump Jr.’s inbox. The fake news media claim this was stone cold proof of collusion, as WikiLeaks has long been smeared as a Kremlin puppet.

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service